Genetic alterations in poorly differentiated endocrine colon carcinomas developing in tubulo-villous adenomas: a report of two cases

Unusual Microsatellite-Instable Mixed Neuroendocrine and Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasm: A Clinicopathological Inspection and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Mixed neuroendocrine and non-endocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are challenging to diagnose and manage clinically. The current understanding of MiNENs' pathobiology, molecular mechanisms, and management is incomplete. Though microsatellite instability (MSI) is known to impact carcinogenesis, reports examining MSI mechanisms for MiNENs are rare.

METHODS

We report an unusual colonic MSI-MiNEN uncovered in an 89-year-old woman and the review of the literature.

RESULTS

Pathologic inspection revealed a high-grade carcinoma composed of tumor cells with neuroendocrine histologic traits and immunophenotype intermixed with mucin-containing signet ring-like cells arranged in nested and micronodular patterns. Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 mismatch repair proteins was detected in tumor cells. INSM1 immunostaining highlighted about 50% of the tumour, further reinforcing the MiNEN diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing identified multiple carcinogenic mutations. Because of the advanced stage of the tumor and its adhesion to the adjacent organs, surgical resection was aborted; immunotherapy was initiated. The tumor is in remission 30 months following initiation of treatment, and the patient remains asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

This unique MSI MiNEN was characterized by its immunohistochemical and molecular signatures and illustrated how correctly diagnosing MSI can strongly improve a patient's outcomes.

Should immunohistochemical expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis be routinely performed for poorly differentiated colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas?

SUMMARY

Colorectal poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are typically associated with poor outcomes. The mechanisms of their aggressiveness are still being investigated. Microsatellite instability (MSI) has recently been found in colorectal NECs showing aberrant methylation of the MLH1 gene and is associated with improved prognosis. We present a 76-year-old lady with an ascending colon tumour showing features of a pT3 N0 R0, large cell NEC (LCNEC) following right hemicolectomy. The adjacent mucosa showed a sessile serrated lesion (SSL) with low-grade dysplasia. Immunohistochemistry showed loss of expression for MLH1 and PMS2 in both the LCNEC and dysplastic SSL. Molecular analysis indicated the sporadic nature of the MLH1 mismatch repair (MMR) protein-deficient status. Our patient did not receive adjuvant therapy and she is alive and disease-free after 34 months follow-up. This finding, similar to early-stage MMR-deficient colorectal adenocarcinoma, is likely practice-changing and will be critical in guiding the appropriate treatment pathway for these patients. We propose that testing of MMR status become routine for early-stage colorectal NECs.

LEARNING POINTS

Colorectal poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are known to be aggressive and typically associated with poor outcomes. A subset of colorectal NECs can display microsatellite instability (MSI) with mismatch repair (MMR) protein-deficient status. MMR-deficient colorectal NECs have been found to have a better prognosis compared with MMR-proficient NECs. MMR status can be detected using immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry for MMR status is routinely performed for colorectal adenocarcinomas. Immunohistochemical expression of MMR protein and MSI analysis should be performed routinely for early-stage colorectal NECs in order to identify a subgroup of MMR-deficient NECs which are associated with a significantly more favourable prognosis.

Endocrine cell carcinomas of the colon and rectum: a clinicopathological evaluation

PURPOSE

Endocrine cell carcinoma, according to the Japanese classification criteria for colorectal cancer, corresponds to neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC), as defined in the 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical features of patients with these tumors diagnosed and treated at our institution.

METHODS

The clinicopathological features of endocrine cell carcinomas of the colon and rectum diagnosed by neuroendocrine markers from January 2000 to December 2012 were retrospectively evaluated in 12 patients.

RESULTS

Surgical specimens were obtained from eight of the 12 patients. MANEC was diagnosed in six patients and NEC in one. One tumor was unclassifiable. The tumors were not resected in four patients, and all died within 3 months. Of the eight patients who underwent resection, four received an R0 resection, two of whom underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and survived more than 5 years. One patient who underwent an R2 resection and continuous chemotherapy survived for 53 months. One patient with NEC underwent surgery and radiotherapy, and died 17 months later.

CONCLUSION

Most endocrine cell carcinomas of the colon and rectum reviewed were MANECs. Though their prognosis was generally poor, chemotherapy may be effective in some patients.

Gastroenteropancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma

Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms are classified as low-grade, intermediate-grade, and high-grade tumors based on morphologic criteria and the proliferation rate. Most studies have been conducted in patients with well differentiated (low-grade to intermediate-grade) neuroendocrine tumors. Data are substantially scarcer on poorly differentiated, high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), which includes the entities of small cell carcinoma and large cell NEC. A literature search of GEP-NEC was performed. Long-term survival was poor even among patients who presented with localized disease. Several studies highlighted heterogeneity within the high-grade NEC category and a need for the further identification of discreet prognostic and predictive groups. Tumors with a Ki-67 proliferation index <55% were less responsive to platinum-based chemotherapy, and patients with such tumors or with well differentiated morphology had better survival than patients who had tumors with poorly differentiated morphology or a higher Ki-67 index. Treatment options beyond platinum-based chemotherapy are emerging. A revision of the World Health Organization high-grade NEC classification seems to be necessary based on recent data. Platinum-based chemotherapy may not be the optimal treatment for patients who have GEP-NEC with a moderately high proliferation rate. Adequate diagnostic and prognostic stratifications constitute the basis for future progress.

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of duodenal high grade neuroendocrine carcinoma underlying a villous adenoma: report of a case

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy is a reliable and accurate method for the diagnosis of submucosal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. We report the cytopathologic findings of a case of duodenal high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma in a 68-year-old woman who presented with melena and marked anemia, 45 years after kidney transplantation. Imaging studies performed in the work-up of melena showed a duodenal mass, which on endoscopy proved to be an exophytic, villous duodenal lesion, 3 cm from the ampulla. Forceps biopsy of the exophytic lesion showed a villous adenoma. Endoscopic ultrasound additionally revealed an underlying submucosal lesion and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of this submucosal mass and of the enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes was diagnostic of a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. The aspirates showed abundant cellularity with tumor cells arranged in sheets and occasional loose clusters. The neoplastic cells had a moderate amount of pale cytoplasm and large round to oval hyperchromatic nuclei with focally prominent nucleoli. Mitoses, apoptotic bodies and necrotic debris were also present. The tumor cells were strongly and diffusely positive for cytokeratin AE1/AE3, synaptophysin and chromogranin and showed a very high proliferative fraction on Ki67 staining, supporting the diagnosis of a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. This is to our knowledge the first case of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the duodenum diagnosed by EUS-FNA. This case also emphasizes the diagnostic value of EUS-FNA sampling of the submucosal and intramural component of villous tumors of the gastrointestinal tract when mucosal forceps biopsies show only benign findings.

Site-specific biology and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

The gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are composed of cells with a neuroendocrine phenotype. Well-differentiated tumors, well-differentiated carcinomas, poorly differentiated carcinomas, functioning tumors (with a hormonal syndrome), and nonfunctioning tumors are identified. To predict their clinical behavior, these neuroendocrine tumors are classified on the basis of their clinicopathological features, including size, local invasion, angioinvasion, proliferative activity, histological differentiation, and metastases, into neoplasms with benign, uncertain, low-grade malignant and high-grade malignant behavior. In addition, a tumor/nodes/metastases classification and a grading system are presented. In the light of these criteria, the various GEP-NET entities are reviewed.

Goblet cell carcinoids and other mixed neuroendocrine/nonneuroendocrine neoplasms

Within the spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors arising in different organs, intermediate and controversial entities exist displaying a coexistence of neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine cell populations, and that are grouped under terms such as "goblet cell carcinoid", "mixed endocrine-exocrine carcinoma", "combined carcinomas", or "adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation". These tumors may display variable amounts of the two components, potentially ranging from 1 to 99%, and variable structural patterns, ranging from single scattered neuroendocrine cells to a well-defined neuroendocrine tumor cell component organized in typical organoid, trabecular, or solid growth patterns. Although variably included in the site-specific World Health Organization classification schemes, clear definitions and diagnostic features are still missing, as well as a definite knowledge of their biological properties and histogenesis. In the present report, the main characteristics of tumors showing mixed neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine features will be described, using morphological patterns and site of origin as schematic guidelines. Moreover, molecular and clinical aspects, which might help to understand their possible histogenesis and biological behavior, will be reviewed.

Molecular genetic events in gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors originate from the cells of the diffuse endocrine system. Their molecular genetic mechanism of development and progression is complex and remains largely unknown, and they are different in genetic composition from the gastrointestinal epithelial tumors. The current literature suggests that multiple genes are involved in their tumorigenesis with significant differences for tumors of different embryological derivatives: foregut, midgut and hindgut. The MEN1 gene is involved in initiation of 33% of foregut gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. 18q defects are present almost exclusively in mid/hindgut neuroendocrine tumors. X-chromosome markers are associated with malignant behavior in foregut tumors only. Analysis of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas of any site demonstrates high chromosomal instability and frequent p53 alterations similar to other poorly differentiated carcinomas. Several factors played a limiting role in the molecular studies published to date: the tumors are rare and heterogeneous, it is difficult to predict their behavior and prognosis, and several different tumor classifications are used by the investigators in the studies. Future studies need to evaluate molecular genetic composition of large series of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors of each specific tumor type. Understanding of specific genetic alterations characteristic for gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors might lead to their improved diagnosis, morphologic and molecular characterization and treatment.

