Pancreatoduodenectomy--current status of surgical and perioperative techniques in Germany

RCTs in der Pankreaschirurgie der letzten 10 Jahre – ein Update

Randomisiert kontrollierte Studien (RCT) stellen eine der wichtigsten Quellen neuer Evidenz für die Behandlung insbesondere onkologischer Patienten dar. Insbesondere auf dem Gebiet der Pankreaschirurgie, wo Komplikationen vergleichsweise häufig und schwerwiegend sind, sind innovative operativ-technische wie auch periinterventionelle Innovationen gefragt, die in der Lage sind, Morbidität und Mortalität zu reduzieren. Trotz der mannigfaltigen methodischen Herausforderungen bei der Durchführung chirurgischer RCTs konnten in den letzten 10 Jahren große und wissenschaftlich hochwertige Studien verzeichnet werden.

Dieser Review gibt einen Überblick über wichtige, bereits abgeschlossene und publizierte, aber auch über interessante und wichtige ausstehende RCTs in der Pankreaschirurgie.

Current practice of thyroid surgery in Germany: a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

Due to the lack of perioperative standards in thyroid surgery, this study aimed to evaluate the perioperative management and wound closure techniques used in a nationwide survey.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire evaluating preferred technique in thyroid resection, postoperative management, and the occurrence of complications was sent to all hospitals in Germany performing more than 50 thyroid operations p.a. (n=362, response rate 78% (n=283)). Subsequently, hospitals were subdivided into university and maximum care hospitals (Category A, n=54) and tertiary hospitals and basic care hospitals (Category B, n=229).

RESULTS

10.6% of the hospitals were certified as a center for thyroid surgery, with a significantly higher percentage in Category A (20.4% vs. 8.3%; p<0.01). Concerning the surgical techniques, Kocher´s incision was the favored cervical approach in 96% of the hospitals. A minimally invasive approach was performed in 30.1%, with a significantly more common description in category A. 97.8% of all clinics stated that they perform a platysma muscle suture, primarily as a single stitch interrupted. Skin closure was predominantly performed via intracutaneous suture in 84.5% using absorbable suture material in 63.1%. There was no difference in the technology used in terms of hospital size. The mean in-hospital stay was significantly shorter in Category A hospitals (p=0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The suture technique used in thyroid surgery in Germany is a simple interrupted suture technique for platysma and a continuous suture with absorbable skin closure material. Maximum care hospitals are characterized by shorter in-hospital stays and improved quality assurance.

No Need for Routine Drainage After Pancreatic Head Resection: The Dual-Center, Randomized, Controlled PANDRA Trial (ISRCTN04937707)

OBJECTIVE

This dual-center, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial aimed to prove that omission of drains does not increase reintervention rates after pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND

There is considerable uncertainty regarding intra-abdominal drainage after pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing pancreatic head resection with pancreaticojejunal anastomosis were randomized to intra-abdominal drainage versus no drainage. Primary endpoint was overall reintervention rate (relaparotomy or radiologic intervention). Secondary endpoints were clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B/C), mortality, morbidity, and hospital stay. The planned sample size was 188 patients per group.

RESULTS

A total of 438 patients were randomized. Forty-three patients (9.8%) were excluded because no pancreatic anastomosis was performed, and 395 patients (202 drain, 193 no-drain) were analyzed. Reintervention rates were not inferior in the no-drain group (drain 21.3%, no-drain 16.6%; P = 0.0004). Overall in-hospital mortality (3.0%) was the same in both groups (drain 3.0%, no-drain 3.1%; P = 0.936). Overall surgical morbidity (41.8%) was comparable (P = 0.741). Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B/C: drain 11.9%, no-drain 5.7%; P = 0.030) and fistula-associated complications (drain 26.4%; no drain 13.0%; P = 0.0008) were significantly reduced in the no-drain group. Operation time (P = 0.093), postoperative hemorrhage (P = 0.174), intra-abdominal abscess formation (P = 0.199), biliary leakage (P = 0.382), delayed gastric emptying (P = 0.062), burst abdomen (P = 0.480), wound infection (P = 0.758), and hospital stay (P = 0.487) did not show significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Omission of drains was not inferior to intra-abdominal drainage in terms of postoperative reintervention and superior in terms of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula rate and fistula-associated complications. There is no need for routine prophylactic drainage after pancreatic resection with pancreaticojejunal anastomosis.

Meta-analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal drains are frequently used after pancreatic surgery whereas their benefit in other gastrointestinal operations has been questioned. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare abdominal drainage with no drainage after pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science electronic databases were searched systematically to identify RCTs comparing abdominal drainage with no drainage after pancreatic surgery. Two independent reviewers critically appraised the studies and extracted data. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to aggregate dichotomous outcomes, and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes. Summary effect measures were presented together with their 95 per cent confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Some 711 patients from three RCTs were included. The 30-day mortality rate was 2·0 per cent in the drain group versus 3·4 per cent after no drainage (OR 0·68, 95 per cent c.i. 0·26 to 1·79; P = 0·43). The morbidity rate was 65·6 per cent in the drain group and 62·0 per cent in the no-drain group (OR 1·17, 0·86 to 1·60; P = 0·31). Clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas were seen in 11·5 per cent of patients in the drain group and 9·5 per cent in the no-drain group. Reinterventions, intra-abdominal abscesses and duration of hospital stay also showed no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic resection with, or without abdominal drainage results in similar rates of mortality, morbidity and reintervention.

