Posterior cavoplasty: a new approach to avoid venous outflow obstruction and symptoms for small-for-size syndrome in right lobe living donor liver transplantation

Management of Established Small-for-size Syndrome in Post Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Medical, Radiological, and Surgical Interventions: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) following living donor liver transplantation is a complication that can lead to devastating outcomes such as prolonged poor graft function and possibly graft loss. Because of the concern about the syndrome, some transplants of mismatched grafts may not be performed. Portal hyperperfusion of a small graft and hyperdynamic splanchnic circulation are recognized as main pathogenic factors for the syndrome. Management of established SFSS is guided by the severity of the presentation with the initial focus on pharmacological therapy to modulate portal flow and provide supportive care to the patient with the goal of facilitating graft regeneration and recovery. When medical management fails or condition progresses with impending dysfunction or even liver failure, interventional radiology (IR) and/or surgical interventions to reduce portal overperfusion should be considered. Although most patients have good outcomes with medical, IR, and/or surgical management that allow graft regeneration, the risk of graft loss increases dramatically in the setting of bilirubin >10 mg/dL and INR>1.6 on postoperative day 7 or isolated bilirubin >20 mg/dL on postoperative day 14. Retransplantation should be considered based on the overall clinical situation and the above postoperative laboratory parameters. The following recommendations focus on medical and IR/surgical management of SFSS as well as considerations and timing of retransplantation when other therapies fail.

Clinical Significance of Plasma Tenascin-C Levels in Recipients With Prolonged Jaundice After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Focusing on tenascin-C (TNC), whose expression is enhanced during the tissue remodeling process, the present study aimed to clarify whether plasma TNC levels after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) could be a predictor of irreversible liver damage in the recipients with prolonged jaundice (PJ).

METHODS

Among 123 adult recipients who underwent LDLT between March 2002 and December 2016, the subjects were 79 recipients in whom we could measure plasma TNC levels preoperatively (pre-) and on postoperative days 1 to 14 (POD1 to POD14). Prolonged jaundice was defined as serum total bilirubin level >10 mg/dL on POD14, and 79 recipients were divided into 2 groups: 56 in the non-PJ (NJ) group and 23 in the PJ group.

RESULTS

The PJ group had significantly increased pre-TNC; smaller grafts; decreased platelet counts POD14; increased TB-POD1, -POD7, and -POD14; increased prothrombin time-international normalized ratio on POD7 and POD14; and higher 90-day mortality than the NJ group. As for the risk factors for 90-day mortality, multivariate analysis identified TNC-POD14 as a single significant independent prognostic factor (P = .015). The best cut-off value of TNC-POD14 for 90-day survival was determined to be 193.7 ng/mL. In the PJ group, the patients with low TNC-POD14 (<193.7 ng/mL) had satisfactory survival, with 100.0 % at 90 days, while the patients with high TNC-POD14 (≥193.7 ng/mL) had significantly poor survival, with 38.5 % at 90 days (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

In PJ after LDLT, plasma TNC-POD14 is very useful for diagnosing postoperative irreversible liver damage early.

Back table Preparation of the Right Lobe Live Donor Liver Allograft: A Crucial Part of the Adult Live Donor Liver Transplant Procedure

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to describe our procedure for vascular reconstruction and back table bench preparation for the right lobe live donor allograft. Live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains an important option for the expansion of the donor pool. The procedure has been widely used, and its success is dependent on a technically perfect operation with appropriate inflow and outflow of the allograft. Adequate preparation of the right lobe (RL) allograft prior to implantation remains a vital part of the procedure.

METHODS

Our technique of back table vascular reconstruction of the RL allograft has been performed using a hepatic vein patch venoplasty, inferior hepatic vein inclusion, portal vein reconstruction, and segment V and VIII reconstruction for all of our LDLTs.

RESULTS

Between March 2009 and January 2020, 321 consecutive adult LDLTs were performed and underwent back table reconstruction with the techniques described. During that time period, no patients had hepatic insufficiency. There was a single thrombosis of a superior mesenteric vein (SMV) to PV jump conduit.

