Unison or cacophony: postgraduate training in pathology in Europe

[A European comparison of continuing education in pathology]

In the coming years, the shortage of pathologists will become internationally evident. In addition, the increase in knowledge, technical transformation processes, and the attractiveness of working conditions pose clear challenges for the field of pathology. A bi-directional opening for international mobility of pathologists could be a potential solution.In this analysis, the European training concept of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) was compared with its implementation in the 27 countries of the EU plus its 4 associated countries with regard to nationally differentiated concepts, type and implementation of the specialist examination, and additional qualifications. Subsequently, questions regarding the recognition of exams, titles, and specialist exams were elicited.The duration of training ranges between 4 and 6 years. The number of cases also varies considerably. Obtaining the specialist title can be done by simply completing the specifications up to a structured examination. In the EU, exams are mutually recognized, but this does not necessarily apply to academic titles and additional qualifications. Increasingly, on-site training centers are also subject to auditing procedures.The European agreements allow a high degree of permeability. However, national regulations pose hurdles for international mobility. The UEMS is therefore focusing on harmonization, including the certification of training centers. The so-called European Pathology Progress Test of the European Society of Pathology (ESP) is a further step towards the development of a future European specialist title. It remains the joint responsibility of residents and institutes to shape the future of the next generation of pathologists from the variety of different concepts.

Quality assurance in postgraduate pathology training the Dutch way: regular assessment, monitoring of training programs but no end of training examination

It might seem self-evident that in the transition from a supervised trainee to an independent professional who is no longer supervised, formal assessment of whether the trainee knows his/her trade well enough to function independently is necessary. This would then constitute an end of training examination. Such examinations are practiced in several countries but a rather heterogeneous situation exists in the EU countries. In the Netherlands, the training program is not concluded by a summative examination and reasons behind this situation are discussed. Quality assurance of postgraduate medical training in the Netherlands has been developed along two tracks: (1) not a single testing moment but continuous evaluation of the performance of the trainee in ‘real time’ situations and (2) monitoring of the quality of the offered training program through regular site-visits. Regular (monthly and/or yearly) evaluations should be part of every self-respecting training program. In the Netherlands, these evaluations are formative only: their intention is to provide the trainee a tool by which he or she can see whether they are on track with their training schedule. In the system in the Netherlands, regular site-visits to training programs constitute a crucial element of quality assurance of postgraduate training. During the site-visit, the position and perceptions of the trainee are key elements. The perception by the trainee of the training program, the institution (or department) offering the training program, and the professionals involved in the training program is explicitly solicited and systematically assessed. With this two-tiered approach high-quality postgraduate training is assured without the need for an end of training examination.

Board examination for anatomical pathology in Switzerland: two intense days to verify professional competence

About 15 years ago, the Swiss Society of Pathology has developed and implemented a board examination in anatomical pathology. We describe herein the contents covered by this 2-day exam (autopsy pathology, cytology, histopathology, molecular pathology, and basic knowledge about mechanisms of disease) and its exact modalities, sketch a brief history of the exam, and finish with a concise discussion about the possible objectives and putative benefits weighed against the hardship that it imposes on the candidates.

The use of virtual slides in the EUROPALS examination

Background

The only realistic way to improve harmonisation of European pathology training is to define the generally accepted competencies and to test them periodically during the training programme (progress test). The European Association of Pathology Chairs and Program Directors therefore decided to implement an annual on-line test using virtual slides in addition to static jpeg images and theoretical MCQ’s. The EU supported this endeavour as EUROPALS (EUROpean Pathology Assessement & Learning System).

Methods

To address the challenges of large scale digital testing EUROPALS teamed up with i-Path Diagnostics Ltd, a company specialising in utilisation of virtual slides in histology/pathology education and examination. Specific examination software was used in the test system.

Results

In the first 2 years we provided at five occasions progress tests, including 2 proctored tests, attracting hundreds of participants. The accessibility varied from suboptimal to good and improved with each subsequent test. It was influenced both by the hosting server capacity and the internet bandwidth at the user’s location.

Conclusion

On-line testing using virtual slides is possible but requires a good collaboration between the provider and the user. Both should be aware of the requirements and threads of large scale testing with hundreds of simultaneous users.