Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma: from early lesions to transformation

Mature B, T and NK-cell, plasma cell and histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasms: classification according to the World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification

In 2022, two updated classification systems for lymphoid neoplasms were published by the World Health Organization (WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours, 5th edition, referred to hereafter as WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Conference (ICC) (Alaggio et al. in Leukemia 36(7):1720-1748, 2022; Campo et al. in Blood 140(11):1229-1253, 2022). Both classifications were conceived by both pathologists and clinicians with expertise in the field. The reasons for this have been reviewed previously (Arber et al. in Virchows Arch 482(1):1-9, 2023; Cree in Leukemia 36(7):1701-1702, 2022, Leukemia 36(11):2750, 2022). Given that both groups were using data-driven processes and consensus and used the revised 4th edition of the WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO-HAEM4R) as a starting point, it is not entirely surprising that the resulting classifications are quite similar. However, they are not identical and reflect preferences or approaches for certain unsettled areas as well as preferred terminology. In this review, we will compare nomenclature of the WHO-HAEM5 and ICC classifications, focusing on lymphoid neoplasms and lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs).

Real-world patterns and sequences of targeted therapy use in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma in the United States: a longitudinal study

With increasing focus on novel targeted therapies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), this longitudinal claims-based study evaluated real-world CLL/SLL treatment sequences, particularly sequential targeted therapy. Among patients with first-line (1 L) treatment in 2014-2017 (N = 2,612; median follow-up = 3 years), the most common 1 L treatment was chemoimmunotherapy (CIT; 44.6%), followed by CD20 (25.2%) and Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi; 21.7%). Among those with 1 L in 2018-2021 (N = 4,534; median follow-up = 1 year), these were BTKi (45.5%), CD20 (20.4%), CIT (17.5%), and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor (8.3%). In 2014-2017, the proportion of patients receiving sequential targeted therapy in the first 2 LOTs was 11.2% (80.2% was BTKi→BTKi); in 2018-2021, this proportion was 34.3% (66.4% was BTKi→BTKi). Over time, there was a substantial increase in targeted therapy use in 1 L and sequential targeted therapy, particularly with BTKi→BTKi. Future studies should assess clinical outcomes to determine optimal sequences for CLL/SLL and reasons for restarting BTKi.

The 2022 classifications of lymphoid neoplasms : Keynote

Classification of hematological neoplasms in the past 25 years has been generated through international efforts to achieve broad consensus among professionals. In recent years, the understanding of lymphoid neoplasms has advanced notably, particularly with the impact of genomic studies. Two classifications of these neoplasms were produced in 2022. The International Consensus Classification (ICC) was generated following the same successful process used for the third, fourth, and updated fourth editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Hematologic Neoplasms, coordinated by a steering committee approved by the Executive Committees of the European Association for Haematopathology and the Society of Hematopathology. The topics were prepared by different working groups and subsequently discussed in the clinical advisory committee (CAC) meeting with the participation of a large group of pathologists, clinicians, and scientists who all approved the classification after reaching consensus on all topics. Simultaneously, the International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC) of the WHO has produced the fifth edition of the classification of these neoplasms with a group of professionals appointed by the agency who discussed the proposed classification in different meetings. The definition and criteria for diagnosis of many entities have been refined in both proposals. Terminology for some diseases has been adapted to the current knowledge of their biology. Major findings from recent genomic studies have impacted the conceptual framework and diagnostic criteria for many entities. Although most categories are similar in both classifications, there are also conceptual differences and differences in the diagnostic criteria for some diseases.