Diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip using the Graf ultrasound method: risk and protective factor analysis in 11,820 universally screened newborns

Risk factors of developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants: A meta-analysis based on cohort studies

INTRODUCTION

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a prevalent condition in children. Currently, the exact etiology of DDH remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the risk factors associated with DDH in infants. The findings would provide a theoretical foundation for targeted early screening and diagnosis.

HYPOTHESIS

Several indicators, such as gender, intrauterine position, family history of DDH, gestational age, delivery mode, amniotic fluid levels, swaddling, parity, fetus number, combined musculoskeletal deformities, birth weight, and physical examination results, may serve as risk factors for DDH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cohort studies investigating the risk factors of DDH in infants through logistic regression analysis were searched in the Wanfang, VIP citation, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine disc, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2023. After extracting the data from eligible literature and assessing them using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), articles were selected based on pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of eleven literature reports covering 979,757 infants were included in this meta-analysis. The publication bias did not significantly influence the results. The incidence rate of DDH was 47.99‰ among infants with risk factors compared to 3.21‰ in the general population. Risk factors for DDH included being female (OR=6.97, 95% CI: 5.18-9.39, p<0.001), breech delivery (OR=4.14, 95% CI: 3.09-5.54, p<0.001), positive family history (OR=4.07, 95% CI: 2.20-7.52, p<0.001), cesarean section (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.21, p=0.032), oligohydramnios (OR=3.93, 95% CI: 1.29-12.01, p=0.016), swaddling (OR=6.74, 95% CI: 1.25-36.31, p=0.026), firstborn status (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.49-2.53, p<0.001), combined musculoskeletal malformations (OR=2.27, 95% CI: 1.58-3.27, p<0.001), and physical signs of DDH (OR=8.71, 95% CI: 2.44-31.07, p=0.001). Premature delivery (OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.95, p<0.001) was a protective factor for DDH. The relationship between multiple pregnancies (OR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.33-1.02, p=0.060) and low birth weight (OR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.14-2.76, p=0.529) in relation to DDH remained uncertain.

DISCUSSION

This meta-analysis shows that female, breech delivery, positive family history, cesarean section, firstborn status, oligohydramnios, swaddling and combined musculoskeletal malformations are associated with DDH. Premature delivery appeared to be a protective factor against DDH. Nevertheless, the other factors need more research to reach more conclusive results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; meta-analysis.

Ultrasonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: the Graf method revisited

Until the 1980s, the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) was based on clinical examination and radiographic imaging. In 1980, Reinhard Graf developed his own ultrasonographic method for the examination of the infant hip joint. Graf's method evaluates the osseous and cartilaginous coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum in the infantile hip joint by measuring the angles α and β. The validity of Graf method is that with these measurements the hip joint is further classified by Graf classification into types I to IV that guide treatment. Currently, Graf method is considered the gold standard examination for the diagnosis of DDH in many European countries. This review article aims to discuss the incidence, risk factors and pathophysiology of DDH, and to emphasize on the Graf method for the evaluation, classification, prevention and further management of this entity.

Does Screening Ultrasound Timing in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Need to be Adjusted for Moderate Preterm and Near-term Infants: A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

An initial screening ultrasound is essential for patients at higher risk of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) due to breech presentation or a family history of DDH. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening ultrasounds to be performed after 6 weeks of age to reduce the rate of false positives. However, there is limited evidence regarding whether these screening ultrasounds need to be adjusted for gestational age in prematurity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of moderate preterm and near-term births on screening hip ultrasounds for high-risk DDH populations.

