Pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: surgical results, prognostic factors, and long-term follow-up

Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) has emerged as an alternative to open technique in treating periampullary tumors. However, the safety and efficacy of LPD compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) remain unclear. Thus, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LPD versus OPD in patients with periampullary tumors, with a particular focus on the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient subgroup.

METHODS

According to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in December 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compare LPD versus OPD in patients with periampullary tumors. Endpoints and sensitive analysis were conducted for short-term endpoints. All statistical analysis was performed using R software version 4.3.1 with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five RCTs yielding 1018 patients with periampullary tumors were included, of whom 511 (50.2%) were randomized to the LPD group. Total follow-up time was 90 days. LPD was associated with a longer operation time (MD 66.75; 95% CI 26.59 to 106.92; p = 0.001; I2 = 87%; Fig. 1A), lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 124.05; 95% CI - 178.56 to - 69.53; p < 0.001; I2 = 86%; Fig. 1B), and shorter length of stay (MD - 1.37; 95% IC - 2.31 to - 0.43; p = 0.004; I2 = 14%; Fig. 1C) as compared with OPD. In terms of 90-day mortality rates and number of lymph nodes yield, no significant differences were found between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that LPD is an effective and safe alternative for patients with periampullary tumors, with lower intraoperative blood loss and shorter length of stay.

Differences in Lymph Node Metastases Patterns Among Non-pancreatic Periampullary Cancers and Histologic Subtypes: An International Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Standard lymphadenectomy for pancreatoduodenectomy is defined for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and adopted for patients with non-pancreatic periampullary cancer (NPPC), ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC), distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA), or duodenal adenocarcinoma (DAC). This study aimed to compare the patterns of lymph node metastases among the different NPPCs in a large series and in a systematic review to guide the discussion on surgical lymphadenectomy and pathology assessment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for NPPC with at least one lymph node metastasis (2010-2021) from 24 centers in nine countries. The primary outcome was identification of lymph node stations affected in case of a lymph node metastasis per NPPC. A separate systematic review included studies on lymph node metastases patterns of AAC, dCCA, and DAC.

RESULTS

The study included 2367 patients, of whom 1535 had AAC, 616 had dCCA, and 216 had DAC. More patients with pancreatobiliary type AAC had one or more lymph node metastasis (67.2% vs 44.8%; P < 0.001) compared with intestinal-type, but no differences in metastasis pattern were observed. Stations 13 and 17 were most frequently involved (95%, 94%, and 90%). Whereas dCCA metastasized more frequently to station 12 (13.0% vs 6.4% and 7.0%, P = 0.005), DAC metastasized more frequently to stations 6 (5.0% vs 0% and 2.7%; P < 0.001) and 14 (17.0% vs 8.4% and 11.7%, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to comprehensively demonstrate the differences and similarities in lymph node metastases spread among NPPCs, to identify the existing research gaps, and to underscore the importance of standardized lymphadenectomy and pathologic assessment for AAC, dCCA, and DAC.

Optimized early recurrence score for distal cholangiocarcinoma: A new attempt by adding imaging indicators

PURPOSE

To improve the preoperative prediction efficacy for patients with risk for early recurrence (ER) of distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC).

METHODS

56 patients pathologically diagnosed as DCC were included. Their clinical data and preoperative upper abdominal enhanced MSCT images were retrospectively reviewed to look for risk factors associated with ER. ER scores were calculated by Distal Cholangiocarcinoma Early Recurrence (DICER) score and optimized ER score (OERS). Chi-square test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between ER group and Non-ER group, DICER score and OERS, and TNM stage and OERS. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors of ER.

RESULTS

Of 56 DCC patients, 15 (26.8 %) experienced ER who were classified as ER group. Patients in ER group had significantly higher percentage of soft tissue around superior mesenteric artery (STASMA), positive lymph node, microvascular invasion and TNM stage III than those in Non-ER group, among which STASMA and positive lymph node were found to be independent risk factors for ER of DCC (All P values < 0.050). DICER score was optimized by adding STASMA and positive lymph node score to form OERS. OERS predicted more accurately than DICER score in low- and high-risk patients for ER of DCC (30.0 % vs. 0 %, 50.0 % vs. 75.0 %, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

By adding preoperative imaging indicators, OERS could improve the predictive efficacy for ER of DCC.

Laparoscopic hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for synchronous intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A case report

Laparoscopic hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (LHPD) is a complex surgical procedure with high rates of complications and mortality and is performed in a limited number of medical centers. The present study reports a case of a synchronous primary malignant tumor of the left hepatic common bile ducts. A 63-year-old male was admitted to Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (Jinhua, China) with a 1 week history of right upper abdominal distension and pain associated with yellow sclera. Preoperative CT and MRI imaging demonstrated a synchronous primary malignant tumor of the left hepatic and common bile ducts; therefore, laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy were performed. There was no biliary or pancreatic leakage following the operation and the patient was discharged 16 days later. Postoperative pathology verified that the synchronous primary cholangiocarcinoma originated in the left hepatic and common bile ducts. Therefore, LHPD for synchronous primary cholangiocarcinoma may be a safe and feasible treatment for this condition.

Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare surgical and oncological outcomes after minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) for distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA).

BACKGROUND

A dCCA might be a good indication for MIPD, as it is often diagnosed as primary resectable disease. However, multicenter series on MIPD for dCCA are lacking.

METHODS

This is an international multicenter propensity score-matched cohort study including patients after MIPD or OPD for dCCA in 8 centers from 5 countries (2010-2021). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free interval (DFI). Secondary outcomes included perioperative and postoperative complications and predictors for OS or DFI. Subgroup analyses included robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD).

RESULTS

Overall, 478 patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for dCCA were included of which 97 after MIPD (37 RPD, 60 LPD) and 381 after OPD. MIPD was associated with less blood loss (300 vs 420 mL, P =0.025), longer operation time (453 vs 340 min; P <0.001), and less surgical site infections (7.8% vs 19.3%; P =0.042) compared with OPD. The median OS (30 vs 25 mo) and DFI (29 vs 18) for MIPD did not differ significantly between MIPD and OPD. Tumor stage (Hazard ratio: 2.939, P <0.001) and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (Hazard ratio: 0.640, P =0.033) were individual predictors for OS. RPD was associated with a higher lymph node yield (18.0 vs 13.5; P =0.008) and less major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo 3b-5; 8.1% vs 32.1%; P =0.005) compared with LPD.

DISCUSSION

Both surgical and oncological outcomes of MIPD for dCCA are acceptable as compared with OPD. Surgical outcomes seem to favor RPD as compared with LPD but more data are needed. Randomized controlled trials should be performed to confirm these findings.

The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Most studies on minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) combine patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancers even though there is substantial heterogeneity between these tumors. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the role of MIPD compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) in patients with non-pancreatic periampullary cancer (NPPC).

