Application of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology using cell blocks

Application of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology to core needle biopsies of the parotid gland

AIMS

The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology was developed by an international group of experts and first published in 2018 with the goal to standardise reporting of salivary gland aspirates. Seven categories with distinct risks of malignancy were proposed. Core needle biopsies (CNB) of salivary glands are also common, but reporting lacks standardisation. Here we explore the feasibility of a Milan-like reporting system on CNB of the parotid gland.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Our laboratory information system was searched for parotid gland CNBs from 2010 to 2021. Reports were translated into a Milan-like reporting system. When available, CNB findings were correlated with cytology and resection specimens. In order to compare the performance of CNB with fine-needle aspirations (FNA), we established a second cohort of cases consisting of parotid FNA with surgical follow-up. The risk of neoplasia (RON) and risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated for FNA and CNB Milan categories using cases with follow-up resection. We analysed 100 cases of parotid gland CNB. Of these cases, 32 underwent subsequent resection, while 52 had concurrent FNA. A total of 20 cases had concurrent FNA and underwent follow-up resection. In 63 (63%) cases, a specific diagnosis was provided on CNB, with 18 cases undergoing follow-up resection having an accuracy rate of 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the feasible of using a Milan-like system in the setting of parotid gland CNB with differentiation in RON and ROM. CNB allows assessment of architectural features that may allow more specific diagnoses in some cases.

Molecular Profiling for Bethesda III to VI Nodules: Results of a Multicenter International Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Molecular testing is a well-established tool that assists in the management of thyroid nodules. We describe our experience using molecular testing of thyroid nodules with Bethesda III to VI cytology.

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter, multinational study of thyroid nodules that underwent preoperative molecular profiling with ThyGenX/ThyGeNEXT or ThyroSeq V3 between 2015 and 2022. The clinical characteristics and mutational profiles of tumors were compared. Collected data included demographics, cytology results, surgical pathology, and molecular alterations. Molecular alterations were categorized into 3 main phenotypes: BRAF-like, RAS-like, and non-BRAF-non-RAS (NBNR).

RESULTS

Overall, 784 patients who had surgery were included, of which 603 (76.2%) were females. The most common histologic type was papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with 727 (91.9%) cases. In total, 205 (28.2%) cases showed an aggressive subtype of PTC (eg, tall cell and hobnail). BRAF-like alterations were most likely to be found in Bethesda V and VI nodules and show extrathyroidal extension (ETE), nodal disease, and/or aggressive subtypes of PTC (P < .001 for all). RAS-like alterations were more commonly found in Bethesda III and IV nodules and were less likely to show ETE, nodal disease, and/or aggressive histology (P < .001 for all). NBNR alterations were more commonly found in Bethesda III and IV nodules and were less likely to show ETE, nodal disease, and/or aggressive subtypes of PTC. However, they were rarely but significantly associated with poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (P < .005).

CONCLUSION

Molecular testing of thyroid nodules can help determine the likelihood of malignancy and classify nodules into several tumor phenotypes, predicting their behaviors and potentially allowing for a more tailored treatment. NBNR alterations should be managed with caution.

Investigation of genetic sex-specific molecular profile in well-differentiated thyroid cancer: Is there a difference between females and males?

BACKGROUND

Although more common in females, thyroid cancer is deemed to be more aggressive in males. The reasons for sex disparities in thyroid cancer are not well understood. We hypothesised that differences in molecular mutations between females and males contribute to this phenomenon.

METHODS

Retrospective multicentre multinational study of thyroid nodules that underwent preoperative molecular profiling between 2015 and 2022. The clinical characteristics and mutational profiles of tumours in female and male patients were compared. Collected data included demographics, cytology results, surgical pathology, and molecular alterations.

RESULTS

A total of 738 patients were included of which 571 (77.4%) were females. The extrathyroidal extension was more common in malignancies in males (chi-squared, p = 0.028). The rate of point mutations and gene fusions were similar in both sex groups (p > 0.05 for all mutations). Patients with nodules with BRAFV600E mutations were significantly younger than BRAF wild-type nodule patients (t-test, p = 0.0001). Conversely, patients with TERT promoter mutations were significantly older than patients with wild-type TERT (t-test, p < 0.0001). For patients harbouring both BRAFV600E and TERT mutations, the difference in age at presentation was significantly different in females (t-test, p = 0.009) but not in males (t-test, p = 0.433). Among females, patients with BRAFV600E and TERT mutations were significantly older than their wild-type or single-mutation counterpart (t-test, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The absolute rate of molecular mutations was similar in females and males. We found that extrathyroidal extension was more common in males. Moreover, BRAFV600E and TERT mutations occur at a younger age in males than in females. These two findings are factors that may explain the tendency of more aggressive disease in males.