METHODS

We identified all prospectively enrolled patients in a single-center database referred for screening hip ultrasound for DDH. We included those hips referred for risk factors of DDH, including breech presentation, family history of DDH, or hip click, and excluded those with known dysplasia or referral for hip instability. Each ultrasound was measured by a pediatric radiologist to determine the alpha angle and femoral head coverage. Patients were classified as "premature" if born at <37 weeks gestation or "full term" if born at ≥37 weeks gestation. All patients underwent screening hip ultrasound between 5 and 8 weeks of age. Sonographic markers of dysplasia and the incidences of abnormal ultrasound and Pavlik harness treatment were compared between cohorts. Significance was set at P <0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 244 hips in 122 patients were included, 58 hips in the premature cohort and 186 hips in the full-term cohort. The premature cohort had a significantly decreased gestational age compared with the full-term cohort (35.4 ± 1.1 vs 38.5 ± 1.1 wk, respectively, P < 0.001). However, there was no difference between premature and full-term cohorts in sex distribution (69% vs 75%, females, P = 0.39), unadjusted age at the time of ultrasound (6.6 ± 0.7 vs 6.8±0.7 wk, respectively, P = 0.07), or referral reason ( P = 0.14). On hip ultrasound, there was no difference between premature and full-term cohorts with respect to alpha angle (62.6 ± 3.3 vs 62.2 ± 5.3 degrees, P = 0.41), femoral head coverage (54.9 ± 6.3 vs 55.1 ± 10.6, P = 0.19), rate of abnormal ultrasound (18.3% vs 20.7%, respectively, P = 0.68), or the rate of Pavlik harness treatment (0% vs 5.3%, respectively, P = 0.12).

DISCUSSION

There was no significant difference in alpha angle or femoral head coverage between premature and full-term patients at 5 to 8 weeks of unadjusted age. This preliminary data suggests that screening ultrasounds can be performed without adjusting for prematurity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prognostic study.

Birthweight correlates to pubo-femoral distances and α angles in hip ultrasound of newborns at 6 weeks of age: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is inconsistency in the literature regarding the relationship between increased birthweight and risk of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). We aimed to investigate the correlation between birthweight and pubo-femoral distance (PFD), as well as Graf's α angle in newborns undergoing hip ultrasound examination at 6 weeks of age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Basic newborn characteristics and ultrasound measurements were retrospectively collected during a 1-year study period. We excluded multiple births, newborns born at less than 37 gestational weeks, and incomplete information. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation of birthweight and PFD, and, second, birthweight and α angles including a stratified regression analysis investigating the potential effect modification of sex.

RESULTS

707 newborns (1,414 hips) were included. Mean birthweight was significantly higher for male newborns (P < 0.001). Increased birthweight was positively correlated to PFD values (crude coefficient 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.32) and the correlation was still present after adjusting for sex, family history, and breech presentation (adjusted coefficient 0.18, CI 0.07-0.29). The stratified α angle model for the males was significant for both the crude coefficient (-0.73, CI -1.28 to -0.19) and the adjusted (-0.59, CI -1.15 to -0.03), and also for the females (crude coefficient -1.14, CI -1.98 to -0.31 and adjusted coefficient -1.15, CI -1.99 to -0.31).

CONCLUSION

We found that increased birthweight positively correlated to PFD, and negatively correlated to α angle, but this was not of clinical significance.

Validation of parameters recommended for secondary screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in Japan

BACKGROUND

Based on the Japanese Pediatric Orthopaedic Association's guidelines, secondary screening and imaging including ultrasonography and radiography, are recommended in infants with limited hip abduction (<70°) or in those with multiple risk factors including the following: asymmetrical skin creases, a family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip, female sex, and pelvic position at delivery. However, there is still little information regarding the usefulness of this guideline. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between the risk factors and developmental dysplasia of the hip diagnosed using ultrasound and radiography.

METHODS

A total of 356 infants (67 boys and 289 girls) underwent secondary ultrasonographic and radiological screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in our hospital. Risk factors were documented from their medical records. The recommended item score, which we defined as an integrated value of the recommended item, was calculated for each patient. The limitation of hip abduction alone was a criterion for secondary screening; therefore, we defined the scores as follows: the limitation of hip abduction scored 2 points and other recommended scores were assigned 1 point. If the recommended item score was 2 points or more, we classified the infants as high-risk.

