Myoid gonadal tumor. Case series, systematic review, and Bayesian analysis

Contemporary Updates on Sex Cord-stromal Tumors of the Testis

Testicular sex cord-stromal tumors (TSCSTs) are relatively rare, representing ~5% of testicular neoplasms overall. Historically, TSCSTs have been classified into 3 major entities: Leydig cell tumor, Sertoli cell tumor, and granulosa cell tumor. In recent years, immunophenotypic and molecular analyses have led to a more detailed understanding of the biological and genomic features of these neoplasms, resulting in the description of new entities, some of which have been included in the latest WHO classification. This review summarizes novel histopathologic, clinical, and molecular findings that may lead to a reappraisal of established concepts and help improve the diagnosis and clinical management of TSCSTs in the coming years.

Myoid gonadal stromal tumor of the testis-the novel subtype of testicular gonadal stromal tumors: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Sex cord gonadal stromal tumors compose less than 10% of all testicular neoplasms and consist of a variety of histological subtypes. In 2016, the World Health Organization introduced a novel subtype, the myoid gonadal stromal tumor, that consists of spindle-shaped cells with immunohistologic features of muscle cells. Only few cases have been reported to date. Due to its rarity and owing to its only recent introduction, the current knowledge about myoid gonadal stromal tumor is limited, and particularly, appropriate clinical management is still ill-defined.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 47-year-old man of Caucasian descent presented with nonspecific scrotal discomfort. A roundish and well demarcated hypoechoic mass of 8.5 mm in diameter was detected in the cranial region of the left testis. Serum tumor marker levels were within normal ranges. Testis-sparing surgery revealed a 9-mm whitish, hard mass with sharp surgical margin. Histologically, the neoplasm consisted of microfibrillar tissue with spindle-shaped cells harboring elongated nuclei. Immunohistochemical work-up disclosed expression of desmin, small muscle actin, and S100 protein giving evidence for the myogenic nature of the neoplastic cells. There was no indication of malignancy, neither histologically nor clinically. Follow-up of 1 year was uneventful.

CONCLUSION

A literature survey revealed 22 previous cases of myoid gonadal stromal tumor. The median age was 37 years, the median size of the neoplasm was 20 mm, and there was no side-preponderance. Myoid gonadal stromal tumor is not much different from other subtypes of gonadal stromal tumors nor from testicular gem cell tumors regarding age and laterality; however, tumor size is smaller in myoid gonadal stromal tumors than in germ cell tumors. Although rarely performed so far, testis-sparing surgery probably constitutes an appropriate treatment of this neoplasm. Myoid gonadal stromal tumor represents an emerging novel entity of benign testicular new growths that caregivers of patients with testicular tumors should be aware of.

Myoid Gonadal Stromal Tumor: A New Case Report with a Review of the Literature

The myoid gonadal stromal tumor is a very rare testicular spindle cell tumor. Few cases have been reported in the literature from 1977 to 2022. It was an emerging entity in the fourth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs and has been instated as a full benign entity in the new edition of 2022. We report herein an additional case of a myoid gonadal stromal tumor. It was a 27-year-old man who presented with an asymptomatic mass in his left testicle for 2 months. The mass was confirmed by ultrasound as a 3 cm solid well-circumscribed lesion for which orchiectomy has been performed. The histological analysis of the specimen and the immunohistochemistry staining was consistent with a myoid gonadal stromal tumor. The characteristics of this tumor are summarized in well-circumscribed, nonencapsulated masses of uniform spindle cells, and immunohistochemically, tumor cells coexpress SMA and S-100 protein. The benign behavior of this tumor is demonstrated by our results and those presented in the previous cases reported in the literature.

Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cannot Predict the Presence of a Rare Myoid Gonadal Stromal Testicular Tumor: A Case Report

Testicular myoid gonadal stromal tumors (MGSTs) are rare neoplasms. While past research has detailed the pathological characteristics of these tumors, the radiological differences between MGST and other types of testicular tumors have not been elucidated. Our study aimed to reveal the possible distinctive features of MGST using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We report a 24-year-old patient presenting with a left scrotal mass. During the patient's preoperative MRI, we observed a testicular tumor measuring 2.5 cm that was consistent with the findings of a seminoma. The serum tumor markers were within the normal range. The T1-weighted MRI revealed a solid mass that was isointense-slightly hyperintense compared to the testicular parenchyma, while the mass appeared homogeneously hypointense on the T2-weighted imaging. The patient was planned to undergo left inguinal orchiectomy with the final pathological diagnosis of MGST. The MGST cannot be distinguished from other testicular tumors with certainty based on any MRI findings. The main tool for diagnosis should be based on the histomorphological characteristics and the immunohistochemical profile of the mass.

An update on diagnostic tissue-based biomarkers in testicular tumors

Testicular cancer is rare overall but comprises the most common solid malignancy diagnosed in young men aged ∼20-40 years. Most testicular neoplasms generally fall into 2 broad categories: germ cell tumors (GCTs; ∼95%) and sex cord-stromal tumors (SCSTs ∼5%). Given the relative rarity of these tumors, diagnostic biomarkers are highly relevant for their diagnosis. Over the past several decades, diagnostic biomarkers have improved dramatically through targeted immunohistochemical and molecular characterization. Despite these recent advances, most markers are not perfectly sensitive or entirely specific. Therefore, they need to be used in combination and interpreted in context. In this review, we summarize tissue-based biomarkers relevant to the pathologist, with a focus on practical diagnostic issues that relate to testicular GCT and SCST.

