Statistical model ignores 'age', products of peak Q and a-vΟ₂ difference greatly exceed V̇Ο₂max and different ergometers confound validity

Hemodynamic and metabolic responses to self-paced and ramp-graded exercise testing protocols

Recent examinations have shown lower maximal oxygen consumption during traditional ramp (RAMP) compared with self-paced (SPV) graded exercise testing (GXT) attributed to differences in cardiac output. The current study examined the differences in hemodynamic and metabolic responses between RAMP and SPV during treadmill exercise. Sixteen recreationally trained men (aged23.7 ± 3.0 years) completed 2 separate treadmill GXT protocols. SPV consisted of five 2-min stages (10 min total) of increasing speed clamped by the Borg RPE6-20 scale. RAMP increased speed by 0.16 km/h every 15 s until volitional exhaustion. All testing was performed at 3% incline. Oxygen consumption was measured via indirect calorimetry; hemodynamic function was measured via thoracic impedance and blood lactate (BLa^-) was measured via portable lactate analyzer. Differences between SPV and RAMP protocols were analyzed as group means by using paired-samples t tests (R Core Team 2017). Maximal values for SPV and RAMP were similar (p > 0.05) for oxygen uptake (47.1 ± 3.4 vs. 47.4 ± 3.4 mL·kg^-1·min^-1), heart rate (198 ± 5 vs. 200 ± 6 beats·min^-1), ventilation (158.8 ± 20.7 vs. 159.3 ± 19.0 L·min^-1), cardiac output (26.9 ± 5.5 vs. 27.9 ± 4.2 L·min^-1), stroke volume (SV) (145.9 ± 29.2 vs. 149.8 ± 25.3 mL·beat^-1), arteriovenous oxygen difference (18.5 ± 3.1 vs. 19.7 ± 3.1 mL·dL^-1), ventilatory threshold (VT) (78.2 ± 7.2 vs. 79.0% ± 7.6%), and peak BLa^- (11.7 ± 2.3 vs. 11.5 ± 2.4 mmol·L^-1), respectively. In conclusion, SPV elicits similar maximal hemodynamic responses in comparison to RAMP; however, SV kinetics exhibited unique characteristics based on protocol. These results support SPV as a feasible GXT protocol to identify useful fitness parameters (maximal oxygen uptake, oxygen uptake kinetics, and VT).

Assessment of peak oxygen uptake during handcycling: Test-retest reliability and comparison of a ramp-incremented and perceptually-regulated exercise test

Purpose

To examine the reliability of a perceptually-regulated maximal exercise test (PRET_max) to measure peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak) during handcycle exercise and to compare peak responses to those derived from a ramp-incremented protocol (RAMP).

Methods

Twenty recreationally active individuals (14 male, 6 female) completed four trials across a 2-week period, using a randomised, counterbalanced design. Participants completed two RAMP protocols (20 W·min^-1) in week 1, followed by two PRET_max in week 2, or vice versa. The PRET_max comprised five, 2-min stages clamped at Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) 11, 13, 15, 17 and 20. Participants changed power output (PO) as often as required to maintain target RPE. Gas exchange variables (oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production, minute ventilation), heart rate (HR) and PO were collected throughout. Differentiated RPE were collected at the end of each stage throughout trials.

Results

For relative V˙O2peak, coefficient of variation (CV) was equal to 4.1% and 4.8%, with ICC_(3,1) of 0.92 and 0.85 for repeated measures from PRET_max and RAMP, respectively. Measurement error was 0.15 L·min^-1 and 2.11 ml·kg^-1·min^-1 in PRET_max and 0.16 L·min^-1 and 2.29 ml·kg^-1·min^-1 during RAMP for determining absolute and relative V˙O2peak, respectively. The difference in V˙O2peak between PRET_max and RAMP was tending towards statistical significance (26.2 ± 5.1 versus 24.3 ± 4.0 ml·kg^-1·min^-1, P = 0.055). The 95% LoA were -1.9 ± 4.1 (-9.9 to 6.2) ml·kg^-1·min^-1.

Conclusion

The PRET_max can be used as a reliable test to measure V˙O2peak during handcycle exercise in recreationally active participants. Whilst PRET_max tended towards significantly greater V˙O2peak values than RAMP, the difference is smaller than measurement error of determining V˙O2peak from PRET_max and RAMP.