RESULTS

A total of 280 of 356 infants were included in the high-risk group, which showed a higher ratio of cases with abnormal imaging findings than the low-risk group. According to the multivariate logistic regression analyses among the recommended items, being female, skin asymmetry, and limb limitation were identified as independent risk factors for imaging abnormality and the need for Pavlik harness treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended items for secondary screening based on the Japanese Pediatric Orthopaedic Association's guidelines could be useful for screening infants in need of treatment.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: How Many Risk Factors Are Needed?

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a progressive condition that lacks clear diagnostic and management protocols, due to insufficient data. While some advocate for universal screening, others recommend using risk factors as landmarks. In this study, we aimed to assess the risk factors associated with DDH incidence among a large population. We conducted a retrospective single-center multifactorial study between January 2019 and March 2022, including 3720 children who were investigated anamnestically, clinically, and through an ultrasound scan. We classified them into two groups: the control group with 3300 healthy children and the study group with 420 newborns diagnosed with DDH. Our analysis identified several risk factors associated with DDH, including gender, prematurity, non-vertex birth presentation, oligohydramnios, gestational diabetes, maternal hypertension, family history, associated deformities, and swaddling. We found that every DDH patient had at least two risk factors. Based on our findings, we recommend that children who present two or more risk factors for DDH be mandatorily evaluated sonographically, as well as children with clinical signs. DDH screening is recommended for each newborn for the long-term benefits of early detection and treatment.

Fifty percent of patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia showed normal findings upon neonatal ultrasound screening : Symptomatic hip dysplasia in adulthood despite inconspicuous neonatal hip ultrasound

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is characterized by the pathomorphology of inadequate acetabular coverage of the femoral head leading to increased loading of the articular surface and acetabular rim. If left untreated, this ultimately leads to osteoarthritis. Germany introduced a nationwide universal ultrasound screening program for all newborn infants in 1996. Subsequently, the incidence of undiagnosed hip dislocation was significantly reduced. In this consecutive series of patients who underwent periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of symptomatic dysplasia of the hip between October 2014 and October 2022 data regarding the U3 screening examination were analyzed. The data included whether the examination was performed, whether the findings were positive or negative, whether the patients underwent any form of treatment in the case of a positive finding and whether a control X‑ray was performed. This study provides evidence that acetabular undercoverage cannot be ruled out based on a normal finding in ultrasonography screening. Furthermore, the study also shows that residual dysplasia may persist despite attempts of conservative treatment.

Concentric Circles: A New Ultrasonographic Sign for the Diagnosis of Normal Infantile Hip Development

Ultrasound (US) of the infant hip is used to diagnose developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). We present a new sonographic sign that describes the periphery of the femoral head and the acetabulum as two concentric circles.During 2008−2019, 3650 infants were referred for diagnosis of DDH. All underwent a clinical and US examination. We recorded the femoral head as the inner circle, within a fixed external circle, which was identified as the acetabulum. We analysed the clinical signs and risk factors. The US sign of two concentric circles was normal in 3522 infants and was classified as normal hip development. The alpha angle was >60° in 3449 (95%) infants. For the remaining 73 (5%) infants, the alpha angle was 50−60° and underwent further follow-up examination until the alpha angle was normalised. In 128 babies (3.5%), we detected the disruption of the concentric circle sign; the femoral head was found outside the acetabulum, which appeared with an upward sloping roof and the alpha angle was <50°. These infants had DDH and received appropriate treatment. Infants with a concentric circle sign and normal alpha angle are normal, whereas those with a disrupted sign are considered as having DDH.

Surgical procedures in infants with early diagnoses of developmental dysplasia of the hip. A prospective 4-year follow-up study

Background

Dysplastic hips infants may normalize spontaneously without any intervention due to the natural growth. However, some infants need one or more surgical interventions to achieve stable and non-dysplastic hips. The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of infants diagnosed with DDH before the age of 6 months undergoing surgical procedures of the hip(s) before the age of four years and to determine the number and types of surgical procedures in each infant.

