Evaluating systemic prednisone therapy for proliferating haemangioma in infancy

Paediatrics: how to manage infantile haemangioma

Infantile haemangiomas (IHs) are relatively common benign vascular tumours found in the paediatric population. They have varying sizes and involve different depths in the skin leading to various colours, shapes and textures. Although considered harmless in most cases, they may lead to life-threatening complications or cause permanent disfigurations and organ dysfunction. For problematic IHs, the treatment options include oral and topical beta-blockers, systemic corticosteroids, laser treatment, and surgery. In this narrative review, the treatment options for problematic IH are compared and delivered concisely to facilitate the clinical decisions from practitioners, including those in primary care settings. Oral propranolol is currently considered the first-line intervention for problematic IHs. For superficial lesions, there is robust evidence for the use of topical timolol maleate. Systemic corticosteroids are sometimes used in specific situations such as resistance or contraindications to beta-blockers. Surgical excision can be considered in cases requiring urgent intervention such as airway obstruction; this can be done alongside laser therapies for the removal of residual tissue or when reconstructing areas of deformity. The combination of multiple treatment modalities may lead to a more rapid clinical response.

Oral Propranolol in Infantile Hemangiomas: Analysis of Factors that Affect the Outcome

Aim

The primary treatment for the subset of infantile hemangiomas (IHs) which develops complication is pharmacological intervention, and propranolol has become a popular choice. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of propranolol in a clinical cohort of IHs and analyzed clinical characteristics associated with a good outcome.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a total of 52 IHs patients, between ages 1 and 48 months (median age: 7.5 months), who were treated with oral propranolol, with dose ranging from 2 to 3 mg/kg/day. Efficacy was evaluated using mean percentage reduction, visual analog scale (VAS), and parental satisfaction levels at week 2 and months 1, 2, 6, and 12. The adverse effects were noted and responses after 6 months were graded. Statistical analyses of the outcome were also performed for the responses with regard to age at propranolol initiation, site of lesion, and mean duration of treatment.

Results

A therapeutic response with at least 50% mean percentage reduction in size was noted in 84.6% at the end of 6 months. VAS score and parental satisfaction levels correlated well with mean percentage reduction (63.7 ± 15.6) at 6 months. Patients aged <6 months and those with cephalic lesions exhibited a greater therapeutic response rate with shorter overall mean duration of the treatment.

Conclusions

Oral propranolol at 2-3 mg/kg/day dosing has shown to be effective and safe for IHs in pediatric age group. Intervention in the early proliferative phase, with especially, the cephalic lesions result in better resolution rates with shorter duration of overall treatment.

Curative effect and safety of propranolol combined with prednisone in the treatment of infantile hemangiomas

The object of this study was to analyze the curative effect and safety of propranolol combined with prednisone in the treatment of infantile hemangiomas (IHs). Forty-four children with IHs on the head and face at the proliferative phase admitted to Jinan Center Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University were randomly divided into two groups. Children in group A took orally propranolol 2 mg/kg/day in three divided doses combined with prednisone 2 mg/kg/day in two divided doses in the first two weeks; children in group B took orally propranolol alone, and the dose was the same as that in group A. The treatment time of the two groups was up to 6 months, and the clinical curative effect and the incidence rate of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. In the comparison of the curative effect between two groups of children with the tumor size decrease as the evaluation index, the total effective rate of group A was 100%, which was better than that of group B (81.82%), and the results were significantly different (P<0.05). In the same comparison with the surface of hemangiomas becoming flat and the color becoming light as evaluation indexes, the total effective rates of group A were 95.45 and 100%, which was not significantly different (P>0.05) compared with those of group B (86.36 and 77.27%) with a significant difference. The treatment in group A was superior to that in group B in terms of the curative effect on IH children younger than 6 months and was effective for different types of IHs. In group A, adverse reactions included loss of appetite (n=1) and bronchial and upper respiratory tract infections (n=1); in group B, adverse reactions included crying at night (n=1), lowered heart rate (n=1) and loss of appetite (n=2). The incidence rate of adverse reactions was compared between the two groups, and the difference was not significant (P>0.05), indicating that the combination therapy did not aggravate adverse reactions, and adverse reactions in the two groups were less and not severe. In the treatment of IHs, propranolol combined with prednisone can significantly reduce the tumor volume at the proliferative phase and significantly improve the tumor color with a low incidence rate of adverse reactions in a mild degree. Children have high tolerance to this treatment method, and the treatment method is highly safe and of great significance in clinical practice.

