Parental internet search in the field of pediatric orthopedics

Information exchange on adolescent scoliosis discussion forums among patients and caregivers: a thematic analysis

PURPOSE

Online health-related support groups have increasingly become a regular resource for patients and caregivers; however, the content of these forums is largely unknown to medical teams. The purposes of this study were to (1) review posts from scoliosis discussion forums to establish common themes related to the care experience of patients with scoliosis and (2) understand how common themes vary among pediatric and adult patients, as well as caregivers.

METHODS

Posts were collected from two public scoliosis forums. Analysis was performed using grounded theory-a methodology that relies on the repeated analyses of qualitative data to identify recurring concepts, which are then coded and grouped into categories and ultimately central themes that seek to synthesize the relationships between categories. Information posts were reviewed by a board-certified orthopedic surgeon who performs scoliosis surgery for factual basis or misinformation.

RESULTS

Analysis of 911 posts revealed five central themes. The two most common themes among patients ≥ 18 and caregivers involve seeking out emotional support and information about surgical treatment. Patients < 18 frequently sought out emotional support but were also largely interested in information about bracing. The most prevalent theme among all contributors involved seeking out emotional support. There was very little medical misinformation found within posts.

CONCLUSION

Scoliosis forums serve as an informal outlet where patients and families can offer emotional support and share experiences. Physicians should provide direct emotional support to patients and offer these forums as a resource, without significant concerns about propagating medical misinformation.

A Readability Analysis of Online Spondylolisthesis and Spondylolysis Patient Resources Among Pediatric Hospital Web Pages: A US-Based Study

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing use of the internet for health information, it is essential to prioritize resources that match the reading level of patients and parents. Limited health literacy is a notable issue in the United States, creating a financial burden and negatively affecting patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the availability and readability of pediatric hospital web pages concerning two prevalent spine conditions in children, spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis, specifically examining whether the available resources meet the recommended sixth grade reading level.

METHODS

A total of 179 pediatric hospital web pages were assessed for their availability and readability of spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis patient information. The web pages' readability was assessed using five readability formulae. Descriptive statistics and Student t-tests were performed on the collected scores with significance set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Among the analyzed hospitals, 40.2% had no information on spondylolisthesis or spondylolysis, 20.1% mentioned treating these conditions, 7.8% had < 100 dedicated words, and only 31.8% had dedicated web pages with more than 100 words on these conditions. The average reading grade level for the evaluated web pages was 12.0, indicating a high school education level is required for comprehension. None of the web pages were written below the recommended sixth grade reading level.

DISCUSSION

The readability of the limited resources was markedly higher than the recommended reading level. In addition, this study emphasizes the need for enhanced accessibility and readability of online patient information from pediatric hospitals to improve parental comprehension and informed decision-making. Physicians should consider identifying online resources that they consider of high quality and acceptable readability to support better patient understanding and outcomes.

Can Artificial Intelligence Improve the Readability of Patient Education Materials?

BACKGROUND

The recommended readability of online health education materials is at or below the sixth- to eighth-grade level. Nevertheless, more than a decade of research has demonstrated that most online education materials pertaining to orthopaedic surgery do not meet these recommendations. The repeated evidence of this limited progress underscores that unaddressed barriers exist to improving readability, such as the added time and cost associated with writing easily readable materials that cover complex topics. Freely available artificial intelligence (AI) platforms might facilitate the conversion of patient-education materials at scale, but to our knowledge, this has not been evaluated in orthopaedic surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Can a freely available AI dialogue platform rewrite orthopaedic patient education materials to reduce the required reading skill level from the high-school level to the sixth-grade level (which is approximately the median reading level in the United States)? (2) Were the converted materials accurate, and did they retain sufficient content detail to be informative as education materials for patients?

METHODS

Descriptions of lumbar disc herniation, scoliosis, and spinal stenosis, as well as TKA and THA, were identified from educational materials published online by orthopaedic surgery specialty organizations and leading orthopaedic institutions. The descriptions were entered into an AI dialogue platform with the prompt "translate to fifth-grade reading level" to convert each group of text at or below the sixth-grade reading level. The fifth-grade reading level was selected to account for potential variation in how readability is defined by the AI platform, given that there are several widely used preexisting methods for defining readability levels. The Flesch Reading Ease score and Flesch-Kincaid grade level were determined for each description before and after AI conversion. The time to convert was also recorded. Each education material and its respective conversion was reviewed for factual inaccuracies, and each conversion was reviewed for its retention of sufficient detail for intended use as a patient education document.