Methods

A prospective and consecutive study of all infants aged 0-6 months diagnosed with dysplasia of the hips in the combined paediatric orthopaedic and radiologic examination in the Region of Southern Denmark 2013-2017. From medical records, we obtained information about all surgical procedures in the hips including open or closed reductions, arthrographies, tenotomies, and pelvic osteotomies before the age of 4 years.

Results

Overall, 281 infants with hip dysplasia were included. The median age at first examination was 48 days. In 254 (90%) of the infants, the hips resolved spontaneously, and 27 (10%) needed one or more surgical interventions. Overall, the 27 infants had 47 surgical intervention as 12 infants had more than one intervention. One infants had five surgical interventions. The most frequent surgical procedures were closed reduction and arthrography with or without adductor tenotomy (58%) and pelvic osteotomy (27%). Among infants with surgical interventions, 23 (8.2%) had unstable hips, and four (1.4%) had stable hips. All four infants with stable hips had an arthrography and none required a pelvic osteotomy.

Discussion

This study supports the propensity for spontaneous normalization early dysplasia of the hips in infants. Only a small proportion of the infants needed surgical interventions to achieve stable and non-dysplastic hips.

Redislocation After Posteromedial Open Reduction in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Analyzing the Risk Factors and Determining the Optimal Treatment Method

BACKGROUND

Redislocation, which is one of the most serious problems in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), might occur because of several reasons. Regardless of the treatment, redislocations are reported to be associated with high complication rates in the literature. Our objective was to identify the risk factors for redislocation in the patients treated for DDH and to determine the optimal treatment method for redislocations.

METHODS

Patients with DDH who were treated with the limited posteromedial approach in our clinic between 1993 and 2021 and followed up prospectively were examined in this single-centered study. The participants were assigned into 2 groups: a study group consisting of 25 hips of 17 patients with redislocation and a control group consisting of 502 hips of 390 patients without redislocation. To determine the risk factors for redislocation, demographic data, known risk factors for DDH, preoperative Tönnis stage, and whether the capsule was opened or not were evaluated. To determine the optimal treatment method, a subgroup analysis based on applied treatment (closed reduction and cast replacement vs. repeating open reduction) was conducted, and recurrent redislocation, complication, and secondary surgery rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

Bilaterality and high-grade hip dislocations were found to be associated with higher odds ratio (OR) for redislocation [ P =0.007, OR=3.64, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3 to 8.8; and P =0.006, OR=4.52, 95% CI, 1.37 to 14.91, respectively]. Recurrent redislocation and complication rates were found to be significantly higher in redislocations treated with closed reduction and cast replacement ( P =0.007 and P =0.015, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Bilaterality and higher preoperative Tönnis stage are critical risk factors for redislocation after open reduction in DDH. It should be kept in mind that closed reduction and cast replacement is associated with higher rates of recurrent redislocation and complications, and redislocation cases should be treated by repeating open reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-therapeutic study.

Incidence of Neonatal Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Late Detection Rates Based on Screening Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Universal ultrasonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has gained increasing popularity despite the lack of benefit in terms of reducing the rates of late-detected cases (age ≥12 weeks) in randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To report the reported incidence of DDH in the English scientific literature and compare rates of late-detected cases in settings with different DDH screening strategies.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched on November 25 and 27, 2021. No time filters were used in the search.

STUDY SELECTION

All observational studies reporting the incidence of early-detected or late-detected (age ≥12 weeks) DDH were included. Non-English reports were excluded if the abstract did not include enough information to be included for analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The number of newborns screened and the detection rates were extracted. Meta-analysis calculated the pooled incidence of DDH per 1000 newborns with 95% CIs using a random- or fixed-effects model. This study is reported according to the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome measures were early detection, early treatment, late detection, and operative treatment incidences.

