HER2 status in patients with residual rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: the relationship with molecular results and clinicopathologic features

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of HER2 amplification, overexpression, and positivity in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death globally. Recent clinical trials suggest an emerging role for HER2 as a potential clinically relevant biomarker in CRC. Testing for HER2 in CRC is not standard practice; consequently, the prevalence of HER2 positivity (HER2+) in patients with CRC remains uncertain.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted to generate estimates of proportions of patients with CRC with HER2 overexpression or HER2 amplification and HER2+ (either overexpression or amplification), overall and in patients with rat sarcoma virus (RAS) wild-type cancer. HER2+ was defined as 1) immunohistochemistry with a score of 3+, 2) immunohistochemistry with a score of 2+ and in situ hybridization+, or 3) next-generation sequencing positive.

RESULTS

Of 224 studies identified with information on HER2 in CRC, 52 studies used a US Food and Drug Administration-approved assay and were selected for further analysis. Estimated HER2+ rate was 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.4% to 5.0%) overall (n = 17 589). HER2+ rates were statistically higher in RAS wild-type (6.1%, 95% CI = 5.4% to 6.9%) vs RAS mutant CRC (1.1%, 95% CI = 0.3% to 4.4%; P < .0001). Despite limited clinical information, we confirmed enrichment of HER2+ CRC in patients with microsatellite stable and left-sided CRC.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provides an estimate of HER2+ CRC and confirms enrichment of HER2 in microsatellite stable, left-sided, RAS wild-type CRC tumors. Our work is important given the recently described clinical efficacy of HER2-targeted therapies in HER2+ CRC and informs strategies for incorporation of HER2 testing into standard of care.

An Update on the Role of Immunohistochemistry in the Evaluation of Pancreatic/Liver/Gastrointestinal Luminal Tract Disorders

CONTEXT.—

Immunohistochemistry serves as an ancillary diagnostic tool for a wide variety of neoplastic and nonneoplastic disorders, including infections, workup of inflammatory conditions, and subtyping neoplasms of the pancreas/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract. In addition, immunohistochemistry is also used to detect a variety of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

OBJECTIVE.—

To highlight an update on the role of immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of pancreatic/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract disorders.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and authors' research data and personal practice experience were used.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool, assisting in the diagnosis of problematic tumors and benign lesions of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract, and also in the prediction of prognosis and therapeutic response for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

HER2 overexpression/amplification status in colorectal cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization using five different immunohistochemical scoring criteria

OBJECTIVE

Although HER2 has gradually become an important therapeutic target for colorectal cancer (CRC), a unified and standard HER2 scoring system was still not established in CRC, and the debatable results of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in CRC requires further exploration.

METHODS

In this study, we use five immunohistochemical (IHC) scoring criteria (i.e., IRS-p, IRS-m, GEA-s, GEA-b and HERACLES) and two FISH criteria to evaluate HER2 status, and further evaluate the correlation between HER2 status and clinicopathological features, survival in a large, unselected Chinese cohort of 664 CRCs.

RESULTS

Finally, we set HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2.0, or an average HER2 copy number ≥ 6.0 as FISH-positive threshold and the amplification rate of HER2 gene was 7.08% (47/664).The HER2 positivity (IHC 3+) was 2.71%, 3.16%, 2.56%, 2.71% and 3.16%, according to the IHC scoring criteria of IRS-p, IRS-m, GEA-s, GEA-b and HERACLES, respectively. Set FISH results as the golden standard; receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that IRS-p had both high sensitivity and specificity than other IHC scoring systems to evaluate HER2 status. Based on IRS-p criterion, There were significant differences in tumor differentiation (p = 0.038), lymphatic vascular invasion (p = 0.001), pN stage (p value = 0.043), and overall survival (p < 0.001) among IHC score 0-3 + groups. Meanwhile, there were significant differences in pT stage (p = 0.031), pN stage (p = 0.009) and overall survival (p < 0.001) among FISH subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The IRS-p criterion was more suitable for assessing the HER2 status in CRC patients than other IHC criteria. Whereas for FISH scoring system, only HER2/CEP17 < 2.0, meanwhile HER2cn < 4.0 and HER2cn ≥ 6.0 were subgroups with unique clinicopathological characteristics.