METHODS

A systematic review of Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed by two independent reviewers to identify studies comparing MIPD and OPD for NPPC (ampullary, distal cholangio, and duodenal adenocarcinoma) (01/2015-12/2021). Individual patient data were required from all identified studies. Primary outcomes were (90-day) mortality, and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo 3a-5). Secondary outcomes were postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), blood-loss, length of hospital stay (LOS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Overall, 16 studies with 1949 patients were included, combining 928 patients with ampullary, 526 with distal cholangio, and 461 with duodenal cancer. In total, 902 (46.3%) patients underwent MIPD, and 1047 (53.7%) patients underwent OPD. The rates of 90-day mortality, major morbidity, POPF, DGE, PPH, blood-loss, and length of hospital stay did not differ between MIPD and OPD. Operation time was 67 min longer in the MIPD group (P = 0.009). A decrease in DFS for ampullary (HR 2.27, P = 0.019) and distal cholangio (HR 1.84, P = 0.025) cancer, as well as a decrease in OS for distal cholangio (HR 1.71, P = 0.045) and duodenal cancer (HR 4.59, P < 0.001) was found in the MIPD group.

CONCLUSIONS

This individual patient data meta-analysis of MIPD versus OPD in patients with NPPC suggests that MIPD is not inferior in terms of short-term morbidity and mortality. Several major limitations in long-term data highlight a research gap that should be studied in prospective maintained international registries or randomized studies for ampullary, distal cholangio, and duodenum cancer separately.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42021277495) on the 25th of October 2021.

The short- and long-term outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to calculate the short-term and long-term outcomes of curative-intent surgery in distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) patients to identify potential prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 32 consecutive DCC patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2009-2017. The clinicopathological and histopathological data were evaluated for prognostic factors using the univariable Cox regression analysis. The Overall Survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The study comprised a total of 32 patients, with a mean age of 65.8 (± 9.0) years at the time of surgery. R0 resection was achieved in 25 (86.2%) patients, 19 (65.5%) patients received adjuvant oncological therapy. The OS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 62.5%, 37.5% and 21.9%, respectively. The 90-day mortality was 3/32 (9.4%) accounting for one-fourth of the first-year mortality rate. The median OS was 28.5 months. The only statistically significant prognostic factor was vascular resection, which was associated with worse OS in the univariable analysis (HR: 3.644; 95%-CI: 1.179-11.216, P=0.025). An age less than 65 years, ASA grade I/II, hospital stay of fewer than 15 days, R0 resection, lymph node ratio less than 0.2 and adjuvant oncological therapy tended to be associated with better OS but without statistically significant relevance.

CONCLUSION

The main factor directly influencing the survival of DCC patients is surgical complications. Surgical mortality comprises a significant group of patients, who die in the first year following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Vascular resection is the most important negative prognostic factor for long-term survival.

Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Simple summary

Accurately estimate the prognosis of patients with ECCA is important. However, the TNM system has some limitations, such as low accuracy, exclusion of other factors (e.g., age and sex), and poor performance in predicting individual survival risk. In contrast, a nomogram-based clinical model related to a comprehensive analysis of all risk factors is intuitive and straightforward, facilitating the probabilistic analysis of tumor-related risk factors. Simultaneously, a nomogram can also effectively drive personalized medicine and facilitate clinicians for prognosis prediction. Therefore, we construct a novel practical nomogram and risk stratification system to predict CSS in patients with ECCA.

Background

Accurately estimate the prognosis of patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECCA) was important, but the existing staging system has limitations. The present study aimed to construct a novel practical nomogram and risk stratification system to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) in ECCA patients.

Methods

3415 patients diagnosed with ECCA between 2010 and 2015 were selected from the SEER database and randomized into a training cohort and a validation cohort at 7:3. The nomogram was identified and calibrated using the C-index, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and calibration plots. Decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and the risk stratification were used to compare the nomogram with the AJCC staging system.

Results

Nine variables were selected to establish the nomogram. The C-index (training cohort:0.785; validation cohort:0.776) and time-dependent AUC (>0.7) showed satisfactory discrimination. The calibration plots also revealed that the nomogram was consistent with the actual observations. The NRI (training cohort: 1-, 2-, and 3-year CSS:0.27, 0.27,0.52; validation cohort:1-,2-,3-year CSS:0.48,0.13,0.34), IDI (training cohort: 1-, 2-, 3-year CSS:0.22,0.18,0.16; validation cohort: 1-,2-,3-year CSS:0.18,0.16,0.17), and DCA indicated that the established nomogram significantly outperformed the AJCC staging system (P<0.05) and had better recognition compared to the AJCC staging system.

Conclusions

We developed a practical prognostic nomogram to help clinicians assess the prognosis of patients with ECCA.

The impact of C‐reactive protein‐albumin‐lymphocyte ( CALLY ) index on the prognosis of patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma following pancreaticoduodenectomy

Aim

The C-reactive protein (CRP)-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index is a novel inflammation-based biomarker, which has been associated with long-term outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to investigate whether the CALLY index can predict the prognosis for distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Methods

The study comprised 143 patients who had undergone primary pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma between 2002 to 2019. The CALLY index was defined as (albumin × lymphocyte)/ (CRP × 10⁴). We investigated the association of CALLY index with disease-free survival and overall survival by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Eighty-seven (61%) patients had a preoperative CALLY index <3.5. In multivariate analysis, obstructive jaundice drainage (P < .01), poorly differentiated tumor (P < .01), and CALLY index<3.5 (P = .02) were independent predictors of disease-free survival, while obstructive jaundice drainage (P < .01), poorly differentiated tumor (P < .01), and CALLY index <3.5 (P = .02) were independent predictors of overall survival.

Conclusion

The CALLY index may be an independent and significant indicator of poor long-term outcomes in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy, suggesting the importance of comprehensive assessment for inflammatory status.

Lymph Node Ratio Nomogram-Based Prognostic Model for Resected Distal Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Several variables have been described as prognostic factors for resected distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCC), including lymph node metastases (N status) and lymph node ratio (LNR). The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of LNR on survival and to establish a novel prognostic nomogram to predict the cancer-specific recurrence-free survival (RFS) of dCC.

STUDY DESIGN

Between December 2006 and September 2020, 415 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for dCC in 10 centers were identified. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to identify all independent risk factors among several prognostic factors. A nomogram was then developed and assessed by integrating the independent prognostic factors into the model, and the concordance index (C-index) was used to evaluate its performance.

RESULTS

According to Cox regression multivariate analysis, a nomogram based on independent prognostic factor for RFS was performed including LNR 15 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.442, 95% CI 1.348-4.425, p = 0.003), perineural invasion (HR 3.100, 95% CI 1.183-8.122, p = 0.025), differentiation grade (HR 2.100, 95% CI 1.172-4.143, p = 0.021), and radicality of PD (HR 2.276, 95% CI 1.223-4.234, p = 0.009). The C-index of the nomogram, tailored based on the previous significant factors, was 0.8.

