Molecular profiles of gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors

The ENETS/WHO grading system for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a review of the current state, limitations and proposals for modifications

The understanding of neuroendocrine neoplasms has evolved significantly since their initial descriptions in the 1800s to early 1900s. In the gastroenteropancreatic system, this group of malignant tumors is subdivided into well and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms based on morphologic, proliferative and biologic differences. However, it has become increasingly apparent that well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors are not a homogeneous group. Attempting to better predict outcome of these tumors has been the motivation behind numerous proposed classification systems, the evolution of which culminated with the currently used system, the ENETS/WHO classification. Herein, we review the genesis of this classification system and some of its shortcomings. In addition, we discuss some of the most recent proposals that suggest modifications to the current system.

New insights into the role of chronic inflammation and cytokines in the etiopathogenesis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Although previously considered rare, recent epidemiological studies have revealed that the incidence (3.6/100,000) and prevalence (35/100,000) of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) has increased over the past few decades. Despite the progress in the understanding of GEP-NET molecular biology, there is still little advance in the early diagnosis due to lack of specific tumor markers. As the tumors are mostly detected in their late stage, they are not well controlled by either biotherapy or conventional chemotherapy, and thus represent a significant clinical issue. Chronic inflammation has been implicated in the development of GEP-NETs. This review presents recent findings that link pro-inflammatory cytokines to the molecular basis of GEP-NET tumorigenesis, leading to a more personalized approach to disease management and therapy.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comprehensive review

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors. Despite being relatively rare, representing just 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms, the incidence of pancreatic NET has increased over the past two decades. Although the primary treatment for localized NET is surgical resection, there is still a lack of effective therapeutic options for patients with advanced unresectable pancreatic NET. Recently, the targeted agents sunitinib malate (SUTENT®, Pfizer Inc, NYC) and everolimus (AFINITOR®, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland)-both with different mechanisms of action-received United States Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of progressive, well-differentiated, pancreatic NET in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic disease. SUTENT® also received approval for this indication by the European Commission in 2010. Our article presents an overview of pancreatic NET, with a focus on their diagnostic work-up, clinical presentation and treatment options. Topics for further investigation of targeted therapy are also discussed.

Pathology of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Update

Gastrointestinal (GI) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of relatively slow-growing neoplasms with marked site-specific differences in hormonal secretion and clinical behavior. Most are sporadic neoplasms, with only 5% to 10% arising in patients with hereditary disorders, most commonly in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Although a uniform terminology is not universally accepted, use of the 4-category WHO classification of these tumors is becoming more widespread, and recommendations for tumor grading and staging have been recently formulated. Most GI NETs are easily recognized on routine histologic examination; rarely, a limited panel of immunohistochemical markers may be useful in establishing the diagnosis. This article describes general and site-specific features of these tumors and outlines potential pitfalls in diagnosis.

Genetics and molecular pathology of neuroendocrine gastrointestinal and pancreatic tumors (gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) originate from cells of the diffuse endocrine system. Most GEP-NETs are sporadic, however, some of them, especially pancreatic endocrine tumors, may occur as part of familial syndromes. The genetic and molecular pathology of neuroendocrine tumor development is incomplete and remains largely unknown. However, the WHO classification introduced in clinical practice will give more insight into genetic and molecular changes related to tumor subtypes.

RECENT FINDINGS

In sporadic endocrine pancreatic tumors, losses of chromosome 1 and 11q as well as gain on 9q appear to be early invents in development of pancreatic tumors because they are already present in small tumors. Multiple genetic defects may accumulate with time and result in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor progression and malignancy. Gastrointestinal endocrine tumors (carcinoids) show predominantly genetic alterations concentrated on chromosome 18. There are losses of the entire chromosome as well as smaller deletions. The most frequently reported mutated gene in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors is b-catenin. Overexpression of cyclin D1 and cMyc has also been reported. Recently, a set of genes NAP1L1, MAGE-2D and MTA1 has been correlated with malignant behavior of small intestinal carcinoids.

SUMMARY

Molecular profiling of GEP-NETs demonstrates that pancreatic endocrine tumors and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoids) display different genetic changes and should, therefore, be considered to be different tumor entities; thereby, also differently managed clinically. Although the number of genetic changes is higher in malignant tumors, we are still far away from defining a malignant profile in GEP-NETs.

Loss of nuclear p27 expression and its prognostic role in relation to cyclin E and p53 mutation in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) are classified by the WHO, yet its prognostic value needs to be confirmed. Therefore, we aimed to determine the prognostic role of cell cycle key regulatory genes p53, p27kip1 (p27), and cyclin E in this tumor entity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tumor specimen from 89 patients with a complete follow-up were studied immunohistochemically for p27 and cyclin E expression and for p53 mutations. The functional relevance of p27 was evaluated in the neuroendocrine cell lines BON1 (human) and INS1 (rat) by the use of small interfering RNA.

RESULTS

Twenty-six of 29 benign, well-differentiated endocrine tumors (WHO class 1) showed a high expression (> 50%) of p27, whereas all 10 poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas (WHO class 3) displayed a low expression of p27. Metastatic well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas (WHO class 2) showed a low p27 expression in 20 of 50 (40%) patients, which conferred a poor prognosis (median survival, 57 versus 140 months; P = 0.037). This prognostic dichotomy was improved by the use of a combination of p27 and cyclin E (high cyclin E/low p27 versus low cyclin E/high p27: median survival 53 months versus not reached; P = 0.0044). p53 mutations were rare (1 of 10 poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas).

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of p27 and overexpression of cyclin E play a critical role in the aggressiveness of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This coincides with increased cell cycle progression. We propose a discussion whether to incorporate the immunohistochemical expression of p27 into a revised classification to individualize therapeutic strategies in this tumor entity.

An overview of practical issues in the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine pathology

CONTEXT

Although somewhat uncommon, neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas have come under scrutiny in recent times. With advances in imaging techniques, more of these tumors are being removed and sent for pathologic evaluation. It is important for the diagnostic pathologist to be aware of recent developments in this field.

OBJECTIVE

This overview focuses on nomenclature/terminology, classification, practical issues related to recent developments in immunohistochemical markers that aid diagnosis and may relate to prognosis, and molecular advances.

DATA SOURCES

Currently available literature and personal experience in the field of neuroendocrine pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

The preferred terminology is neuroendocrine/tumor/carcinoma and it is recommended that the World Health Organization classification be used, taking note of the site variations that may occur. A large number of immunohistochemical markers are available but a core panel that is relevant to the site should be used. Cytokeratin 19 positivity is an independent marker of aggressive behavior in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors arise via the CpG island methylator phenotype pathway, whereas their pancreatic counterparts arise as a result of chromosomal instability. The MEN1 gene is implicated in both syndromic and sporadic forms of these tumors.

Site-specific biology and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

The gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are composed of cells with a neuroendocrine phenotype. Well-differentiated tumors, well-differentiated carcinomas, poorly differentiated carcinomas, functioning tumors (with a hormonal syndrome), and nonfunctioning tumors are identified. To predict their clinical behavior, these neuroendocrine tumors are classified on the basis of their clinicopathological features, including size, local invasion, angioinvasion, proliferative activity, histological differentiation, and metastases, into neoplasms with benign, uncertain, low-grade malignant and high-grade malignant behavior. In addition, a tumor/nodes/metastases classification and a grading system are presented. In the light of these criteria, the various GEP-NET entities are reviewed.