RESULTS

As presented to the public, the current descriptions of herniated lumbar disc, scoliosis, and stenosis had median (range) Flesch-Kincaid grade levels of 9.5 (9.1 to 10.5), 12.6 (10.8 to 15), and 10.9 (8 to 13.6), respectively. After conversion by the AI dialogue platform, the median Flesch-Kincaid grade level scores for herniated lumbar disc, scoliosis, and stenosis were 5.0 (3.3 to 8.2), 5.6 (4.1 to 7.3), and 6.9 (5 to 7.8), respectively. Similarly, descriptions of TKA and THA improved from 12.0 (11.2 to 13.5) to 6.3 (5.8 to 7.6) and from 11.6 (9.5 to 12.6) to 6.1 (5.4 to 7.1), respectively. The Flesch Reading Ease scores followed a similar trend. Seconds per sentence conversion was median 4.5 (3.3 to 4.9) and 4.5 (3.5 to 4.8) for spine conditions and arthroplasty, respectively. Evaluation of the materials that were converted for ease of reading still provided a sufficient level of nuance for patient education, and no factual errors or inaccuracies were identified.

CONCLUSION

We found that a freely available AI dialogue platform can improve the reading accessibility of orthopaedic surgery online patient education materials to recommended levels quickly and effectively. Professional organizations and practices should determine whether their patient education materials exceed current recommended reading levels by using widely available measurement tools, and then apply an AI dialogue platform to facilitate converting their materials to more accessible levels if needed. Additional research is needed to determine whether this technology can be applied to additional materials meant to inform patients, such as surgical consent documents or postoperative instructions, and whether the methods presented here are applicable to non-English language materials.

Strategies to optimize the information provision for parents of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Aims

The aim of this study was to identify the information topics that should be addressed according to the parents of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in the diagnostic and treatment phase during the first year of life. Second, we explored parental recommendations to further optimize the information provision in DDH care.

Methods

A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews was conducted between September and December 2020. A purposive sample of parents of children aged younger than one year, who were treated for DDH with a Pavlik harness, were interviewed until data saturation was achieved. A total of 20 interviews with 22 parents were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, independently reviewed, and coded into categories and themes.

Results

Interviews revealed four fundamental information topics that should be addressed in the different phases of the DDH healthcare trajectory: general information (screening phase), patient-specific information (diagnostic and treatment phase), practical information (treatment phase), and future perspectives (treatment and follow-up phase). To further optimize the information provision in DDH care, parents wished for more accessible and trustworthy general information prior to the first hospital visit to be better prepared for the diagnosis. Furthermore, parents wanted more personalized and visually supported information for a better understanding of the nature of the disease and the reason for treatment.

Conclusion

This study offers novel insights to optimize the information provision in DDH care. The main finding is the shift in information need from general information in the screening phase to patient-specific information in the diagnostic and treatment phase of DDH. Parents prefer visually-supported information, provided in a timely fashion, and tailored to their child's situation. These recommendations potentially decrease parental anxiety, insecurity, confusion, and increase parental empowerment and treatment adherence throughout the diagnostic and treatment phase of DDH.

Readability assessment of patient educational materials for pediatric spinal conditions from top academic orthopedic institutions

Background

The Internet has become a popular source of health information for patients and their families. Healthcare experts recommend that the readability of online education materials be at or below a sixth grade reading level. This translates to a standardized Flesch Reading Ease Score between 81 and 90, which is equivalent to conversational English. However, previous studies have demonstrated that the readability of online education materials of various orthopedic topics is too advanced for the average patient. To date, the readability of online education materials for pediatric spinal conditions has not been analyzed. The objective of this study was to assess the readability of online educational materials of top pediatric orthopedic hospital websites for pediatric spinal conditions.

Methods

Online patient education materials from the top 25 pediatric orthopedic institutions, as ranked by the U.S. News and World Report hospitals for pediatric orthopedics, were assessed utilizing multiple readability assessment metrics including Flesch-Kincaid, Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog Index, and others. Correlations between academic institutional ranking, geographic location, and the use of concomitant multimedia modalities with Flesch-Kincaid scores were evaluated using a Spearman regression.