CONCLUSIONS

LNR15 yields a high prognostic efficiency for RFS. The nomogram based on LNR can provide an accurate prognosis assessment for patients with resected dCC.

Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of distal common bile duct adenocarcinoma: chronological analysis in a single high-volume institutional experience

Background

Distal common bile duct (dCBD) cancer is typical indication for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We aimed to retrospectively evaluate surgical outcomes and investigate prognostic factors of dCBD adenocarcinoma for which PD was performed at a single institution.

Methods

We searched consecutive cases of dCBD adenocarcinoma undergone PD at Samsung Medical Center from 1995 to 2018. Cases with distant metastasis or palliative intent were excluded. The year in which the survival rate was dramatically improved was identified and entire years were divided into two periods for comparison. To balance between the two periods, we conducted propensity score matching (PSM) analysis using age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologist score.

Results

Total of 804 cases were enrolled in this study. The entire period was divided into early period of 18 years and recent period of 6 years. The early and late period included 466 and 338 patients, respectively. As a result of PSM, balanced 316 patients were selected from each of the two periods. Significant improvements in surgical outcomes were identified, including shorter operation time, fewer blood loss, shorter hospitalization, and favorable overall survival. As results of multivariable analysis of independent risk factors for overall survival, older age and advanced N stage were identified, as expected. It was distinct that aggressive surgery and advanced tumor state in the early period and a lower BMI in the late period negatively affected the survival, respectively.

Conclusions

Surgical outcomes of dCBD cancer underwent PD was improved. There were few modifiable factors to improve survival and continuous further study is needed to detect dCBD cancer in the early stages.

Spread of lymph node metastasis and adjuvant therapy for distal cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic metastasis is a major route of metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC). The present study aimed to elucidate the pattern of lymph node (LN) metastasis and the effectiveness of LN dissection and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with DCC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection with curative intent for DCC were enrolled. The nomenclature of the LN stations was defined according to the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery guidelines. Effectiveness of LN dissection of each station was calculated using frequency of LN metastasis to the station and 5-year survival rate of patients with LN metastasis to that station.

RESULTS

Of the 105 patients included in the study, 46 (43.8%) had LN metastasis, and 43 (41.0%) underwent postoperative adjuvant therapy. LN metastasis, serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level > 37 U/mL, and positive bile duct margin were independent risk factors for shorter overall survival (OS). The most common metastatic LN station at surgery was No. 13 (32.7%), followed by No. 12 (19.2%), No. 17 (9.6%), and No. 8 (6.6%). There was no effectiveness of LN dissection of the station No. 8, 14, and 16. Adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with longer OS in patients with LN metastasis but not in those with positive ductal margins or serum CA 19-9 level > 37 U/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a better prognosis in patients with DCC and LN metastasis. However, a more effective therapeutic strategy is required to improve the prognosis of patients with other negative prognostic factors.

Vater's ampullary carcinoma increases the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a frequent complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study aimed to investigate the impact of Vater's ampullary carcinoma (VAC) on clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) in patients undergoing PD.

METHODS

Clinical data were gathered retrospectively from January 2018 to December 2020 for all patients undergoing PD. The univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identify independent risk factors of CR-POPF. A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis at a ratio of 1:1 was performed to minimize bias from baseline characteristics between VAC and non-VAC groups. Main postoperative complications were compared between the two groups after PSM.

RESULTS

In 263 patients, 94 (35.7%) patients were diagnosed as VAC. CR-POPF occurred in 99 (37.6%) patients and VAC was identified as an independent risk factor of CR-POPF in multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR = 0.548, 95% CI = 0.327-0.920, P = 0.023). After PSM, there were similar baseline characteristics between the VAC and non-VAC group. Moreover, VAC group had a higher rate of CR-POPF (P = 0.025) and intra-abdominal infection (P = 0.015) compared to the non-VAC group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing PD, VAC increases the risk of CR-POPF and several other postoperative complications.

A Nomogram Based on the Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts the Prognosis of Patients With Distal Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery

Background: Lymph node (LN) metastasis is considered one of the most important risk factors affecting the prognosis of distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC). This study aimed to demonstrate the superiority of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) compared with other LN stages, and to establish a novel prognostic nomogram to predict the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of DCC.

Methods: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, the data of 676 patients after DCC radical operation were screened, and patients were randomly divided into training (n = 474) and validation sets (n = 474). The prognostic evaluation performance of the LODDS and American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) N stage and lymph node ratio (LNR) were compared using the Akaike information criteria, receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), and C-index. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to screen independent risk factors, and a LODDS-based nomogram prognostic staging model was established. The nomogram's precision was verified by C-index, calibration curves, and AUC, and the results were compared with those of the AJCC TNM staging system.

Results:Compared with the other two stages of LN metastasis, LODDS was most effective in predicting CSS in patients with DCC. Multivariate analysis proved that LODDS, histologic grade, SEER historic stage, and tumor size were independent risk factors for DCC. The C-index of the nomogram, based on the above factors, in the validation set was 0.663. The 1-, 3-, and 5-y AUCs were 0.735, 0.679, and 0.745, respectively. Its good performance was also verified by calibration curves. In addition, the C-index and Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the nomogram performed better than the AJCC TNM staging system.

Conclusion:For postoperative patients with DCC, the LODDS stage yielded better prognostic efficiency than the AJCC N and LNR stages. Compared with the AJCC TNM staging system, the nomogram, based on the LODDS, demonstrated superior performance.

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as a novel prognostic biomarker in distal cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) presents as one of the relatively rare malignant tumors in the digestive system and has a poor long-term prognosis. Curative resection is currently the most appropriate therapy for patients with DCC because of the lack of effective adjuvant therapies. Therefore, it is important to accurately predict the prognosis for formulating a reasonable treatment plan and avoiding unnecessary surgical trauma.

AIM

To minimize the interference of obstructive jaundice on carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level by adapting CA19-9 to γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) as an indicator, to determine the strong associations between CA19-9/GGT and postoperative neoplasm recurrence and long-term outcome of DCC.

METHODS

We enrolled 186 patients who were diagnosed with DCC between January 2010 and December 2019 and performed radical excision with strict criteria as follows in our hospital. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn according to preoperative CA19-9/GGT and 1-year survival. Based on this, patients were divided into two groups (group 1, low-ratio, n = 81; group 2, high-ratio, n = 105). Afterwards, by the way of univariate and multivariate analysis, the risk factors influencing postoperative tumor recrudesce and long-term prognosis of patients with DCC were screened out.