CONCLUSIONS

Our technique of back table reconstruction of the LDLT right lobe graft remains a crucial part of the operative procedure. Our experience with RL grafts without middle hepatic vein (MHV) and our systematic approach for inflow and outflow reconstruction has yielded excellent results with no technical outflow issues and minimal inflow complications.

Outflow reconstruction of left lateral graft with two widely spaced hepatic veins in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Living donor liver transplantation using the left lateral segment of the liver is the most common type of pediatric liver transplantation. An appropriate surgical approach is crucial for decreasing the risk of vascular complications using these grafts with anatomical variations.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and December 2020, 631 living donor liver transplantations using left lateral segment grafts were performed at Tianjin First Central Hospital. The grafts from 162 (25.7%) donors have 2 hepatic vein openings. A total number of 21 transplantations using left lateral segment grafts with 2 widely spaced hepatic vein openings were performed. In group 1, the unification venoplasty technique with interposition vein graft was used at the back table for the reconstruction of hepatic vein from grafts. In group 2, dual hepatic vein reconstructions were performed, in which venoplasty of recipients' left hepatic vein, middle hepatic vein, and inferior vena cava was performed to create a large orifice for anastomosis with segment Ⅱ hepatic vein from the graft. Segment III hepatic vein from the graft was anastomosed with the recipient's right hepatic vein. The incidence, treatment, and outcomes of hepatic venous outflow obstruction were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 12.8 months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hepatic venous outflow obstruction between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Dual hepatic vein reconstruction is an alternate surgical option for grafts with 2 widely spaced hepatic veins, and it is associated with ideal graft recovery and vascular condition. However, long-term follow-up is still needed to verify the efficacy and safety of this approach.

Living Donor Liver Transplant in Patients With Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience at Our University Hospital

OBJECTIVES

Budd-Chiari syndrome is an infrequent, but potentially fatal, hepatic condition with the clinical manifestation of obstructed venous drainage. This may lead to progressive hepatic congestion, portal hypertension, and, ultimately, liver failure. If medical, interventional, and surgical approaches are not effective, liver transplant offers a rescue modality. The primary objective of this study was to report the perioperative and, above all, the vascular challenges associated with living donor liver transplant in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed demographic and clinical characteristics of 6 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome who underwent living donor liver transplant at our transplant center from April 2004 to July 2020. We also evaluated all data regarding perioperative course, surgical outcome, and the postoperative follow-up period.

RESULTS

All patients displayed advanced liver disease with a Child-Pugh score C. The mean calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 32. The causes of Budd-Chiari syndrome were factor V Leiden thrombophilia in 1 patient, myeloproliferative disorder in 3 patients, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome in 1 patient, and a protein C deficiency in 1 patient. The mean age of patients was 40 years. One of the 6 patients was female. All patients had living donor liver transplant from immediate kin according to Jordanian allocation rules. The mean graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 0.9, and the median follow-up period was 89 months. Cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year-survival rates were 84%, 67%, and 67%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Good survival rates are achievable with living donor liver transplant for patients with advanced Budd-Chiari syndrome, particularly by means of posterior cavoplasty for enlargement of the cava orifice. Therefore, in countries with insufficient deceased donor programs, such as Jordan, living donor liver transplant may be a lifesaving therapeutic possibility.

A systematic review of small for size syndrome after major hepatectomy and liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Major hepatectomy (MH) and particular types of liver transplantation (LT) (reduced size graft, living-donor and split-liver transplantation) lead to a reduction in liver mass. As the portal venous return remains the same it results in a reciprocal and proportionate rise in portal venous pressure potentially resulting in small for size syndrome (SFSS). The aim of this study was to review the incidence, diagnosis and management of SFSS amongst recipients of LT and MH.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the 2010 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The following terms were used to search PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library in July 2019: ("major hepatectomy" or "liver resection" or "liver transplantation") AND ("small for size syndrome" or "post hepatectomy liver failure"). The primary outcome was a diagnosis of SFSS.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles met the inclusion criteria and could be included in this review. In total 2728 patients were included of whom 316 (12%) patients met criteria for SFSS or post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Of these, 31 (10%) fulfilled criteria for PHLF following MH. 8 of these patients developed intractable ascites alongside elevated portal venous pressure following MH indicative of SFSS.

