1
|
Kang J, Wu J, Huang X, Mao W, Li X. Differential effects of left DLPFC anodal and cathodal tDCS interventions on the brain in children with autism: A randomized controlled trial. IBRO Neurosci Rep 2025; 18:171-179. [PMID: 39896718 PMCID: PMC11787616 DOI: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2025] [Indexed: 02/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex and heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorder with few effective treatment options. In recent years, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been applied in interventions for ASD, often targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). However, studies investigating anodal and cathodal tDCS interventions have reported differing outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to compare and analyze the effects of these two stimulations through a randomized controlled trial, utilizing both behavioral assessments and EEG proxy markers capable of characterizing the brain's excitatory-inhibitory balance. Methods This study recruited a total of 24 children with ASD (20 males and 4 females; mean age ± SD: 5.5 ± 1.2 years), who were randomly divided into two groups receiving either anodal or cathodal tDCS targeting the DLPFC. The stimulation intensity was set at 1 mA, administered five times per week for a total of 20 sessions. Behavioral intervention outcomes were assessed using the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) and the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC). Additionally, the study evaluated the effects of tDCS on the brain's excitatory-inhibitory balance by analyzing corrected periodic alpha oscillation power and bandwidth, as well as non-periodic exponent and offset derived from EEG data. Results Following anodal tDCS intervention, results from the SRS scale indicated a decrease in overall scores, with significant differences observed in social communication and social motivation among children. On the ABC scale, overall scores also decreased, with significant differences noted in sensory behavior, social relating, body and object use, and language and communication skills. Non-periodic exponent and offsets increased following anodal tDCS stimulation, whereas they decreased after cathodal tDCS stimulation. Regarding alpha oscillation power, there was a significant increase following anodal tDCS and a significant decrease following cathodal tDCS. In terms of alpha oscillation bandwidth, there was a reduction following anodal tDCS and an increase following cathodal tDCS. Further correlation analysis revealed that in children who received anodal tDCS intervention, non-periodic exponent showed correlations with behaviors such as social communication. Conclusion Our study results demonstrated that anodal and cathodal tDCS targeting the left DLPFC had distinct effects on the behavior and excitatory-inhibitory balance of children with ASD. Anodal tDCS intervention appeared to have a more positive impact compared to cathodal intervention. However, the sample size was small, and we focused solely on the effects of tDCS, with our experimental design perhaps not being able to generalize to all external manipulations of excitability in our study. In future research, we will continue to improve the experiments to address these limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiannan Kang
- Child Rehabilitation Division, Ningbo Rehabilitation Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Juanmei Wu
- Child Rehabilitation Division, Ningbo Rehabilitation Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Xinping Huang
- Child Rehabilitation Division, Ningbo Rehabilitation Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Wenqin Mao
- Child Rehabilitation Division, Ningbo Rehabilitation Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Xiaoli Li
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arutiunian V, Buyanova I, Minnigulova A, Davydova E, Pereverzeva D, Sorokin A, Tyushkevich S, Mamokhina U, Danilina K, Dragoy O. Left-hemispheric atypicalities in the primary auditory cortex are associated with language comprehension and social skills in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Cereb Cortex 2025; 35:bhaf055. [PMID: 40083153 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2025] [Accepted: 02/19/2025] [Indexed: 03/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Low-level auditory processing difficulties have been previously reported in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and some studies showed the relationship between these difficulties in the primary auditory cortex and language impairment in ASD. However, there is still a limited number of studies that comprehensively assess (i) amplitudes, latencies, and sensory gating effects in all early components of auditory processing (M50-M100-M200 complex) at the source level in magnetoencephalography with their relation to structural anatomy (gray matter volume, thickness, gyrification) (ii) and the association between brain metrics and clinical phenotype in the same group of children. To address this question, we used a standard paired-clicks paradigm in magnetoencephalography and brain morphometry analysis in children with and without ASD (NASD = 20, NTD = 20). First, the results revealed a reduction of M200 and altered M200 sensory gating effect in the left auditory cortex in children with ASD. Second, these alterations were related to lower language comprehension skills and higher autistic symptom severity. Finally, altered MEG responses were associated with gray matter thickness reduction as well as abnormal gyrification in the primary auditory cortex in ASD. The study revealed low-level functional and structural atypicalities in children with ASD and their relation to clinical phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vardan Arutiunian
- Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1920 Terry Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, United States
| | - Irina Buyanova
- Center for Language and Brain, HSE University, Krivokolenny pereulok, 3, Moscow 101000, Russia
- University of Otago, 362 Leith Street, Dunedin North, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
| | - Alina Minnigulova
- Center for Language and Brain, HSE University, Krivokolenny pereulok, 3, Moscow 101000, Russia
| | - Elizaveta Davydova
- Federal Resource Center for ASD, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Ulitsa Kashenkin Lug, 7, Moscow 127427, Russia
- Chair of Differential Psychology and Psychophysiology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Shelepikhinskaya Naberezhnaya, 2А, Moscow 123290, Russia
| | - Darya Pereverzeva
- Federal Resource Center for ASD, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Ulitsa Kashenkin Lug, 7, Moscow 127427, Russia
| | - Alexander Sorokin
- Federal Resource Center for ASD, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Ulitsa Kashenkin Lug, 7, Moscow 127427, Russia
- Haskins Laboratories, 300 George Street, Suite 900, New Haven, CT 06511, United States
| | - Svetlana Tyushkevich
- Federal Resource Center for ASD, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Ulitsa Kashenkin Lug, 7, Moscow 127427, Russia
| | - Uliana Mamokhina
- Federal Resource Center for ASD, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Ulitsa Kashenkin Lug, 7, Moscow 127427, Russia
| | - Kamilla Danilina
- Federal Resource Center for ASD, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Ulitsa Kashenkin Lug, 7, Moscow 127427, Russia
- Scientific Research and Practical Center of Pediatric Psychoneurology, Michurinskiy Prospekt, 74, Moscow 119602, Russia
| | - Olga Dragoy
- Center for Language and Brain, HSE University, Krivokolenny pereulok, 3, Moscow 101000, Russia
- Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Bolshoy Kislovsky Ln, 1, Moscow 125009, Russia
- Center for Language and Brain, HSE University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|