The SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex status in renal cell carcinomas with sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features

Update on Selected High-grade Renal Cell Carcinomas of the Kidney: FH-deficient, ALK-rearranged, and Medullary Carcinomas

High-grade renal cell carcinoma (RCC), often diagnosed at advanced stages, significantly contributes to renal cancer-related mortality. This review explores the progress in understanding specific subtypes of high-grade RCC, namely fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient RCC, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged RCC, and SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma, all of which are now recognized as molecularly defined entities in the WHO classification system (2022). While these entities each exhibit a morphologic spectrum that overlaps with other high-grade RCC, ancillary tools developed based on their distinctive molecular alterations can help establish a specific diagnosis, underscoring the importance of integrating molecular findings into diagnostic paradigms. It is important to exclude these specific tumor types in cases with similar morphologic spectrum before rendering a diagnosis of high-grade papillary RCC, collecting duct carcinoma, or RCC, NOS. Several gray areas exist within the spectrum of high-grade uncommon types of RCC, necessitating continued research to enhance diagnostic precision and therapeutic options.

The rhabdoid variant of adrenocortical carcinoma-Report of three cases and literature review

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy. Extensive rhabdoid morphology in ACC has been described recently in very few cases. The proportion of rhabdoid morphology and the role of SMARCB1/ INI1 expression in these tumor cells to diagnose the specific variant is not described in the literature. We reviewed the clinicopathological features of nine cases of adrenocortical neoplasm. Out of which, three cases of ACC showed predominant rhabdoid morphology. Large discohesive cells with abundant cytoplasm containing eosinophilic inclusions, eccentric vesicular nucleus, and prominent nucleoli. INI1 immunostain was retained in all cases. We reported the rhabdoid variant of ACC, a novel entity, and its diagnostic approach from their histological mimickers. Identifying more cases of this entity will help to clearly understand the pathogenesis, biologic behaviour, and any specific molecular alterations in the future.

SWI/SNF complexes and cancers

Epigenetics refers to the study of genetic changes that can affect gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence, including DNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodelling, X chromosome inactivation and non-coding RNA regulation. Of these, DNA methylation, histone modification and chromatin remodelling constitute the three classical modes of epigenetic regulation. These three mechanisms alter gene transcription by adjusting chromatin accessibility, thereby affecting cell and tissue phenotypes in the absence of DNA sequence changes. In the presence of ATP hydrolases, chromatin remodelling alters the structure of chromatin and thus changes the transcription level of DNA-guided RNA. To date, four types of ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complexes have been identified in humans, namely SWI/SNF, ISWI, INO80 and NURD/MI2/CHD. SWI/SNF mutations are prevalent in a wide variety of cancerous tissues and cancer-derived cell lines as discovered by next-generation sequencing technologies.. SWI/SNF can bind to nucleosomes and use the energy of ATP to disrupt DNA and histone interactions, sliding or ejecting histones, altering nucleosome structure, and changing transcriptional and regulatory mechanisms. Furthermore, mutations in the SWI/SNF complex have been observed in approximately 20% of all cancers. Together, these findings suggest that mutations targeting the SWI/SNF complex may have a positive impact on tumorigenesis and cancer progression.

Tumor progression by epithelial-mesenchymal transition in ARID1A- and SMARCA4-aberrant solid-type poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma

Solid-type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA) of the stomach is frequently associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) and aberrations of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Previous studies showed that aberrant ARID1A and SMARCA4 expression induces mesenchymal transition. We analyzed 51 primary-site cases and 209 metastatic lymph nodes among solid-type PDA for the expression of SWI/SNF complex subunits (ARID1A, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, SMARCC2) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers (E-cadherin, β-catenin, Snail). We also analyzed 40 cases of non-solid-type PDA as a stage-matched control group. Aberrant expression of ARID1A (39%) and SMARCA4 (49%) was more common in solid-type PDA than in non-solid-type PDA (ARID1A, P = 0.0049; SMARCA4, P < 0.0001). The group of solid-type PDA with aberrant ARID1A showed significantly longer overall and progression-free survival than the corresponding ARID1A-retained group (P = 0.0405 and P = 0.0296, respectively). Aberrant expression of EMT factors inducing mesenchymal transition in the groups with solid-type PDA at the primary site or metastatic lymph nodes with aberrant ARID1A was less common than in the corresponding groups with retained ARID1A (E-cadherin, primary site P = 0.0341, lymph node P < 0.0001; β-catenin, primary site P = 0.0293, lymph node P = 0.0010; Snail, primary site P = 0.0169, lymph node P = 0.0828). Furthermore, N3 of the TNM classification was more frequently observed in the group with solid-type PDA with retained ARID1A than in the corresponding ARID1A-aberrant group (P = 0.0288). Mesenchymal transition was not induced in the ARID1A-aberrant group, in which patients had favorable prognosis, and preserved epithelial characteristics in EMT may play an important role in low tumor aggressiveness of solid-type PDA.

[SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient renal cell carcinoma: medullary and beyond : Evolving concepts]

During the last decades, the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex has received enormous recognition as a major player in the molecular pathogenesis of diverse neoplasms. Accordingly, SWI/SNF defects affecting different subunits of the complex became defining genetic features in the nosology of different neoplastic entities. In the kidney, loss of SMARCB1(INI1) as a major component of the SWI/SNF complex has emerged as the defining genetic marker for renal medullary carcinoma and pediatric malignant rhabdoid tumor. Diagnosis of these two rare entities is based on a set of defined demographic, clinicopathological, immunophenotypic, and genetic (SMARCB1 loss) criteria. Moreover, the sickle cell trait is considered a prerequisite for renal medullary carcinoma. Current knowledge illustrates that SMARCB1 loss is encountered in three major tumor categories in the kidney: (1) histologically defined neoplasms that are primarily driven by de novo SMARCB1 loss (renal medullary carcinoma and malignant rhabdoid tumor); (2) SMRACB1-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with variable non-specific histology ranging from collecting duct-like, papillary high-grade (papillary type 2), or medullary-like (lacking sickle cell trait), to fully undifferentiated; and (3) biphasic (dedifferentiated) RCC showing a variable SMARCB1-deficient undifferentiated component. The latter variant most frequently originates from pre-existing clear cell RCC but may rarely superimpose on papillary or chromophobe RCC. This review summarizes the major defining features of the emerging SMARCB1-deficient renal neoplasms. All SMARCB1-deficient carcinomas have a poor prognosis in common. Therefore, exact diagnosis of these tumors is a prerequisite for studies investigating new therapies.

Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated urological carcinomas: lessons learned from the recent developments

Loss of the morphological and immunophenotypic characteristics of a neoplasm is a well-known phenomenon in surgical pathology and occurs across different tumor types in almost all organs. This process may be either partial, characterized by transition from well differentiated to undifferentiated tumor component (=dedifferentiated carcinomas) or complete (=undifferentiated carcinomas). Diagnosis of undifferentiated carcinoma is significantly influenced by the extent of sampling. Although the concept of undifferentiated and dedifferentiated carcinoma has been well established for other organs (e.g. endometrium), it still has not been fully defined for urological carcinomas. Accordingly, undifferentiated/ dedifferentiated genitourinary carcinomas are typically lumped into the spectrum of poorly differentiated, sarcomatoid, or unclassified (NOS) carcinomas. In the kidney, dedifferentiation occurs across all subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but certain genetically defined RCC types (SDH-, FH- and PBRM1- deficient RCC) seem to have inherent tendency to dedifferentiate. Histologically, the undifferentiated component displays variable combination of four patterns: spindle cells, pleomorphic giant cells, rhabdoid cells, and undifferentiated monomorphic cells with/without prominent osteoclastic giant cells. Any of these may occasionally be associated with heterologous mesenchymal component/s. Their immunophenotype is often simple with expression of vimentin and variably pankeratin or EMA. Precise subtyping of undifferentiated (urothelial versus RCC and the exact underlying RCC subtype) is best done by thorough sampling supplemented as necessary by immunohistochemistry (e.g. FH, SDHB, ALK) and/ or molecular studies. This review discusses the morphological and molecular genetic spectrum and the recent develoments on the topic of dedifferentiated and undifferentiated genitourinary carcinomas.

New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia

The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) reviewed recent advances in renal neoplasia, particularly post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, to provide an update on existing entities, including diagnostic criteria, molecular correlates, and updated nomenclature. Key prognostic features for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain WHO/ISUP grade, AJCC/pTNM stage, coagulative necrosis, and rhabdoid and sarcomatoid differentiation. Accrual of subclonal genetic alterations in clear cell RCC including SETD2, PBRM1, BAP1, loss of chromosome 14q and 9p are associated with variable prognosis, patterns of metastasis, and vulnerability to therapies. Recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines increasingly adopt immunotherapeutic agents in advanced RCC, including RCC with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid changes. Papillary RCC subtyping is no longer recommended, as WHO/ISUP grade and tumor architecture better predict outcome. New papillary RCC variants/patterns include biphasic, solid, Warthin-like, and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. For tumors with 'borderline' features between oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC, a term "oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, not further classified" is proposed. Clear cell papillary RCC may warrant reclassification as a tumor of low malignant potential. Tubulocystic RCC should only be diagnosed when morphologically pure. MiTF family translocation RCCs exhibit varied morphologic patterns and fusion partners. TFEB-amplified RCC occurs in older patients and is associated with more aggressive behavior. Acquired cystic disease (ACD) RCC-like cysts are likely precursors of ACD-RCC. The diagnosis of renal medullary carcinoma requires a negative SMARCB1 (INI-1) expression and sickle cell trait/disease. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) can be distinguished from papillary RCC with overlapping morphology by losses of chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 22. MTSCC with adverse histologic features shows frequent CDKN2A/2B (9p) deletions. BRAF mutations unify the metanephric family of tumors. The term "fumarate hydratase deficient RCC" ("FH-deficient RCC") is preferred over "hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome-associated RCC". A low threshold for FH, 2SC, and SDHB immunohistochemistry is recommended in difficult to classify RCCs, particularly those with eosinophilic morphology, occurring in younger patients. Current evidence does not support existence of a unique tumor subtype occurring after chemotherapy/radiation in early childhood.