Propranolol versus corticosteroids: what should be the treatment of choice in infantile hemangiomas?

BACKGROUND

Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are common and benign vascular tumors and usually involute spontaneously. Nevertheless, in some cases, treatment with systemic corticosteroids or propranolol is required. No randomized controlled studies, in which both treatment options were compared, have been performed.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and a retrospective cohort study in the Academic Medical Centre of 56 patients (mean age, 5.5 months; range, 0-40 months; SD, 7.6) with IHs were carried out. These patients were treated with either systemic corticosteroids or propranolol. The outcomes of both treatment options were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

The literature review showed that propranolol resulted in an involution in 100% of the patients, whereas corticosteroids only reached involution in 89%. The mean first response of the IH to propranolol was 3.2 days and of corticosteroids was 8.5 days. In our study sample, the patients treated with propranolol showed a faster and better response than the patients treated with corticosteroids. This is in line with literature findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic propranolol treatment is more effective for IHs than systemic corticosteroid treatment. Secondly, propranolol elicits a faster response than corticosteroids.

Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Propranolol versus Other Treatments for Infantile Hemangiomas: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies evaluating treatments for infantile hemangiomas have produced inconsistent results. A meta-analysis of published data was conducted to investigate the effectiveness and safety of oral propranolol versus other treatments for infantile hemangiomas.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted based on literature (published from 1960 to December 1, 2014) found on the PubMed, EMBASE, and OVID search engines. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for the outcome measures. Heterogeneity, publication bias and subgroup analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 61 studies involving 5,130 participants met the inclusion criteria. Propranolol was found to be a more effective modality in treating IHs (ORs = 0.92; 95%CI, 0.89-0.95) and had fewer complications compared to the other treatments including systemic steroids (ORs = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.59-0.76); laser ablation (ORs = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.43-0.67); other beta-adrenergic blockers (ORs = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.50-0.61) and surgery (ORs = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.28-0.81). A subgroup analysis of propranolol showed that a dose of 2 mg/kg/day or more yielded better outcomes (ORs = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.95; ORs = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.89-1.00), and IHs that had not been previously treated had better responses to propranolol treatment (ORs = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis demonstrated that propranolol was more effective and safer than other therapies in treating IHs. It provides strong evidence for supporting the use of propranolol as a first-line therapy for IHs.

[Medication-based therapy of infantile hemangioma and lymphatic malformations]

The therapy of vascular tumors and malformations should be interdisciplinary and performed according to available guidelines. Infantile hemangiomas (IH) are the most frequent vascular tumors of childhood and do not require treatment in most cases. If the IH is complicated by its location (e.g. facial or genital) or if the lesion threatens to cause loss of function, small localized IH should be treated by laser- or cryotherapy. If the IH is diffuse or rapidly growing it can be successfully treated using the β blocker propranolol. The mechanism underlying the efficacy of this medication-based therapy is not completely understood and this still represents an experimental therapy. The results of molecular studies on vascular malformations have indicated new strategies for medical therapies. However, lymphatic malformations (LM) are still treated by surgery where possible, or sclerotherapy. Further investigations are necessary to determine whether new drugs such as the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin may be effective for treatment of diffuse LM. First case reports seem to be promising.