Precision Medicine in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Targeting ERBB2 (HER-2) Oncogene

Simple Summary

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in terms of incidence rate in adults and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in Europe. The treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) is based on the use of chemotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) for RAS wild-type tumors. Precision medicine tries to identify molecular alterations that could be treated with targeted therapies. Although ERBB2 (also known as HER-2) has an important therapeutic role in breast and esophagogastric cancer, there are no approved ERBB2-targeted therapies for mCRC. The purpose of this review is to describe the landscape of ERBB2-positive mCRC.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in terms of incidence rate in adults and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in Europe. The treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) is based on the use of chemotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) for RAS wild-type tumors. Precision medicine tries to identify molecular alterations that could be treated with targeted therapies. ERBB2 amplification (also known as HER-2) has been identified in 2–3% of patients with mCRC, but there are currently no approved ERBB2-targeted therapies for mCRC. The purpose of this review is to describe the molecular structure of ERBB2, clinical features of these patients, diagnosis of ERBB2 alterations, and the most relevant clinical trials with ERBB2-targeted therapies in mCRC.

Construction and characterization of rectal cancer-related lncRNA-mRNA ceRNA network reveals prognostic biomarkers in rectal cancer

Rectal cancer is an important cause of cancer‐related deaths worldwide. In this study, the differentially expressed (DE) lncRNAs/mRNAs were first identified and the correlation level between DE lncRNAs and mRNAs were calculated. The results showed that genes of highly correlated lncRNA‐mRNA pairs presented strong prognosis effects, such as GPM6A, METTL24, SCN7A, HAND2‐AS1 and PDZRN4. Then, the rectal cancer‐related lncRNA‐mRNA network was constructed based on the ceRNA theory. Topological analysis of the network revealed that the network was maintained by hub nodes and a hub subnetwork was constructed, including the hub lncRNA MIR143HG and MBNL1‐SA1. Further analysis indicated that the hub subnetwork was highly related to cancer pathways, such as ‘Focal adhesion’ and ‘Wnt signalling pathway’. Hub subnetwork also had significant prognosis capability. A closed lncRNA‐mRNA module was identified by bilateral network clustering. Genes in modules also showed high prognosis effects. Finally, a core lncRNA‐TF crosstalk network was identified to uncover the crosstalk and regulatory mechanisms of lncRNAs and TFs by integrating ceRNA crosstalks and TF binding affinities. Some core genes, such as MEIS1, GLI3 and HAND2‐AS1 were considered as the key regulators in tumourigenesis. Based on the authors’ comprehensive analysis, all these lncRNA‐mRNA crosstalks provided promising clues for biological prognosis of rectal cancer.

Relationship of HER2 Alteration and Microsatellite Instability Status in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Background

The impact of HER2 somatic mutations in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) has not been well studied and its relationship with microsatellite instability‐high (MSI‐H) is yet to be fully elucidated.

Materials and Methods

From February 2017 to February 2020, the data of patients with CRC who underwent next‐generation sequencing and had detailed record of clinicopathological information were investigated. HER2 alteration and its relationship with MSI‐H were analyzed.

Results

Among 731 patients who underwent sequencing, 55 patients (7.5%) had HER2 alteration, including 29 (4.0%) with HER2 somatic mutations, 24 (3.3%) with HER2 gene amplification, and 2 patients (0.2%) with both HER2 mutations and amplification. R678Q was the most common mutated kinase domain, and no HER2 kinase domain in‐frame insertions/deletions were found in HER2 mutated cases. MSI‐H was found in 5.2% of our cohort and 36.8% of MSI‐H patients had HER2 mutation. For HER2 mutated cases, 48.3% were MSI‐H, whereas none of the HER2 amplification cases were MSI‐H. MSI‐H patients with HER2 mutation had significantly worse median progression‐free survival for programmed death‐1 (PD‐1) antibody than those without HER2 alteration (p = .036).