Results

Only 32% (8 of 25) of top pediatric orthopedic hospitals provided online health information at or below a sixth grade reading level. The mean Flesch-Kincaid score was 9.3 ± 2.5, Flesch Reading Ease 48.3 ± 16.2, Gunning Fog Score 10.7 ± 3.0, Coleman-Liau Index 12.1 ± 2.8, Simple Measure of the Gobbledygook Index 11.7 ± 2.1, Automated Readability Index 9.0 ± 2.7, FORCAST 11.3 ± 1.2, and Dale-Chall Readability Index 6.7 ± 1.4. There was no significant correlation between institutional ranking, geographic location, or use of video material with Flesch-Kincaid scores (p = 0.1042, p = 0.7776, p = 0.3275, respectively).

Conclusion

Online educational material for pediatric spinal conditions from top pediatric orthopedic institutional websites is associated with excessively complex language which may limit comprehension for the majority of the US population.

Type of study/Level of evidence

Economic and Decision Analysis/level III.

Alternative and Adjunct Treatments for Scoliosis: A Google Trends Analysis of Public Popularity Compared With Scientific Literature

Purpose As Google searches have often been found to provide inaccurate information regarding various treatments for orthopedic conditions, it becomes important to analyze search trends to understand what treatments are most popularly considered and the quality of information available. We sought to compare the public interest in popular adjunct/alternative scoliosis treatments to the published literature on these topics and assess any temporal trends in the public interest in these treatments. Methods The study authors compiled the most common adjunct/alternative treatments for scoliosis on PubMed. Chiropractic manipulation, Schroth exercises, physical therapy, pilates, and yoga, along with "scoliosis," were each entered into Google Trends, collected from 2004 to 2021. A linear regression analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was done to determine whether there was a linear relationship between Google Trends' popularity and PubMed publication data. The seasonal popularity of the terms was assessed using locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression. Results Google Trends and publication frequency linear regression curves were different for chiropractic manipulation (p < 0.001), Schroth exercises (p < 0.001), physical therapy (p < 0.001), and pilates (p = 0.003). Chiropractic manipulation (p < 0.001), Schroth exercises (p = 0.003), and physical therapy (p < 0.001) had positive trends, and yoga (p < 0.001) had a negative trend. Chiropractic manipulation and yoga were more popular in the summer and winter months. Conclusion Google Trends can provide orthopedic surgeons and other healthcare professionals with valuable information on which treatments are gaining popularity with the public, so physicians may specifically inform themselves prior to patient encounters, leading to more productive shared decision-making.

Family risk communication preferences in pediatric surgery: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Effective patient-surgeon communication is vital in pediatric surgical practice. However, family (including child) preferences for the format and content of risk communication information are largely unknown. In order to optimize the shared-decision making process, this scoping review explored the family-preferred methods for risk communication in pediatric surgery.

METHODS

A search was conducted in 7 databases from inception until June 2020 to identify family risk communication preferences in pediatric surgical patients, with language restricted to English and French. Two independent reviewers completed the screening in Rayyan software following PRISMA protocol. Included publications were reviewed for data extraction, analyzed, and assessed for risk of bias using standardized instruments.

RESULTS

A total of 6370 publications were retrieved, out of which 70 were included. Studies were predominantly from ENT (30.0%), general surgery (15.7%), and urology (11.4%). Family-preferred risk communication methods were classified as visual, verbal, technology-based, written, decision aids or other. Technological (32.4%) and written tools (29.7%) were most commonly chosen by families as their preferred risk communication methods. Written tools were frequently used in general surgery and urology, while technology-based tools were widely used in ENT. Most studies were cross-sectional and had a significant risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Eliciting families' preferences for risk communication methods is critical for the implementation of shared decision-making. Different risk communication media appear to be preferred within specific surgical domains. To further improve shared-decision making in pediatric surgery, the development and usage of robust, validated risk communication tools are necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV (Scoping Review).

Readability assessment of patient educational materials for pediatric spinal deformity from top academic orthopedic institutions

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of patient educational materials from top pediatric orthopedic hospital websites.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the readability of online educational materials of top pediatric orthopedic hospital websites for pediatric spinal deformity. The internet has become an increasingly popular source of health information for patients and their families. Healthcare experts recommend that the readability of online education materials be at or below a 6th-grade reading level. However, previous studies have demonstrated that the readability of online education materials on various orthopedic topics is too advanced for the average patient. To date, the readability of online education materials for pediatric spinal deformity has not been analyzed.

