Is a verification phase needed to determine [Formula: see text]O2max across fitness levels?

Does a priming warm-up influence the incidence of [Formula: see text] during a ramp test and verification phase?

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the effects of two different warm-up protocols (normal vs. priming) on the oxygen plateau ([Formula: see text]) incidence rate during a ramp test. It also compared the cardiopulmonary responses during the ramp test and subsequent verification phase.

METHODS

Eleven recreational cyclists performed two experimental visits. The first visit required a normal warm-up (cycling at 50 W for 10 min) followed by the ramp test (30 W.min-1) and supramaximal verification phase with 30 min rest between tests. The second visit required a priming warm-up (cycling at 50 W for 4 min increasing to 70% difference between the gas exchange threshold [GET] and maximum work rate [WRmax] for 6 min) followed by the same protocol as in the first visit. Physiological responses were collected during the exercise and compared. Oxygen kinetics ([Formula: see text] Kinetics) and [Formula: see text] incidence rate were determined during the ramp tests for both visits.

RESULTS

As planned, following the warm-up the priming visit experienced greater physiological response. However, the incidence rate of [Formula: see text] during the ramp test was the same between visits (73%), and maximal oxygen uptake was not different between visits after the ramp test (normal, 4.0 ± 0.8; primed, 4.0 ± 0.7 L·min-1, p = 0.230) and verification phase (normal, 3.8 ± 0.6; primed, 3.8 ± 0.7 L·min-1, p = 0.924) using a Holm-Bonferroni correction for controlling family-wise error rate. [Formula: see text] Kinetics were not different between visits during the ramp test (normal, 10.8 ± 1.1; primed, 10.8 ± 1.2 mL·min-1·W-1, p = 0.407). The verification phase confirmed [Formula: see text] in 100% for both the normal and priming visits.

CONCLUSION

Our hypothesis that a priming warm-up facilitates the incidence rate of [Formula: see text] during a ramp test is not supported by the results. The verification phase remains a prudent option when determining a 'true' [Formula: see text] is required.

Greater lactate accumulation does not alter peripheral concentrations of key appetite-regulating neuropeptides

The potential mechanisms involved in lactate's role in exercise-induced appetite suppression require further examination. We used sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) supplementation in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover design to explore lactate's role on neuropeptide Y (NPY), agouti-related peptide (AgRP), and alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) concentrations. Twelve adults (7 males; 24.2 ± 3.4 kg·m-2; 42.18 ± 8.56 mL·kg-1·min-1) completed two identical high-intensity interval training sessions following ingestion of NaHCO3 (BICARB) or sodium chloride (PLACEBO) pre-exercise. Blood lactate, acylated ghrelin, NPY, AgRP, α-MSH, and appetite perceptions were measured pre-exercise, 0-, 30-, 60-, and 90-min postexercise. Free-living energy intake (electronic food diaries) was measured the day before, of, and after each experimental session. In BICARB, blood lactate was greater postexercise (P < 0.002, d > 0.70), though acylated ghrelin was similar (P = 0.075, [Formula: see text] = 0.206) at all time points postexercise (P > 0.034, d < 0.22). NPY (P = 0.006, [Formula: see text] > 0.509) and AgRP (P < 0.001, [Formula: see text] > 0.488) had main effects of time increasing following exercise and returning to baseline, with no differences between sessions (NPY: P = 0.0.192, [Formula: see text] = 0.149; AgRP: P = 0.422, [Formula: see text] = 0.060). α-MSH had no main effect of time (P = 0.573, [Formula: see text] = 0.063) or session (P = 0.269, [Formula: see text] = 0.110). Appetite perceptions were similar during BICARB and PLACEBO (P = 0.007, d = 0.28), increasing in both sessions postexercise (P < 0.088, d > 0.57). Energy intake had a main effect of day (P = 0.025, [Formula: see text] = 0.825), where the experimental session day was greater than the day before (P = 0.010, d = 0.59) with no other differences between days (P > 0.260, d < 0.38). The lower accumulation of lactate than our previous work did not generate exercise-induced appetite suppression as there were no differences in acylated ghrelin, appetite perceptions, or peripheral concentrations of neuropeptides.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Current evidence supports lactate's role in exercise-induced appetite suppression. Here, we demonstrate a smaller degree of lactate accumulation with sodium bicarbonate ingestion and HIIT than our previous work and no subsequent suppression of acylated ghrelin concentrations, subjective appetite perceptions, or peripheral concentrations of neuropeptides. These results suggest either changes in central appetite-regulating neuropeptides are not reflected peripherally or the smaller magnitude of lactate accumulation did not generate exercise-induced appetite suppression as seen previously.

