VE1 immunohistochemical detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in thyroid carcinoma: a review of its usefulness and limitations

Clinicopathological features of incidentally detected metastatic thyroid papillary carcinoma in cervical lymph nodes of non-thyroid cancer patients: a retrospective analysis of 31cases

BACKGROUND

The incidental finding of thyroid inclusions in lymph nodes of neck dissections of non-thyroid cancer patients is an unusual event. It is still controversial for pathologists about whether this represents benign inclusions or metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). This study is to analyze clinicopathological features of such cases in an attempt to explore their clinical implications.

METHODS

Pathological data were searched for incidentally detected PTC of cervical lymph nodes in non-thyroid cancer cases. Clinicopathological characteristics were reevaluated and recorded. BRAF V600E protein expression and sequencing analysis was then performed in cases with sufficient tissues.

RESULTS

31 patients had an incidental finding of PTC in lymph nodes of patients with non-thyroid cancer. BRAF immunohistochemical staining were performed in 17 metastatic lymph nodes with sufficient tumor tissues, and 6 were positive. BRAF V600E point mutation was detected in 5 of 6 BRAF V600E positive cases. Subsequent imaging examinations of the thyroid showed no nodules or calcifications/benign nodules in 20 patients, and suspected malignant nodules in 5 patients. 12 patients underwent total thyroidectomy or ipsilateral lobectomy, and 6 showed PTC in postoperative pathological examinations. The remaining 19 patients without surgery were kept under active surveillance, and no one had recurrence of PTC.

CONCLUSION

Incidentally discovered PTC in lymph nodes has usually interpreted as metastasis from a clinical occult thyroid primary cancer, but primary PTC was not always detected. This suggests it could be double occult lesions. With regards to concurrence with highly malignant tumor, most patients could keep regular surveillance.

Do BRAFV600E mutation and sodium-iodide symporter expression affect the response to radioactive iodine therapy in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma?

OBJECTIVE

To report on the associations between BRAF and sodium iodide symporter expressions and treatment outcomes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria included a pathologic diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma of any stage, thyroidectomy followed by radioactive iodine therapy, and follow-up for at least 12 months after initial therapy. Events were classified as persistent or recurrent disease based on a clinical or investigational evidence of disease within or after, respectively, 1 year from initial therapy. Disease-free survival was calculated between the dates of surgery and confirmed event. Patients with no evidence of disease were censored at their last follow-up (censored group). BRAF mutation and sodium-iodide symporter expressions were evaluated using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The study included 78 patients (60 females, 18 males) with median age 36 years (range: 20-70 years). BRAF was positive in 78%, equivocal in 13%, and negative in 9%. Sodium-iodide symporter was positive in 88%. BRAF mutation was significantly associated with increasing tumor size, presence of lymphovascular invasion, classic subtype of papillary thyroid carcinoma, thyroid capsular infiltration, and lymph node metastasis. Sodium-iodide symporter expression was not associated with any clinical or pathologic characteristics. Patients with negative or equivocal BRAF had significantly better disease-free survival (82%, 3 events) compared to the positive group (41%, 33 events; P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

In patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma, BRAF mutation is associated with high-risk pathological characteristics and worsened disease-free survival.

VE1 immunohistochemistry is an adjunct tool for detection of BRAFV600E mutation: Validation in thyroid cancer patients

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy among other endocrine tumors, and BRAF^V600E is a frequent genetic mutation occurring in the disease. Although different molecular techniques, most importantly sequencing has been widely recognized as a gold standard but molecular diagnosis remains an expensive, laborious, and time‐intensive process. Recently, immunohistochemistry (IHC) with anti‐BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody has increased practical utility and implemented clinically for the detection of BRAF^V600E mutation. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of VE1 IHC for detecting the BRAF^V600E mutation frequency and clinical implementation in diagnostic laboratories. In this study, 72 formalin fixed paraffin‐embedded tissues (FFPE) were used to determine the BRAF^V600E mutation status using IHC and Sanger sequencing. The mutation was found in 29% and 28% cases using IHC and Sanger sequencing, respectively. Furthermore, the results showed 100% sensitivity, 98.07% specificity, 95.2% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. Notably, significant associations were found between BRAF^V600E status and tumor stage, tumor focality, and extrathyroidal extensions, respectively. VE1 IHC was found to be a highly sensitive, specific, and diagnostically accurate method in this cohort. Therefore, BRAF^V600E detection through IHC has been considered as the best tailored technique for routine pathology laboratories.