[Mixed endocrine tumors]

Mixed endocrine tumors are tumors composed of at least two distinct tumor populations, one of which is endocrine. Because of their rarity and unusual presentation, endocrine mixed tumors raise many problems of diagnosis, management and therapy. Three main types of endocrine mixed tumors are recognized: The existence of these various types has been confirmed by recent molecular studies, even if the same studies have also shown that the histogenesis of a mixed endocrine tumor cannot be predicted from its histological features. Composite tumors are the less rare mixed tumors. The recent WHO classification recommends to restrict the term of composite endocrine tumor to the epithelial tumors containing at least 30% of obviously tumoral endocrine cells; some authors recommend to use higher thresholds, of at least 50%, in order to avoid overdiagnosis. The endocrine component is usually well differentiated, easily identified by its suggestive histological features; the endocrine nature of tumor cells is confirmed by the immunodetection of specific endocrine and neuro-endocrine markers (such as chromogranin A and synaptophysin). In some cases, the endocrine component is poorly differentiated: the demonstration of neuro-endocrine markers is necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Mixed tumors can occur in every anatomical site; they are more frequent in organs containing endocrine cells in the normal state (especially the digestive tract and the pancreas), but they can also be observed in organs devoid of endocrine cells (such as the mammary gland). The management of mixed endocrine tumors must take into account the more aggressive component. Mixed tumors containing a well differentiated endocrine component and an adenocarcinomatous component are to be treated like adenocarcinomas. Mixed tumors containing a poorly differentiated endocrine component must be considered as poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas.

Évaluation de la malignité dans les tumeurs endocrines digestives : recommandations pratiques

For a long time, the assessment of malignancy risk and patient outcome in digestive endocrine tumors had to rely on sparse and mostly unconfirmed data. The 2000 WHO classification with its standardized scheme of pathologic report constitutes a framework facilitating the assessment of tumor malignancy and has been regarded to be useful for clinical purposes, providing the basis for proper patient management and for designing treatment protocols. The classification is based on a combination of pathological and clinical features with parameters specific for each organ in which the endocrine tumors originate. Three main categories are considered: 1) well differentiated endocrine tumors, further subdivided into tumors with benign and with uncertain behavior; 2) well differentiated endocrine carcinomas, low grade; and 3) poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas, high grade. In this review the differential tumor characteristics between the above categories are summarized. The relevance of additional features as for tumor prognostication, chiefly the Ki67 proliferation index and malignancy associated genetic changes, is discussed with emphasis on the discrepancies emerging between tumors of foregut and midgut origin.

Endocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract: aetiology, molecular pathogenesis and genetics

Endocrine tumours of the gut and pancreas originate from cells of the diffuse endocrine system and are characterised by the production of a wide variety of bioactive substances including growth factors. Two major tumour categories are distinguished-well-differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms-with distinct phenotypes and significantly diverse clinical behaviour. Here, genetic background data are summarised on an anatomical basis for tumours of foregut, midgut and hindgut derivatives. For well-differentiated tumours, independent techniques identified the abnormality of multiple chromosomal sites and genes, pointing to a complex genetic background. Differences in foregut tumours compared with midgut and hindgut tumours are, however, outlined. The multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 1 (MEN1) gene is reported to be involved in about one-third of sporadic foregut endocrine tumours and exceptionally in midgut and hindgut tumours. Similarly, X chromosome markers are associated with malignant behaviour in foregut tumours only. For poorly differentiated carcinomas, a high degree of chromosomal instability is the common genetic trait independent of tumour site and frequently involving the p53 gene.

Primary Mixed Adenocarcinoma and Small Cell Carcinoma of the Appendix

Appendiceal carcinoids range from well-differentiated endocrine tumor to well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma, while poorly differentiated (small cell) carcinoma has not been described in this site. We report herein a case of mixed intestinal-type adenocarcinoma associated with a small cell carcinoma arisen in a 35-year-old woman and clinically presenting as an appendiceal abscess. The resected tumor histologically appeared as a biphasic lesion composed of a nonmucinous adenocarcinoma closely juxtaposed with a poorly differentiated (small cell) endocrine carcinoma. The subsequent right hemicolectomy was unremarkable, but one pericolic lymph node showed a metastatic deposit consisting of the adenocarcinoma only. The patient thus underwent a chemotherapeutic protocol for colorectal cancer, and she is alive and well at the 65-month follow-up. Immunohistochemically, the adenocarcinoma strongly stained for cytokeratin 20 and carcinoembryonic antigen, while the endocrine component displayed a dot-like positivity for pan-cytokeratins and chromogranin. Of note, both components did not stain with CDX2 and p53. At genotypic analysis by microsatellite instability, both components shared many microsatellite alterations as well as a normal p53 gene setup, although small cell carcinoma harbored additional alterations. Clinical and molecular findings led us to consider this lesion as a clonal tumor in which the endocrine component seems to derive from a progressive differentiation of the adenocarcinoma following a glandular-to-endocrine sequence.

