Advances in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with NPM1 mutation or acute myeloid leukemia?

The 2022 WHO revision and the ICC classification have recently modified the diagnostic criteria for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukemia. However, there is no consensus on whether CMML with NPM1 mutation (NPM1mut) should be diagnosed as AML. Nowadays, it is a subject of discussion because of its diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Therefore, we describe a case of a patient diagnosed with CMML NPM1mut and briefly review the literature to highlight the uncertainty about how to classify a CMML with NPM1 mutation. We emphasize the importance of a comprehensive molecular study, which is crucial to optimize the individualized treatment of patients, enabling them to access targeted therapies.

NGS panel enhance precise diagnosis of myeloid neoplasms under WHO-HAEM5 and International Consensus Classification: An observational study

This study aimed to assess hematological diseases next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel enhances the diagnosis and classification of myeloid neoplasms (MN) using the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of Myeloid Tumors. A cohort of 112 patients diagnosed with MN according to the revised fourth edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM4R) underwent testing with a 141-gene NGS panel for hematological diseases. Ancillary studies were also conducted, including bone marrow cytomorphology and routine cytogenetics. The cases were then reclassified according to WHO-HAEM5 and ICC to assess the practical impact of these 2 classifications. The mutation detection rates were 93% for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 89% for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), 94% for myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), and 100% for myelodysplasia/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) (WHO-HAEM4R). NGS provided subclassified information for 26 and 29 patients with WHO-HAEM5 and ICC, respectively. In MPN, NGS confirmed diagnoses in 16 cases by detecting JAK2, MPL, or CALR mutations, whereas 13 "triple-negative" MPN cases revealed at least 1 mutation. NGS panel testing for hematological diseases improves the diagnosis and classification of MN. When diagnosed with ICC, NGS produces more classification subtype information than WHO-HAEM5.

Infrequent Presentations of Chronic NPM1-Mutated Myeloid Neoplasms: Clinicopathological Features of Eight Cases from a Single Institution and Review of the Literature

Non-acute myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with NPM1 mutations (NPM1mut-MNs) pose a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma, primarily manifesting as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The classification and treatment approach for these conditions as acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are debated. We describe eight cases of atypical NPM1mut-MNs from our institution and review the literature. We include a rare case of concurrent prostate carcinoma and MN consistent with chronic eosinophilic leukemia, progressing to myeloid sarcoma of the skin. Of the remaining seven cases, five were CMML and two were MDS. NPM1 mutations occur in 3-5% of CMML and 1-6% of MDS, with an increased likelihood of rapid evolution to AML. Their influence on disease progression varies, and their prognostic significance in non-acute MNs is less established than in AML. Non-acute MNs with NPM1 mutations may display an aggressive clinical course, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive diagnosis integrating clinical and biological data. Tailoring patient management on an individualized basis, favoring intensive treatment aligned with AML protocols, is crucial, regardless of blast percentage. Research on the impact of NPM1 mutations in non-acute myeloid neoplasms is ongoing, requiring challenging prospective studies with substantial patient cohorts and extended follow-up periods for validation.

Recent advances in the application of induced pluripotent stem cell technology to the study of myeloid malignancies

Acquired myeloid malignancies are a spectrum of clonal disorders known to be caused by sequential acquisition of genetic lesions in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, leading to their aberrant self-renewal and differentiation. The increasing use of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology to study myeloid malignancies has helped usher a paradigm shift in approaches to disease modeling and drug discovery, especially when combined with gene-editing technology. The process of reprogramming allows for the capture of the diversity of genetic lesions and mutational burden found in primary patient samples into individual stable iPSC lines. Patient-derived iPSC lines, owing to their self-renewal and differentiation capacity, can thus be a homogenous source of disease relevant material that allow for the study of disease pathogenesis using various functional read-outs. Furthermore, genome editing technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 enable the study of the stepwise progression from normal to malignant hematopoiesis through the introduction of specific driver mutations, individually or in combination, to create isogenic lines for comparison. In this review, we survey the current use of iPSCs to model acquired myeloid malignancies including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), acute myeloid leukemia and MDS/MPN overlap syndromes. The use of iPSCs has enabled the interrogation of the underlying mechanism of initiation and progression driving these diseases. It has also made drug testing, repurposing, and the discovery of novel therapies for these diseases possible in a high throughput setting.