Comparison of Molecular Methods and BRAF Immunohistochemistry (VE1 Clone) for the Detection of BRAF V600E Mutation in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

The evaluation of surgically resected papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for BRAF mutation has diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications. The goal of this meta-analysis was to perform a systematic review of studies using the VE1 clone (specific for detection of the BRAF V600E mutation) on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) thyroid surgical resection specimens for primary papillary thyroid carcinoma. The authors' molecular techniques, immunohistochemistry protocols, and scoring methods for VE1 immunostaining were also evaluated. This study included 4079 PTCs representing data from 23 studies. The results extracted from each study were split into two different groups, direct sequencing group or PCR group, based on the molecular "gold standard" method used to compare VE1 IHC staining. In the direct sequencing group, the IHC sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 0.97-1.00) and specificity 84% (95% 0.72-0.91). In the PCR group the sensitivity was 98% (95% CI 0.96-0.99) and specificity 89% (95% CI 0.82-0.94). Although immunohistochemical procedures varied by author, the overall performance of the VE1 clone shows that it is highly sensitive and relatively specific for detecting the BRAF V600E mutation in surgical resection specimens. However, standardization of immunohistochemical procedural method and scoring/interpretation criteria may improve the reliability and reproducibility for the use of VE1 clone for future practice.

An affordable immunohistochemical approach to estimate the prevalence of BRAFV600E in large cohort studies-establishing the baseline rate of BRAF mutation in an institutional series of papillary thyroid carcinoma from Thailand

Background

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) accounts for the majority of diagnoses of thyroid carcinoma. BRAF^V600E mutation is the most common genetic alteration in PTC, which has diagnostic and prognostic significance. The rate of BRAF^V600E mutation in PTC from Thailand has not been reported. Our purpose was to estimate the prevalence of BRAF mutation in a large institutional series using an affordable approach, which combined mutation-specific immunohistochemistry (IHC) with VE1 antibody and tissue microarray (TMA).

Methods

A total of 476 PTC cases plotted on TMA were employed for determining the mutation status in this study. The cancer tissue of initial 100 cases (pilot study) were analyzed for BRAF^V600E mutation by using both direct sequencing and VE1 immunostaining. For the subsequent PTC cases, VE1 IHC was used as an alternative to direct sequencing for the detection of mutation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to determine the association of clinicopathological variables with BRAF^V600E mutation.

Results

In the pilot study, VE1 IHC showed excellent analytical performance (κ=0.884) for detecting BRAF^V600E mutation in PTC TMA as compared to direct sequencing. The prevalence of BRAF^V600E in the whole cohort was 60.9% by using VE1 IHC. The mutation was commonly seen in tall cell (92.9%) and classic (70.2%) variants of PTC. Multivariate analysis (P<0.05) showed association of BRAF^V600E with histological type of tumor, extrathyroidal extension, and absence of Hashimoto's thyroiditis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, BRAF^V600E mutation was detected in 60.9% of Thai PTC and it was associated with several aggressive clinicopathological variables of thyroid cancer. VE1 IHC proved as a reliable method able to replace direct sequencing for detection of the mutation. A combination of mutation-specific IHC and TMA allows conducting large cohort studies more labor-saving and cost-efficiently.

Prevalence of BRAFV600E mutation in Asian series of papillary thyroid carcinoma-a contemporary systematic review

