Salivary type tumors seen in consultation

[Why is the histomorphological diagnosis of small salivary gland tumours so much more difficult?]

There is a widespread impression among clinicians and pathologists that the histomorphological diagnosis of minor salivary gland tumours is more difficult and more frequently misdiagnosed than that of major glands. This is based on subjective clinical impression; scientific proof of and potential reasons for this difference are lacking. We identified 14 putative clinical, histopathological and combined clinical-histological reasons and four consequences, which together could explain the perceived greater difficulty of diagnosing minor gland tumours. We performed a thorough literature search and a statistical comparison of data from a personal large consultation series (biased for "difficult" cases) with cumulated data from a routine, unselected (non-consultation) series from the literature. Through this comparison, we could prove with statistical significance a series of reasons and consequences for this greater diagnostic difficulty in minor glands. Frequent incisional biopsies, almost obligatory low-grade bland cytology in malignant tumours and insufficient clinical-pathological communication emerged as the most important reasons. The special anatomic location of the hard palate contributes to further diagnostic difficulties, such as tumour necrosis, mucosal ulceration, pseudoinvasion and the "tumoural-mucosal fusion" phenomenon. Knowledge of these pitfalls in clinic and pathology can help overcome these difficulties and reduce the misdiagnosis rate in minor gland tumours. Our findings result in a series of recommendations both for the clinic and pathology.

Identification of LMO2 as a new marker for acinic cell carcinoma of salivary gland

Background

The distinction between acinic cell carcinoma (ACC) and secretory carcinoma (SC) of the salivary gland is hampered by the lack of specific diagnostic markers. It is known the cytoplasm of glandular cells in the salivary gland immunohistochemically expresses LIM Domain Only 2 (LMO2). Herein, we aim to evaluate the expression status of LMO2 in a large cohort of tumors of the salivary gland, with an emphasis on its significance in the distinction of ACC and SC.

Methods

Immunohistochemical stains were performed to evaluate the expression of LMO2 in normal tissues and tumors of salivary gland.

Results

LMO2 was expressed in normal serous acinar cells of the salivary gland. We also found the cytoplasmic immunostaining of LMO2 was specific and sensitive for the recognition of ACCs including those with morphological overlaps with SCs, whereas the cytoplasmic expression of LMO2 was not detected in SCs.

Conclusions

LMO2 is useful for the recognition of ACC and is of potential value in distinguishing ACC from SC.

Primary acinic cell carcinoma of mandible, report of a case and literature review

Introduction and importance

Acinic cell carcinoma (ACC) is a rare low-grade salivary gland malignancy that accounts for approximately 17% of all salivary gland malignancies. The most common site affected by ACC is the parotid gland followed by the submandibular glands, minor salivary glands, and sublingual glands. Also, it could hardly be observed in unusual sites such as the jaw bones.

Case presentation

This case is an example of a central acinic cell carcinoma in a 73-year-old man who came up with a painless gradual swelling for 15 months. Based on clinico-radio-pathologic findings, the diagnosis of a solid variant Intraosseous Acinic Cell Carcinoma was established. Subsequently, the patient underwent hemimandibulectomy and modified radical neck dissection, followed by postoperative radiotherapy. Within a six-month follow-up period, no evidence of residual tumor was found.

Clinical discussion

Central salivary gland carcinoma is a rare entity and intraosseous ACC is more scarcely observed. Based on our findings, a total of 17 cases of primary intraosseous ACC have been reported so far. Etiology and clinical presentations of this tumor are still vague due to its rarity.

Conclusion

Dentists and oral surgeons must be aware of such a rare malignant lesion when encountering a radiolucent lesion within the jaws. The early diagnosis and a complete surgical excision to achieve tumor-free surgical margins and a long-term follow-up could result in significantly improved survival rates.

•

ACCs are a type of uncommon salivary gland tumors and the intra-osseous counterparts are extremely rare.

•

Due to clinical and radiologic similarities to benign tumors, histopathologic and IHC findings should also be considered.

•

Primary surgical design should be wide enough and en bloc resection should be suggested.

Why is the histomorphological diagnosis of tumours of minor salivary glands much more difficult?

