Intra-operative nerve monitoring and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroid surgery: a network meta-analysis of prospective studies

Does the Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery Reduce the Incidence of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) can be a devastating complication of thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been proposed as a method to reduce the number of RLN injuries but the data are inconsistent. We performed a meta-analysis to critically assess the data. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 60 studies, including five randomized trials and eight non-randomized prospective trials, were included. A meta-analysis of all studies demonstrated an odds ratio (OR) of 0.66 (95% CI [0.56, 0.79], p < 0.00001) favoring IONM compared to the visual identification of the RLN in limiting permanent RLN injuries. A meta-analysis of studies employing contemporaneous controls and routine postoperative laryngoscopy to diagnose RLN injuries (considered to be the most reliable design) demonstrated an OR of 0.69 (95% CI [0.56, 0.84], p = 0.0003), favoring IONM. Strong consideration should be given to employing IONM when performing thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Recurrent laryngeal never monitoring versus non-monitoring in parathyroid surgery

Background

Although intraoperative neural monitoring (IONM) is well established in thyroid surgery, it is less commonly analyzed in parathyroid operations. This study presents the results of IONM for primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed 270 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), 53 patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), and 300 patients with thyroid cancer from June 2010 to June 2022 in one hospital in China. The follow-up was 12 months. Demographic, electromyography data from IONM, laboratory, and clinical information were collected. Laryngoscopy was collected from 109 patients with PHPT in whom IONM was not used. All groups were assessed by Pearson's chi-square test and Fisher's exact probability method to verify the relationship between parathyroid size and location, duration of surgery, preoperative concordant localization, laryngeal pain, IONM outcomes, cure rate, and RLN injury. Visual analog scale (VAS) assessed laryngeal pain. RLN outcomes were measured according to nerves at risk (NAR).

Results

The study comprehended 918 NAR, that is 272, 105, 109, and 432 NAR for PHPT, SHPT with IONM, PHPT without IONM, and thyroid surgery control group, respectively. IONM successfully prevented RLN injury (P<0.001, P=0.012): Fifteen (5.51%) RLNs experienced altered nerve EMG profiles during surgery, and five (1.84%) experienced transient RLN injury in PHPT patients. Five (4.76%) RLNs were found to have altered EMG profiles during surgery, and one (0.95%) RLN had a transient RLN injury in SHPT patients. There was no permanent nerve injury (0.00%) in this series. There was no association between location, gland size, preoperative concordant localization, cure rate, duration of surgery, and IONM (P >0.05). Duration of surgery was associated with postoperative pharyngeal discomfort (P=0.026, P=0.024). Transient RLN injury was significantly lower in patients with PHPT who underwent IONM than in those who did not. Intraoperative neuromonitoring played an effective role in protecting the recurrent laryngeal nerve (P=0.035). Compared with parathyroidectomy, thyroidectomy had a higher rate of RLN injury (5.32%, P<0.001).

Conclusion

IONM for SHPT and PHPT offers rapid anatomical gland identification and RLN functional results for effective RLN protection and reduced RLN damage rates.

Parathyroid carcinoma: Current management and outcomes – A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Parathyroid carcinoma is rarely encountered in clinical practice. When faced with this clinical challenge, there is currently a paucity of evidence available for the optimal management of patients with parathyroid carcinoma. This systematic review synthesizes the available literature to evaluate the optimal management approach, thus providing guidance for future management.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases for studies, published in English, reporting on parathyroid carcinoma. Full text of potentially eligible articles were reviewed by two authors independently and eligible studies selected. Treatment options and associated outcomes were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to describe pooled patient cohorts.

RESULTS

3203 articles were initially identified using the search criteria with 59 full-text articles then screened for eligibility. Seven articles, all retrospective studies, concerning 2307 patients (median 224/study). Parathyroidectomy alone was the most frequently utilised surgical approach across all studies, followed by en-bloc resection (with adjacent thyroid and/or nodal tissue). There was no difference in post-operative morbidity, mortality or survival between surgical approaches (p < 0.005). Patients who underwent either form of surgery had longer overall survival than those managed non-operatively (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection is the optimal treatment of parathyroid carcinoma. However there remains no consensus on the optimal extent of surgery, and as such future randomised prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the effects of different surgical approaches on morbidity, mortality and oncologic outcomes. Following resection, long-term surveillance with PTH is advised.