Propensity-matched comparison of postoperative stability and visual outcomes of toric intraocular lens with or without a capsular tension ring and updated meta-analysis

Clinical Results of a Monofocal Aspheric Bitoric Intraocular Lens with Plate Haptics in Hyperopic Eyes

Purpose

To assess the refractive and visual outcomes of hyperopic and astigmatic eyes implanted with a monofocal, aspheric, bitoric intraocular lens (IOL) with plate haptics following cataract surgery.

Methods

The study evaluated 51 eyes implanted with the AT TORBI 709M IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) during a follow-up of 12-months. Refractive error, rotational stability, monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and contrast sensitivity were analyzed at 1-, 6-, and 12-months post-surgery.

Results

At 12 months, the cumulative CDVA was 20/25 in 94.12% of eyes and 20/32 or better in 98.04%. The UDVA was the same as, or better than, the CDVA in 88.24% of eyes. The mean logMAR UDVA and CDVA values were 0.06 ± 0.11 and 0.00 ± 0.08, respectively. In addition, 92.16% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 98.04% were within ±1.00 D of a spherical equivalent, and 86.27% of eyes had refractive astigmatism ≤0.50D and 100% were ≤1.00D. The mean spherical equivalent was 0.21 ± 0.31D and the mean refractive cylinder 0.34 ± 0.27D. The IOL rotation was 1.18 ± 1.35 degrees and all eyes had a rotation ≤5 degrees. The log contrast sensitivity functions were good and similar for all spatial frequencies during follow-up.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that implantation of the AT TORBI 709M IOL in hyperopic and astigmatic eyes is effective and safe. The visual and refractive outcomes were good, showing excellent rotational stability.

Rotational stability of monofocal and diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens with identical design and material: a propensity score based prospective comparative study

PURPOSE

To compare the rotational stability of a monofocal and a diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens(IOLs) with identical design and material.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled patients who underwent plate-haptic toric IOL (AT TORBI 709 M and AT LISA 909 M) implantation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline factors. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 1 h, 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. A linear mixed model of repeated measures was used to investigate the changes in IOL rotation over time. A 2-week timeframe was utilized to assess differences in IOL rotation between the two groups.

RESULT

After PSM, a total of 126 eyes were selected from each group for further analysis. Postoperatively, the time course of IOL rotation change in the two groups remained consistent, with the greatest rotation occurring between 1 h and 1 day postoperatively. At the 2-week postoperative mark, the monofocal toric IOL exhibited a higher degree of rotation compared to the multifocal toric IOL (5.40 ± 7.77° vs. 3.53 ± 3.54°, P = 0.015). In lens thickness(LT) ≥ 4.5 mm and white-to-white distance(WTW) ≥ 11.6 mm subgroups, the monofocal toric IOL rotated greater than the multifocal toric IOL (P = 0.026 and P = 0.011, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The diffractive multifocal toric IOL exhibits superior rotational stability compared to the monofocal toric IOL, especially in subgroups LT ≥ 4.5 mm and WTW ≥ 11.6 mm. Moreover, the time course of IOL rotation change is consistent for both, with the maximum rotation occurring between 1 h and 1 day postoperatively.

Insights into the rotational stability of toric intraocular lens implantation: diagnostic approaches, influencing factors and intervention strategies

Toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) have been developed to enhance visual acuity impaired by cataracts and correct corneal astigmatism. However, residual astigmatism caused by postoperative rotation of the toric IOL is an important factor affecting visual quality after implantation. To decrease the rotation of the toric IOL, significant advancements have been made in understanding the characteristics of toric IOL rotation, the factors influencing its postoperative rotation, as well as the development of various measurement techniques and interventions to address this issue. It has been established that factors such as the patient's preoperative refractive status, biological parameters, surgical techniques, postoperative care, and long-term management significantly impact the rotational stability of the toric IOL. Clinicians should adopt a personalized approach that considers these factors to minimize the risk of toric IOL rotation and ensure optimal outcomes for each patient. This article reviews the influence of various factors on toric IOL rotational stability. It discusses new challenges that may be encountered to reduce and intervene with rotation after toric IOL implantation in the foreseeable future.

Extensive misalignment of plate-haptic rotationally asymmetric multifocal toric intraocular lens

PURPOSE

Plate-haptic rotationally asymmetric multifocal toric intraocular lenses (IOL) (Lentis Comfort Toric) occasionally rotate extensively after surgery. We conducted the current study to investigate the incidence of extensive misalignment of this IOL and its association with clinical parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Data were collected from patients who had undergone phacoemulsification and implantation of a plate-haptic multifocal toric IOL.

RESULTS

Among 332 eyes, extensive misalignment of toric IOLs ≥ 45º occurred in 3.3% (11 eyes). The amount of misalignment in eyes with extensive misalignment was 81.6 ± 22.9º, while in those without extensive misalignment, it was 3.0 ± 2.7º. The eyes with extensive misalignment showed significantly greater axial length (p < 0.001), larger corneal diameter (p = 0.034), and flatter corneas (p = 0.044) than those without extensive misalignment. Repositioning surgery to correct toric IOL misorientation was conducted in 9 eyes between 7 and 28 days after cataract surgery. In 2 eyes, repositioning surgery was carried out twice.

CONCLUSIONS

In majority of cases plate-haptic multifocal toric IOLs showed satisfactory rotational stability, but extensive misalignment ≥ 45º occurred in 3.3% of cases.

Optimal Timing of Repositioning Surgery for a Plate-Haptic Toric Intraocular Lens: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate risk factors for significant rotation and determine optimal timing for repositioning surgery following a plate-haptic toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent the plate-haptic toric IOL implantation at seven hospitals in Shanghai. IOL rotation and residual astigmatism were compared before and after repositioning surgery. Risk factors for significant IOL rotation after cataract surgery were identified by stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. Spearman's and linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with IOL rotation after repositioning. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the optimal timing for repositioning surgery.

RESULTS

Among 2,745 eyes implanted with the toric IOL, 46 eyes (1.68%) of 45 patients underwent repositioning surgery. Axial length and lens thickness were significantly associated with IOL rotation before repositioning. After repositioning surgery, IOL rotation and residual astigmatism were significantly reduced (all P < .001). IOL rotation after repositioning was negatively associated with the timing of repositioning surgery (all P < .001). The ROC curve showed that the optimal cut-off for the timing of repositioning surgery was 15 days or greater.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of repositioning surgery after the plate-haptic toric IOL implantation was 1.68%, and the optimal timing for repositioning surgery was recommended to be 2 to 3 weeks after cataract surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(2):120-126.].