Effect of propranolol vs prednisolone vs propranolol with prednisolone in the management of infantile hemangioma: a randomized controlled study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of orally administered propranolol versus prednisolone versus both in the treatment of potentially disfiguring or functionally threatening infantile hemangiomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study of 30 patients aged 1 week-8 months was randomized into three equal groups. These were as follows: A, propranolol (2-3 mg/kg/d); B, prednisolone (1-4 mg/kg/d); and C, receiving both for a minimum duration of 3 months. Dimensions, color, consistency, ultrasonography, photographic documentation based on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were recorded before and periodically after starting treatment. A minimum 75% improvement was considered as success with no regrowth up to 1 month of stopping treatment.

RESULTS

Mean initial response time (days) in A (4.1±3.3 SD) and C (4.7±3.4SD) was significantly lower than B (9.78±7.8SD) (p<0.047). Significant change in consistency was noted very early in A (24 hours) compared to B and C (8 days). VAS results are as follows: (a) color fading--significant reduction in A within 48 hours compared to B and C (p=0.025), (b) flattening--more significant and earlier in A and C than B (p<0.05), and (c) mean reduction in size: significant in A and C at 3 months (p=0.005, p=0.005), 6 months (p=0.005, p=0.008), 12 months (p=0.005, p=0.008), and 18 months (p=0.02, p=0.04), whereas in B, it was seen only at 6 months (p=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Propranolol had a consistent, rapid therapeutic effect compared to prednisolone. A combination of the two had a comparable but not higher efficacy than propranolol alone. Prednisolone was associated with a higher number of complications, thereby decreasing patient compliance.

Propranolol versus corticosteroids in the treatment of infantile hemangioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Infantile hemangiomas are benign vascular neoplasms that can cause numerous functional or cosmetic problems. The authors reviewed the pathogenesis of hemangioma and compared the efficacy and complications related to therapy with propranolol versus corticosteroids.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted from 1965 to March of 2012 using MEDLINE, PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Review database, and Google Scholar. All articles were reviewed for reports of clinical cases, reported side effects, doses, duration of treatment, number of patients, and response rate to treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 1162 studies were identified. Of those, only 56 articles met inclusion criteria after review by two independent reviewers (A.I. and J.K.). For the meta-analysis, 16 studies comprising 2629 patients and 25 studies comprising 795 patients were included. Less than 90 percent of patients treated with corticosteroids responded to therapy, compared with 99 percent of patients treated with propranolol after 12 months of follow-up. Meta-analysis demonstrated the corticosteroid studies to have a pooled response rate of 69 percent versus the propranolol response rate of 97 percent (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Propranolol is a relatively recent therapy of hemangiomas with fewer side effects, a different mechanism of action, and greater efficacy than current first-line corticosteroid therapy. Many of these studies do not have the same patient population or duration/regimen of treatment for hemangiomas; however, based on available data in the literature, it appears that propranolol could be an emerging and effective treatment for infantile hemangiomas. Further randomized controlled trials are recommended.

β1-Adrenoceptor mRNA level reveals distinctions between infantile hemangioma and vascular malformations

BACKGROUND

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most frequent vascular tumor of early childhood. Recently, propranolol, a nonselective β1- and β2-adrenoceptor inhibitor, was introduced into the therapy of severe proliferating IH with excellent results. However, the underlying mechanism of action of propranolol is still unclear.

METHODS

We performed immunohistochemistry for cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31), D2-40, glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1), and Ki67 in order to characterize 21 vascular anomalies (nine IH, seven venous malformations (VMs), and five lymphatic malformations (LMs)). Furthermore, we analyzed the expression of β1-, β2-, and β3-adrenoceptor mRNA in these specimens as well as in hemangioma-derived stem cells by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR).

RESULTS

We show that the expression of β1-adrenoceptor mRNA is 10.7-fold higher in IH independent of the proliferative or regressive phase as well as 2.5-fold higher in hemangioma-derived stem cells as compared with β2-adrenoceptor mRNA. In LM, the expression of β2-adrenoceptor mRNA was ninefold higher than that of β1-adrenoceptor mRNA. VM showed low expression levels of all β-adrenoceptor mRNAs, and β3-adrenoceptor mRNA was hardly detectable in any specimens examined.

