TDIF peptides regulate root growth by affecting auxin homeostasis and PINs expression in Arabidopsis thaliana

Research Progress of Small Plant Peptides on the Regulation of Plant Growth, Development, and Abiotic Stress

Small peptides in plants are typically characterized as being shorter than 120 amino acids, with their biologically active variants comprising fewer than 20 amino acids. These peptides are instrumental in regulating plant growth, development, and physiological processes, even at minimal concentrations. They play a critical role in long-distance signal transduction within plants and act as primary responders to a range of stress conditions, including salinity, alkalinity, drought, high temperatures, and cold. This review highlights the crucial roles of various small peptides in plant growth and development, plant resistance to abiotic stress, and their involvement in long-distance transport. Furthermore, it elaborates their roles in the regulation of plant hormone biosynthesis. Special emphasis is given to the functions and mechanisms of small peptides in plants responding to abiotic stress conditions, aiming to provide valuable insights for researchers working on the comprehensive study and practical application of small peptides.

Peptides from conserved tandem direct repeats of SHORT-LEAF regulate gametophore development in moss P. patens

Tandem direct repeat (TDR)-containing proteins, present across all domains of life, play crucial roles in plant development and defense mechanisms. Previously, we identified that disruption of a bryophyte-specific protein family, SHORT-LEAF (SHLF), possessing the longest reported TDRs, is the cause of the shlf mutant phenotype in Physcomitrium patens. shlf exhibits reduced apical dominance, altered auxin distribution, and 2-fold shorter leaves. However, the molecular role of SHLF was unclear due to the absence of known conserved domains. Through a series of protein domain deletion analyses, here, we demonstrate the importance of the signal peptide and the conserved TDRs and report a minimal functional protein (miniSHLF) containing the N-terminal signal peptide and first two TDRs (N-TDR1-2). We also demonstrate that SHLF behaves as a secretory protein and that the TDRs contribute to a pool of secreted peptides essential for SHLF function. Further, we identified that the mutant secretome lacks SHLF peptides, which are abundant in WT and miniSHLF secretomes. Interestingly, shlf mutants supplemented with the secretome or peptidome from WT or miniSHLF showed complete or partial phenotypic recovery. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses revealed that shlf displays an elevated stress response, including high ROS activity and differential accumulation of genes and metabolites involved in the phenylpropanoid pathway, which may affect auxin distribution. The TDR-specific synthetic peptide SHLFpep3 (INIINAPLQGFKIA) also rescued the mutant phenotypes, including the altered auxin distribution, in a dosage-dependent manner and restored the mutant's stress levels. Our study shows that secretory SHLF peptides derived from conserved TDRs regulate moss gametophore development.

Spatial range, temporal span, and promiscuity of CLE-RLK signaling

CLAVATA3/EMBRYO SURROUNDING REGION-RELATED (CLE) signaling through receptor-like kinases (RLKs) regulates developmental transitions and responses to biotic and abiotic inputs by communicating the physiological state of cells and tissues. CLE peptides have varying signaling ranges, which can be defined as the distance between the source, i.e., the cells or tissue that secrete the peptide, and their destination, i.e., cells or tissue where the RLKs that bind the peptide and/or respond are expressed. Case-by-case analysis substantiates that CLE signaling is predominantly autocrine or paracrine, and rarely endocrine. Furthermore, upon CLE reception, the ensuing signaling responses extend from cellular to tissue, organ and whole organism level as the downstream signal gets amplified. CLE-RLK-mediated effects on tissue proliferation and differentiation, or on subsequent primordia and organ development have been widely studied. However, studying how CLE-RLK regulates different stages of proliferation and differentiation at cellular level can offer additional insights into these processes. Notably, CLE-RLK signaling also mediates diverse non-developmental effects, which are less often observed; however, this could be due to biased experimental approaches. In general, CLEs and RLKs, owing to the sequence or structural similarity, are prone to promiscuous interactions at least under experimental conditions in which they are studied. Importantly, there are regulatory mechanisms that suppress CLE-RLK cross-talk in vivo, thereby eliminating the pressure for co-evolving binding specificity. Alternatively, promiscuity in signaling may also offer evolutionary advantages and enable different CLEs to work in combination to activate or switch off different RLK signaling pathways.