How-we-do-it: the repair of postoperative ventral hernias after a Mercedes abdominal incision

Delphi consensus statement for understanding and managing the subcostal hernia: subcostal hernias collaborative report (scholar study)

INTRODUCTION

Subcostal hernias are categorized as L1 based on the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification and frequently involve M1, M2, and L2 sites. These are common after hepatopancreatic and biliary surgeries. The literature on subcostal hernias mostly comprises of retrospective reviews of small heterogenous cohorts, unsurprisingly leading to no consensus or guidelines. Given the limited literature and lack of consensus or guidelines for dealing with these hernias, we planned for a Delphi consensus to aid in decision making to repair subcostal hernias.

METHODS

We adopted a modified Delphi technique to establish consensus regarding the definition, characteristics, and surgical aspects of managing subcostal hernias (SCH). It was a four-phase Delphi study reflecting the widely accepted model, consisting of: 1. Creating a query. 2. Building an expert panel. 3. Executing the Delphi rounds. 4. Analysing, presenting, and reporting the Delphi results. More than 70% of agreement was defined as a consensus statement.

RESULTS

The 22 experts who agreed to participate in this Delphi process for Subcostal Hernias (SCH) comprised 7 UK surgeons, 6 mainland European surgeons, 4 Indians, 3 from the USA, and 2 from Southeast Asia. This Delphi study on subcostal hernias achieved consensus on the following areas-use of mesh in elective cases; the retromuscular position with strong discouragement for onlay mesh; use of macroporous medium-weight polypropylene mesh; use of the subcostal incision over midline incision if there is no previous midline incision; TAR over ACST; defect closure where MAS is used; transverse suturing over vertical suturing for closure of circular defects; and use of peritoneal flap when necessary.

CONCLUSION

This Delphi consensus defines subcostal hernias and gives insight into the consensus for incision, dissection plane, mesh placement, mesh type, and mesh fixation for these hernias.

Outcomes of Ventral Hernia Repair After Orthotopic Liver Transplant Using Component Separation and Onlay Biologic Mesh

INTRODUCTION

The management of ventral hernias (VHs) after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) can be uniquely challenging because of immunosuppression coupled with large laparotomy size that can compromise the quality of the abdominal wall. The component separation with multipoint suture onlay acellular dermis fixation technique has proven to be effective in high-risk abdominal wall reconstructions. The goal of this study was to elucidate the factors that affect safety and efficacy of VH repair in post-OLT patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 345 patients who underwent repair of VH with compartment separation and onlay acellular dermal matrix reinforcement from a single surgeon from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. Of these, 27 patients were identified with a history of OLT and were stratified based on whether the defect was a initial or recurrent hernia repair. The majority of patients had a standard chevron incision (70%). Data abstraction was performed for preoperative risk factors, hernia characteristics, surgical site complications, and postoperative course including hernia recurrence.

RESULTS

A majority of cases in the study period were initial hernia repairs (59%) with no significant differences in the patient demographics and size of VH defects (190 ± 112.69 cm 2 ). Comorbidities were similar between the groups with the exception of a significantly higher baseline creatinine levels and higher history of smoking in the recurrent hernia repair group ( P < 0.05). Of the 27 cases, there were no demonstrable hernia recurrences noted and an overall 11% complication rate. Univariate analysis noted a statistically significant difference in surgical site complication rate ( P = 0.017), with the initial hernia repair group having the lowest rate of surgical site complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In complex post-OLT patients with large VH, modified component separation with onlay acellular mesh was shown to have acceptable medium-term results. Further studies investigating the factors leading to postoperative complications are necessary to reduce recurrence in this evolving patient population.