Saphenous vein conduits for hepatic arterial reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation

National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

A consensus meeting of national experts from all major national hepatobiliary centres in the country was held on May 26, 2023, at the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre (PKLI & RC) after initial consultations with the experts. The Pakistan Society for the Study of Liver Diseases (PSSLD) and PKLI & RC jointly organised this meeting. This effort was based on a comprehensive literature review to establish national practice guidelines for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA). The consensus was that hCCA is a complex disease and requires a multidisciplinary team approach to best manage these patients. This coordinated effort can minimise delays and give patients a chance for curative treatment and effective palliation. The diagnostic and staging workup includes high-quality computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Brush cytology or biopsy utilizing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a mainstay for diagnosis. However, histopathologic confirmation is not always required before resection. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration of regional lymph nodes and positron emission tomography scan are valuable adjuncts for staging. The only curative treatment is the surgical resection of the biliary tree based on the Bismuth-Corlette classification. Selected patients with unresectable hCCA can be considered for liver transplantation. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to patients with a high risk of recurrence. The use of preoperative biliary drainage and the need for portal vein embolisation should be based on local multidisciplinary discussions. Patients with acute cholangitis can be drained with endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage. Palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine has shown improved survival in patients with irresectable and recurrent hCCA.

Liver transplantation with interposition saphenous vein conduits for arterial reconstruction: Impact of morbidity and arterial ischemia time

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of liver transplantation with hepatic arterial reconstruction using interposition saphenous vein conduits are not widely reported. Here, we share our experience using great saphenous vein conduits for hepatic arterial reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (n = 950). The saphenous vein conduits were used in 39 patients. We compared hepatic artery thrombosis, graft dysfunction, and 30-day and 1-year survival in the early (2012-2017) and late (2017-2020) transplant periods.

RESULTS

Among 39 patients (of whom 30 [76.9%] were males, median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease was 24 [interquartile range, 17-27], median age was 50 [interquartile range, 43-54]), saphenous vein conduits were placed on supra celiac aorta in 7 (17.9%), infrarenal aorta in 25 (64.1%), and other arteries in 7 (17.9%) patients. The number of biliary and hepatic vein anastomoses, total arterial ischemia time, portal vein-hepatic artery reperfusion time, and duration of surgery was different in the 2 groups (P < .05). The 30-day mortality was 5/21 (23.8%) and 0 in the early and late periods (P = .05). The 30-day survival was >90% in patients with portal vein-hepatic artery reperfusion time <240 minutes, ≤2 grade 3 complications, no graft dysfunction, and later period of transplantation (P < .05). The 1-year survival with standard transplantation, transplantation with saphenous vein conduits in the early and late period was 87%, 62%, and 89% (P = .022).

CONCLUSION

Liver transplantation with saphenous vein conduits is associated with acceptable outcomes. Major complications and arterial ischemia times are major determinants of outcomes.

Surgical Outcomes of Domino Liver Transplantation Using Grafts From Living Donors With Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy

Domino liver transplantation (DLT) using grafts from donors with familial amyloid polyneuropathy is an acceptable procedure for expanding the donor pool. The vascular and biliary reconstructions in living donor DLT (LDDLT) are technically demanding, and data on the short-term and long-term surgical outcomes of domino donors and recipients in LDDLT are limited. In this study, we identified 25 domino recipients from our liver transplantation program (1999-2018), analyzed the vascular and biliary reconstructions performed, and evaluated the surgical outcomes, including graft survival. Piggyback technique was adopted in all 25 domino donors. The only surgical complication in domino donors was hepatic vein (HV) stenosis with an incidence rate of 4%. In 22 domino recipients, right HV and middle/left HV were reconstructed separately. A total of 10 recipients had 2 arteries anastomosed, and 18 underwent duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis. HV stenosis and biliary stricture had incidence rates of 8% and 24%, respectively, in the recipients, but none of them developed hepatic artery thrombosis. The 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates were 100% each in the domino donors, and 84.0% and 67.3% in the domino recipients, respectively. In conclusion, LDDLT has acceptable outcomes without increasing the operative risk in donors despite the demanding surgical technique involved.