Cost-effectiveness comparison of prophylactic octreotide and pasireotide for prevention of fistula after pancreatic surgery

PURPOSE

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major determinant of pancreatic surgery outcome, and prevention of POPF is a relevant clinical challenge. The aim of the present study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of octreotide and pasireotide for POPF prophylaxis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis and a retrospective patient cohort provided the data. Cost-effectiveness was calculated by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and by decision tree modelling of hospital stay duration.

RESULTS

Six randomised trials on octreotide (1255 patients) and one trial on pasireotide (300 patients) were included. The median POPF incidence without prophylaxis was 19.6 %. The relative risks for POPF after octreotide or pasireotide prophylaxis were 0.54 or 0.45. Octreotide prophylaxis (21 × 0.1 mg) costs were 249.69 Euro, compared with 728.84 Euro for pasireotide (14 × 0.9 mg) resulting in an ICER of 266.19 Euro for an additional 1.8 % risk reduction with pasireotide. Decision tree modelling revealed no significant reduction of median hospital stay duration if pasireotide was used instead of octreotide.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic octreotide is almost as effective as pasireotide but incurs significantly fewer drug costs per case. However, the data quality is limited, because the effect of octreotide on clinically relevant POPF is unclear. Together with the lack of multicentric data on pasireotide and its effectiveness, a current off-label use of pasireotide does not appear to be justified.

The Tight Adaptation at Pancreatic Anastomosis Without Parenchymal Laceration: An Institutional Experience in Introducing and Modifying the New Procedure

BACKGROUND

Among the types of pancreatic anastomosis used after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), Blumgart type reconstruction has rapidly been distributed for its theoretical reasonableness, including secure tight adaptation of jejunal wall and pancreatic parenchyma without cause of parenchymal laceration. The clinical appropriateness of our modified Blumgart method was demonstrated by comparing to that of Kakita method.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 156 patients underwent elective open PD, reconstructed former 78 patients with the Kakita method, utilizing a full-thickness penetrating suture for tight stump adhesion. The later 78 patients were treated with the modified Blumgart method, which involved clamping the pancreatic parenchymal stump by the jejunal seromuscular layers with horizontal mattress-type penetration sutures. Evaluated variables were the rate of pancreatic fistula (PF) and the length of postoperative hospital stay (POHS).

RESULTS

The rate of ISGPF grade B+C PF was 29/78 (37.2%) in the Kakita group and 16/78 (20.5%) in the Blumgart group (P=0.033). The median POHS for the Kakita group was 23 days, whereas that for the Blumgart group was 16 days (P<0.001), one of the shortest value among Japanese high-volume centers. There was no perioperative intensive hemorrhage or deaths in either group.

CONCLUSION

A unique concept of Blumgart pancreatic anastomosis, i.e., utilizing the jejunum as an interstitial cushion to prevent pancreatic laceration at the knot site, has become realistic through a simple "one step" modification. This technique, also providing flexible handling space at main pancreatic duct anastomosis, should contribute to the improved PF prevention and shortening the POHS.

Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy

AIM: To explore the morbidity and risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS: The data from 196 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, performed by different surgeons, in the General Hospital of the People’s Liberation Army between January 1^st, 2013 and December 31^st, 2013 were retrospectively collected for analysis. The diagnoses of POPF and clinically relevant (CR)-POPF following pancreaticoduodenectomy were judged strictly by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Univariate analysis was performed to analyze the following factors: patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, serum CA19-9 level, history of jaundice, serum albumin level, blood loss volume, pancreatic duct diameter, pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic drainage and pancreaticojejunostomy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the main independent risk factors for POPF.

RESULTS: POPF occurred in 126 (64.3%) of the patients, and the incidence of CR-POPF was 32.7% (64/196). Patient characteristics of age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, serum CA19-9 level, history of jaundice, serum albumin level, blood loss volume, pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy and pancreaticojejunostomy showed no statistical difference related to the morbidity of POPF or CR-POPF. Pancreatic duct diameter was found to be significantly correlated with POPF rates by univariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis, with a pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm being an independent risk factor for POPF (OR = 0.291; P = 0.000) and CR-POPF (OR = 0.399; P = 0.004). The CR-POPF rate was higher in patients without external pancreatic stenting, which was found to be an independent risk factor for CR-POPF (OR = 0.394; P = 0.012). Among the entire patient series, there were three postoperative deaths, giving a total mortality rate of 1.5% (3/196), and the mortality associated with pancreatic fistula was 2.4% (3/126).

CONCLUSION: A pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm is an independent risk factor for POPF. External stent drainage of pancreatic secretion may reduce CR-POPF mortality and POPF severity.