The phenotype of gut endocrine tumours

Endocrine tumours of gut and pancreas tract are rare entities originating from cells of the diffuse endocrine system. The endocrine phenotype is assessed by the expression of general and specific endocrine markers. General endocrine markers associate to organelles like large dense core vesicles (e.g. chromogranin A) and small synaptic-like vesicles (e.g. synaptophysin), or to the cytosol, like neuron specific enolase and protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5). The specific markers correspond to the hormones produced by tumour cells. Two major categories of endocrine tumours are identified as (i) well-differentiated and (ii) poorly differentiated neoplasms. Well-differentiated tumours/carcinomas (also known as carcinoids) express all general markers of endocrine differentiation and various hormones. Poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas lack large dense core vesicles markers (chromogranin A), while widely express synaptophysin and cytosol endocrine markers. The clinical behaviour of endocrine tumours spans from benign to low-grade malignant for well-differentiated tumours/carcinomas to high grade malignant for poorly differentiated carcinomas. The Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 syndrome (MEN1) gene is involved in the genesis of a proportion of both well- and poorly differentiated sporadic tumours. p53 gene abnormality appears as restricted to poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas.

Genetic alterations in poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

The molecular pathogenesis of poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract (GI PDECs) remains unclear. It has been suggested that these lesions either originate from multipotent stem cells that also can serve as the origin of nonendocrine adenocarcinomas or arise due to the dedifferentiation of well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas (WDECs).

METHODS

Ten gastric and 9 colorectal PDECs, 9 gastric WDECs, and 12 colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) were analyzed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 11q13 (MEN1), 17p13.1 (p53), 3p14.2 (FHIT), 3p21.3 (RASSF1A), and 18q23 (DCC/DPC4/Smad2), and for immunohistochemical expression of p53, FHIT, Rb, and p16.

RESULTS

PDECs exhibited high fractional allelic loss (FAL; 0.49), with frequent (> 40%) alterations in p53, Rb, MEN1, FHIT, and 18q. No significant differences were found between gastric and colorectal PDECs. Gastric WDECs also exhibited high FAL (0.44), with frequent alterations in Rb and/or p16, MEN1, and 3p21. CRCs exhibited a low level of FAL (0.23), with frequent (> 50%) p16 and p53 alterations. When gastric PDECs and WDECs were compared, substantial similarities were found with respect to FAL (0.42 vs. 0.44) and with respect to individual gene alterations, except in p53, which was consistently altered only in PDECs. CRCs, which were characterized by a lower FAL (0.56 vs. 0.23) and which lacked alterations in both 3p and Rb, were found to be significantly different from colorectal PDECs.

CONCLUSIONS

GI PDECs demonstrated a high level of chromosomal instability; consistent inactivation of both the p53 and p16/Rb pathways; and frequent LOH at 3p (possibly involving FHIT), the MEN1 locus, and 18q. The profile of genetic alterations in PDECs was more consistent with the profile in WDECs than with the profile in CRCs.

Potential applications of molecular biology in neuroendocrine tumors

The impact of molecular biology procedures on neuroendocrine (NE) tumor biology is gradually evolving from purely academic and research studies to clinical applications. This review deals with applications of molecular techniques in neuroendocrine tumors, with special reference to their potential for diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic impact. Since the cloning of the genes involved in inherited endocrine tumor syndromes, molecular analysis of the responsible genetic alterations has become a routine diagnostic tool to select affected patients and their relatives, and also an interesting approach to investigate the pathogenesis of neuroendocrine tumors. Assessment of the clonal composition of endocrine tumors could be useful to differentiate hyperplastic versus either adenomatous or carcinomatous conditions, as well as to better understand the clonal relationship between different neoplastic populations in mixed tumors. In addition, molecular approaches allow high sensitivity both in defining the neuroendocrine phenotype in poorly differentiated tumors and in searching for micrometastasis during the follow up of patients with endocrine tumors. Finally, the detection of peptide hormone receptors (e.g., oxytocin and somatostatin receptors) and the development of potent synthetic analogs of such peptides, are opening promising applications in the diagnosis and therapy of endocrine tumors.