Nodal EBV-positive polymorphic B cell lymphoproliferative disorder with plasma cell differentiation: clinicopathological analysis of five cases

Immune deficiency/dysregulation -associated lymphoproliferative disorders. Revised classification and management

Significant advances in the field of lymphoma have resulted in two recent classification proposals, the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 5th edition WHO. A few entities are categorized differently in the ICC compared to the WHO. Nowhere is this more apparent than the immunodeficiency lymphoproliferative disorders. The three previous versions of the WHO classification (3rd, 4th and revised 4th editions) and the ICC focused on four clinical settings in which these lesions arise for primary categorization. In contrast the 2023 WHO 5th edition includes pathologic characteristics including morphology and viral status, in addition to clinical setting, as important information for lesion classification. In addition, the 2023 WHO recognizes a broader number of clinical scenarios in which these lesions arise, including not only traditional types of immune deficiency but also immune dysregulation. With this classification it is hoped that new treatment strategies will be developed leading to better patient outcomes.

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)+ tumour cells and low-reacting programmed cell death 1 (PD1)+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes predict poor prognosis in Epstein-Barr virus+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)⁺ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has specific tumour cell characteristics, and these patients have worse outcomes than EBV-negative DLBCL patients. We compared 38 EBV⁺ DLBCL patients with 43 methotrexate-associated EBV⁺ B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (MTX⁺/EBV⁺ BLPDs) and 30 non-germinal centre (GC) subtype DLBCL. Lymphoma cells of the EBV⁺ DLBCL group were positive for BCL2 in 17 patients (44.7%), CMYC in 23 patients (60.5%), and p53 in 33 patients (86.8%), which was significantly higher than in the MTX⁺/EBV⁺ BLPD group (P < 0.05), and were positive for CD30 in 29 patients (76.3%), compared with two in non-GC subtype DLBCL (6.7%) (P < 0.0001). Significantly more EBV⁺ DLBCL patients (n = 16, 42.1%) had programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)⁺ tumour cells than patients with non-GC subtype DLBCL (n = 5, 16.7%; P = 0.024), and PD-L1⁺ tumour cells were more common in advanced stages than in early stages (P = 0.048). Twenty-five EBV⁺ DLBCL patients (69.4%) had few reactive PD1⁺ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), compared with 12 patients with MTX⁺/EBV⁺ BLPDs (37.5%) (P = 0.008). In the EBV⁺ DLBCL group, CD30, BCL2, CMYC, and p53 expression was not related to patient prognosis. Poor outcomes were associated with PD-L1⁺ tumour cells (P = 0.001) and low-reacting PD1⁺ TILs (P = 0.02), while their combination conferred a worse outcome (P < 0.0001). Immune evasion by PD-L1⁺ tumour cells and exhaustion of PD1⁺ TILs may occur in EBV⁺ DLBCL patients, and PD-L1/PD1 interactions may influence tumour progression and poor prognosis.