Trends in paediatric inpatient antibiotic therapy in a secondary care setting

Antimicrobial use among paediatric inpatients in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: A three-year point prevalence survey

Aim

Antimicrobials are among the most widely prescribed therapeutic agents among paediatric population. Irrational use of these agents increases the risk of antimicrobial resistance. We described the prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial use among paediatric inpatients from 2017 to 2019.

Subject and Method

The study was a repeated point prevalence survey over a 3-year period using the global point prevalence standardized tools among all paediatric inpatients. The prevalence of antimicrobial use, the prescription indicators and patterns of antimicrobial use were estimated.

Result

Among 191 paediatric inpatients assessed, the 3-year period prevalence antimicrobial use was 85.9% (164/191) with prevalence of 80.6% in 2017, 94.6% in 2018, and 83.6% in 2019. Antimicrobial agents used ranged from one agent (20.1%) to five different agents (5.5%). Parenteral route (66.6%) was the preferred route of administration. The reason for the use of antimicrobial agents (92.6%) and the stop/review date (99.5%) were mostly well documented. Only 4.5% of the antimicrobial use were targeted. There were no antimicrobial guidelines or policy guiding the use of antimicrobial agents, except the national guideline on the treatment of malaria and tuberculosis. Ceftriaxone, a third generation cephalosporin was the most commonly used agent across the period under review. Community-acquired infection was the commonest indication for antimicrobial use.

Conclusion

Our findings of high antimicrobial prevalence has raised the attention for the need to develop hospital-based antimicrobial guideline and antimicrobial stewardship program to protect the vulnerable children, their contacts and the environment from the impact of antimicrobial resistance.

Retrospective audit of antibiotic use in a university general pediatrics department using hospital pharmacy dispensing data

Antibiotics are among the most frequently prescribed drugs in children's hospitals, which is why regular monitoring of antibiotic use in hospitals is of great importance. This retrospective audit (60 months, January 2014 - December 2018) analyzes the antibiotic consumption at a university inpatient department of general pediatrics including neonatal and pediatric intensive care based on pharmacy dispensing data in units of grams per 100 patient days and in Defined Daily Doses per 100 patient days. The results provide potential targets for Antibiotic Stewardship interventions. Conversely, this audit elicits methodological limitations of the method of antibiotic surveillance in pediatrics recommended by the Robert Koch Institute, Berlin.

The use of continuous electronic prescribing data to infer trends in antimicrobial consumption and estimate the impact of stewardship interventions in hospitalized children

Background

Understanding antimicrobial consumption is essential to mitigate the development of antimicrobial resistance, yet robust data in children are sparse and methodologically limited. Electronic prescribing systems provide an important opportunity to analyse and report antimicrobial consumption in detail.

Objectives

We investigated the value of electronic prescribing data from a tertiary children’s hospital to report temporal trends in antimicrobial consumption in hospitalized children and compare commonly used metrics of antimicrobial consumption.

Methods

Daily measures of antimicrobial consumption [days of therapy (DOT) and DDDs] were derived from the electronic prescribing system between 2010 and 2018. Autoregressive moving-average models were used to infer trends and the estimates were compared with simulated point prevalence surveys (PPSs).

Results

More than 1.3 million antimicrobial administrations were analysed. There was significant daily and seasonal variation in overall consumption, which reduced annually by 1.77% (95% CI 0.50% to 3.02%). Relative consumption of meropenem decreased by 6.6% annually (95% CI −3.5% to 15.8%) following the expansion of the hospital antimicrobial stewardship programme. DOT and DDDs exhibited similar trends for most antimicrobials, though inconsistencies were observed where changes to dosage guidelines altered consumption calculation by DDDs, but not DOT. PPS simulations resulted in estimates of change over time, which converged on the model estimates, but with much less precision.

Conclusions

Electronic prescribing systems offer significant opportunities to better understand and report antimicrobial consumption in children. This approach to modelling administration data overcomes the limitations of using interval data and dispensary data. It provides substantially more detailed inferences on prescribing patterns and the potential impact of stewardship interventions.

Respiratory Tract Infection Management and Antibiotic Prescription in Children: A Unique Study Comparing Three Levels of Healthcare in The Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are common in children with febrile illness visiting the general practitioner (GP) or emergency department. We studied the management of children with fever and RTI at 3 different levels of healthcare in The Netherlands, focusing on antibiotic prescription.

METHODS

This prospective observational study is part of the Management and Outcome of Febrile children in Europe study. Data were used from face-to-face patient contacts of children with febrile illness in three healthcare settings in Nijmegen, The Netherlands during 2017. These settings were primary (GP), secondary (general hospital) and tertiary care (university hospital).

RESULTS

Of 892 cases with RTI without complex comorbidities, overall antibiotic prescription rates were 29% with no differences between the 3 levels of healthcare, leading to an absolute number of 5031 prescriptions per 100,000 children per year in primary care compared with 146 in secondary and tertiary care combined. The prescription rate in otitis media was similar in all levels: 60%. In cases with lower RTI who received nebulizations prescription rates varied between 19% and 55%.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic prescription rates for RTIs in children were comparable between the 3 levels of healthcare, thus leading to a majority of antibiotics being prescribed in primary care. Relatively high prescription rates for all foci of RTIs were found, which was not in agreement with the national guidelines. Antibiotic stewardship needs improvement at all 3 levels of healthcare. Guidelines to prescribe small spectrum antibiotics for RTIs need to be better implemented in hospital care settings.