Myoid gonadal stromal tumours are characterised by recurrent chromosome-level copy number gains: molecular assessment of a multi-institutional series

Myoid gonadal stromal tumours (MGST) represent a rare type of testicular sex cord-stromal tumour that has recently been recognised as a distinct entity by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of genitourinary tumours. MGSTs affect adult men and have been reported to behave in an indolent fashion. Histologically, MGSTs are pure spindle cell neoplasms that coexpress SMA and S100 protein. Given that the molecular features of these neoplasms remain largely undescribed, we evaluated a multi-institutional series of MGSTs using DNA and RNA sequencing. This study included 12 tumours from 12 patients aged 28 to 57 years. Tumour sizes ranged from 0.6 to 4.3 cm. Aggressive histologic features, such as vascular invasion, necrosis, invasive growth, and atypical mitoses were invariably absent. Mitotic activity was low, with a median of less than 1 mitosis per 10 high power fields (HPF; maximum: 3 mitoses per 10 HPF). Molecular analyses did not identify recurrent mutations or gene fusions. All cases with interpretable copy number variant data (9/10 cases sequenced successfully) demonstrated a consistent pattern of chromosome arm-level and whole-chromosome-level copy number gains indicative of ploidy shifts, with recurrent gains involving chromosomes 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14q, 15q, 17, 18q, 20, and 21q. Similar findings have also been recognised in pure spindle cell and spindle-cell predominant sex cord-stromal tumours without S100 protein expression. MGSTs are characterised by ploidy shifts and may be part of a larger spectrum of spindle cell-predominant sex cord-stromal tumours, including cases without S100 protein expression.

Testicular Tumors: New Developments in Germ Cell and Sex Cord Stromal Tumors

This article reviews the recent advances and potential future changes in the classification of testicular germ cell and sex cord stromal tumors, highlighting changes in the classification system and terminology with description on newer entities. A discussion on approaching difficult areas and diagnostic pitfalls is also included along with the utility of ancillary investigations. Areas with limited knowledge are highlighted to providing direction for future studies and a bulleted summary in the form of critical care points is provided.

An introduction to the WHO 5th edition 2022 classification of testicular tumours

The 5th edition of the World Health Organisation Blue Book was published recently and includes a comprehensive update on testicular tumours. This builds upon the work of the 4th edition, retaining its structure and main nomenclature, including the use of the term 'germ cell neoplasia in situ' (GCNIS) for the pre-invasive lesion of most germ cell tumours and division from those not derived from GCNIS. While there have been important developments in understanding the molecular underpinnings of testicular cancer, this updated classification paradigm and approach remains rooted in morphology. Nomenclature changes include replacement of the term 'primitive neuroectodermal tumour' by 'embryonic neuroectodermal tumour' based on the non-specificity of the former term and to separate these tumours clearly from Ewing sarcoma. Seminoma is placed in a germinoma family of tumours emphasising relation to those tumours at other sites. Criteria for the diagnosis of 'teratoma with somatic transformation' have been modified to not include variable field size assessments. The word 'carcinoid' has been changed to 'neuroendocrine tumour', with most examples in the testis now classified as 'prepubertal type testicular neuroendocrine tumour'. For sex cord-stromal tumours, the use of mitotic counts per high-power field has been changed to per mm2 for malignancy assessments, and the new entities, 'signet ring stromal tumour' and 'myoid gonadal stromal tumour', are defined. Well-differentiated papillary mesothelial tumour has now been defined as tumour type with a favourable prognosis. Sertoliform cystadenoma has been removed as an entity from testicular adnexal tumours and placed with Sertoli cell tumours.

News in the classification of WHO 2022 testicular tumours

The novelties in WHO 5^th edition classification of genitourinary tumours are: a) nomenclature changes, including the replacement of the term "primitive neuroectodermal tumour" with "embryonic-type neuroectodermal tumour" and of "carcinoid" with "neuroendocrine tumour". Also, seminoma is now placed in a "germinoma" family of tumours, while sertoliform cystoadenoma was moved from adnexal tumours to Sertoli cell tumours; b) new entities, specifically signet ring stromal tumour, myoid gonadal stromal tumour and well-differentiated papillary mesothelial tumour.

Digital Pathology During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy: Survey Study

BACKGROUND

Transition to digital pathology usually takes months or years to be completed. We were familiarizing ourselves with digital pathology solutions at the time when the COVID-19 outbreak forced us to embark on an abrupt transition to digital pathology.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to quantitatively describe how the abrupt transition to digital pathology might affect the quality of diagnoses, model possible causes by probabilistic modeling, and qualitatively gauge the perception of this abrupt transition.

METHODS

A total of 17 pathologists and residents participated in this study; these participants reviewed 25 additional test cases from the archives and completed a final psychologic survey. For each case, participants performed several different diagnostic tasks, and their results were recorded and compared with the original diagnoses performed using the gold standard method (ie, conventional microscopy). We performed Bayesian data analysis with probabilistic modeling.

RESULTS

The overall analysis, comprising 1345 different items, resulted in a 9% (117/1345) error rate in using digital slides. The task of differentiating a neoplastic process from a nonneoplastic one accounted for an error rate of 10.7% (42/392), whereas the distinction of a malignant process from a benign one accounted for an error rate of 4.2% (11/258). Apart from residents, senior pathologists generated most discrepancies (7.9%, 13/164). Our model showed that these differences among career levels persisted even after adjusting for other factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings are in line with previous findings, emphasizing that the duration of transition (ie, lengthy or abrupt) might not influence the diagnostic performance. Moreover, our findings highlight that senior pathologists may be limited by a digital gap, which may negatively affect their performance with digital pathology. These results can guide the process of digital transition in the field of pathology.