Characterization of HER2 gene amplification heterogeneity in invasive and in situ breast cancer using bright-field in situ hybridization

The spectrum of HER2 expression in breast cancer: linking immunohistochemistry quantification with in situ hybridization assay

We aimed to document the pathological characteristics of breast cancer (BC) cases with different scores of HER2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), as well as to establish a relationship between HER2 expression and HER2 amplification by in situ hybridization (ISH). A cohort of 258 primary BC cases was evaluated for HER2 gene amplification with bright-field ISH. All HER2-negative and HER2-positive cases by IHC were concordant with the ISH classification. BC cases with score of 0 had lower average of HER2 copy number compared to cases with score of 1 + . HER2-equivocal cases by IHC had intermediate pathological characteristics between HER2-negative and HER2-positive cases. About 12% of HER2-equivocal cases were classified as ISH-positive. HER2-equivocal cases with HER2 gene amplification had proliferation index, HER2/CEP17 ratio, and average of HER2 copy number between HER2-equivocal cases without HER2 gene amplification and HER2-positive cases by IHC. Additionally, HER2-equivocal cases with HER2 amplification had score of 2 + in at least 50% of the total tumor area, with a proportion of ISH-positive cases increasing with the amount of score of 2 + present in the tumor. The quantification of score of 2 + in the tumor predicted the ISH classification with an AUC of 0.902. A logistic regression model using the same HER2 quantification and the nuclear score was able to increase the abovementioned prediction to an AUC of 0.929. As such, we were able to link HER2 quantification by IHC and morphological analysis with HER2 amplification by ISH.

HER2 in situ hybridization test in breast cancer: quantifying margins of error and genetic heterogeneity

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of counting increasing number of invasive cancer cells in the result of the HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) test in breast cancer as well as to compare two different approaches of measuring genomic heterogeneity (single cell and population based). A cohort of 100 consecutive breast cancer cases (primary and metastatic) were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification with bright-field ISH. The evaluation of the samples included scoring 20 nuclei, in five different areas, measuring the margins of error for each case. Genomic heterogeneity (GH) was defined by the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline as a discrete population of tumor cells with HER2 amplification. We also evaluated GH as single tumor cells with HER2 amplification. The stabilization of the coefficient of variation of HER2/CEP17 ratio requires about 60 invasive cancer cells. The average margin of error of HER2/CEP17 ratio and of HER2 copy number was 0.40 and 0.53, respectively, when counting 20 cells, decreasing to 0.20 and 0.26 when counting 100 cells. Population GH was observed in 1% of the cases, while single cell GH was observed in 27% of the cases, reaching its maximum value in cases near the thresholds of positivity. Therefore, margins of error in HER2 ISH test are high, and the minimal cell number recommended in current guidelines should be raised to at least 60 cells. Population GH is a rare event and single cell GH is maximal in cases near the thresholds.

ER staining levels affect HER2 staining and heterogeneity

PURPOSE

This study explored the relationship of ER expression levels with HER2 staining properties and heterogeneity and discussed the differences in HER2 assessment caused by the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline updates from that of the 2013 version.

METHODS

HER2-positive breast cancer was divided into three groups of the high hormone receptor expression (LH-high) group, low expression (LH-low) group, or negative (NLH) group to (1) compare differences in the percentage of the HER2 IHC test score of 2 + based on the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline and in the intratumor heterogeneity of HER2 expression for breast cancer with an IHC score of 3 + among these groups, (2) compare the HER2/CEP17 ratio and the average HER2 copy number, and classified ISH groupings according to the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline algorithm.

RESULTS

(1) Of 244 HER2-positive breast cancers, the cases with a HER2 IHC score of 2 + (n = 54, 22.1%) were significantly more common in the LH-high group (n = 45, P < 0.001). The frequency of heterogeneity was low (n = 25, 10.2%) for the HER2 score of 3 + (n = 190, 77.9%), and significantly higher in the LH-high group (n = 19, 76%, P = 0.002). (2) In a HER2 IHC score of 2 + , Group 2 which is deemed HER2 negative according to the revised 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline was observed in 17 (39.5%) out of 43 cases, of which 16 cases (94.1%) were in the LH-high group.

CONCLUSIONS

The LH-high group is a heterogeneous group largely consisting of heterogeneous cases with HER2 IHC scores of 2 + or 3 + . NLH, in contrast, is a homogenous group.