AIMS

There is a widespread perception among clinicians and pathologists that the histomorphological assessment of minor salivary gland (MinSG) tumours is more difficult and hampered by more misdiagnoses than that of major salivary gland tumours. This is based on a vague, subjective clinical impression, lacking scientific proof. The aim of the present study was to identify and statistically verify potential reasons that could explain this difference.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 14 putative clinical, pathological and combined clinicopathological reasons that, altogether, could explain the phenomenon of the perceived greater diagnostic difficulty associated with MinSG tumours. We performed a comprehensive literature search and a statistical comparison of data from a large personal consultation series (biased for difficult cases) with cumulated data from straightforward, unselected (non-consultation) series from the literature. By performing this comparison, we identified, with statistical significance, a comprehensive series of reasons, as well as of consequences, of the greater difficulty in diagnosing MinSG tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the 14 criteria, high frequencies of initial incisional biopsies and of a low-grade category in malignant tumours emerged as the two most important reasons for enhanced diagnostic difficulty. Very rare entities, unusual locations, shortcomings in clinicopathological communication, and pecularities of the special anatomical location of the hard palate, such as tumour necrosis, mucosal ulceration, pseudoinvasion, and the peculiar phenomenon of 'tumoral-mucosal fusion', contribute to further diagnostic difficulties. The awareness of these shortcomings and pitfalls enables us to provide a series of recommendations for clinicians and pathologists that might aid in assessment and reduce the rate of misdiagnosis of MinSG tumours.

The HTN3-MSANTD3 Fusion Gene Defines a Subset of Acinic Cell Carcinoma of the Salivary Gland

The spectrum of tumors arising in the salivary glands is wide and has recently been shown to harbor a network of tumor-specific fusion genes. Acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) is one of the more frequently encountered types of salivary gland carcinoma, but it has remained a genetic orphan until recently when a fusion between the HTN3 and MSANTD3 genes was described in one case. Neither of these 2 genes is known to be implicated in any other malignancy. This study was undertaken to investigate whether the HTN3-MSANTD3 fusion is a recurrent genetic event in AciCC and whether it is a characteristic of one of its histological variants. Of the 273 AciCCs screened, 9 cases showed rearrangement of MSANTD3 by break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization, 2 had 1 to 2 extra signals, and 1 had gain, giving a total of 4.4% with MSANTD3 aberrations. In 6 of 7 available cases with MSANTD3 rearrangement, the HTN3-MSANTD3 fusion transcript was demonstrated with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Histologically, all fusion-positive cases were predominantly composed of serous tumor cells growing in solid sheets, with serous tumor cells expressing DOG-1 and the intercalated duct-like cell component being CK7 positive and S-100 positive in 6/9 cases. All but one case arose in the parotid gland, and none of the patients experienced a recurrence during follow-up. In contrast, the case with MSANTD3 gain metastasized to the cervical lymph nodes and lungs. In conclusion, we find the HTN3-MSANTD3 gene fusion to be a recurrent event in AciCC with prominent serous differentiation and an indolent clinical course.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and microvascular density in salivary gland tumours

This study investigates whether salivary tumours with different morphology and evolution also differ in terms of neovascularization and VEGF expression and the prognostic value of the results. Surgical specimens from 45 patients - 8 pleomorphic adenomas (PA), 7 Warthin tumours (WT), 5 basal cell adenomas (BA), 6 carcinomas ex-pleomorphic adenoma (CEPA), 6 mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MEC), 5 acinic cell carcinomas (AC), 4 adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACC) and 4 adenocarcinomas not otherwise specified (ADK NOS) - were immunostained. In malignant salivary tumours, the following mean microvascular density (MVD) values were recorded (± SD = Standard Deviation): 27.61 (SD ± 2.27) in cases with CEPA, 27.08 (DS ± 7.81) in AC and 32.93 (SD ± 7.76) in ADK NOS, with lower values for MEC 24.31(SD ± 2.88) and for ACC 22.13 (SD ± 5.44). For benign tumours, an MVD of 35.71 (SD ± 2.09) was recorded in WT and lower average values in PA (MVD = 14.84; SD ± 4.86) and in BA (MVD = 23.96; SD ± 9.13). MVD did not correlate with the investigated clinicopathological parameters. The VEGF expression is significantly more important (p = 0.001) in malignant salivary tumours as compared with benign ones. The VEGF expression and the microvascularization in salivary gland tumours are important elements to be considered when formulating a diagnosis and assessing case evolutions in patients with such tumours.

Clinicopathological characterization of mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary glands

AIMS

Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma (MASC) is a recently described tumour with ETV6 translocation. We aimed to characterize the clinical significance of recognizing MASC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with MASC (27 identified retrospectively and nine prospectively) are presented. Historically, MASC mimicked other salivary tumours, as follows: 14 of 37 (37.8%) adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified, 11 of 89 (12.4%) acinic cell carcinomas (AciCC), one of five (20%) mucin-producing signet ring adenocarcinomas, and one of 165 (0.6%) mucoepidermoid carcinomas. Demographically, MASC affected males more commonly (1.4:1). The average age at diagnosis was 45.7 years. Parotid gland was the most common site of involvement (26 of 36, 72.2%), although other head and neck sites, including the base of tongue, were affected. Of 18 patients with neck dissection, lymph node involvement was identified in four patients (four of 18, 22.2%). Survival analysis of MASC cases presented here, combined with those reported previously, revealed a mean disease-free survival for patients with MASC of 92 months [n = 29; 95% confidence interval (CI) 71-115 months], compared with a mean DFS of 121 months for patients with AciCC (n = 38; 95% CI 92-149, P = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Although perhaps slightly more aggressive, MASC clinical outcome mimics that of AciCC.