RESULTS

A total of 1899 studies were identified, 203 full texts were assessed, and 76 studies with 16 901 079 infants were included in final analyses. The early detection rate was 8.4 (95% CI, 4.8-14.8) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with clinical screening, 4.4 (95% CI, 2.4-8.0) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with selective ultrasonographic screening, and 23.0 (95% CI, 15.7-33.4) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with universal ultrasonographic screening. Rates for nonoperative treatment were 5.5 (95% CI, 2.1-14) treatments per 1000 newborns with clinical screening, 3.1 (95% CI, 2.0-4.8) treatments per 1000 newborns with selective ultrasonographic screening, and 9.8 (95% CI, 6.7-14.4) treatments per 1000 newborns with universal ultrasonographic screening. The incidence of late-detected DDH was 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2-1.5) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with clinical screening, 0.6 (95% CI, 0.3-1.3) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with selective ultrasonographic screening, and 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0-0.8) infants with DDH per 1000 newborns with universal ultrasonographic screening. The corresponding incidences of operative treatment were 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0-0.9) operations per 1000 newborns with clinical screening, 0.5 (95% CI, 0.4-0.7) operations per 1000 newborns with selective ultrasonographic screening, and 0.4 (95% CI, 0.2-0.7) operations per 1000 newborns with universal ultrasonographic screening.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This meta-analysis found that early detection rates and nonoperative treatments were higher with universal screening. The late detection and operative treatment rates with universal screening were similar to those among selectively and clinically screened newborns. Based on these results, universal screening may cause initial overtreatment without reducing the rates of late detection and operative treatment.

Pulvinar and pubic cartilage measurements to refine universal ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: Data from 1896 infant hips

PURPOSE

Screening modalities for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) and indications for treatment of mild forms remain controversial. Ultrasound (US) measurement of the pubofemoral distance (PFD > 6 mm, composed of the pubic cartilage and the pulvinar) can avoid late diagnoses of DDH. A thick pubic cartilage may nevertheless lead to false positives. The purpose of this study was to establish standard measurements of pubic cartilage and pulvinar, through universal US screening, to lower false positive results and thus any overtreatment.

METHODS

This is a single-center observational prospective study conducted from December 2016 to January 2018, on infants who underwent universal US screening for DDH. The only inclusion criterion was an adjusted age between 4 and 12 weeks when US was realized. PFD measurement was made using the Couture and Tréguier method. In addition, thicknesses of pubic cartilage and pulvinar were measured on the same US section, in millimeters.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and forty-eight patients, representing 1896 hips, were included. The average value of pubic cartilage thickness was 1.25 mm ± 0.58 mm, with an upper threshold of 2.39 mm (+1.96σ). The average value of pulvinar thickness was 2.67 mm ± 0.78 mm, with an upper threshold of 4.20 mm (+1.96σ). We found high inter-observer reproducibility in pubic cartilage measurements.

CONCLUSION

Systematic measurements of pubic cartilage and pulvinar may refine therapeutic decision by identifying false positives. Patients with increased PFD due to a thick pubic cartilage >2,39 mm, without an associated pulvinar enlargement (<4,20 mm), could be therefore only monitored and not overtreated.

Early neonatal universal ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a single institution observational study

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effect of early universal ultrasound (US) screening program for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

METHODS

A total of 21,676 newborns between 2006 and 2015 were included in the study. All hips were examined by US within the first week of life. The incidence of sonographic hip-types according to the Graf method was analyzed, and then followed prospectively. Risk factors for DDH and treatment measures were also recorded, together with the number of first surgical procedures before the age of three years.

RESULTS

Overall, 92.5% of hips were mature (Graf types Ia, Ib) at first examination, 7.2% were mature (Graf type IIa) and 0.3% were pathological (Graf types IIc to IV). A total of 146 pathological hips were detected in 118 of newborns (0.6%). Only 0.26% of screened population was treated with an orthosis. The rate of first surgical procedures and the rate of late detected DDH were 0.23 and 0.09 per 1000 live births, respectively. Regarding risk factors, positive family history, female gender, breech presentation, and high birth weight were significantly more common in newborns with pathological hips.

