Tracking improves performance of biological collision avoidance models

Artificial fly visual joint perception neural network inspired by multiple-regional collision detection

The biological visual system includes multiple types of motion sensitive neurons which preferentially respond to specific perceptual regions. However, it still keeps open how to borrow such neurons to construct bio-inspired computational models for multiple-regional collision detection. To fill this gap, this work proposes a visual joint perception neural network with two subnetworks - presynaptic and postsynaptic neural networks, inspired by the preferentialperception characteristics of three horizontal and vertical motion sensitive neurons. Related to the neural network and three hazard detection mechanisms, an artificial fly visual synthesized collision detection model for multiple-regional collision detection is originally developed to monitor possible danger occurrence in the case where one or more moving objects appear in the whole field of view. The experiments can clearly draw two conclusions: (i) the acquired neural network can effectively display the characteristics of visual movement, and (ii) the collision detection model, which outperforms the compared models, can effectively perform multiple-regional collision detection at a high success rate, and only takes about 0.24s to complete the process of collision detection for each virtual or actual image frame with resolution 110×60.

Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods

Biological systems consistently outperform autonomous systems governed by engineered algorithms in their ability to reactively avoid collisions. To better understand this discrepancy, a collision avoidance algorithm was applied to frames of digitized video trajectory data from bats, swallows and fish (Myotis velifer, Petrochelidon pyrrhonota and Danio aequipinnatus). Information available from visual cues, specifically relative position and velocity, was provided to the algorithm which used this information to define collision cones that allowed the algorithm to find a safe velocity requiring minimal deviation from the original velocity. The subset of obstacles provided to the algorithm was determined by the animal's sensing range in terms of metric and topological distance. The algorithmic calculated velocities showed good agreement with observed biological velocities, indicating that the algorithm was an informative basis for comparison with the three species and could potentially be improved for engineered applications with further study.