CONCLUSION

These results provide the first evidence of distinctions between IH and vascular malformations with regard to β-adrenoceptor subtype mRNA levels.

Early Surgical Excision of Giant Congenital Hemangiomas of the Scalp in Newborns: Clinical Indications and Reconstructive Aspects

Background:

Infantile hemangioma is the most common vascular tumor in newborns, with an incidence from 12 to 23% among preterm infants with low weight at birth and a female to male ratio of 3:1. The head and neck is the most frequently affected area (60%), and the scalp is a typical site for such large lesions.

Objective:

We describe some clinical and medical aspects in comparison with the surgical approach to giant infantile hemangioma of the scalp.

Methods:

The indications to treatment are discussed. An outcome basis evaluation, by reviewing some clinical cases, is provided to help readers better understand when and how to undergo surgery safely.

Conclusion:

Early excision of huge infantile hemangioma of the scalp is the treatment of choice if feasible within 5 months of age.

Infantile hemangiomas: an update on pathogenesis and therapy

Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common vascular tumors of childhood, affecting ~5% of all infants. Although most lesions proliferate and then involute with minimal consequence, a significant minority can be disfiguring, functionally significant, or, rarely, life-threatening. Recent discoveries concerning hemangioma pathogenesis provide both an improved understanding and more optimal approach to workup and management. Important detrimental associations can be seen with IH, such as significant structural anomalies associated with segmental IH. Standards of care have dramatically changed evaluation and management of hemangiomas. The goal of timely recognition and therapy is to minimize or eliminate long-term sequelae. New modalities, such as oral propranolol, provide the caregiver with better therapeutic options, which can prevent or minimize medical risk or scarring, but the side effect profile and risk-benefit ratio of such interventions must always be evaluated before instituting therapy.

Oral propranolol for the treatment of periorbital infantile hemangioma: a preliminary report from oman

Purpose:

To investigate the efficacy and safety of oral propranolol in the management of periorbital infantile hemangioma in four subjects.

Materials and Methods:

Consecutive patients who presented with periorbital capillary hemangioma with vision-threatening lesions were prospectively enrolled in this study between January 2009 and October 2010. All subjects underwent treatment with 2 mg/kg/day oral propranolol. All subjects underwent ocular, systemic, and radiologic evaluations before treatment and at periodic intervals after starting therapy. Side effects from therapy were also evaluated.

Results:

Four subjects, between 3 months and 19 months of age, with periorbital hemangioma were enrolled in this study. Two subjects had been previously treated with oral corticosteroids with unsatisfactory response. All subjects had severe ptosis, with the potential for deprivation amblyopia. Three subjects had orbital involvement. After hospital admission, oral propranolol was initiated in all subjects under monitoring by a pediatric cardiologist. Subsequent therapy was performed with periodic out-patient monitoring. All subjects had excellent response to treatment, with regression of periorbital and orbital hemangioma. There were no side effects from therapy.

Conclusions:

Oral propranolol for periorbital hemangioma was effective in all the four subjects. Oral propranolol may be appropriate for patients who are nonresponsive to intralesional or systemic steroids. In patients with significant orbital involvement and lesions causing vision-threatening complications, oral propranolol can be the primary therapy.

Successful and safe treatment of hemangioma with oral propranolol in a single institution

Purpose

Dramatic improvement of hemangioma to propranolol has been recently reported; however, details on dose and duration of treatment, potential risks, and monitoring have not been determined. The objective of this study is to describe and analyze the use of propranolol as a first-line treatment or as a single therapy in management of complicated hemangioma.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of eight patients diagnosed with hemangioma and treated with propranolol in Kangbuk Samsung Hospital from February 2010 to April 2011 was performed.