Verification Phase Confirms V̇O 2max in a Hot Environment in Sedentary Untrained Males

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the V̇O 2 uptake obtained during a GXT and subsequent verification phase in untrained participants in a hot environment.

METHODS

Twelve sedentary males completed a GXT followed by a biphasic supramaximal-load verification phase in a hot environment (39°C, 32% relative humidity). Rest between tests occurred in a temperate chamber and lasted until gastrointestinal temperature returned to baseline.

RESULTS

Mean verification phase V̇O 2max (37.8 ± 4.3 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ) was lower than GXT (39.8 ± 4.1 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ; P = 0.03) and not statistically equivalent. Using an individualized analysis approach, only 17% (2/12) of participants achieved a V̇O 2 plateau during the GXT. Verification phase confirmed GXT V̇O 2max in 100% of participants, whereas the traditional and the new age-dependent secondary V̇O 2max criteria indicated GXT V̇O 2max achievement at much lower rates (8/12 [67%] vs 7/12 [58%], respectively). Correlational indices between GXT and verification phase V̇O 2max were strong (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95, r = 0.86), and Bland-Altman analysis revealed a low mean bias of -2.1 ± 1.9 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 and 95% limits of agreement (-5.8 to 1.7 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ).

CONCLUSIONS

Very few untrained males achieved a V̇O 2 plateau during GXT in the heat. When conducting GXT in a hot condition, the verification phase remains a valuable addition to confirm V̇O 2max in untrained males.

Individual and Group Responses of Cardiorespiratory Fitness to Running and Cycling Sprint Interval Training

Digby, L, McCarthy, SF, Bornath, DPB, Copeland, JL, and Hazell, TJ. Individual and group responses of cardiorespiratory fitness to running and cycling sprint interval training. J Strength Cond Res 37(4): e313–e316, 2023—Sprint interval training (SIT) has gained popularity as an effective way to improve peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) and subsequently health in a time-efficient manner. In addition, SIT has demonstrated improvements of ∼5–12% in V̇O2peak for both running and cycling protocols, although comparisons of differing modalities have yet to be examined. Therefore, this study sought to determine group and individual responses to running and cycling SIT while examining any crossover effects of running and cycling SIT when V̇O2peak is tested in different modes of exercise where 18 subjects completed either 3 weeks of cycling SIT (6 male, 3 female) or running SIT (5 male, 4 female) consisting of 4–6 repeated 30-second all-out bouts interspersed with 240 seconds of recovery. Cycling and running V̇O2peak tests were completed pretraining and post-training for the investigation of mode-specific cardiorespiratory fitness improvements. There were main effects of time for cycling V̇O2peak (P = 0.022, = 0.499) and running V̇O2peak (P = 0.080, = 0.334) that seem greater when testing in the same mode as training (∼+5.5%). A similar proportion of responders were identified in both training modes (∼67%) suggesting running and cycling SIT are both effective for improving cardiorespiratory fitness. These results suggest that the specificity of testing and training are important for SIT and that both running and cycling SIT are similarly effective at improving V̇O2peak.

The exercise-induced suppression of acylated ghrelin is blunted in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle compared to the follicular phase following vigorous-intensity exercise

Limited work examining woman's appetite-regulatory response to exercise has been focused on the follicular phase (FP) of the menstrual cycle. This is an important limitation as estradiol (E₂) and progesterone (P₄) fluctuate across phases with greater concentrations in the luteal phase (LP).

OBJECTIVE

To examine the appetite-regulatory response to vigorous-intensity continuous exercise (VICT) in the FP and LP.