RESULTS

Optimum cut-off value of CA19-9/GGT was 0.12. Patients in group 2 represented higher CA19-9 and lymphatic metastasis rate accompanied by lower GGT, when compared with group 1 (P < 0.05). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of patients in groups 1 and 2 were 88.3%, 59.2% and 48.1%, and 61.0%, 13.6% and 13.6%, respectively (P = 0.000). Multivariate analysis indicated that CA19-9/GGT, lymphatic metastasis and tumor differentiation were independent risk factors for tumor recurrence and long-term prognosis of DCC.

CONCLUSION

Elevation of CA19-9/GGT performed better as a biomarker of aggressive carcinoma and predictor of poor clinical outcomes by reducing the effect of obstruction of biliary tract on CA19-9 concentration in patients with DCC.

Systemic immune-inflammation index as a prognostic marker for distal cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a new marker, defined as the platelet count × neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. This study evaluates the SII as a prognostic marker for the overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC).

METHODS

One hundred and forty patients who underwent PD for DCC between September, 2002 and December, 2015 at our hospital were divided into a low SII (SII < 1450) group and a high SII (SII ≥ 1450) group. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and OS of the two groups retrospectively and used multivariate analyses to identify the prognostic factors for OS.

RESULTS

The low and high SII groups comprised 119 and 21 patients, respectively. OS was better in the low SII group than in the high SII group, with median survival times of 81 and 26 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that portal vein resection (hazard ratio [HR], 9.58; p < 0.001), SII ≥ 1450 (HR, 2.05; p = 0.041), microscopic venous invasion (HR, 2.04; p = 0.005), and pN1 (HR, 1.73; p = 0.034) were independently associated with poor survival.

CONCLUSION

The SII may be useful for predicting the long-term survival of patients with DCC after PD.

Long-term survival in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with portal vein system resection and reconstruction

PURPOSE

Pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with portal vein resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma is rarely reported because it is a rare disease. We developed a program to evaluate the vascular invasion type, operation procedure, and long-term survival of distal cholangiocarcinoma patients with portal vein invasion.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data for 123 distal cholangiocarcinoma patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2013 and December 2019. Portal vein system invasion was confirmed pathologically in 17 patients.

RESULTS

Multivariable Cox regression identified tumor differentiation degree, portal vein system invasion, and lymph node metastasis as independent risk factors affecting long-term survival. The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates for patients without and with portal vein system invasion were 79.7% and 58.9%, and 48.6% and 10.8%, respectively. Median overall survival in patients without and with portal vein system invasion was 33 months and 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Portal vein system invasion is an important independent risk factor affecting long-term survival in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. Pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with portal vein system resection and reconstruction did not increase the incidence of perioperative complications or mortality.

Survival benefit with adjuvant radiotherapy after resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity-matched National Cancer Database analysis

BACKGROUND

No convincing evidence for the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) exists, especially for lower-risk (margin- or node-negative) disease. Hence, the association of adjuvant RT on survival after surgical resection of dCCA was compared with no adjuvant RT (noRT).

METHODS

Using National Cancer Database data from 2004 to 2016, patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for nonmetastatic dCCA were identified. Patients with neoadjuvant RT and chemotherapy and survival <6 months were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to account for treatment-selection bias. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was then used to analyze the association of adjuvant RT with survival.

RESULTS

Of 2162 (34%) adjuvant RT and 4155 (66%) noRT patients, 1509 adjuvant RT and 1509 noRT patients remained in the cohort after matching. The rates of node-negative disease (N0), node-positive disease (N+), and unknown node status (Nx) were 39%, 51%, and 10%, respectively. After matching, adjuvant RT was associated with improved survival (median, 29.3 vs 26.8 months; P < .001), which remained after multivariable adjustment (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.93; P < .001). Multivariable interaction analyses showed this benefit was seen irrespective of nodal status (N0: HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.89; P < .001; N+: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.89; P < .001) and margin status (R0: HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.67; P < .001; R1: HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96; P = .007). Stratified analyses by nodal and margin status demonstrated consistent results.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant RT after dCCA resection was associated with a survival benefit in patients, even in patients with margin- or node-negative resections. Adjuvant RT should be considered routinely irrespective of margin and nodal status after resection for dCCA.

LAY SUMMARY

Adjuvant radiotherapy after resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma was associated with a survival benefit in patients, even in patients with margin-negative or node-negative resections. Adjuvant radiotherapy should be considered routinely irrespective of margin and nodal status after resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma.

The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?

BACKGROUND

Although early series focused on benign disease, minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) might be particularly suited for malignancy. Unlike their predecessors, fellowship-trained (FT) Hepatic-Pancreatic and Biliary (HPB) surgeons usually have equal skills in approaching peri-ampullary tumors (PT) either openly or via minimally invasive (MI) techniques.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed a MI-HPB-FT surgeon's 10-year experience with PD. A sub-analysis of malignant PT was also done (MIPD-PT vs. OPD-PT). The primary endpoint was to assess postoperative mortality and morbidity. Secondary endpoints included operative parameters, length of hospital stay, and survival analysis. Moreover, we addressed practice pattern changes for a surgeon straight out of training with no previous experience of independent surgery.

RESULTS

From December 2007-February 2018, one MI-HPB-FT performed a total of 100 PDs, including 57 MIPDs and 43 open PDs (OPDs). In both groups, over 70% of PDs were undertaken for malignancy. Eight patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal cancer (PDC) were in the OPD-PT group (as compared to only 2 in the MIPD-PT group) (p = 0.07). Estimated mean blood loss and length of stay were less in the MIPD-PT group (345 mL and 12 days) as compared to the OPD-PT group (971 mL and 16 days), p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively. However, the mean operative time was longer for the MIPD-PT (456 min) as compared to the OPD-PT (371 min), p < 0.001. Thirty and 90-day mortality was 2.6%/5.1% after MIPD-PT compared to 0%/3.2% after OPD-PT, respectively, p = 1. Overall 30-/90-day morbidity rates were similar at 41.0%/43.6% after MIPD-PT and 35.5%/41.9% after OPD-PT, respectively, p = 0.8 and 1. Complete resection (R0) rates were not statistically different, 97.4% after MIPD-PT compared to 87.0% after OPD-PT (p = 0.2). After MIPD and OPD for malignant PT, overall 1, 3 and 5-year survival rates, and median survival were 82.5%, 59.6% and 46.3% and 38 months as compared to 52.5%, 15.7% and 10.5% and 13 months, respectively (p = 0.01). In the MIDP-PT group, recurrence free survival (RFS) at 1, 3 and 5 years and median RFS were 69.1%, 41.9% and 33.5% and 26 months as compared to 50.4%, 6.3% and 6.3% and 13 months, in the OPD-PT group, respectively (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

FT HPB Surgeons who begin their practice with the ability to do both MI and OPD may preferentially approach resectable peri-ampullary tumors minimally invasively. This may result in decreased blood loss decreased length of hospital stays. Despite longer operative time, the improved visualization of MI techniques may enable superior R0 rates when compared to historical open controls. Moreover, combined with quicker initiation of adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatments, this may eventually result in improved survival.