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), the most common malignancy of the endocrine system, is frequently driven by BRAFV600E mutation, which was reported in 35-60% cases in Western series. Numerous studies have recently emerged from Asian countries and regions; however sufficient summary is lacking to date. BRAF mutation serves as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in thyroid cancer, therefore establishing a rate of BRAF on the national scale could be of practical significance. We performed systematic reviews of available literature to investigate the prevalence of BRAF mutation in series of PTC from various Asian countries and regions. Out of the total 3,966 reports identified via initial screening, 138 studies encompassing over 40,000 PTCs were included for the final analysis. A vast majority (90.2%) of PTCs with known BRAF status were from East Asia, including China, South Korea, and Japan, with BRAF mutation rates of 71.2%, 75.5%, and 70.6%, respectively. Less abundant Indian and Saudi Arabian series found 45.6% and 46.3% prevalence of BRAFV600E in PTC, respectively. Much limited evidence was available from Thailand, Iran, Kazakhstan, Taiwan, Singapore, Indonesia, Hong Kong, Philippines, Vietnam, Iraq, and Myanmar. No relevant publications were found from other highly populated countries, such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Malaysia. After grouping by geographic region, we found that the highest rate of BRAFV600E was reported in the PTC series from East Asia (76.4%). Much lower rate (45-48%) was seen in PTC cohorts from South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East while the Southeast Asian series were in between (57%). Further subgroup analysis revealed that studies employing fresh frozen tissue and fine-needle aspirates showed higher rates of BRAF compared to those used formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. We found that the PTC series enrolled patients' cohorts after 2010 demonstrated a higher rate of BRAF compared to the earlier series. Finally, pediatric PTCs had lower BRAF prevalence compared to the baseline rate for the country. In conclusion, despite considerable among and within countries heterogeneity, the Asian PTC series showed a higher prevalence of BRAFV600E mutation than that in Western series. Causes of geographic heterogeneity, whether genuine (etiology, genetics) or methodology-related should be further investigated.

Frequency and Prognostic Value of IDH Mutations in Korean Patients With Cholangiocarcinoma

The molecular profile of cholangiocarcinoma (CC) remains elusive. The prognostic value of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in CC is controversial, and there have been few relevant studies in Asian populations. In the present study, we investigated the frequency and prognostic significance of IDH mutations in Korean patients with CC. CC specimens were collected from patients who underwent surgical liver resection between 2004 and 2019. Clinical and pathological data were retrospectively reviewed from medical records. Mutational IDH profiling was performed by peptide nucleic acid-mediated PCR clamping in 206 surgical specimens; IDH-mutant samples were confirmed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Of the 195 patients with CC, six (3.13%) were found to exhibit IDH1 (n = 5) or IDH2 (n = 1) mutations. Among patients with IDH1 mutations, four had R132C (c.394C>T) and one had R132G (c.394C>G) mutations. One patient had R172W (c.514A>T) mutations in IDH2. All IDH-mutant samples were of intrahepatic origin, and patients with IDH mutations had physiological to low serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). No association between IDH mutation status and long-term survival outcomes was observed. The frequency of IDH mutations was considerably lower than the 10–20% reported in previous studies. The frequency and pattern of IDH mutations in CC are likely to vary among patients with different ethnicities. These findings suggest that characterization of the oncogenic mutation profile in different populations is of high clinical importance.

VE1 Immunohistochemistry Improves the Limit of Genotyping for Detecting BRAFV600E Mutation in Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Detection of BRAF^V600E is useful for making diagnosis and risk stratification of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Molecular testing, however, is not always available for routine clinical use. To assess the clinical utility and reliability of VE1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) for detecting BRAF^V600E mutation in PTC, VE1 IHC was performed on the tissue microarrays of 514 patients with PTC and was compared with Sanger sequencing results. Of 514 PTC cases, 433 (84.2%) were positive for VE1 expression. Among 6 discordant cases between VE1 IHC and Sanger sequencing, 3 initial VE1-false negative cases turned out to be true false negative on repeat testing, and 3 VE1-false positive cases showed BRAF^V600E mutation using digital PCR analysis. PTCs with low variant allele fraction were positive for VE1 IHC but were not detected using sequencing. VE1 IHC showed 99.3% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 96.4% negative predictive value. The BRAF^V600E mutation was significantly associated with older age, multifocality, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, and advanced tumor stage. In conclusion, VE1 IHC is a reliable method for detecting BRAF^V600E mutation in PTC specimens.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of BRAF V600E Immunohistochemistry in Thyroid Histopathology