CONCLUSION

SFSS is under-recognised following major hepatectomy and should be considered as an underlying cause of PHLF. Surgical and pharmacological therapies are available to reduce portal congestion and reverse SFSS.

A Case of Live Donor Liver Transplantation in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure with Budd-Chiari Syndrome: Donor and Recipient with Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome

Patient: Female, 47

Final Diagnosis: Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

Symptoms: Liver failure • pneumonia • renal failure

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Live donor liver transplantation

Specialty: Transplantology

Feasibility of using marginal liver grafts in living donor liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the most effective treatments for end-stage liver disease caused by related risk factors when liver resection is contraindicated. Additionally, despite the decrease in the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) over the past two decades, the absolute number of HBsAg-positive people has increased, leading to an increase in HBV-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Consequently, a large demand exists for LT. While the wait time for patients on the donor list is, to some degree, shorter due to the development of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), there is still a shortage of liver grafts. Furthermore, recipients often suffer from emergent conditions, such as liver dysfunction or even hepatic encephalopathy, which can lead to a limited choice in grafts. To expand the pool of available liver grafts, one option is the use of organs that were previously considered “unusable” by many, which are often labeled “marginal” organs. Many previous studies have reported on the possibilities of using marginal grafts in orthotopic LT; however, there is still a lack of discussion on this topic, especially regarding the feasibility of using marginal grafts in LDLT. Therefore, the present review aimed to summarize the feasibility of using marginal liver grafts for LDLT and discuss the possibility of expanding the application of these grafts.

Small for size syndrome difficult dilemma: Lessons from 10 years single centre experience in living donor liver transplantation

AIM

To analyze the incidence, risk factors, prevention, treatment and outcome of small for size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Through-out more than 10 years: During the period from April 2003 to the end of 2013, 174 adult-to-adults LDLT (A-ALDLT) had been performed at National Liver Institute, Menoufiya University, Shibin Elkoom, Egypt. We collected the data of those patients to do this cohort study that is a single-institution retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database analyzing the incidence, risk factors, prevention, treatment and outcome of SFSS in a period started from the end of 2013 to the end of 2015. The median period of follow-up reached 40.50 m, range (0-144 m).

RESULTS

SFSS was diagnosed in 20 (11.5%) of our recipients. While extra-small graft [small for size graft (SFSG)], portal hypertension, steatosis and left lobe graft were significant predictors of SFSS in univariate analysis (P = 0.00, 0.04, 0.03, and 0.00 respectively); graft size was the only independent predictor of SFSS on multivariate analysis (P = 0.03). On the other hand, there was lower incidence of SFSS in patients with SFSG who underwent splenectomy [4/10 (40%) SFSS vs 3/7 (42.9%) no SFSS] but without statistical significance, However, there was none significant lower incidence of the syndrome in patients with right lobe (RL) graft when drainage of the right anterior and/or posterior liver sectors by middle hepatic vein, V5, V8, and/or right inferior vein was done [4/10 (28.6%) SFSS vs 52/152 (34.2%) no SFSS]. The 6-mo, 1-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 10-year survival in patients with SFSS were 30%, 30%, 25%, 25%, 25% and 25% respectively, while, the 6-mo, 1-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 10-year survival in patients without SFSS were 70.1%, 65.6%, 61.7%, 61%, 59.7%, and 59.7% respectively, with statistical significant difference (P = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

SFSG is the independent and main factor for occurrence of SFSS after A-ALDLT leading to poor outcome. However, the management of this catastrophe depends upon its prevention (i.e., selecting graft with proper size, splenectomy to decrease portal venous inflow, and improving hepatic vein outflow by reconstructing large draining veins of the graft).

