Long-term follow-up for monovision surgery by Implantable Collamer Lens V4c implantation for myopia correction in early presbyopia

Comparison of monovision surgery using ICL V4c or femtosecond laser LASIK for myopia correction in the presbyopia age patients

To compare the long-term outcomes of monovision surgery using implantable collamer lens (ICL) V4c and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in myopic patients with early presbyopia. This case series study included 48 eyes of 24 patients (male/female: 10/14, mean age 45.50 ± 3.82 years) and followed-up for 4.5 years (54.00 ± 9.77 months). Patients were examined for spherical equivalent, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, intraocular pressure, presbyopic add power, visual acuity (VA) (logMAR) of dominant eyes (D-eye), non-dominant eyes (nD-eye), and both eyes (Bi) at 0.4 m, 0.8 m, and 5 m, corneal wavefront aberration, and contrast sensitivity (CS). All surgeries were uneventful. The safety indices of ICL V4c group and FS-LASIK group were 1.17 ± 0.30 and 0.98 ± 0.20 (p < 0.05), and the efficacy indices were 0.79 ± 0.07 and 0.52 ± 0.07 (p < 0.05) respectively. The binocular VA (logMAR) of ICL V4c group and FS-LASIK group at 5.0 m were: 0.02 ± 0.11, 0.18 ± 0.30; 0.8 m: 0.09 ± 0.12, - 0.01 ± 0.11; 0.4 m: - 0.02 ± 0.06, - 0.03 ± 0.08, (p > 0.05 at three distances). Compared with ICL V4c group, lower CS was observed at 1.0 cpd in the FS-LASIK group (1.07 ± 0.31 vs. 0.80 ± 0.51, p = 0.043). Monovision surgery using ICL V4c and FS-LASIK provides good binocular visual acuity at near-to-far distances in myopia patients in the presbyopia age group.

Clinical and Aberrometric Outcomes of a New Implantable Collamer Lens for Myopia and Presbyopia Correction in Phakic Patients

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical and aberrometric outcomes of a new Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO Viva ICL; STAAR Surgical) to correct moderate to high myopia and presbyopia.

METHODS

The study included 80 eyes of 40 patients who had bilateral EVO Viva ICL implantation. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, refraction, presbyopic add power, binocular through-focus visual acuity, total ocular spherical aberration (SA), coma aberration, and root mean square of ocular higher order aberrations (RMS HOAs) (i-Trace Aberrometer; Tracey Technologies) for a 4.5-mm pupil size were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean binocular postoperative UDVA and CDVA were 0.09 ± 0.19 and 0.02 ± 0.03 logMAR, respectively. The postoperative spherical equivalent was -0.61 ± 0.54 diopters (D). The presbyopic add power reduced from +1.31 ± 0.74 D preoperatively to +0.44 ± 0.58 D after surgery (P < .0001). The mean visual acuity was 0.1 logMAR or better (20/25 or better) across the vergence range from +0.50 to -1.50 D, better than 0.2 logMAR (20/32 or better) up to the vergence of -2.00 D, and remained better than 0.3 logMAR (20/40 or better) up to the vergence of -2.50 D. The total ocular aberrations induced by EVO Viva ICL were -0.34 ± 0.09 µm of SA, 0.24 ± 0.18 µm of coma, and 0.26 ± 0.12 µm of RMS HOAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes support that the new ICL might be a good alternative for myopia and presbyopia correction in patients aged between 45 and 55 years. Further studies are needed to evaluate the threshold lens misalignment from which the patient´s visual quality would be affected. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(9):589-596.].

Binocular imbalance in patients after implantable collamer lens V4c implantation or femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia with presbyopia

Aim

To investigate the long-term safety, efficacy, and binocular balance of monovision surgery using Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) V4c implantation and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for the treatment of myopic patients with presbyopia.

Methods

This case series study involved 90 eyes of 45 patients (male/female = 19/26; average age:46.27 ± 5.54 years; average follow-up time:48.73 ± 14.65 months) who underwent the aforementioned surgery to treat myopic presbyopes. Data on manifest refraction, corrected distance visual acuity, dominant eye, presbyopic addition, intraocular pressure, and anterior segment biometric parameters were collected. The visual outcomes and binocular balance at 0.4 m, 0.8 m, and 5 m were documented.