Results

Eight patients with hemangioma with functional impairment, cosmetic disfigurement, or rapid growth were treated with propranolol. Five patients had solitary facial hemangioma. The mean age of symptoms at onset was 5 weeks. The median age for starting propranolol treatment was 5.5 months. Propranolol at 2 mg/kg/day was finally administered in divided doses with a gradual increase. Significant regression was observed in seven patients, and shrinkage in size, softening in consistency, and decrease in redness were evident within 4 weeks. Among them, six patients were still taking propranolol, and one patient had stopped after 12 months. Other one patient did not show significant improvement with satisfactory result after 3 months of propranolol use. Treatment with propranolol was well tolerated and had few side effects. No rebound growth was observed in any of the patients.

Conclusion

We observed that use of propranolol was very effective in treatment of hemangioma without obvious adverse effects or relapse.

Hepatic haemangioma-prenatal imaging findings, complications and perinatal outcome in a case series

BACKGROUND

The clinical presentation of foetal hepatic haemangioma (HH) is highly variable, from asymptomatic to life-threatening.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe foetal hepatic haemangioma and identify prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antenatal and postnatal imaging studies, clinical and biological records of infants with antenatally diagnosed HH (2001-2009) were reviewed.

RESULTS

Sixteen foetuses had one focal lesion, with a mean volume of 75 ml (5-240 ml). One had multifocal HH. Most presented as a focal well-delimited heterogeneous vascular mass. Four had associated cardiomegaly, five had cardiac failure. Eight of the nine foetuses with cardiac disorders were symptomatic at birth: cardiac failure with pulmonary hypertension (9), consumptive coagulopathy (8), compartmental syndrome (2). All received supportive medical treatment, four embolisation. Five of these died. The remaining eight had a normal cardiac status. Two became symptomatic after birth: one with a large porto-hepatic shunt and one with significant mass effect. Prenatal cardiac abnormality (univariate, P = 0.031), enlargement of more than one hepatic vein (P = 0.0351) and large volume (P = 0.0372) were associated with symptomatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic haemangioma associated with prenatal cardiac disorders, large volume and more than one enlarged hepatic vein have poorer outcome and require specific perinatal multidisciplinary management.

Propranolol: useful therapeutic agent for the treatment of ulcerated infantile hemangiomas

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common vascular tumor in early childhood. Ulceration is the most frequent complication, and its management can be challenging. We present 6 cases of ulcerated IH at a single pediatric center, which responded to oral propranolol within 2 to 6 weeks. We recommend that oral propranolol therapy be considered for the management of ulcerated IH as first-line treatment.

Current management of infantile hemangiomas

During the past several years, there have been new advancements in the management of infantile hemangiomas (IHs). In many patients, no treatment is ever necessary--because IHs are well known for their natural history of spontaneous involution. However, a significant minority of hemangiomas do require treatment. Moreover, they are very heterogeneous, making the decision of when, how, and why to intervene quite variable. The least common but most important rationale for intervention is the presence of a life- or function-threatening complication, where prompt therapeutic intervention is a necessity. A much more common scenario is ulceration, where appropriate management is needed to expedite healing and control pain. Increasingly, the life-altering aspects of hemangioma are being recognized as a rationale for treatment because permanent scarring and disfigurement can result even if involution is complete. Treatments for IHs currently include topical, intralesional, and systemic therapies. Laser and surgical modalities are also sometimes used depending on the clinical scenario. In the absence of rigorous evidence-based studies, clinicians must carefully weigh the risks and benefits of medical or surgical treatments versus observation alone in tailoring management to the specific clinical situation at hand.

Successful treatment of ulcerated haemangioma with propranolol

BACKGROUND

Ulceration is a frequent complication of proliferating haemangioma.

METHODS

Four patients with ulcerated hemangioma aged 2, 4, 5 months and 5 weeks were treated with 2 mg/kg KG propranolol.

RESULTS

Efficacy and safety of propranolol were excellent in all four cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Propranolol may be the first-choice therapy for ulcerated haemangioma.