Conclusion

High MSI‐H rate was found in HER2 mutated cases, but no MSI‐H was found in HER2 amplification cases. MSI‐H patients with HER2 mutated had worse progression‐free survival for PD‐1 antibody than those without.

Implications for Practice

This study highlights the high microsatellite instability‐high (MSI‐H) rate in HER2 mutated cases but no MSI‐H in HER2 amplification cases. Moreover MSI‐H patients with HER2 mutated had worse progression‐free survival for programmed death‐1 antibody than those without. Further research to explore the internal relationship between HER2 alteration and MSI‐H is needed.

The clinical significance of HER2 somatic mutations and its relationship with high microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer is not fully understood. This study investigated the relationship by analyzing data of patients with colorectal cancer who underwent next‐generation sequencing.

HER2 in Colorectal Carcinoma: Are We There yet?

HER2 (ERBB2) is a member of the ERBB family of receptor tyrosine kinases and functions to drive signaling in the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways. Overall, approximately 2-3% of CRCs exhibit ERBB2 amplification. Multiple phase II clinical trials have now shown that ERBB2 amplification can be predictive of response to anti-ERBB2 targeted therapy. Consequently, recently released guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend treatment with anti-ERBB2 targeted therapy for RAS wild-type, ERBB2-amplified metastatic CRC. While circumspection is still needed, ERBB2 amplification has now emerged as the next standard-of-care biomarker for metastatic CRC, expanding targeted therapy options for these patients.

Molecular-Biology-Driven Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic CRC (mCRC) is a molecular heterogeneous disease. The aim of this review is to give an overview of molecular-driven treatment of mCRC patients.

METHODS

A review of clinical trials, retrospective studies and case reports was performed regarding molecular biomarkers with therapeutic implications.

RESULTS

RAS wild-type status was confirmed as being crucial for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies and for rechallenge strategy. Antiangiogenic therapies improve survival in first- and second-line settings, irrespective of RAS status, while tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain promising in refractory mCRC. Promising results emerged from anti-HER2 drugs trials in HER2-positive mCRC. Target inhibitors were successful for BRAFV600E mutant mCRC patients, while immunotherapy was successful for microsatellite instability-high/defective mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) or DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic subunit (POLE-1) mutant patients. Data are still lacking on NTRK, RET, MGMT, and TGF-β, which require further research.

CONCLUSION

Several molecular biomarkers have been identified for the tailored treatment of mCRC patients and multiple efforts are currently ongoing to increase the therapeutic options. In the era of precision medicine, molecular-biology-driven treatment is the key to impro patient selection and patient outcomes. Further research and large phase III trials are required to ameliorate the therapeutic management of these patients.

Assessment of two different HER2 scoring systems and clinical relevance for colorectal cancer

Although the positivity of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is low in colorectal cancer (CRC), anti-HER2 is becoming a new target therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, assessment of the HER2 scoring system was still not established in CRC. The purpose of our study was to evaluate HER2 status and its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and survival according to the HER2 diagnostic criteria for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA criteria) and the HERACLES diagnostic criteria (HERACLES criteria) in a large cohort of Chinese CRC patients. The HER2 positivity was 2.9% (43/1490) and 2.6% (39/1490) in CRCs based on the GEA criteria and the HERACLES criteria, and 3.7% (9/243) in mCRC according to both criteria. HER2 status was associated with primary tumor location (P = 0.037), regional lymph node metastasis (P = 0.035), and TNM stage (P = 0.022) in CRCs based on the HERACLES criteria. No such association was found based on the GEA criteria. Furthermore, HER2 positive only presented in patients with RAS gene wild type (P = 0.001). Significant difference was only observed between the HER2-positive and HER2-negative groups in terms of disease-free survival for stage II-III CRCs (P = 0.048) according to the HERACLES criteria, but not based on the GEA criteria. Our findings suggest that the frequency of HER2 overexpression or amplification was low in Chinese CRC patients, and provide a rationale for further evaluation of HER2 in CRC based on the HERACLES criteria and the HER2 diagnostic criteria for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.