Prognostic impact of lymph node parameters in distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is the only definitively curative therapy for the long-term survival of distal cholangiocarcinoma patients. Lymph node metastasis is widely accepted as an important prognostic factor for distal cholangiocarcinoma. The latest American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM classification system for distal cholangiocarcinoma has divided the lymph node metastasis patients into N1 and N2 by lymph node metastasis number. However, some studies suggested that the lymph node metastasis ratio may be better than the lymph node metastasis number. Therefore, we develop a program to analyze the correlation between lymph node parameters (lymph node dissection number, lymph node metastasis number, and lymph node metastasis rate) and long-term prognosis.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 123 distal cholangiocarcinoma patients after pancreatoduodenectomy from January 2011 to December 2019. The patients were grouped according to lymph node metastases and tumor-free and overall survival rates which were investigated with the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The logistic regression models were used for multivariate analysis to determine the risk factors for lymph node metastases. And the X-tile program was used to calculate the cutoff values for the lymph node parameters that discriminated survival.

Results

The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreatoduodenectomy were 75.2%, 37.1%, and 31.5%, respectively. And the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of patients without and with lymph node metastasis were 83.0%, 50.7%, and 42.5% and 63.5%, 19.0%, and 19.0% (p = 0.000), respectively. Logistic regression showed CA19-9 and portal vein system invasion as independent risk factors for lymph node metastases. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed the optimal cutoff value of CA19-9 to predict the lymph node metastases was 75.5 U/mL. Determined by the X-tile software, the optimal cutoff values of the lymph node dissection number were 24 (p = 0.021), the lymph node metastasis number were 1 and 7 (p = 0.504), and the lymph node metastasis rate were 0.13 (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Lymph node metastasis is an important factor affecting the long-term survival of distal cholangiocarcinoma patients.CA19-9 and portal vein system invasion are independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis. Besides, the lymph node dissection number and lymph node metastasis rate can predict the long-term survival better than lymph node metastasis number.

A Novel Approach to Assessing Differentiation Degree and Lymph Node Metastasis of Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Prediction Using a Radiomics-Based Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine Model

BACKGROUND

Radiomics can improve the accuracy of traditional image diagnosis to evaluate extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC); however, this is limited by variations across radiologists, subjective evaluation, and restricted data. A radiomics-based particle swarm optimization and support vector machine (PSO-SVM) model may provide a more accurate auxiliary diagnosis for assessing differentiation degree (DD) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) of ECC.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study is to develop a PSO-SVM radiomics model for predicting DD and LNM of ECC.

METHODS

For this retrospective study, the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 110 patients with ECC who were diagnosed from January 2011 to October 2019 were used to construct a radiomics prediction model. Radiomics features were extracted from T1-precontrast weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using MaZda software (version 4.6; Institute of Electronics, Technical University of Lodz). We performed dimension reduction to obtain 30 optimal features of each sequence, respectively. A PSO-SVM radiomics model was developed to predict DD and LNM of ECC by incorporating radiomics features and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. We randomly divided the 110 cases into a training group (88/110, 80%) and a testing group (22/110, 20%). The performance of the model was evaluated by analyzing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

A radiomics model based on PSO-SVM was developed by using 110 patients with ECC. This model produced average AUCs of 0.8905 and 0.8461, respectively, for DD in the training and testing groups of patients with ECC. The average AUCs of the LNM in the training and testing groups of patients with ECC were 0.9036 and 0.8889, respectively. For the 110 patients, this model has high predictive performance. The average accuracy values of the training group and testing group for DD of ECC were 82.6% and 80.9%, respectively; the average accuracy values of the training group and testing group for LNM of ECC were 83.6% and 81.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MRI-based PSO-SVM radiomics model might be useful for auxiliary clinical diagnosis and decision-making, which has a good potential for clinical application for DD and LNM of ECC.

Use of preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a better prognostic marker for distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreatoduodenectomy

PURPOSE

The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score can be easily calculated from the serum albumin concentration, total cholesterol concentration, and total lymphocyte count. The study aim was to assess the preoperative prognostic factors for the overall survival (OS) of distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and to demonstrate the utility of the CONUT score.

METHODS

A total of 149 consecutive patients who underwent PD for DCC between September 2002 and December 2016 were divided into a low-CONUT (LC) group (CONUT scores ≤ 2) and a high-CONUT (HC) group (CONUT scores ≥ 3). The clinicopathological characteristics and OS of the patients were evaluated retrospectively. Prognostic factors of DCC were identified by multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The LC and HC groups included 113 and 36 patients, respectively. The OS was better in the LC group than in the HC group (median survival time and 5 year survival rate: 82 months and 56.8% vs. 38 months and 27.6%, P = 0.005). Multivariate analyses for the OS in all patients showed that the tumor differentiation, perineural invasion, residual tumor status, portal vein resection, blood transfusion, and preoperative CONUT score ≥ 3 were independently associated with a poor survival.

CONCLUSION

The CONUT score may be a useful preoperative factor for predicting the long-term survival in patients with DCC.

Benefits and limitations of middle bile duct segmental resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a standardized strategy for patients with middle and distal bile duct cancers. The aim of this study was to compare clinicopathological features of bile duct segmental resection (BDR) with PD in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Consecutive cases with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent BDR (n = 21) or PD (n = 84) with achievement of R0 or R1 resection in Kobe University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2016 were enrolled in the present study.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent PD were significantly younger than those receiving BDR. The frequency of preoperative jaundice, biliary drainage and cholangitis was not significantly different between the two groups. The duration of surgery was longer and there was more intraoperative bleeding in the PD than in the BDR group (553 vs. 421 min, and 770 vs. 402 mL; both P<0.01). More major complications (>Clavien-Dindo IIIa) were observed in the PD group (46% vs. 10%, P<0.01). Postoperative hospital stay was also longer in that group (30 vs. 19 days, P = 0.02). Pathological assessment revealed that tumors were less advanced in the BDR group but the rate of lymph node metastasis was similar in both groups (33% in BDR and 48% in PD, P = 0.24). The rate of R0 resection was significantly higher in the PD group (80% vs. 38%, P<0.01). Adjuvant chemotherapy was more frequently administered to patients in the BDR group (62% vs. 38%, P = 0.04). Although 5-year overall survival rates were similar in both groups (44% for BDR and 51% for PD, P = 0.72), in patients with T1 and T2, the BDR group tended to have poorer prognosis (44% vs. 68% at 5-year, P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

BDR was comparable in prognosis to PD in middle bile duct cancer. Less invasiveness and lower morbidity of BDR justified this technique for selected patients in a poor general condition.