Salvage aorto-hepatic jump graft for hepatic artery thrombosis following living donor liver transplantation: a case report with 10-year follow-up

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a lethal complication. We present the case of a patient who underwent salvage redo hepatic artery reconstruction using an aorto-hepatic jump graft because of HAT following LDLT. A 64-year-old female patient diagnosed with hepatitis C virus-associated liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma underwent salvage LDLT using a modified right liver graft. Partial graft infarct was identified at posttransplant day 4, and by day 9, it had spread. Celiac arteriography showed complete occlusion of the graft hepatic artery. We performed redo hepatic artery reconstruction using a fresh iliofemoral artery homograft 10 days after the LDLT operation because such a vessel homograft was available at our institutional tissue bank. The infrarenal aorta was dissected and an iliofemoral artery graft was anastomosed. Soon after hepatic artery revascularization, liver function progressively improved, and the infarct area at the liver graft was reduced. The patient has been doing well for 10 years without any vascular complications. In conclusion, our experience with this case suggests that salvage redo hepatic artery reconstruction using an aorto-hepatic jump graft is a feasible option to treat HAT following LDLT, as in deceased donor liver transplantation.

Hepatic artery reconstruction using interposition of autologous saphenous vein conduit for living donor liver transplantation: a case report

We have preferentially used the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) as an alternative for the recipient hepatic artery (HA) inflow during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), but it was not always available. We herein present a case of adult LDLT with HA reconstruction using a greater saphenous vein (GSV) conduit because of the absence of the RGEA due to prior subtotal gastrectomy. A 55-year-old male patient diagnosed with hepatitis B virus-associated liver cirrhosis and secondary biliary cirrhosis underwent LDLT using a modified right liver graft. The upper abdominal cavity was heavily adhered due to prior abdominal surgeries, thus we had to sacrifice the common bile duct and the right HA completely. A 6-cm-long GSV segment was harvested from the left ankle and interposed between the recipient gastroduodenal artery and the graft HA. The patient recovered from LDLT and HA complications did not occur. However, 8 years after LDLT, chronic rejection occurred, thus repeated deceased donor liver transplantation was performed. This patient has been doing well for 2 years after retransplantation. In conclusion, we suggest that interposition of an autologous GSV conduit can be an alternative for establishing HA inflow in LDLT when other inflow source is not available.

Addressing the challenges of split liver transplantation through technical advances. A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Split liver transplantation addresses donor shortages by facilitating the transplant of two recipients using one donor liver. Some still consider these grafts inferior due to prolonged cold ischaemia time and at times difficult vascular reconstruction. Techniques such as in-situ splitting, machine perfusion and interposition grafts may address these challenges and thereby address these concerns. The aim of this review is to assess these technical advances in split liver transplantation, their utility and outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Keywords included 'split liver transplantation', 'arterial reconstruction', and 'machine perfusion'. Data found was synthesised into sections including: methods of splitting, full-left full-right splitting, donor cholangiography, machine perfusion and arterial reconstruction.

RESULTS

A total of 78 articles met inclusion criteria after screening of 151 eligible articles. These were subdivided into the following categories: in-situ (25), ex-vivo (25), full-left full-right splitting (15), donor cholangiography (2), machine perfusion (6), and arterial reconstruction (5). The in-situ splitting technique reduces the cold ischaemia time compared to the ex-vivo technique which may improve graft quality and liver splitting during normothermic machine perfusion is a novel technique with the potential to incorporate the best aspects of both techniques. Interposition grafts are often required during split liver transplantation but have an increased risk of hepatic artery thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

Advancements in technique have allowed many of the unique challenges of split liver transplantation to be overcome. Overall, this supports the use of split liver transplantation in broader and riskier settings and we advocate for liver transplant surgeons to not hesitate in using these grafts liberally and expanding their recipient selection criteria.