High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in paediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome--early rescue use

Factors Associated with Survival during High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Children

Our aim is to determine indicators of survival in children with severe hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF) after transition to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). Single-center retrospective examination of children with HRF transitioned to HFOV. Blood gases and ventilator settings 24 hours prior to and 48 hours after HFOV in survivors and nonsurvivors were evaluated. Sixty-two children with mean age of 7 years and mean weight of 26 kg were included with an observed mortality of 29%. Mean airway pressures (Paw), oxygenation index (OI), arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO₂)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) (P/F) ratio, pH, bicarbonate, and arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure were similar prior to HFOV in survivors and nonsurvivors. During HFOV, mean OI and P/F ratio improved in both groups with an average Paw increase of ∼10 cm H₂O. Survivors had lower OI than nonsurvivors (21 ± 0.9 vs. 26.5 ± 2.2; p < 0.01) beginning 24 hours after HFOV. P/F ratio appears to diverge by 36 hours, with survivors having P/F ratio >200. Survivors had higher pH than nonsurvivors at 36 hours (7.40 ± 0.01 vs. 7.32 ± 0.02; p < 0.05), higher bicarbonate levels (27.1 ± 0.7 vs. 23.9 ± 1.3 mEq/L), and similar arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure with less oscillatory support (i.e., hertz and amplitude). Inhaled nitric oxide was used in 53% of patients with improvements in oxygenation but with no effect on mortality. HFOV improves oxygenation in children with severe HRF. Nonsurvivors can be distinguished from survivors at 24 to 36 hours during HFOV by higher OI, metabolic acidosis, and higher oscillatory support. These data may assist in prognostication or timing of initiating alternative therapies, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Clinical Use of Nonconventional Modes of Ventilator Support

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is now a mainstay of respiratory care for the neonatal patient. In this chapter, we will define HFOV as those ventilators with a “true” active expiratory phase created by a piston or diaphragm. Jet ventilation and flow interrupters are discussed elsewhere in this book.

The use of high frequency oscillatory ventilation in a pediatric oncology intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

High frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) has been successfully used in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in children. The aim of our study is to determine its effectiveness in pediatric patients with cancer or post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) diagnosed with ARDS.

PROCEDURE

A retrospective case review, in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in a tertiary-care oncology center in Amman, Jordan. Patients included were children with cancer and/or receiving allogeneic HSCT who were diagnosed with ARDS and placed on HFOV from January 2007 to February 2009.

RESULTS

Data from 12 pediatric oncology patients on HFOV were analyzed for demographics, oncological diagnosis, PRISM III scores, ventilator settings before switching to HFOV and 24 hours after switching, complications, and outcomes. Alveolar-arterial oxygen (A-a) gradient and oxygen index (OI) were calculated, and pressure of arterial CO(2) (PaCO(2) ) was measured before and 24 hours after switching. Endpoints were successful extubation and discharge, or death while intubated. After 24 hours on HFOV, the A-a gradient decreased significantly in all patients (from a median of 564-267 torr; P=0.001). OI decreased in all but two patients who died (median 17); PaCO(2) decrease was not significant. Five patients died (two of them post-HSCT) and the 7 (58%) survivors were weaned from HFOV (median, 9 days) and discharged.

CONCLUSIONS

HFOV improves gas exchange and is useful in managing critically ill children with cancer and post-HSCT patients who develop ARDS.

Pediatric acute respiratory failure: areas of debate in the pediatric critical care setting

Pediatric intensive care units across the world care for large numbers of mechanically ventilated infants and children on a daily basis, yet management of these patients is far from standardized. This lack of standardization may be a necessity in certain situations given variation between underlying disease processes, pathophysiology, response to therapy and available resources. However, there are many situations in which similar patients are managed differently across pediatric intensive care units simply because there are a shortage of available data to guide the management of these critically ill infants and children. Thus, a large fraction of pediatric critical care involves a combination of institutional preference, individual experience, opinion and extrapolation of adult data.

