Revisiting regulatory roles of replication protein A in plant DNA metabolism

The Intriguing Mystery of RPA Phosphorylation in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

Human Replication Protein A (RPA) was historically discovered as one of the six components needed to reconstitute simian virus 40 DNA replication from purified components. RPA is now known to be involved in all DNA metabolism pathways that involve single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Heterotrimeric RPA comprises several domains connected by flexible linkers and is heavily regulated by post-translational modifications (PTMs). The structure of RPA has been challenging to obtain. Various structural methods have been applied, but a complete understanding of RPA's flexible structure, its function, and how it is regulated by PTMs has yet to be obtained. This review will summarize recent literature concerning how RPA is phosphorylated in the cell cycle, the structural analysis of RPA, DNA and protein interactions involving RPA, and how PTMs regulate RPA activity and complex formation in double-strand break repair. There are many holes in our understanding of this research area. We will conclude with perspectives for future research on how RPA PTMs control double-strand break repair in the cell cycle.

Fine mapping of the reduced height gene Rht22 in tetraploid wheat landrace Jianyangailanmai (Triticum turgidum L.)

Rht22 was fine mapped in the interval of 0.53-1.48 Mb on 7AS, which reduces cell number of internode to cause semi-dwarfism in Jianyangailanmai. As a valuable germplasm resource for wheat genetic improvement, tetraploid wheat has several reduced height (Rht) and enhanced harvest index genes. Rht22, discovered in Jianyangailanmai (JAM, Triticum turgidum L., 2n = 4x = 28, AABB), significantly increases the spikelet number per spike, but its accurate chromosomal position is still unknown. In this study, a high-density genetic map was constructed using specific-length amplified fragment sequencing in an F₇ RIL_DJ population, which was derived from a cross between dwarf Polish wheat (T. polonicum L., 2n = 4x = 28, AABB) and JAM. Two plant height loci, Qph.sicau-4B and Qph.sicau-7A, were mapped on chromosomes 4BS and 7AS, respectively. Qph.sicau-7A was mapped to the 0.33-4.46 Mb interval on 7AS and likely represents the candidate region of Rht22. Fine mapping confirmed and narrowed Rht22 on chromosome arm 7AS between Xbag295.s53 and Xb295.191 in three different populations. The physical region ranged from 0.53 to 1.48 Mb and included 18 candidate genes. Transcriptome analysis of two pairs of near-isogenic lines revealed that 135 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were associated with semi-dwarfism. Of these, the expression of 83 annotated DEGs involved in hormones synthesis and signal transduction, cell wall composition, DNA replication, microtubule and phragmoplast arrays was significantly down-regulated in the semi-dwarf line. Therefore, Rht22 causes semi-dwarfism in JAM by disrupting these cellular processes, which impairs cell proliferation and reduces internode cell number.

Physiologic Targets and Modes of Action for CBL0137, a Lead for Human African Trypanosomiasis Drug Development

CBL0137 is a lead drug for human African trypanosomiasis, caused by Trypanosoma brucei Herein, we use a four-step strategy to 1) identify physiologic targets and 2) determine modes of molecular action of CBL0137 in the trypanosome. First, we identified fourteen CBL0137-binding proteins using affinity chromatography. Second, we developed hypotheses of molecular modes of action, using predicted functions of CBL0137-binding proteins as guides. Third, we documented effects of CBL0137 on molecular pathways in the trypanosome. Fourth, we identified physiologic targets of the drug by knocking down genes encoding CBL0137-binding proteins and comparing their molecular effects to those obtained when trypanosomes were treated with CBL0137. CBL0137-binding proteins included glycolysis enzymes (aldolase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, phosphofructokinase, phosphoglycerate kinase) and DNA-binding proteins [universal minicircle sequence binding protein 2, replication protein A1 (RPA1), replication protein A2 (RPA2)]. In chemical biology studies, CBL0137 did not reduce ATP level in the trypanosome, ruling out glycolysis enzymes as crucial targets for the drug. Thus, many CBL0137-binding proteins are not physiologic targets of the drug. CBL0137 inhibited 1) nucleus mitosis, 2) nuclear DNA replication, and 3) polypeptide synthesis as the first carbazole inhibitor of eukaryote translation. RNA interference (RNAi) against RPA1 inhibited both DNA synthesis and mitosis, whereas RPA2 knockdown inhibited mitosis, consistent with both proteins being physiologic targets of CBL0137. Principles used here to distinguish drug-binding proteins from physiologic targets of CBL0137 can be deployed with different drugs in other biologic systems. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: To distinguish drug-binding proteins from physiologic targets in the African trypanosome, we devised and executed a multidisciplinary approach involving biochemical, genetic, cell, and chemical biology experiments. The strategy we employed can be used for drugs in other biological systems.

Cell cycle checkpoint control in response to DNA damage by environmental stresses

Being sessile organisms, plants are ubiquitously exposed to stresses that can affect the DNA replication process or cause DNA damage. To cope with these problems, plants utilize DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, consisting of both highly conserved and plant-specific elements. As a part of this DDR, cell cycle checkpoint control mechanisms either pause the cell cycle, to allow DNA repair, or lead cells into differentiation or programmed cell death, to prevent the transmission of DNA errors in the organism through mitosis or to its offspring via meiosis. The two major DDR cell cycle checkpoints control either the replication process or the G2/M transition. The latter is largely overseen by the plant-specific SOG1 transcription factor, which drives the activity of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors and MYB3R proteins, which are rate limiting for the G2/M transition. By contrast, the replication checkpoint is controlled by different players, including the conserved kinase WEE1 and likely the transcriptional repressor RBR1. These checkpoint mechanisms are called upon during developmental processes, in retrograde signaling pathways, and in response to biotic and abiotic stresses, including metal toxicity, cold, salinity, and phosphate deficiency. Additionally, the recent expansion of research from Arabidopsis to other model plants has revealed species-specific aspects of the DDR. Overall, it is becoming evidently clear that the DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms represent an important aspect of the adaptation of plants to a changing environment, hence gaining more knowledge about this topic might be helpful to increase the resilience of plants to climate change.