Small for size syndrome difficult dilemma: Lessons from 10 years single centre experience in living donor liver transplantation

AIM

To analyze the incidence, risk factors, prevention, treatment and outcome of small for size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Through-out more than 10 years: During the period from April 2003 to the end of 2013, 174 adult-to-adults LDLT (A-ALDLT) had been performed at National Liver Institute, Menoufiya University, Shibin Elkoom, Egypt. We collected the data of those patients to do this cohort study that is a single-institution retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database analyzing the incidence, risk factors, prevention, treatment and outcome of SFSS in a period started from the end of 2013 to the end of 2015. The median period of follow-up reached 40.50 m, range (0-144 m).

RESULTS

SFSS was diagnosed in 20 (11.5%) of our recipients. While extra-small graft [small for size graft (SFSG)], portal hypertension, steatosis and left lobe graft were significant predictors of SFSS in univariate analysis (P = 0.00, 0.04, 0.03, and 0.00 respectively); graft size was the only independent predictor of SFSS on multivariate analysis (P = 0.03). On the other hand, there was lower incidence of SFSS in patients with SFSG who underwent splenectomy [4/10 (40%) SFSS vs 3/7 (42.9%) no SFSS] but without statistical significance, However, there was none significant lower incidence of the syndrome in patients with right lobe (RL) graft when drainage of the right anterior and/or posterior liver sectors by middle hepatic vein, V5, V8, and/or right inferior vein was done [4/10 (28.6%) SFSS vs 52/152 (34.2%) no SFSS]. The 6-mo, 1-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 10-year survival in patients with SFSS were 30%, 30%, 25%, 25%, 25% and 25% respectively, while, the 6-mo, 1-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 10-year survival in patients without SFSS were 70.1%, 65.6%, 61.7%, 61%, 59.7%, and 59.7% respectively, with statistical significant difference (P = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

SFSG is the independent and main factor for occurrence of SFSS after A-ALDLT leading to poor outcome. However, the management of this catastrophe depends upon its prevention (i.e., selecting graft with proper size, splenectomy to decrease portal venous inflow, and improving hepatic vein outflow by reconstructing large draining veins of the graft).

Early Graft Dysfunction in Living Donor Liver Transplantation and the Small for Size Syndrome

LDLT has arisen as a viable means to reduce waitlist mortality. However, its widespread embrace by the liver transplant community has been met with frustration centered on donor morbidity and small-for-size-syndrome. Focusing on the later entity, we describe the initial recognition of this early graft dysfunction, the theorized pathophysiology and solutions to remedy its emergence.

Deficiency of the oxygen sensor PHD1 augments liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy

PURPOSE

Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PH) occurs in conditions of reduced oxygen supply. HIF prolyl hydroxylase enzymes (PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3) are oxygen sensors involved in adaptive response to hypoxia. Specific functions of these PHD enzymes in liver regeneration have, however, remained enigmatic. Here, we investigated the significance of PHD1 in liver regeneration following hepatectomy.

METHODS

Liver regeneration was studied in PHD1-deficient (PHD1(-/-)) and wild type (WT) mice subjected to 80% hepatectomy. For in vitro analyses, hepatocytes were isolated from PHD1(-/-) and WT livers. Cell cycle progression was studied via FACS-based analysis of nuclear DNA profile. Transcription factor binding assays, qRT-PCR, and immunoblotting were applied to study the relevance of PHD1 downstream effectors during liver regeneration.

RESULTS

Liver regeneration was significantly enhanced in PHD1(-/-) mice compared to WT littermates. This effect was due to enhanced proliferation rather than to hypertrophy of liver cells. Cell cycle progression was significantly enhanced, and transcriptional activity of the cell cycle regulator c-Myc was increased in PHD1-deficient hepatocytes. These changes coincided with increased expression of cyclin D2, a cell cycle-promoting c-Myc target, and decreased expression of the cell cycle-delaying c-Myc target p21.