Cardiotoxicity in HER2-positive breast cancer patients

Due to the recent advances in diagnosis and management of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, especially through novel HER2-targeted agents, cardiotoxicity becomes an emerging problem. Although chemotherapy significantly increases survival, the risk of cardiovascular disease development is high and still underestimated and could imply treatment discontinuation. Frequently, due to lack of rigorous diagnosis strategies, cardiotoxicity assessment is delayed, and, moreover, the efficacy of current therapy options in restoring heart function is questionable. For a comprehensive risk assessment, it is vital to characterize the clinical spectrum of HER2-targeted agents and anthracyclines, as well as their pathogenic pathways involved in cardiotoxicity. Advanced cardiovascular multimodal imaging and circulating biomarkers plays primary roles in early assessing cardiotoxicity and also in guiding specific preventive measures. Even though the knowledge in this field is rapidly expanding, there are still questions that arise regarding the optimal approach in terms of timing and methods. The aim of the current review aims to providean overview of currently available data.

HER2 genomic heterogeneity is a frequent event in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and correlates with tumor morphology

AIM

To characterize a cohort of gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas (GEA) evaluated for HER2 gene amplification using bright field in situ hybridization (ISH) following the 2016 guidelines for GEA and correlating the results with clinico-pathological features. It was also aimed to evaluate the effect of applying the ISH criteria from the 2018 guidelines for breast cancer (BC) in the same GEA cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

159 GEA cases collected in a period of 59 months were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification by ISH according to GEA and BC guidelines. All cases were reviewed for histological type, grading and presence of signet ring cells.

RESULTS

Most of the cases refereed to ISH were HER2 equivocal (57.9 %) by immunohistochemistry. According to the GEA guideline, 131 cases were HER2-negative (87.3 %) and 19 cases were HER2-positive (12.7 %). According to the BC guideline, 133 cases were HER2-negative (88.7 %) and 17 cases were HER2-positive (11.3 %), being statistically similar to the results obtained with the GEA guideline. HER2 genomic heterogeneity was detected in 31.6 % of the HER2-positive cases, almost exclusively in tubular adenocarcinoma. We observed a significant association between HER2 gene amplification and tubular adenocarcinomas, and absence of signet ring cells. The only case with HER2 gene amplification and presence of signet ring cells was a mixed carcinoma, where the signet ring cells represented the non-amplified component.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 positivity rate was similar when applying the GEA or the BC guidelines. We also establish a tight association between morphology and HER2 gene amplification.

Pathologic Features and Clinical Implications of Breast Cancer With HER2 Intratumoral Genetic Heterogeneity

OBJECTIVES

To review breast cancer with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) genetic heterogeneity (GH), with a focus on clinician interpretation of the results and subsequent management.

METHODS

We retrospectively searched all consecutive invasive breast cancers that underwent HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization testing and identified cases with HER2 GH.

RESULTS

Eleven (0.4%) cases of primary breast tumors with reported HER2 GH were identified over 76 months. HER2-positive tumor cells comprised a mean ± SD of 20% ± 15% of the overall tumor population (range, 5%-50%) and exhibited high levels of amplification (HER2/CEP17 = 5.4 ± 2.9). Three cases had morphologic heterogeneity. Of the four patients who completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy, two had trastuzumab; all showed a partial pathologic response. We identified two cases in which there appeared to be clinical misinterpretation of the HER2 results.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 GH is an infrequent event, may contain morphologic heterogeneity, could infer incomplete response to neoadjuvant therapy, and requires adequate communication with treating clinicians.

What to expect from the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline in the reflex in situ hybridization test of immunohistochemically equivocal 2+ cases?

To evaluate the effect of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline in the identification of HER2-positive breast carcinomas (BC) in reflex in situ hybridization (ISH) test. A total of 592 primary invasive BC cases from before and after the publication of the updated ASCO/CAP guideline were evaluated for HER2 amplification by silver ISH according to the 2013 and 2018 guidelines. Cases were mostly (95%) HER2 equivocal by immunohistochemistry (IHC), not centrally reviewed. Other reasons for referring cases were IHC confirmation, IHC discordancy (either between needle-core-biopsy (NCB) and surgical excision specimen (SES) or between different laboratories) and IHC result unexpected for histopathologic features. Cases evaluated with the 2013 guideline (1st cohort) were 14.6% HER2-positive, decreasing significantly after the reclassification with the 2018 guideline due to the exclusion of group 2 cases without HER2 protein overexpression. Cases studied after the implementation of the 2018 guideline (2nd cohort) were 8.7% HER2-positive, a frequency that was not significantly different from the reclassification of the 1st cohort with the 2018 guideline. All cases referred for IHC confirmation had the expected ISH result. Cases with IHC discordancy between NCB and SES were ISH concordant. Only one out of 14 cases with an IHC score 3+ and classified as histological grade 1 or with a Ki67 below 10% was classified as ISH HER2-positive. The 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline resulted in a decrease of HER2-positive cases in reflex ISH test, selecting less patients for anti-HER2-targeted therapy.