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in evaluating thyroid surgical specimens may facilitate diagnostic and prognostic evaluation, with potential therapeutic implications. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the analytic validity of IHC in detecting BRAFV600E mutations in thyroid cancer (primary or metastatic). We screened citations from three electronic databases (until December 20, 2018), supplemented by a hand search of authors' files and cross-references of reviews. Citations and full-text papers were independently reviewed in duplicate, and consensus was achieved on inclusion of papers. Two reviewers independently critically appraised and abstracted data from included papers. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted for sensitivity and specificity estimates. We reviewed 1499 unique citations and 93 full-text articles. We included 1 systematic review and 30 original articles. The published review (from 2015) needed to be updated as there were multiple subsequent original studies. The pooled sensitivity of IHC in detecting a BRAFV600E mutation was 96.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] at 94.1%, 98.3%) (29 studies, including 2659 BRAFV600E mutant tumors). The IHC pooled specificity was 86.3% (95% CI 80.7%, 90.4%) (28 studies, including 1107 BRAFV600E wild-type specimens). These meta-analyses were subject to statistically significant heterogeneity, partly explained by antibody type (sensitivity and specificity) and tissue/tumor type (specificity). In conclusion, BRAF IHC is highly sensitive and reasonably specific in detecting the BRAFV600E mutation; however, there is some variability in analytic performance.

Role of P53, E-cadherin and BRAF as predictors of regional nodal recurrence for papillary thyroid cancer

BACKGROUND

Regional nodal recurrence (RNR) in patients diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) has increased. Variable immunohistochemical (IHC) markers have been studied for predicting the likelihood of PTC for recurrence. We aimed to clarify the IHC expression of p53, Ecadherin and BRAF as potential markers of RNR in PTC.

METHOD

145 (73 study group and 72 control group) patients with PTC were analyzed retrospectively between January 2010 and June 2017. Further classification to a specific histological variant was done, and IHC expression of p53, Ecadherin and BRAF was analyzed both in the primary tumor and in nodal recurrence.

RESULTS

Regarding the risk of RNR, we found certain clinicopathologic features as elder age ≥55 years, tumor size >1 cm, presence of microscopic extrathyroid extension, presence of lymphovascular emboli, and conventional papillary subtype. Furthermore, IHC results for negative E-cadherin, and positive P53 and BRAF are significant risk factors, while radioactive iodine (RAI) adjuvant therapy decrease recurrence risk.

CONCLUSION

We found several risk factors for RNR in PTC diagnosed patients, all of which are easily achievable in clinical settings. In this regard, we suggested that patients with specific clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features have strict follow up for early detection of RNR as it has a great impact on their survival.

Concomitant KIT/BRAF and PDGFRA/BRAF mutations are rare events in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

AIM

The BRAF mutation is a rare pathogenetic alternative to KIT/PDGFRA mutation in GIST and causes Imatinib resistance. A recent description of KIT and BRAF mutations co-occurring in an untreated GIST has challenged the concept of their being mutually exclusive and may account for ab initio resistance to Imatinib, even in the presence of Imatinib-sensitive KIT mutations. BRAF sequencing is generally limited to KIT/PDGFRA wild-type cases. Hence, the frequency of concomitant mutations may be underestimated.

METHODS

We screened for KIT (exon 9, 11, 13, 17), PDGFRA (exon 12,14, 18) and BRAF (exon 15) mutations a series of 407 GIST. Additionally, we evaluated the BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody, VE1, as a surrogate for V600E mutation, on a series of 313 GIST (24 on whole sections, 288 cases on tissue array), including 6 cases molecularly ascertained to carry the BRAF V600E mutation.

RESULTS

No concomitant KIT/BRAF or PDGFRA/BRAF mutations were detected. BRAF mutation was detected only in one case, wild-type for KIT/PDGFRA. All the 6 BRAF-mutant cases stained positive with the VE1 antibody. A weak VE1 expression was observed in 14/287 (4.9%) BRAF wild-type cases, as observed also in 2/6 BRAF-mutant cases. Overall in our series, sensitivity and specificity of the VE1 antobody were 100% and 95.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The concomitance of BRAF mutation with either KIT or PDGFRA mutation is rare in GIST. In these tumors, moderate/strong VE1 immunoreactivity is a valuable surrogate for molecular analysis. Instead, genotyping is warranted in the presence of weak VE1 staining.

Immunohistochemistry cannot replace DNA analysis for evaluation of BRAF V600E mutations in papillary thyroid carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The BRAF V600E mutation is the most common genetic event occurring in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Recently, the possibility of using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect the BRAF V600E mutation has been reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 140 patients with classical PTC, the status of the BRAF V600E mutation was determined by IHC (using two alternative staining protocols, IHC-1 and IHC-2) and molecular biology methods: Sanger sequencing (SEQ) and real-time PCR (qPCR).