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of PHD1 enhances liver regeneration by boosting hepatocyte proliferation in a c-Myc-dependent fashion. PHD1 might, therefore, represent a potential target to facilitate liver regeneration after surgical resection.

An experimental study of triple split-liver transplantation in dogs

AIM: To explore the feasibility of a strategy of tripartition of a whole deceased liver graft for use in 3 recipients in dogs to ultimately maximize donor organ use.

METHODS: Adult healthy mongrel dogs were selected to be donors (n = 30, weighing between 20-25 kg) and recipients (n = 30, weighing between 8-15 kg). Donor/recipient pairs were randomly matched. For donor operation, transection of the parenchymal bridge was performed between the right lateral lobe and right middle lobe, and between the left middle lobe and the quadrate lobe. After in vivo perfusion, the left, middle and right liver grafts were procured, and their primary branches were cut near the main stem. Among the three liver grafts, the one was chosen to be implanted if it's GRWR (graft-to-recipient weight ratio) was more than 1.0% and was nearest to 1.5%. Recipients entered Groups A, B and C if the left, middle and right grafts were chosen, respectively. With the piggyback technique, the outflow orifice of liver graft was anastomosed to the anterolateral wall of the recipient vena cava. The graft was revascularized via reconstructed hepatic vein and portal vein, and then the hepatic artery and bile duct were anastomosed both in an end-to-end manner. Biliary and abdominal drainage was inspected postoperatively. Autopsies were performed promptly after recipients' death to investigate the possibility of technical complications.

RESULTS: By prominent fissures, the canine liver was divided into 7 lobes, among which the parenchymal bridges were thin. The parenchymal bridge connecting the right lateral lobe to the right middle lobe was much thinner than that connecting the left middle lobe to the quadrate lobe. No major conduit was found during transection of these two parenchymal bridges. The portal vein was split into three branches. The common bile duct was formed by the union of three hepatic ducts-the left, middle and right hepatic ducts. The hepatic vein consisted of the left, median and right hepatic veins. Anatomical variations in the hepatic arteries could be found. Among three recipient groups, the operation time, anhepatic time and blood loss did not show significant differences (P > 0.05), but the mean recipient weight, liver graft weight, and GRWR differed significantly (all P < 0.01). In the three groups, none of the recipients died during surgery. Once the hepatic vein and the portal vein were anastomosed and declamped, the implanted liver regained its color soon and its appearance returned to normal following arterial revascularization. There was no statistical difference in survival duration among the three groups (128.3 h ± 48.5 h vs 102.7 h ± 59.8 h vs 98.7 h ± 46.8 h, P = 0.234). Ascites and liver necrosis were not found at autopsy. Bile was present in the bile duct and all anastomoses were patent.

CONCLUSION: Our experimental results indicate that the whole liver of a big dog can be split into three parts, every one of which can be transplanted to a small recipient as an independent allograft.

Standard hepatic vein reconstruction with patch plasty using the native portal vein in adult living donor liver transplantation

An outflow obstruction of the hepatic vein is a critical complication after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and occasionally leads to hepatic failure. Here we introduce a simple method for preventing outflow obstructions by patch plasty in adult LDLT. Between September 2001 and May 2010, 468 adult LDLT procedures were performed at Kyoto University Hospital. We harvested each recipient's portal vein (PV) from the extirpated liver for a patch. We intended to re-form several orifices of the hepatic veins into a single, large orifice. The patch was attached to the anterior wall of the re-formed orifice on the bench. After we put in the liver graft, the procedure for the hepatic vein anastomosis to the inferior vena cava was simple enough that the warm ischemia time was reduced. Three of the 468 cases were diagnosed with an outflow obstruction. All 3 cases underwent hepatic vein reconstruction without patch plasty. In contrast, none of the 159 cases that underwent LDLT with patch plasty suffered from an outflow obstruction, regardless of the liver graft type. The procedure for hepatic vein plasty using a patch from the native PV is simple and elegant and results in excellent outcomes. We propose this as the standard procedure for hepatic vein reconstruction in adult LDLT.