METHODS

Online patient education materials from the top 25 pediatric orthopedic institutions, as ranked by the U.S. News and World Report hospitals for pediatric orthopedics, were accessed utilizing the following readability assessments: Flesch-Kincaid (FK), Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Simple Measure of the Gobbledygook Index (SMOG), Automated Readability Index, FORCAST, and the New Dale and Chall Readability. Correlations between academic institutional ranking, geographic location, and the use of concomitant multi-media modalities with FK scores were evaluated using a Spearman regression.

RESULTS

Only 48% (12 of 25) of top pediatric orthopedic hospitals provided online information regarding pediatric spinal deformity at or below a 6th-grade reading level. The mean FK score was 9.0 ± 2.7, Flesch Reading Ease 50.8 ± 15.6, Gunning Fog Score 10.6 ± 3.1, Coleman-Liau Index 11.6 ± 2.6, SMOG index 11.7 ± 2.0, Automated Readability Index 8.6 ± 2.8, and Dale-Chall Readability Score 6.4 ± 1.4. There was no significant correlation between institutional ranking, geographic location, or use of multimedia with FK scores.

CONCLUSION

Online educational material for pediatric spinal deformity from top pediatric orthopedic institutional websites are associated with poor readability.

Quality of YouTube videos for three common pediatric hip conditions: developmental hip dysplasia, slipped capital femoral epiphysis and Legg-Calve-Perthes disease

YouTube is an increasingly accessible platform for families to obtain health information from; however, it is unregulated. The aim of this article was to assess the quality, reliability and accuracy of YouTube videos related to three common pediatric hip conditions: development dysplasia of the hip (DDH), slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and Legg-Calve-Perthes disease. YouTube was searched using a variety of keyword combinations. Videos were analysed using Journal of the American Medical Association, Global Quality Score and condition-specific scores created specifically for this study. Video duration and the number of views were also recorded. In total 120 videos were analysed, 40 for each of DDH, SCFE and Perthes disease. YouTube videos from physicians and academic institutions/hospitals are of significantly higher quality, reliability and accuracy than videos from patients, nonphysicians and commercial outlets. The higher quality for physician videos is associated with significantly longer video. Differences between the three pediatric orthopaedic conditions were not statistically significant. Videos of higher quality may be used as an adjunctive tool to strengthen clinical consultation. Parents and caregivers should be guided to videos from academic institutions or hospitals as a way of improving health literacy.

Parents' Use of Social Media as a Health Information Source for Their Children: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Parents are increasingly using social media to inform health decisions for their children.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review examines 1) How do parents use social media to find health information for their children? 2) What motivates parents to engage with social media to seek health information for their children? 3) How do parents seek to understand and evaluate the health information they find on social media, and how does social media impact parental health information-seeking?

METHODS

Scopus, CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched, with open date parameters. Peer-reviewed studies that examined parents' and responsible caregivers' use of social media as a source of health information for their children (aged <18 years) were included.

RESULTS

The 42 included studies spanned 2011 to 2020. More than half (n = 24, 57%) were published in 2019 and 2020. Parents use social media for information about specific health concerns both before and after a medical diagnosis for their child. Parents are motivated to engage with social media as they seek out extensive information based on lived experience from other parents, as well as social support and community.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review reveals parents' motivation to use social media for health information, and how that can interact with, and impose on, clinical practice. It is important for those who provide pediatric health care to both understand and accommodate this permanent shift facilitated by social media, when working with parents who are seeking health information when making health decisions for their children.

Scoliosis surgery in social media: a natural language processing approach to analyzing the online patient perspective

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to analyze posts shared on Instagram, Twitter, and Reddit referencing scoliosis surgery to evaluate content, tone, and perspective.

METHODS

Public posts from Instagram, Twitter, and Reddit were parsed in 2020-2021 and selected based on inclusion of the words 'scoliosis surgery' or '#scoliosissurgery. 100 Reddit posts, 5022 Instagram posts, and 1414 tweets were included in analysis. The Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) python library was utilized to perform computational text analysis to determine content and sentiment analysis to estimate the tone of posts across each platform.