RESULTS

The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 57.1% (80/140) patients by IHC-1 and 62.9% (88/140) patients by IHC-2. The highest correlation in detecting the BRAF V600E mutation was found between IHC-2 and qPCR (94.2%), and between IHC-1 and qPCR (83.9%). Correlations between IHC-1 and SEQ and between IHC-2 and SEQ were 71.5% and 76.2%, respectively. The IHC-2 protocol had higher sensitivity, PPV, and NPV, and Cohen's kappa than IHC- 1. The presence of BRAF V600E mutation in IHC-2 statistically correlated with age at diagnosis, histopathological stage, and extrathyroidal extension.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained in this study indicate a lack of concordance between BRAF V600E detection by IHC and molecular methods. The IHC method cannot replace molecular methods for the detection of the BRAF V600E mutation.

The utility of the Bethesda category and its association with BRAF mutation in the prediction of papillary thyroid cancer stage

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine the utility of the Bethesda category and its association with BRAF mutation in prediction of the papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) stage.

METHODS

A prospective study analyzed patients who had ultrasound-suspicious thyroid nodules, underwent FNA and cytological examination, and were classified according to the Bethesda system. Patients from Undetermined Significance Or Follicular Lesion Of Undetermined Significance (AUS/FLUS), Follicular Neoplasm or Suspicious for a Follicular Neoplasm (FN/SFN), Suspicious for Malignant Cells (SMC), and Positive for Malignant Cells (PMC) groups were examined for the BRAF mutation and had a thyroid surgery. Demographical and histological features and stage of the disease were evaluated for PTC patients in accordance with the Bethesda category and its association with BRAF mutation.

RESULTS

Three hundred eight of all patients underwent operation. One hundred forty-three (46.4%) of them were diagnosed with PTC. In 14 (9.8%) PTC cases, FNA biopsies were classified as AUS/FLUS, 23 (16.1%) as FN/SFN, 41 (28.7%) as SMC, and 65 (45.5%) as PMC. I-II stages of PTC were diagnosed for 88 (61.5%) patients and III-IVA for 55 (38.5%). Patients from the SMC and PMC groups had larger tumors, higher incidence of lymph node metastases, classical PTC type, B-type Raf (BRAF) positive, and III-IVA stage cancer, than patients from the AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN groups. When comparing 27 (18.9%) BRAF-negative patients from the AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN groups with 116 (81.1%) BRAF-negative patients from the SMC and PMC groups and all BRAF-positive patients, the prediction of more aggressive histological features and stage was slightly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher Bethesda categories are associated with higher stages of PTC. Association of the Bethesda category with BRAF mutation can slightly improve the value of stage prediction.

Detection of BRAF Mutations Using a Fully Automated Platform and Comparison with High Resolution Melting, Real-Time Allele Specific Amplification, Immunohistochemistry and Next Generation Sequencing Assays, for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Metastatic melanoma is a severe disease with one of the highest mortality rate in skin diseases. Overall survival has significantly improved with immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Kinase inhibitors targeting BRAF V600 showed promising results. BRAF genotyping is mandatory for the prescription of anti-BRAF therapies.

METHODS

Fifty-nine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded melanoma samples were assessed using High-Resolution-Melting (HRM) PCR, Real-time allele-specific amplification (RT-ASA) PCR, Next generation sequencing (NGS), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the fully-automated molecular diagnostics platform IdyllaTM. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated using NGS as the reference standard to compare the different assays.

RESULTS

BRAF mutations were found in 28(47.5%), 29(49.2%), 31(52.5%), 29(49.2%) and 27(45.8%) samples with HRM, RT-ASA, NGS, IdyllaTM and IHC respectively. Twenty-six (81.2%) samples were found bearing a c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) mutation, three (9.4%) with a c.1798_1799delinsAA (p.Val600Lys) mutation and one with c.1789_1790delinsTC (p.Leu597Ser) mutation. Two samples were found bearing complex mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

HRM appears the less sensitive assay for the detection of BRAF V600 mutations. The RT-ASA, IdyllaTM and IHC assays are suitable for routine molecular diagnostics aiming at the prescription of anti-BRAF therapies. IdyllaTM assay is fully-automated and requires less than 2 minutes for samples preparation and is the fastest of the tested assays.