Prognostic Factors and the Role of Adjuvant Treatment in Periampullary Carcinoma: a Single-Centre Experience of 95 Patients

PURPOSE

The effect of adjuvant treatment on those undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for periampullary carcinomas (PAC) is not well studied. Most studies employed chemoradiation as the adjuvant modality. We aimed to analyse clinicopathological differences between types of PACs, the prognostic factors and the role of adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy in the majority).

METHODS

Patients with PAC who underwent PD from Jan 2011 to Dec 2015 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients with PAC underwent PD in the study period. Ampullary carcinoma (AC) was the most common. Pancreatic carcinomas (PC) were larger. AC had lower T stage, perineural invasion (PNI) and R1 resections. Median overall survival (OS) was 32.7 months. On multivariate analysis, lymph node ratio (LNR) ≥ 0.2 and advanced T stage adversely affected the OS. Fifty-seven (66.3%) patients received adjuvant treatment, of which 50 had chemotherapy alone. Adjuvant treatment resulted in better OS in patients with T stage ≥ 3, lymph node involvement, LNR ≥ 0.2, lymphovascular invasion, PNI, tumour size > 2 cm, higher grade and distal cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

In patients of PAC undergoing PD, AC had favourable clinicopathological profile. LNR ≥ 0.2 and advanced T stage adversely affected OS. Adjuvant treatment resulted in significantly better OS in patients with high-risk features.

Prognostic relevance of preoperative bilirubin-adjusted serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in a multicenter subset analysis of 179 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) is a rare malignancy and validated prognostic markers remain scarce. We aimed to evaluate the role of serum CA19-9 as a potential biomarker in DCC.

METHODS

Patients operated for DCC at 6 high-volume surgical centers from 1994 to 2015 were identified from prospectively maintained databases. Patient baseline characteristics, surgical and histopathological parameters, as well as overall survival after resection were assessed for correlation with preoperative bilirubin-adjusted serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). Preoperative CA19-9 to bilirubin ratio (CA19-9/BR) was classified as elevated (≥ 25 U/ml/mg/dl) according to the upper serum normal values of CA19-9 (37 U/ml) and bilirubin (1.5 mg/dl) giving a cut-off at ≥ 25 U/ml/mg/dl.

RESULTS

In total 179 patients underwent resection for DCC during the study period. High preoperative CA19-9/BR was associated with advanced age and regional lymph node metastases. Median overall survival after resection was 27 months. Elevated preoperative serum CA19-9/bilirubin ratio (HR 1.6, p = 0.025), T3/4 stage (HR 1.8, p = 0.022), distant metastasis (HR 2.5, p = 0.007), tumor grade (HR 1.9, p = 0.001) and R status (HR 1.7, p = 0.023) were identified as independent negative prognostic factors following multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Elevated preoperative bilirubin-adjusted serum CA19-9 correlates with regional lymph node metastases and constitutes a negative independent prognostic factor after resection of DCC.

A prognostic nomogram for distal bile duct cancer from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database based on the STROBE compliant

In this study, we aimed to develop a reliable nomogram to estimate individualized prognosis for patients with distal bile duct cancer (DBDC) and compare the predictive value with the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.Data of 1110 patients diagnosed with DBDC were recruited from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1973 and 2015. All patients were randomly divided into the training (n = 777) and validation (n = 333) cohorts, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify the independent risk factors. The Akaike information criterion was used to select covariates for constructing a nomogram. The predictive ability of the nomogram was assessed by concordance index (C-index) and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) compared to tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system.A nomogram integrating 8 risk factors was developed with a higher C-index than that of the TNM staging system (training data set, 0.70 vs 0.61; validation data set, 0.71 vs 0.57). The AUROCs of the nomogram for 1-year and 3-year overall survival (OS) predication were 0.76 and 0.78 in the training cohort, 0.78 and 0.77 in the validation cohort. However, AUROCs of the TNM stage for predicting 1-year and 3-year OS were all below 0.60. Calibration curves showed the optimal agreement in predicating OS between nomogram and actual observation. In addition, this nomogram can effectively distinguish the OS between low and high-risk groups divided by the median score (P < .01).Present study was the first one to construct a prognostic nomogram of DBDC patients, which has the potential to provide individual prediction of OS.

Number of positive lymph nodes and lymphatic invasion are significant prognostic factors after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma

Background: Early recurrence of distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) may result in a poorer prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological factors that predict survival and recurrence in patients with DCC.

Methods: Fifty-five patients with DCC who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2005 and 2015 were studied retrospectively. The following clinicopathological parameters were analyzed as predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS): sex, age, body mass index, presence of biliary tract decompression, macroscopic type, histological type, tumor size, TNM classification, lymph node metastasis ratio, number of positive lymph nodes (PLNs), lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, perineural invasion, proximal bile duct margin, dissected margin, portal system invasion, arterial system invasion, stage, and residual tumor.

Results: Univariate analysis showed that contiguous extension of the primary tumor, PLN, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, perineural invasion, and stage were significant prognostic factors for DFS and OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that PLN and lymphatic invasion were prognostic for DFS and OS (P<0.001). Significant differences in OS and DFS were found in analyses stratified by PLN (0, 1, 2 vs ≥3) and lymphatic invasion (0 vs 1, 2, 3).

Conclusion: Among the clinicopathological parameters analyzed, PLN and lymphatic invasion were confirmed as prognostic factors for DCC.

Differences in Prognostic Factors and Recurrence Patterns After Curative-Intent Resection of Perihilar and Distal Cholangiocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and distal cholangiocarcinoma arise from the same tissue but require different surgical treatment methods. It remains unclear whether these cholangiocarcinoma types have different outcomes, prognostic factors, and/or recurrence patterns.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent curative-intent resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma or distal cholangiocarcinoma at a tertiary academic hospital during 2000-2015. Survival and prognostic factors were identified using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

The 90-day mortality rates were 0% for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (36 patients) and 4% for distal cholangiocarcinoma (47 patients). There were no significant differences between perihilar cholangiocarcinoma or distal cholangiocarcinoma in median overall survival (30.9 vs 40.4 months) or median disease-free survival (14.2 vs 21.4 months). Among perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients, age > 65 years was an independent predictor of poorer overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.45, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-5.64), while requiring bile duct re-resection was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-7.51). Among distal cholangiocarcinoma patients, a pN1 category independently predicted poorer overall survival (hazard ratio: 3.40, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-10.11), while preoperative CA19-9 levels >30 U/mL (hazard ratio: 2.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-5.79) and pN1 category (hazard ratio: 2.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-5.79) predicted a shorter disease-free survival. Local recurrence was more common with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (50% of recurrences), while multiple synchronous sites were more common for distal cholangiocarcinoma (41% of recurrences).

CONCLUSION

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and distal cholangiocarcinoma patients have similar survival outcomes. However, local control appears to be more prognostic for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients, while positive lymph nodes are critical prognostic factor for distal cholangiocarcinoma patients.