Re-evaluating historic cohort of salivary acinic cell carcinoma with new diagnostic tools

Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma (MASC) was recently identified as a distinct salivary gland neoplasm, morphologically resembling intercalated duct cell predominant acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC). To determine how frequently MASC has mimicked an intercalated duct cell predominant AciCC, we reviewed AciCC diagnosed from 1956 to 1975. Nine AciCC consecutively diagnosed in that period were identified. Based on morphologic examination, one case diagnosed as AciCC in a male patient in 1960 was re-classified as MASC [confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showing ETV6 translocation]. Another case diagnosed as AciCC of the palate in a female patient in 1975 was re-classified as mucoepidermoid carcinoma (based on the lack of acinar differentiation, presence of mucous cells, and confirmed by FISH showing MAML2 translocation). In this proof-of-principle study, we show that 1 in 9 cases historically designated as AciCC represents a MASC. "Intercalated duct cell predominant AciCC", especially among male patients, most likely represent examples of MASC. For anatomic sites outside of the parotid glands, broader differential diagnoses should be considered before accepting morphologic variants of AciCC as the final diagnosis.

The profile of acinic cell carcinoma after recognition of mammary analog secretory carcinoma

To determine the influence of the newly described mammary analog secretory carcinoma (MASC) with ETV6 translocation on our understanding of salivary acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC), we reviewed 81 cases of AciCC: 64 "classic" AciCCs, 11 AciCCs with high-grade transformation (HGT), and 17 zymogen granule poor AciCCs. ETV6 fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that classic AciCC (7 of 7 tested) and AciCC-HGT (4 of 4 tested) have intact ETV6. However, 10 of 17 zymogen granule poor AciCCs showed ETV6 translocation and were reclassified as MASC; the diagnosis of AciCC was retained for cases with intact ETV6. MASCs were distinguished by the lack of zymogen granules, mucin production, and stronger S100 reactivity. MASC showed a striking male predilection (male-to-female ratio, 8:2) in contrast to AciCC (male-to-female ratio, 1:1.5; P<0.01). Compared with cases of confirmed AciCC, AciCC-HGT occurred in older patients (mean age of 66.2 y vs. 47.7 y, P=0.007) and showed a poorer mean overall survival [40.2 mo (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.5-73 mo) vs. 125 mo (95% CI: 98-151 mo); P<0.001]. Patients with confirmed AciCC without HGT showed a recurrence rate of 15% (9/60) and a 7.9% (3/38) incidence of regional lymph node involvement. It appears that more than half of zymogen granule poor AciCCs are likely to represent MASC. Even after excluding cases of MASC, the presence of HGT in AciCC predicts poorer overall survival.

Rare Malignant and Benign Salivary Gland Epithelial Tumors

Although at least 24 distinct histologic salivary gland carcinomas exist, many of them are rare, comprising only 1% to 2% of all salivary gland tumors. These include epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma, (hyalinizing) clear cell carcinoma, basal cell adenocarcinoma, cystadenocarcinoma, low-grade salivary duct carcinoma (low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma), oncocytic carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified. Few tumors (clear cell carcinoma and basal cell adenocarcinoma) have unique molecular correlates. Benign tumors, although histologically less diverse, are far more common, with pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor the most common salivary gland tumors. Many benign tumors have malignant counterparts for which histologic distinction can pose diagnostic challenge.

Childhood Carcinoma

Carcinoma in children differs from that occurring in adults. It is far rarer and represents only a small fraction of all pediatric cancer diagnoses. Pediatric sarcomas were among the first tumors in which recurrent chromosomal aberrations were discovered. Once defined, these recurrent aberrations, many of them translocations, became incorporated into the pathologist's diagnostic armamentarium. In the past several years, defining chromosomal rearrangements have been identified in pediatric carcinomas as well, and this has become a new frontier in pathologic diagnosis. This article provides an overview of pediatric carcinoma as well as a detailed review of selected types of carcinoma that in particular can present diagnostic difficulty to the practicing pathologist and illustrate new and emerging concepts in pediatric carcinoma.