CONCLUSION

Early neonatal universal US screening using Graf method is recommended to timely detect DDH and to provide the optimal conservative approach of management. It seems to be effective in reducing the overall treatment rate, together with the rate of surgical procedures and late detected cases.

Timing for closed reduction procedure for developmental dysplasia of the hip and its failure analysis

Background

It remains controversial whether the older age to perform closed reduction (CR) procedure for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), the higher incidence of complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the midterm outcome of CR for DDH among different age groups, and to analyze and identify risk factors for the failure of this procedure.

Methods

Clinical data of 107 DDH patients, who received CR, were retrospectively reviewed. Data were divided into three groups according to initial treatment age (Group I: younger than 12 months; Group II: 12 months to less or equal to18 months; Group III: older than 18 months). The presence of avascular necrosis (AVN), residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD), re-dislocation, and further surgeries (FS) were observed. The risk factors were identified for those outcomes aforementioned using univariable logistic regression models. For identified risk factor age, pre-op acetabular index (AI) and post-op AI, their prediction of CR failure were evaluated by receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC).

Results

A total of 107 patients (156 hips) undergoing CR procedure were evaluated with a median age at initial reduction of 13.0 ± 5.4 months (range, 4 to 28 mo). Mean follow-up time in this study was 6.7 ± 0.8 years (range, 3–8 years). The incidence of AVN, RAD and re-dislocation was 15.4% (24/156), 17.3% (27/156) and 14.7% (23/156) respectively. For AVN, RAD and re-dislocation, the significant risk factors are pre-op IHDI IV (p = 0.033), age ≥ 18 months (p = 0.012), and pre-op IHDI IV (p = 0.004) and walking (p = 0.011), respectively. The areas under the ROC curve of each type of failures were 0.841 (post-op AI), 0.688 (pre-op AI) and 0.650 (age).

Conclusions

Severe DDH patients older than 18 months with CR procedure may result in a high risk of RAD complication. Re-dislocation is significantly associated with pre-op IHDI IV and walking. Patients, who are older than 12.5 months or have a pre-op AI of 38.7° or a post-op AI of 26.4°, are also more likely to fail of CR procedure.

Treatment of unstable hips with the Tübingen splint in early postnatal period: radiological mid-term results of 75 hips with mean follow-up of 5.5 years

PURPOSE

For treatment of unstable hips, the Tübingen splint is a treatment option. After the initial treatment, regular radiological follow-up examinations are recommended but there is a lack of long-term outcome studies. Therefore, the further development of unstable hips treated with the Tübingen splint were evaluated.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2015 116 patients with 161 unstable hips treated with the Tübingen splint were evaluated. Inclusion criteria were: 1) successfully treated unstable hip (type D, III and IV); 2) pelvic radiographs at the age of one to ≤ two, two to ≤ four and four to ≤ eight years. The acetabular index (ACI) of all and the centre-edge angle (CEA) of the third radiograph were measured and classified according to the Tönnis classification.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients with 75 unstable hips (type D 34 (45.3%), III 33 (44.0%), IV 8 (10.7%)) were included. In comparison of the first, second and third radiograph, an increase of normal findings was seen in 31 (41.3%) to 53 (70.7%) and 60 (80.0%) hips, respectively. However, a decrease of slightly dysplastic hips from 31 (41.3%) to 19 (25.3%) and 14 (18.7%) respectively and severely dysplastic hips from 13 (17.3%) to three (4.0%) and one (1.3%) hip respectively was detected. In comparison of first to second radiograph, 32 hips improved and five hips deteriorated and of second to third radiograph 16 hips improved and six hips deteriorated. The Tönnis classification of ACI compared with CEA showed no significant differences (p = 0.442).

CONCLUSION

This study shows a good development of unstable hips treated with the Tübingen splint with mean follow-up 5.5 years. Nevertheless, unexpected deteriorations could be identified. The CEA is an alternative to the ACI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip: real world data from a retrospective analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of universal screening

AIMS

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is an important cause of disability in children and young adult and it also has a significant socio-economic impact in our society. The main objective of our study is to evaluate, in our hospital, the effectiveness of a universal ultrasound screening protocol and to assess the general knowledge about the theme of pediatricians and neonatologists.