[Cholangiocellular cancer: the state of the problem and ways to improve the results of surgical treatment]

AIM

To improve the outcomes in patients with resectable biliary cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 263 procedures for cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) for the period 1998—2017. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 102 (38.8%) patients. Extensiveliver resections (78.9%) prevailed for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (n=128), 6 (4.7%) patients required vascular resection. Seventy-seven pancreatoduodenectomies were performed for common bile duct cancer, portal vein resection was done in 8 (10.4%) patients. In case of Klatskin tumor (n=58) liver resection combined with bile duct resection (n=52) prevailed. Portal vein resection was done in 16 (27.6%) patients.

RESULTS

Postoperative morbidity in patients with intrahepatic CCC was revealed in 68 (53.1%) cases, mortality — in 5 (3.9%) cases. Among patients with Klatskin tumor morbidity was revealed in 51 (87.9%) cases, mortality — in 6 (10.3%) cases. In patients with common bile duct cancer morbidity was revealed in 53 (68.8%) cases, mortality — in 4 (5.2%) cases. In whole cohort median overall survival was 30 months. R0-resection was associated with better long-term results (median 37 months) compared with R1—R2 resection (20 months; p=0.01). Lymph node involvement is associated with significantly worse prognosis (p=0.016), however 5-year survival is observed (25.6%). Adjuvant chemotherapy in R0-resection significantly improved long-term results: median was 46 months (vs. 30 in group without chemotherapy; p=0.02). In intrahepatic CCC patients multiple lesions or mechanical jaundice did not aggravate long-term results.

CONCLUSION

R0-resection including lymphadenectomy, resection of adjacent organs and vessels is advisable for CCC. Isolated bile duct resection should be used as an exception. Adjuvant therapy improved long-term results. Multiple lymph node lesion or bile duct infiltration are not contraindications to surgery in intrahepatic CCC patients.

Bile duct angulation and tumor vascularity are useful radiographic features for differentiating pancreatic head cancer and intrapancreatic bile duct cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To perform radical resection without leaving residual cancer, surgeons must distinguish between pancreatic head cancer (PHC) and intrapancreatic bile duct cancer (IPBDC) preoperatively. The aim of this study was to establish the points of difference between these two cancers, especially on preoperative multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) images.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were 28 patients with PHC and proven bile duct invasion who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PHC group) and 22 patients with IPBDC and upstream bile duct dilation (IPBDC group). We compared the preoperative clinical and radiographic features, including the bile duct angle, calculated on coronal images of MDCT, and the vascularity of the tumor.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off values for the bile duct angle, the CT value ratio of the tumor (late arterial phase/non-enhanced), and the main pancreatic duct (MPD) ratio (diameter of MPD/diameter of parenchyma) were 110°, 3.0, and 0.2, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that a bile duct angle < 110°, a CT value ratio of the tumor < 3, and an MPD ratio ≥ 0.2 were independently associated with PHC.

CONCLUSIONS

A bile duct angle and CT value reflecting the vascularity of the tumor might be useful radiographic features for differentiating PHC and IPBDC, in addition to MPD dilatation.

Multicentre study of the impact of factors that may affect long-term survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although the peri-operative mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) has decreased, the post-operative morbidity remains high. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of factors that may affect the long term survival for patients with DCC following PD.

METHODS

All patients who underwent PD for DCC between January 2000 and December 2015 in 5 tertiary referral centers underwent retrospective medical record review. Factors likely to influence overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survivals were assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 201 on 217 patients who underwent PD for DCC were included for further analysis. The median OS was 39 months, with actuarial survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 85%, 53% and 39%. Recurrence occurred in 123 (61%) patients. The median DFS was 16 months, with actuarial survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years of 60%, 37% and 28%. Following multivariate analysis, peri-operative blood transfusions (PBT) were associated to worse OS (HR = 2.25 [1.31-3.85], P = 0.003) and DFS (HR = 2.08 [1.24-3.5], P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the negative impact of PBT on the oncologic result following PD for DCC.

Different Clinical Characteristics Between Distal Cholangiocarcinoma and Pancreatic Head Carcinoma With Biliary Obstruction

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative clinical characteristics between patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) and pancreatic head carcinoma (PHC) with biliary obstruction.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy and were diagnosed with DCC (n = 85) or PHC (n = 90) by final pathological examination. Perioperative clinical characteristics were compared for patients with DCC versus PHC with biliary obstruction.

RESULTS

Median coronal thickness of the pancreatic neck was significantly greater, whereas the main pancreatic duct diameter was significantly smaller in patients with DCC than patients with PHC. Most patients with DCC (95%) had a soft pancreas, whereas only 29% of patients with PHC had. The incidence rates of overall morbidity, infectious complications, and pancreatic fistula were significantly higher in patients with DCC than those in patients with PHC. Eleven DCC patients (12%) were preoperatively misdiagnosed with PHC. Among them, intraductal ultrasonography of the bile duct was performed in 7 patients, and the presence of PHC was suspected in 3 of these patients because intraductal ultrasonography detected a small intrapancreatic mass.

CONCLUSIONS

This study clearly showed different perioperative characteristics between patients with DCC and PHC. It is not uncommon to misdiagnose PHC as DCC. Intraductal ultrasonography may be helpful in differentiating DCC and PHC.

Outcome and evaluation of prognostic factors after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma

Background

The aim of the present study was to examine the outcomes and prognostic factors after surgery with curative intent for distal cholangiocarcinoma during a modern timespan, in a Swedish tertiary referral center.

Methods

All patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma between April 2008 and December 2015 were identified. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and histopathological data were evaluated for prognostic factors relating to mortality, using univariable and multivariable statistical analysis.

Results

Fifty-four patients were included. The mean age was 68±8 years and 21 (39%) of the patients were female. Jaundice was present at diagnosis in 73% of the patients. There was no 90-day mortality. Complications graded as Clavien-Dindo ≥3 occurred in 10 (19%) of the patients. Twenty-eight (52%) received adjuvant therapy. Overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 80%, 21%, and 9.2%, respectively. Median survival was 22.2 months. The presence of lymph node metastases was found to be the only independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio 2.88, 95% confidence interval 1.22-6.84; P=0.016). The total number of lymph node metastases, lymph node ratio or total number of resected nodes did not improve the prediction.

Conclusions

We found that the recurrence rate was higher and the survival poorer after surgery for distal cholangiocarcinoma than has previously been reported. Lymph node status at the time of resection was the most important prognostic factor for survival in the current material.

Liver parenchyma transection-first approach in hemihepatectomy with en bloc caudate lobectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A safe technique to secure favorable surgical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Although hemihepatectomy with total caudate lobectomy (hemiHx-tc) is essential for the surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, the advantage of an anterior approach for hemiHx-tc has not been fully discussed technically; the significance of an anterior approach without liver mobilization for preventing infectious complications also remains unknown.

