Do organisational and ward-level factors explain the variance in multi-site musculoskeletal pain in eldercare workers? A multi-level cross-sectional study

Ward-level leadership quality and prospective low-back pain of eldercare workers: do resident handlings mediate the association?

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the extent to which ward-level leadership quality was associated with prospective low-back pain among eldercare workers, and how this association was mediated by observed resident handlings.

METHODS

530 Danish eldercare workers, employed in 121 wards, distributed across 20 nursing homes were evaluated. At baseline, leadership quality was measured using the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire, and resident handlings [handlings per shift, handlings not using assistive devices, handlings done alone, interruptions to handlings, impediments to handlings] were assessed using observations. Frequency and intensity of low-back pain was assessed monthly during the following year. All variables were averaged for each ward. We used ordinary least squares regressions to examine direct effects of leadership on low-back pain and indirect effects through handlings, using PROCESS-macro for SPSS.

RESULTS

After adjustments for low-back pain at baseline, type of ward, staff ratio (i.e., number of workers divided by number of residents) and proportion of devices not in place, leadership quality showed no effect on prospective low-back pain frequency (β = 0.01 [- 0.05:0.07]) and a small beneficial effect on pain intensity (β = - 0.02 [- 0.04:0.00]). Resident handlings did not mediate the association between leadership quality and frequency or intensity of low-back pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Good leadership quality was associated with a small decrease in prospective low-back pain intensity, but resident handlings did not seem to play a mediating role, although better ward-level leadership quality contributed to fewer workplace-observed resident handlings without assistance. Potentially, organizational factors, such as type of ward and staff ratio, may have a greater influence on handlings and low-back pain than leadership quality per se among eldercare workers.

Epidemiological study of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and related risk factors among automobile maintenance workers

BACKGROUND

The automotive industry is labor-intensive, and workers are involved in highly repetitive tasks, long hours, and medium to low workloads, resulting in work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), which have become a major health concern for workers in this industry. China is a major automotive country with tens of thousands of auto repair workers, but their conditions of WMSDs have been poorly reported.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to analyze the current prevalence of WMSDs and their associated risk factors among automobile maintenance workers.

METHODS

A total of 539 respondents from 50 automotive repair and maintenance companies in China were selected to investigate the prevalence of WMSDs via the modified Nordic Musculoskeletal Disorders Questionnaire. Chi-square test and logistic regression models were applied to analyze their associated risk factors.

RESULTS

The total prevalence of WMSDs among 539 workers was 32.8%. The top three body parts for prevalence were the lower back (17.1%), neck (16.3%), and shoulders (14.5%). The highest prevalence of WMSDs was found in the neck (23.6%) and lower back (14.3%) for sheet metal workers and mechanics, respectively, whereas painters had the highest prevalence of WMSDs in the lower back and feet (both at 15.4%). Logistic regression analysis showed that females were at higher risk of WMSDs than males (OR 5.027, [95% CI] [1.278-19.772], p < 0.05). Workers subjected to uncomfortable positions were at increased risk of WMSDs (OR 1.79, [95% CI] [1.333-2.410], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of WMSDs is high among automotive maintenance workers, with the highest prevalence in the lower back (17.1%). Uncomfortable working postures and frequent repetitive movements with lower limbs and ankles at work may be important risk factors.

Musculoskeletal health climate is associated with musculoskeletal pain and sickness absence among workers: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate whether a musculoskeletal health climate, expressing the shared perceptions among workers concerning musculoskeletal health, is associated with number of musculoskeletal pain sites and sickness absence.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Six slaughterhouses from 2 companies in Denmark and 6 home-nursing units and 12 nursing homes from 1 municipality in Jutland, Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1092 slaughter house workers and 410 care workers completed an online questionnaire from February to October 2019.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The exposure variable was musculoskeletal health climate assessed by two domains; (1) perceived management priority of musculoskeletal health measured by a modified subscale from the Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire and (2) work group pain acceptance which was a modified version of the activity engagement subscale of the chronic pain acceptance scale. Outcomes variables were number of musculoskeletal pain sites (0-6) and days with sickness absence.

RESULTS

The associations between the two subscales, number of musculoskeletal pain sites and sickness absence were calculated using mixed linear and generalised estimating equation regression models. Higher perceived management priority scores were associated with a lower number of musculoskeletal pain sites across both job groups: β=-.57 (95% CI -0.91 to -0.23) and sickness absence (>5 days) due to musculoskeletal pain prevalence ratio (PR) 0.79 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.08). In contrast higher work group pain acceptance scores were associated with higher number of musculoskeletal pain sites: β=0.38 (0.11 to 0.66), whereas associations with sickness absences seemed to be modified by job groups; PR 1.59 care workers and PR 0.86 slaughterhouse workers.

CONCLUSION

The observed relationship between musculoskeletal health climate, musculoskeletal pain sites and sickness absence indicate that cultural factors should receive increased attention in work place preventive interventions.