RESULTS

46.4% of Tweets were positive in tone, 39.4% were negative, and 13.8% were neutral. Positive content focused on patients, friends, or hospitals sharing good outcomes after a patient's surgery. Negative content focused on long wait times to receive scoliosis surgery. 64.7% of Instagram posts were positive in tone, 16.3% were negative, and 19.0% were neutral. Positive content centered around post-operative progress reports and educational resources, while negative content focused on long-term back pain. 37% of Reddit posts were positive in tone, 38% were negative, and 25% were neutral. Positive posts were about personal post-operative progress reports, while negative posts were about fears prior to scoliosis surgery and questions about risks of the procedure.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights scoliosis surgery content in social media formats and stratifies how this content is portrayed based on the platform it is on. Surgeons can use this knowledge to better educate and connect with their own patients, thus harnessing the power and reach of social media.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Readability of Patient Educational Materials in Pediatric Orthopaedics

BACKGROUND

Parents are increasingly turning to the internet to seek pediatric health information. Numerous organizations advise that patient educational materials (PEMs) should not surpass the sixth-grade reading level. We aimed to assess the readability of online pediatric orthopaedic PEMs.

METHODS

The readability of 176 articles pertaining to pediatric orthopaedics from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA), and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) websites was assessed with the use of 8 readability formulae: the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level, the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the Raygor Estimate, the SMOG, the Coleman-Liau, the Fry, the FORCAST, and the Gunning Fog. The mean reading grade level (RGL) of each article was compared with the sixth and eighth-grade reading levels. The mean RGL of each website's articles also was compared.

RESULTS

The cumulative mean RGL was 10.2 (range, 6.6 to 16.0). No articles (0%) were written at the sixth-grade reading level, and only 7 articles (4.0%) were written at or below the eighth-grade reading level. The mean RGL was significantly higher than the sixth-grade (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, 4.0 to 4.4; p < 0.001) and eighth-grade (95% CI, 2.0 to 2.4; p < 0.001) reading levels. The mean RGL of articles on the POSNA website was significantly lower than the mean RGL of the articles on the AAOS (95% CI, -1.8 to -1.0; p < 0.001) and AAP (95% CI, -2.9 to -1.1; p < 0.001) websites.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric orthopaedic PEMs that are produced by the AAOS, the POSNA, and the AAP have readability scores that exceed recommendations. Given the increasing preference of parents and adolescents for online health information, the growing body of online PEMs, and the critical role that health literacy plays in patient outcomes, substantial work is required to address the readability of these materials.

An Evaluation of Websites Offering Caregiver Education for Tracheostomy and Home Mechanical Ventilation

BACKGROUND

Parental and familial caregivers of a child with a tracheostomy, and possibly home mechanical ventilation (HMV), face the overwhelming task of learning to medically care for their child prior to discharge. Caregivers may cope by seeking health information on the Internet. This is concerning because information found during an Internet search may not be accurate, comprehensive, or up to date. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the quality and content of websites offering information about tracheostomies and HMV using a valid assessment tool.

METHODS

A total of 46 websites were identified for evaluation using the DISCERN instrument for quality and reliability, and the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesh- Kincaid (FK) grade level instruments for readability. Accuracy of content was determined by expert opinion.

FINDINGS

Few of the websites met the recommended quality and/or readability levels. The websites recommended had a range of DISCERN scores 21-40, adjusted FRE 61-89.1, and adjusted FK 3.4-6.9. Many of the highest quality websites had a readability level at high school or college levels.

DISCUSSION

The quality and readability of websites offering caregiver education for tracheostomy and HMV are not at a level suitable for caregivers. There was often a mismatch between DISCERN quality and readability. Many high-quality websites would not be easily read and understood by the general lay population.

APPLICATION TO PRACTICE

DISCERN alone is not sufficient to determine whether a website should be recommended. One should consider reliability, quality, and readability when developing patient education materials, including those on the Internet.

Clubfoot for the primary care physician: frequently asked questions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to provide primary care physicians with updates on recent literature regarding clubfoot and answer questions asked by parents and caregivers of children with clubfoot. The topics discussed include prenatal counseling, relapse after Ponseti treatment, long-term outcomes following successful treatment of clubfoot, and the effect of diagnosis and treatment on the parent or caregiver.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clubfoot is one of the most commonly searched orthopaedic conditions on the internet by parents. There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines on clubfoot worldwide. Recent systematic reviews have identified emerging evidence of genetic and modifiable risk factors that lead to clubfoot. Patients treated by the Ponseti method show better ankle power and strength compared with those treated with surgery for residual deformity or recurrence.

SUMMARY

The treatment of clubfoot is a long and involved process. Exposure to and familiarity with the Ponseti method will aid primary care physicians and parents in the optimization of children's clubfoot deformity correction using largely nonoperative management.