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of HFOV in pediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we reviewed all 20 pediatric patients, who were consecutively ventilated with HFOV in the pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary medical center, from January 2006 to February 2007.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were enrolled. The median age of the subjects was 70 (3-168) months; 10 were male. All patients received conventional ventilation before HFOV. After initiation of HFOV, there was an immediate and sustained increase in PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio. The PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio was elevated and OI was decreased significantly after 10-20 minutes and maintained for at least 48 hours (p= 0.03, both). Thirteen of the 20 patients were successfully weaned. No significant change in the mean arterial pressure and heart rate was noted after HFOV. Overall survival rate was 65%. Of 20 patients, 11 patients suffered from extrapulmonary ARDS (ARDSexp) and 9 from pulmonary ARDS (ARDSp). When HFOV was initiated, there was significant increase in PaO(2)/FiO(2) and decrease in OI in ARDSexp compared to ARDSp (p= 0.03, both). Also mortality rate was significantly lower in patients with ARDSexp (9% vs.66%), (p= 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In our study, HFOV was effective in oxygenation and seems to be safe for pediatric ARDS patients. HFOV affected ARDSp and ARDSexp paediatric patients differently. However prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to identify its benefits over conventional modes of mechanical ventilation.

High frequency oscillatory ventilation in children: experience of a medical center in Taiwan

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Data about the effectiveness of high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in children with respiratory failure are limited. This study investigated the efficacy and prognostic factors of this treatment.

METHODS

Children between 2 months and 18 years of age who received HFOV between January 2000 and September 2006 in a tertiary care center were enrolled in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

Thirty-six HFOV treatments were given to 33 patients (twice in one patient and three times in another patient) at a mean age of 5.4 +/- 5.0 years. HFOV was used as a rescue after conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) for 4.4 +/- 4.2 days. The mean duration of HFOV was 7.6 +/- 7.9 days. The most common indication for HFOV was oxygenation failure, which was due to pneumonia with acute respiratory distress syndrome in 15 (45.5%), severe lobar pneumonia in nine (27.3%), pulmonary hemorrhage in eight (24.2%) and pneumothorax in one (3%). PaCO2 was significantly improved 4 hours after HFOV and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased significantly 12 hours later. The oxygenation index and alveolar-arterial oxygen difference P(A-a)O2, however, did not change markedly. Four (12%) patients needed further extracorporeal life support and two of these survived. The overall survival rate was 45.5%. Patients with heavier body weight (p less than 0.05) and of the male gender (p less than 0.05) had a higher risk of mortality.

CONCLUSION

As a relatively late rescue therapy after failure of CMV, HFOV may improve PaCO2 and PaO2/FiO2 in children with respiratory failure. However, it carries an increased mortality rate in patients with heavier body weight and male gender.

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in pediatric patients with acute respiratory failure

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in pediatric patients with acute respiratory failure, failing conventional ventilation.

DESIGN

A prospective, clinical study.

SETTING

Tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Twenty pediatric patients (ages 12 days to 5 yrs) with acute respiratory failure (pneumonia, 14; sepsis with acute respiratory distress syndrome, 3; pulmonary edema as a complication of upper airway obstruction, 2; salicylate intoxication with acute respiratory distress syndrome, 1), failing conventional ventilation (median alveolar-arterial oxygen difference [P(A-a)O2] 578 [489-624] torr, median oxygenation index 26 [21-32].

INTERVENTIONS

HFOV was instituted after a median length of conventional ventilation of 15.5 (3.3-43.5) hrs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ventilator settings, arterial blood gases, oxygenation index, and P(A-a)O2 were recorded before HFOV (0 hrs) and at predetermined intervals during HFOV and compared using the one-way Friedman rank-sum procedure and a two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs test. Initiation of HFOV caused a significant decrease in FiO2 at 1 hr that continued to 24 hrs (p <or= .04). In all patients, target ventilation was achieved, and 19 had improved oxygenation. After 1 hr, PaCO2 significantly decreased (p = .002) and remained within the target range thereafter. There were significant decreases in P(A-a)O2 and oxygenation index at 1 and 4 hrs, respectively, that were sustained up to 12 hrs (p <or= .04). No significant complications associated with HFOV were detected. Fifteen patients (75%) survived to hospital discharge. Only one patient died from respiratory failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients with acute respiratory failure, failing conventional ventilation, HFOV improves gas exchange in a rapid and sustained fashion. However, randomized controlled trials are needed to identify its benefits over conventional modes of mechanical ventilation.