Soft tissue tumor with novel NR1D1-MAML1 fusion in a pediatric case

The utility of FISH analysis in the diagnosis of BCOR-rearranged sarcomas

BACKGROUND

A BCL6 corepressor (BCOR) gene alteration is a genetic signature of rare subsets of sarcomas. The identification of this alteration has recently contributed to the definition of new entities in the current WHO (2020) classification of soft tissue and bone tumours. We retrospectively examined cases of BCOR-rearranged sarcoma (BRS) to assess the reliability of the BCOR FISH analysis using an IVD (in vitro diagnostic) probe.

METHODS

We investigated and compared the molecular diagnostic strategies and features by collecting 17 data from patients with a BCOR gene rearrangement detected using quantitative-Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRTPCR), Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

RESULTS

We describe fourteen BCOR::CCNB3 sarcomas, one spindle cell sarcoma with a novel BCOR::MAML1 fusion, one spindle cell sarcoma with a novel BCOR::AHR fusion, and one ossifying fibromyxoid tumour with a BCOR::ZC3H7B fusion. FISH analysis of all, except one, BCOR::CCNB3 sarcoma, showed a FISH break-apart pattern with mild signal separation. The MAML1::BCOR sarcoma showed large-space split signals, while in the two patients with AHR::BCOR and ZC3H7B::BCOR fusions, no BCOR rearrangement was observed using FISH.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that BCOR FISH analysis using an IVD probe, may be useful to detect the presence of a BCOR rearrangement, including both translocations and inversions; however, negative results, in some cases, can occur.

NR1D1-rearranged soft tissue tumour: A clinicopathological and molecular analysis of four additional cases

AIMS

Nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1 (NR1D1)-rearranged soft tissue tumour is a newly described entity with an epithelioid morphology and a potential for aggressive behaviour. Largely due to under-recognition, this tumour type has not yet been widely acknowledged. Herein, we report four additional cases to further expand its clinicopathological and molecular spectrum.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Four mesenchymal tumours with NR1D1 rearrangement were identified from our consultation files. There were one male and three females with ages ranging from 19 to 47 years (median = 28.5 years). Tumour occurred in the tongue, neck, hip and index finger, respectively. Histologically, two tumours were composed predominantly of epithelioid cells; one tumour had admixed epithelioid-spindle cells and one tumour consisted of monomorphic small round to ovoid cells. By immunohistochemistry, none of the tumours expressed lineage-specific markers. Targeted RNA-sequencing identified NR1D1 fusions in all four tumours, the partner genes being MAML2, MAML3, KMT2A and NCOA2, respectively. The novel MAML3 and NCOA2 rearrangements were confirmed by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation analysis. On follow-up (2-23 months), one patient experienced local recurrence due to incomplete resection and one patient developed lung metastasis. The other two patients were alive without disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds more support for NR1D1-rearranged soft tissue tumour as an emerging entity. The occurrence of two additional tumours in the head and neck region, description of a small round cell variant and identification of novel MAML3, KMT2A and NCOA2 partners further expand its clinicopathological and molecular spectrum. More studies on larger series are necessary to validate the fully malignant potential of NR1D1-rearranged soft tissue tumour.

NR1D1::MAML1 epithelioid and spindle cell sarcoma mimicking pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma in core biopsy: A case report and review of the literature

Epithelioid and spindle cell sarcomas with NR1D1::MAML1/2 gene fusions are rare and emerging entities. Only six cases of NR1D1-rearranged mesenchymal tumors have previously been reported in the literature; they are often characterized by an epithelioid morphology, at least focal pseudogland formation, prominent cytoplasmic vacuoles, and focal to diffuse immunohistochemical expression of keratin. We herein report the first case of an NR1D1::MAML1 epithelioid and spindle cell sarcoma with dual immunohistochemical expression of ERG and FOSB, mimicking a pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma (PHE) on core biopsy. The sarcoma arose in the left forearm of a 64-year-old man. Initial biopsy showed a mesenchymal neoplasm composed of epithelioid and spindle cells dispersed in myxoid stroma with scattered stromal neutrophils. The morphologic features, combined with the dual immunohistochemical expression of ERG and FOSB, initially mimicked PHE, representing an important potential diagnostic pitfall. The patient subsequently underwent a radical resection, which showed a much more diffuse epithelioid appearance with nested architecture and pseudogland formation. Next-generation sequencing was performed on the resection specimen, which revealed an NR1D1::MAML1 gene fusion, confirming the final diagnosis. Given the fully malignant potential of this tumor, knowledge and recognition of this rare entity are essential to ensure proper management, prevent misdiagnosis, and further characterize the clinical course of this emerging entity. Comprehensive molecular testing can help to identify these rare tumors and exclude the possibility of epithelioid mimics, including PHE.

Fibroma of tendon sheath is defined by a USP6 gene fusion-morphologic and molecular reappraisal of the entity

Fibroma of tendon sheath (FTS) is an uncommon benign myofibroblastic neoplasm that arises in association with tenosynovial tissue. Fusions of the USP6 gene have been recently documented in a proportion of so-called "cellular FTS" but not in "classic FTS". It remains unknown whether FTS can be defined by a USP6 fusion, regardless of cellularity, and what are USP6 fusion-negative "cellular FTS". Furthermore, FTS with low cellularity seems to be frequently confused with desmoplastic fibroblastoma. We performed a comprehensive analysis, including targeted RNA sequencing, of 58 consecutive cases originally diagnosed as FTS (n = 49), desmoplastic fibroblastoma (n = 6), or nodular fasciitis (n = 3); the latter two at the predilection sites for FTS. After review of the original slides, 28 lesions were morphologically classified as FTS (13 "classic" and 15 "cellular") and 23 as desmoplastic fibroblastoma. Among originally diagnosed FTS at the more cellular end of the spectrum, we identified seven lesions that shared many morphologic features of FTS but, in addition, showed several distinct morphologic features consistent with myofibroma, such as myoid appearance, branching thin-walled vessels, and perivascular growth. Targeted RNA sequencing showed a USP6 fusion in 17 of 18 analyzed FTS, regardless of cellularity, 0 of 5 desmoplastic fibroblastomas and 0 of 4 myofibromas. MYH9, COL1A1, and ASPN were identified as fusion partners in three cases each, and MIR22HG, CTNNB1, SPARC, CAP1, EMP1, LINC00152, NR1D1, and RAB1A in a single case each. FTS, regardless of cellularity, can be defined by a USP6 fusion with a variety of fusion partners. More cellular lesions exhibiting some morphologic features of FTS but lacking a USP6 fusion tend to be myofibromas.

Malignant epithelioid soft-tissue tumour with NRID1-MAML1 fusion

Epithelioid soft-tissue tumours are predominantly composed of rounded or polygonal tumour cells resembling epithelial cells. In the current WHO classification, epithelioid soft tissue tumors of uncertain differentiaton include myoepithelial tumour, alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), and PEComa among others. There is only one published case of paediatric novel soft-tissue tumour with an NRID1-MAML1 fusion.¹ We report the second case with the same NRID1-MAML1 fusion gene; however, this is the first case with malignancy in a young adult.