METHODS

The liver parenchyma transection-first approach (Hp-first) technique is an early transection of the hepatic parenchyma without mobilization of the liver that utilizes a modified liver-hanging maneuver to avoid damaging the future remnant liver.

RESULTS

Between May 2010 and August 2016, a total of 40 consecutive patients underwent surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Of these, 19 patients underwent a conventional hemihepatectomy with total caudate lobectomy (cHx), while 21 patients received a Hp-first. The patients in the Hp-first group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001) and blood transfusion (P < 0.001), a lower incidence of postoperative hyperbilirubinemia (p = 0.023), a lower incidence of liver failure (p = 0.038), a lower hospital death rate (p = 0.042), and a better 2-year disease-free survival rate (p = 0.010) than those in the cHx group.

CONCLUSIONS

The liver parenchyma transection-first approach is the preferred technique for hemiHx-tc in hilar cholangiocarcinoma because it resulted in improved surgical outcomes as compared with the conventional approach.

Over 700 Whipples for Pancreaticobiliary Malignancies: Postoperative Morbidity Is an Additional Negative Prognostic Factor for Distal Bile Duct Cancer

BACKGROUND

Distal cholangiocarcinomas and pancreatic cancers both arise from pancreaticobiliary epithelium. Despite their common origin, there is a possible discrepancy in outcome. We analysed the surgical, pathological and survival outcome of resected distal cholangiocarcinoma compared with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

All cases of resected distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer from 1998 to 2014 were extracted from our database. Outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

There were 54 (7.6%) cases of cholangiocarcinoma and 656 (92.4%) pancreatic cancer. Cholangiocarcinoma showed lower T and N stage, lymphatic and perineural invasion (p < 0.05), worse surgical outcome (p < 0.05) and less access to adjuvant therapy if compared with pancreatic cancer (72.7 vs. 83.1%, p = 0.05). Both showed a similar disease-specific survival (35 vs. 29 months, p = 0.3). Independent predictors of prognosis for pancreatic cancer were resection margin, grading, perineural invasion, T and N status, whereas for cholangiocarcinoma were grading and occurrence of POPF.

CONCLUSION

Considering a large cohort of resected periampullary cancers, cholangiocarcinoma is extremely rare. An earlier diagnosis is associated with better pathological predictors of outcome but increased postoperative morbidity compared to pancreatic cancer, particularly POPF. Consequent decrease in the access to adjuvant therapy for complicated cholangiocarcinoma might explain why survival is as poor as for pancreatic cancer.

Proposal for a new T-stage classification system for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a 10-institution study from the U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium

BACKGROUND

Seventh AJCC distal cholangiocarcinoma T-stage classification inadequately separates patients by survival. This retrospective study aimed to define a novel T-stage system to better stratify patients after resection.

METHODS

Curative-intent pancreaticoduodenectomies for distal cholangiocarcinoma (1/2000-5/2015) at 10 US institutions were included. Relationships between tumor characteristics and overall survival (OS) were assessed and incorporated into a novel T-stage classification.

RESULTS

176 patients (median follow-up: 24mo) were included. Current AJCC T-stage was not associated with OS (T1: 23mo, T2: 20mo, T3: 25mo, T4: 12mo; p = 0.355). Tumor size ≥3 cm and presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were associated with decreased OS on univariate and multivariable analyses. Patients were stratified into 3 groups [T1: size <3 cm and (-)LVI (n = 69; 39.2%); T2: size ≥3 cm and (-)LVI or size <3 cm and (+)LVI (n = 82; 46.6%); and T3: size ≥3 cm and (+)LVI (n = 25; 14.2%)]. Each progressive proposed T-stage was associated with decreased median OS (T1: 35mo; T2: 20mo; T3: 8mo; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Current AJCC distal cholangiocarcinoma T-stage does not adequately stratify patients by survival. This proposed T-stage classification, based on tumor size and LVI, better differentiates patient outcomes after resection and could be considered for incorporation into the next AJCC distal cholangiocarcinoma staging system.

Long-Term Outcome of Distal Cholangiocarcinoma after Pancreaticoduodenectomy Followed by Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A 15-Year Experience in a Single Institution

Purpose

This study was conducted to evaluate the long-term outcome in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) in a high-volume center and to identify the prognostic impact of clinicopathologic factors.

Materials and Methods

A total of 132 consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria were retrieved from the institutional database from January 1995 to September 2009. All patients received adjuvant treatments at a median of 45 days after the surgery. Median follow-up duration was 57 months (range, 6 to 225 months) for all patients and 105 months for survivors (range, 13 to 225 months).

Results

The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 70.7%, 55.7%, 49.4%, and 48.1%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed poorly differentiated (P/D) tumors and lymph node (LN) metastasis were significantly associated with DMFS and OS. Additionally, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level was significantly correlated with DFS, LRRFS, and DMFS. Upon multivariate analysis for OS, P/D tumors (p=0.015) and LN metastasis (p=0.003) were significant prognosticators that predicted inferior OS. Grade 3 or higher late gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in only one patient (0.8%).

Conclusion

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after PD for DCC is an effective and tolerable strategy without significant side effects. During long-term follow-up, we found that prognosis of DCC was mainly influenced by histologic differentiation and LN metastasis. For patients with these risk factors, further research should focus on improving adjuvant strategies as well as other treatment approaches.

Improving pancreas surgery over time: Performance factors related to transition of care and patient volume

BACKGROUND

Pancreas surgery has evolved with better diagnostic imaging, changing indications, and improved patient selection. Outside high-volume tertiary centers, the documented effect of evolution in care and volumes are limited. Thus, we aimed to review indications and outcomes in pancreas surgery during the transition from community-based hospital to a university hospital.

METHODS

All pancreatic surgeries performed between 1986 and 2012 within a well-defined Norwegian population were identified from the hospital's database. Indications and postoperative outcomes, including mortality, were investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 219 included patients (54% males; median age, 64 years), 150 (69%) underwent pancreatoduodenectomy; 55 (25%), distal resection; and 5 (2%), enucleation. The annual number of operations increased during the study period (from <10/yr to >20/yr). Most patients (169; 77%) underwent surgery for suspected malignancy. The 30-day mortality decreased significantly over time among patients treated for pancreatic cancer (from 16.1% to 3.5%; p = 0.012). Over time, significant reductions in median hospitalization time (19 versus 12 days; p < 0.001), re-operation rate (37.1% versus 8.4%; p < 0.001), and median ICU stay (3 versus 0 days; p < 0.001) were observed.

CONCLUSION

The transition to university hospital and increase in volume has led to significant improvements in several performance metrics and reduced postoperative mortality. We believe improved perioperative management and focused, multidisciplinary care-bundles to be of importance.