Predictors of overall survival following extended radical resections for locally advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancies

Oncologic outcomes of surgically managed primary pelvic soft tissue sarcoma; tumour biology or surgical constraints of the true pelvis?

BACKGROUND

Pelvic soft tissue sarcomas are rare. Potentially curative resection remains challenging due to anatomical constraints of true pelvis and tumour spread through various anatomical hiatus. We sought to review the oncological outcomes of surgically managed cases at our centre and determine whether outcomes differ for patients with localised (limited to pelvis) versus extensive disease (with extra-pelvic extension).

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients who underwent surgical resection with curative intent at the centre for primary, non-metastatic, WHO intermediate to high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the true pelvis from January 2012 through January 2020 were analysed. Establishment of the extent of disease was made by review of pre-treatment imaging and surgical notes. Oncologic endpoints examined were resection margin, recurrence rate, disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

Rates of complete oncological resection and disease control were similar for tumours with localised or extensive disease. On logistic regression analysis, tumour grade, and a negative resection margin (R0) correlated with the risk of recurrence (p=<0.05). On further multinomial analysis, R0 resection was associated with improved local control, but not metastatic relapse (p = 0.003). 5-year local recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival were 61.3% and 67.1%, respectively. Five and 10-year overall survival were 64% and 36%, respectively. Age >50 years and high tumour grade were associated with a worse outcome (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

When potentially curative surgery is performed for pelvic sarcoma, disease-extent does not influence oncologic outcomes. While a complete oncologic resection determines the risk of local recurrence, tumour grade and metastatic relapse remain primary prognostic determinants for overall survival.

Preoperative assessment and optimisation for pelvic exenteration in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer: A review

The pre-operative phase in planning a pelvic exenteration or extended resections is critical to optimising patient outcomes. This review summarises the key components of preoperative assessment and planning in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LLRC) being considered for potential curative resection. The preoperative period can be considered in 5 key phases: 1) Multidisciplinary meeting (MDT) review and recommendation for neoadjuvant therapy and surgery, 2) Anaesthetic preoperative assessment of fitness for surgery and quantification of risk, 3) Shared decision making with the patient and the process of informed consent, 4) Prehabilitation and physiological optimisation 5) Technical aspects of surgical planning. This review will focus on patients who have been recommended for surgery by the MDT and have completed neoadjuvant therapy. Other important considerations beyond the scope of this review are the various neoadjuvant strategies employed which in this patient group include Total Neo-adjuvant Therapy and reirradiation. Critical to improving perioperative outcomes is the dual aim of achieving a negative resection margin in a patient fit enough for extended surgery. Advanced, realistic communication is required pre-operatively and should be maintained throughout recovery. Optimising patient's physiological and psychological reserve with a preoperative prehabilitation programme is important, with physiotherapy, psychological and nutritional input. From a surgical perspective, image based technical preoperative planning is important to identify risk points and ensure correct surgical strategy. Careful attention to the entire patient journey through these 5 preoperative phases can optimise outcomes with the accumulation of marginal gains at multiple timepoints.

Survival in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Associated with Cardiovascular Comorbidities and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Ovarian carcinoma (OC) is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage, necessitating a multimodal approach that includes surgery and systemic therapy. The incidence of OC is approximately five times higher in women over 65 years of age. Cardiovascular comorbidities and type 2 diabetes mellitus, both prevalent at this age, can influence therapeutic strategy and have an adverse effect on survival. Objectives: Our study aimed to determine the impact of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus on survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Materials and methods: From 2004 to 2012, we retrospectively studied 104 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (FIGO stage II–IV) who underwent surgical treatment at the Gynecology Clinic, St. Anna University Hospital, Varna, Bulgaria. Patients were followed for an average of 90 (52–129) months. We divided the study population into two groups: those with concurrent cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus (CVD) and those without these comorbidities (No-CVD group). Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between groups using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Cardiovascular comorbidities and diabetes mellitus were evaluated for their prognostic value for survival using multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis adjusted for age, stage of OC, grade and histological type of the tumor, ascites presence, residual tumor size (RT), performance status, and type of hysterectomy. Results: The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed reduced OS and DSS in the CVD group compared to the No-CVD group. The median OS was 24.5 months (95% CI 18.38 months) and 38 months (95% CI 26, not reached), respectively (Log-rank p = 0.045). The median DSS was 25.5 months (95% CI 19.39 months) and 48 months (95% CI 28, not reached), respectively (Log-rank p = 0.033). The Cox regression multivariate analysis established a lower (by 68%) overall survival rate for the CVD patient group than the No-CVD group, approaching statistical significance (HR 1.68, 95% CI 0.99, 2.86, p = 0.055). Cardiovascular diseases and diabetes were associated with a 79% reduction in DSS (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.02, 3.13, p = 0.041) and a twofold increase in the risk of disease progression (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.25, 3.37, p = 0.005). Conclusions: According to our study, cardiovascular comorbidities and diabetes may adversely affect OC survival. Optimal control of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, and their risk factors may be beneficial for patients with advanced OC. Further research involving a larger patient population is necessary to establish these comorbidities as independent prognostic factors.

Pelvic exenteration, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal surface malignancy: experience and outcomes from an exenterative and peritonectomy unit

PURPOSE

Pelvic exenteration (PE) for locally advanced pelvic malignancy is well established, though high rates of morbidity and mortality exist. Such a complication profile has often deterred the surgical community from offering exenteration in combination with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). We aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes following pelvic exenteration when combined with CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) in a tertiary referral centre.

METHODS

A review of a prospectively maintained PSM database from June 2015 to December 2020 at a tertiary referral institution was performed. Patients who underwent CRS, PE, and HIPEC were matched with patients who underwent PE alone. Primary endpoints were perioperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

From June 2015 to December 2020, 20 patients required PE as part of their CRS and HIPEC for PSM. The majority of patients were female (n = 16, 80%) with a median age of 52 (range 21-70). Colorectal cancer was the predominant pathology (n = 12, 60%). Median PCI was 11.5 (range 3-39). CC0 and R0 resections were achieved in all patients. CRS, PE, and HIPEC and PE-alone groups were well matched for clinicopathological variables. There was no difference in perioperative major morbidity (HIPEC: 30% vs PE: 15% p = 0.256) and mortality (HIPEC: 0 vs PE: 5% p = 0.311) between groups. Median follow-up was 17.5 months (range 7-68). Eight patients (40%) died from disease-related issues during the study period.

CONCLUSION

An aggressive surgical strategy with complete resection is feasible and safe in select patients with complex PSM involving the pelvis.