Results

The safety index for the ICL V4c and FS-LASIK groups were 1.24 ± 0.27 and 1.04 ± 0.20 (p = 0.125), respectively. Binocular visual acuity (logmar) for 0.4 m, 0.8 m, and 5 m were -0.03 ± 0.05, -0.03 ± 0.02, and 0.10 ± 0.03 for the ICL V4c group, and -0.02 ± 0.09, -0.01 ± 0.02, and 0.06 ± 0.04 for the FS-LASIK group, respectively. The proportions of all patients with imbalanced vision at 0.4 m, 0.8 m, and 5 m distances were 68.89, 71.11, and 82.22%, respectively (all p > 0.05 between the two groups). There were significant differences in refraction between the balanced and imbalanced vision for patients at 0.4 m distance (for non-dominant eye spherical equivalent [SE]: -1.14 ± 0.17D and -1.47 ± 0.13D, p < 0.001), 0.8 m distance (for preoperative ADD:0.90 ± 0.17D and 1.05 ± 0.11D, p = 0.041), and 5 m distance (for non-dominant SE: -1.13 ± 0.33D and -1.42 ± 0.11D, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

ICL V4c implantation and FS-LASIK monovision treatment demonstrated good long-term safety and binocular visual acuity at various distances. After the procedure, the imbalanced patients' vision is primarily related to the age-related presbyopia and anisometropia progression caused by the monovision design.

Artificial intelligence-based refractive error prediction and EVO-implantable collamer lens power calculation for myopia correction

BACKGROUND

Implantable collamer lens (ICL) has been widely accepted for its excellent visual outcomes for myopia correction. It is a new challenge in phakic IOL power calculation, especially for those with low and moderate myopia. This study aimed to establish a novel stacking machine learning (ML) model for predicting postoperative refraction errors and calculating EVO-ICL lens power.

METHODS

We enrolled 2767 eyes of 1678 patients (age: 27.5 ± 6.33 years, 18-54 years) who underwent non-toric (NT)-ICL or toric-ICL (TICL) implantation during 2014 to 2021. The postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and sphere were predicted using stacking ML models [support vector regression (SVR), LASSO, random forest, and XGBoost] and training based on ocular dimensional parameters from NT-ICL and TICL cases, respectively. The accuracy of the stacking ML models was compared with that of the modified vergence formula (MVF) based on the mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and percentages of eyes within ± 0.25, ± 0.50, and ± 0.75 diopters (D) and Bland-Altman analyses. In addition, the recommended spheric lens power was calculated with 0.25 D intervals and targeting emmetropia.

RESULTS

After NT-ICL implantation, the random forest model demonstrated the lowest MAE (0.339 D) for predicting SE. Contrarily, the SVR model showed the lowest MAE (0.386 D) for predicting the sphere. After TICL implantation, the XGBoost model showed the lowest MAE for predicting both SE (0.325 D) and sphere (0.308 D). Compared with MVF, ML models had numerically lower values of standard deviation, MAE, and MedAE and comparable percentages of eyes within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 0.75 D prediction errors. The difference between MVF and ML models was larger in eyes with low-to-moderate myopia (preoperative SE >  - 6.00 D). Our final optimal stacking ML models showed strong agreement between the predictive values of MVF by Bland-Altman plots.

CONCLUSION

With various ocular dimensional parameters, ML models demonstrate comparable accuracy than existing MVF models and potential advantages in low-to-moderate myopia, and thus provide a novel nomogram for postoperative refractive error prediction and lens power calculation.

Correction of presbyopia

Presbyopia, a progressive visual difficulty caused by weakened physiological regulation, is one of the main causes of visual impairment in people over 40 years old. Currently, the main methods of correction of presbyopia include optical correction, surgical correction, and drug treatment, which can improve the visual nearness disorder to some extent. Optical correction is the most common way with advantages of safety, which can adjust the lens parameters at any time, while cause kinds of inconvenience in life by wearing and taking off glasses frequently. Surgical intervention, including corneal surgery, lens surgery and scleral surgery, with certain advantages and disadvantages in each operation style. New pharmaceutical agents are expected to be a new and effective method for the treatment of presbyopia, but it lacks multicenter randomized controlled trials and evidence-based medicine evidence to evaluate the safety and effectiveness.