METHODS

Retrospective study of infants born from January 2016 to April 2019, evaluated with hip ultrasound (Graf method). Risk factors assessed were female gender, breech presentation at birth, positive family history and twin birth. For the secondary objective, an anonymous and validated questionnaire was distributed to all pediatricians and neonatologists.

RESULTS

Among the 4000 hips analyzed, on ultrasound examination, 98.8% hips resulted mature or immature but appropriate for age, while 1,2% hips were pathological. Analyzing the mature or immature hips, 2,4% were positive on clinical examination and 97,6% were negative. In relation to ultrasound pathological hips, 33,3% have positive clinical examination, while 66,7% negative. From the analysis of risk factors a significant association emerged between female sex, breech presentation and family history with the ultrasound pathological findings. The results of Survey showed that inadequate training about developmental dysplasia of the hip is done during medical school.

CONCLUSIONS

A universal ultrasound screening allowed us to identify developmental dysplasia of the hip in a number of children with normal clinical examination and no risk factors. Specific training courses should be implemented regarding Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip for neonatologists and pediatricians.

Profile of Patients Diagnosed with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Objective  To describe the profile of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) diagnosed by physical and ultrasound examination, with the implementation of a protocol for the treatment and follow-up of DDH.

Methods  A cross-sectional study with DDH patients born between January 2014 and December 2016, in the city of Pelotas, Southern Brazil. Ethnicity, gender, birth weight, fetal presentation, affected side of the hip, gestational age, maternal age and family history were considered. The data on the medical records were compared with the characteristics of the general population described on the Brazilian National Information System on Live Births (Sistema de Informação sobre Nascidos Vivos [SINASC]).

Results  A total of 33 DDH patients were identified, mostly female, with a four-fold higher probability of having the condition ( p  < 0.001); the left was the most affected side. No statistically significant association was found regarding the following factors: birth weight, gestational age, ethnicity, and maternal age. The newborns in breech presentation had a 15-fold higher probability of presenting DDH ( p  < 0.001). A total of 21 newborns required immediate treatment of the hips, since the ultrasound showed a Graf classification of IIb or higher, or the radiography showed dislocation in DDH patients older than 6 months of age.

Conclusion  Screening for DDH is essential in all newborns; physical examinations revealing alterations must be complemented with ultrasound imaging to avoid the delayed diagnosis of the condition.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip in children with Down syndrome: comparison of clinical and radiological examinations in a local cohort

Guidelines for children with Down syndrome (DS) suggest to perform an annual hip screening to enable early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). How to perform this screening is not described. Delayed detection can result in disabling osteoarthritis of the hip. Therefore, we determined the association between clinical history, physical, and radiological examination in diagnosing DDH in children with DS. Referral centers for children with DS were interviewed to explore variety of hip examination throughout the Netherlands. Clinical features of 96 outclinic children were retrospectively collected. Clinical history was taken, physical examination was performed, and X-ray of the hip was analyzed. All the referral centers performed physical examination and clinical history; however, 20% performed X-ray. Following physical examination according to Galeazzi test 26.9% and to limited abduction 10.8% of the outclinic-studied children were at risk for DDH. Radiological examination showed moderate or severe abnormal deviating migration rate of 14.6% resp. 11.5% in the right and left hip. However, no association between clinical history, physical examination, and radiological examination was found.Conclusion: Clinical history and physical examination are insufficient to timely detect DDH in children with Down syndrome. Thereby regular radiological examination of the hip is advised. What is Known: • Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in people with Down syndrome (DS) develops during childhood. • Guidelines for medical support of children with DS suggest an annual hip screening to enable early detection of hip damaging. How to perform this annual screening is not described. What is New: • This study shows no association between clinical history, physical and radiological examination of the hip. • We recommend regular radiological examination of the hip in children with DS in order to identify DDH early up to 16 years of age.