METHODS

Twelve women completed 30 min of VICT at 80% V˙O_2max in the FP and LP. E₂, P₄, acylated ghrelin, active peptide tyrosine-tyrosine (PYY), active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and appetite perceptions were measured pre-exercise, 0-, 30-, and 90-min post-exercise. Energy intake was recorded for a 2-day period (day before and of each session). A series of two-way repeated measure ANOVA were used to compare all dependent variables.

RESULTS

Pre-exercise E₂ (P = 0.005, d = 1.00) and P₄ (P < 0.001, d = 1.41) concentrations were greater in the LP than the FP and exercise increased both at 0- and 30-min post-exercise (E₂: P < 0.009; P₄: P < 0.001, d = 0.63). Acylated ghrelin was lower in the FP versus LP at pre-exercise as well as 0-min (P = 0.006, d = 0.97) and 90-min (P = 0.029, d = 0.72) post-exercise. There were no differences of menstrual phase on PYY (P = 0.359, η_p² = 0.092), GLP-1 (P = 0.226, η_p² = 0.130), or overall appetite (P = 0.514, η_p² = 0.066). Energy intake was greater on the day of in the LP versus the FP (P = 0.003, d = 1.2).

CONCLUSION

Acylated ghrelin was lower in the FP compared to the LP and though there were no differences in anorexigenic hormones or subjective appetite, energy intake was greater on the day of the session in the LP suggesting important differences across the menstrual cycle where greater concentrations of ovarian hormones in the LP may blunt the exercise response.

Exercise intervention does not reduce the likelihood of VO2max underestimation in older adults with hypertension

The present study aimed to investigate whether training status would influence the capacity of a verification phase (VER) to confirm maximal oxygen uptake (VO₂max) of a previous graded exercise test (GXT) in individuals with hypertension. Twelve older adults with hypertension (8 women) were recruited. Using a within-subject design, participants performed a treadmill GXT to exhaustion followed by a multistage VER both before and after a 12-wkcombined exercise training programme. Individual VO₂max, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), maximal heart rate (HR_max), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured during both GXT and VER tests. Absolute and relative VO₂max values were higher in VER than in GXT at baseline, but only absolute VO₂max differed between bouts post-intervention (all p < 0.05). Individual VO₂max comparisons revealed that 75% of the participants (9/12) achieved a VO_2max value that was ≥3% during VER both before (range: +4.9% to +21%) and after the intervention (range: +3.4% to +18.8%), whereas 91.7% (11/12) of the tests would have been validated as a maximal effort if the classic criteria were employed. A 12-wk combined training intervention could not improve the capacity of older adults with hypertension to achieve VO₂max during a GXT, as assessed by VER.

Comparison of constant load exercise intensity for verification of maximal oxygen uptake following a graded exercise test in older adults

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) declines with advancing age and is a predictor of morbidity and mortality risk. The purpose here was to assess the utility of constant load tests performed either above or below peak work rate obtained from a graded exercise test for verification of VO2 max in older adults. Twenty-two healthy older adults (9M, 13F, 67 ± 6 years, BMI: 26.3 ± 5.1 kg·m-2 ) participated in the study. Participants were asked to complete two experimental trials in a randomized, counterbalanced cross-over design. Both trials (cycle ergometer) consisted of (1) an identical graded exercise test (ramp) and (2) a constant load test at either 85% (CL85; n = 22) or 110% (CL110; n = 20) of the peak work rate achieved during the associated ramp (performed 10-min post ramp). No significant differences were observed for peak VO2 (L·min-1 ) between CL85 (1.86 ± 0.72; p = 0.679) or CL110 (1.79 ± 0.73; p = 0.200) and the associated ramp (Ramp85, 1.85 ± 0.73; Ramp110, 1.85 ± 0.57). Using the study participant's mean coefficient of variation in peak VO2 between the two identical ramp tests (2.9%) to compare individual differences between constant load tests and the associated ramp revealed 19/22 (86%) of participants achieved a peak VO2 during CL85 that was similar or higher versus the ramp, while only 13/20 (65%) of participants achieved a peak VO2 during CL110 that was similar or higher versus the ramp. These data indicate that if a verification of VO2 max is warranted when testing older adults, a constant load effort at 85% of ramp peak power may be more likely to verify VO2 max as compared to an effort at 110% of ramp peak power.