Guide to the Diagnosis of Myeloid Neoplasms: A Bone Marrow Pathology Group Approach

OBJECTIVES

The practicing pathologist is challenged by the ever-increasing diagnostic complexity of myeloid neoplasms. This guide is intended to provide a general roadmap from initial case detection, often triggered by complete blood count results with subsequent blood smear review, to final diagnosis.

METHODS

The integration of hematologic, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features into routine practice is standard of care. The requirement for molecular genetic testing has increased along with the complexity of test types, the utility of different testing modalities in identifying key gene mutations, and the sensitivity and turnaround time for various assays.

RESULTS

Classification systems for myeloid neoplasms have evolved to achieve the goal of providing a pathology diagnosis that enhances patient care, outcome prediction, and treatment options for individual patients and is formulated, endorsed, and adopted by hematologists/oncologists.

CONCLUSIONS

This guide provides diagnostic strategies for all myeloid neoplasm subtypes. Special considerations are provided for each category of testing and neoplasm category, along with classification information, genetic testing requirements, interpretation information, and case reporting recommendations based on the experience of 11 Bone Marrow Pathology Group members.

Genomics of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm

Myelodysplastic/ Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) demonstrate overlapping pathologic and molecular features of myelodysplastic (MDS) and myeloproliferative (MPN) neoplasms. Diagnosis is difficult based on morphology alone, requiring exclusion of various non-neoplastic causes for CBC abnormalities and morphologic findings and other myeloid neoplasms. Identifying a clonal abnormality by cytogenetics or molecular studies has vastly improved our ability to diagnose MDS/MPN and has been incorporated in the different classification schemas. Currently two separate classification systems are in use- The 5^th edition WHO and international consensus classification. The two competing classifications emphasize genetic work-up and are similar on many levels; however, they do introduce diagnostic dilemma when diagnosing certain entities such as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in the presence of NPM1 mutations. The genetic profile overlaps among different subentities; however, the combination and the incidence of mutations; together with the clinical features and morphology helps in further subclassification. In this review, we discuss the advances in molecular characterization of MDS/MPN. We attempt to summarize the differences between the various classification schemes, and highlight the changes made in the diagnostic criteria.

What’s New in the Classification, Diagnosis and Therapy of Myeloid Leukemias

Myeloid leukemias are a broad group of hematological disorders, characterized by heterogeneous clinical and biological features. In recent years, unprecedented genetic discoveries and clinical–biological correlations have revolutionized the field of myeloid leukemias. The most relevant changes have specifically occurred in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with eosinophilia. The recently published International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms has addressed these changes, providing an updated framework and revised diagnostic criteria for such entities. This is also the aim of the 5th edition of the WHO classification of hematopoietic tumors, whose preliminary version was published in 2022. Parallel to this, new therapeutic options and novel molecular targets have changed the management of many myeloid entities, including AML and CML. This review aims to address the most relevant updates in the classification and diagnosis of AML, CMML, CML and MNs with eosinophilia. The state of the art of treatment and future therapeutic options for such disorders are also discussed.

Discrepancy in Transcriptomic Profiling Between CD34+ Stem Cells and Primary Bone Marrow Cells in Myelodysplastic Neoplasm

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) biomarkers can be used to help diagnose and monitor the disease, as well as to determine which treatments are most effective. So, given the complexity of Myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS), it is difficult to determine the impact and disparities of DEGs between CD34⁺ HSC (hematopoietic stem cells) or primary bone marrow cells (PBMC) in MDS pathogenesis, and therefore it remains largely unknown. Here, we performed an in-silico transcriptome analysis on CD34⁺ HSC and PBMC from 1092 MDS patients analyzing the divergences between differential gene expression patterns in these two cell types as potential pathogenic biomarkers for MDS. Initially, we observed a difference of 7117 expressed transcripts between PBMC (n = 40,165) and CD34 +HSC (n = 33,048). Also, we identified that CD34⁺ HSC and PBMC samples showed 240 and 2948 DEGs, respectively. In summary, we identified DEGs disparities in CD34⁺ HSC and PBMC cell types. However, there was a certain similarity of the activated pathways in both cellular samples based on Gene Ontology and KEGG pathways enrichment analyses. Our results provide novel insights into novel DEGs biomarkers to MDS pathogenesis with clinical significance. AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS: All microarray databases were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). To evaluate the biological function of differentially expressed genes, the DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery tool was used) (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/).