Use of multiple metrics to assess antibiotic use in Italian children's hospitals

Quantification of antibiotic utilization is an essential component of antibiotic stewardship programs. In this multicentric study, we used different metrics to evaluate inpatient antibiotic use in children. The study objectives were to describe point prevalence of antibiotic use by indication and patient characteristics, to evaluate DOTs, LOTs and PDDs, and to compare PDDs to DDDs, which assume average maintenance dose per day in adults. All children hospitalized on the days of the study were included. Trained personnel collected demographic and clinical data from patients’ clinical records. We recorded information about antibiotics administered on the date of data collection, and in the previous 30 days of hospitalization. Of 810 patients, 380 (46.9%; CI 95%: 43.4–50.4) received one or more antibiotics; prevalence of use was 27.0% for prophylaxis (219/810), and 20.7% (168/810) for treatment. Overall, 587 drugs were issued to the 380 patients receiving antibiotics (1.5 antibiotic per patient). When considering treatments, DOT and LOT per 100 patient-days were 30.5 and 19.1, respectively, resulting in a DOT/LOT ratio of 1.6. PDDs increased with age and approached DDDs only in children aged ≥ 10 years; the ratio between PDDs estimated in children aged ≥ 10 years and in 0–11 month-old infants ranged from 2 for sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, to 25 for meropenem. Our results confirm that DOT, LOT and PDD are better alternatives to DDD in children.

The predictive utility of prior positive urine culture in children with recurrent urinary tract infections

Urinary tract infections can cause renal damage if not treated promptly. The aim of this study was to examine if prior urine cultures can predict antibiotic susceptibility profile in a subsequent culture, in children with recurrent urinary tract infections. The medical records of all children with at least two episodes of urinary tract infection between 1999-2015 that occurred 2 weeks to 1 year apart were reviewed. Pathogen identity and antibiogram were compared between the two cultures for every patient. One hundred sixty-one cases of recurrent urinary tract infections were identified. Seventy-seven (48%) pairs of cultures grew the same pathogen. However, of these, 31 had an altered biogram. In 53% of the culture pairs, the pathogen in the second culture had a similar or better antibiotic susceptibility profile. We found no statistically significant correlation between the elapsed time between the two cultures and the probability of similar susceptibility profile between them. There was no correlation between antibiogram change and any of the demographic characteristics, including a history of renal transplantation and taking antibiotic prophylactic treatment.Conclusions: Antibiotic susceptibility profile of the pathogen in a prior urinary tract infection did not predict antibiotic susceptibility profile in a subsequent urinary tract infection in our study.What is Known:• Children with urinary tract infections often have recurrent infections.• Clinicians often use prior urine cultures to choose empirical antibiotic treatment in subsequent infections.What is New:• In only 50% of the cases, a subsequent urinary tract infection grows the same pathogen as the 1st urinary tract infection.• Even in cultures with the same pathogen growth, antibiogram is often different.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs; a two-part narrative review of step-wise design and issues of controversy Part I: step-wise design of an antimicrobial stewardship program

Regardless of one's opinion of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), it is hardly possible to work in hospital care and not be exposed to the term or its practical effects. Despite the term being relatively new, the number of publications in the field is vast, including several excellent reviews of general and specific aspects. Work in antimicrobial stewardship is complex, and includes not only aspects of infectious disease and microbiology, but also of epidemiology, genetics, behavioural psychology, systems science, economics and ethics, to name a few. This review aims to take several of these aspects and the scientific evidence of antimicrobial stewardship studies and merge them into two questions: How should we design ASPs based on what we know today? And which are the most essential unanswered questions regarding antimicrobial stewardship on a broader scale? This narrative review is written in two separate parts aiming to provide answers to the two questions. This first part is written as a step-wise approach to designing a stewardship intervention based on the pillars of unmet need, feasibility, scientific evidence and necessary core elements. It is written mainly as a guide to someone new to the field. It is sorted into five distinct steps: (a) focusing on designing aims; (b) assessing performance and local barriers to rational antimicrobial use; (c) deciding on intervention technique; (d) practical, tailored design including core element inclusion; and (e) evaluation and sustainability. The second part, published separately, formulates ten critical questions on controversies in the field of antimicrobial stewardship. It is aimed at clinicians and researchers with stewardship experience and strives to promote discussion, not to provide answers.

Antibiotic consumption and management at Kocani General Hospital – Annual report

The aim of the study was to get detailed insight into the antibiotic consumption trends in the three year period (2016-2018) in Kocani Hospital, to identify the most often prescribed antibiotics and to determine whether the treatment of given diagnosis was in accordance with the official guidelines. The survey covered all pediatric and infant patients admitted to the pediatric ward. Patients’ data included gender, age, diagnosis, antibiotic used and doses. The majority of admitted patients were in the age group of 0-1 (27.48%, 25.94% and 30.77% for 2016, 2017 and 2018, accordingly) followed by age group of 1-2 years (20.86%, 22,0% and 23.83% for 2016, 2017 and 2018, consequently) and 2-3 years (16.06%, 16.1% and 14.63% for 2016, 2017 and 2018, consequently) .The most frequent diagnosis was acute tonsillitis which was determined in ~21% of patients, pneumonia without complications in ~18% and acute bronchitis in ~16% of patients in the period 2016-2018. Results from conducted survey identified high prescription rate and use of antibiotics predominantly ceftriaxone (82.58%, 81.05% and 50.85% in 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively) contrary to official recommendations and evidences based on clinical data for treatment of the diagnoses in question. So, it is foreseeable to conclude that there is urgent need for restrictive and educational measures i.e. to strength the surveillance and monitoring of antibiotic prescription and usage and hence to promote awareness for rational use of antibiotics on all health-care levels. Key words: antibiotic prescription, antibiotic consumption, pediatric wards, annual report