Current practices in children with severe acute asthma across European PICUs: an ESPNIC survey

The adherence to asthma medication for hospitalized children with asthma: A cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

AIM

The aim of the study was to assess adherence to asthma controller therapy and factors that influence asthma control and to determine the association between asthma knowledge of the caregiver and asthma control among admitted children with asthma.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2022 and May 2023 in a tertiary care hospital. Children with a diagnosis of asthma aged 2-14 years, who were admitted to the hospital with an exacerbation of asthma were identified.

METHODS

Caregivers of the admitted children were interviewed using the Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire and Pediatric Inhaler Adherence Questionnaire.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Demographic and clinical data were described using descriptive analyses, where mean and standard deviation were used for normally distributed continuous variables, median and interquartile range (IQR), if otherwise. A P < 0.05 was set as a cutoff for statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 144 caregivers completed the survey. Median score for parents' knowledge of asthma was 64%, with an IQR of 59-67. Both mother's and father's educational levels were associated with a good level of knowledge: odds ratio (OR) = 2.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-5.6, and OR = 5.33, 95% CI = 2.23-12.7, respectively. Median adherence to metered dose inhaler (MDI) was 4 (IQR = 2-6). Children who had been admitted to the general ward in the last 6 months were three times more likely to be nonadherent to MDI (OR = 3.03, 95% CI = 1.18-7.82). Forty-three percent of children who were nonadherent to MDI were less likely to have their asthma controlled (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.17-1.06).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that a low level of knowledge among caregivers of asthma patients is linked to inadequate adherence to asthma controller therapy. As medication adherence is crucial for achieving desirable asthma control and improving the quality of life for this population, efforts need to be made to enhance the knowledge level of parents of children with asthma.

Wide Institutional Variability in the Treatment of Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Children with status asthmaticus refractory to first-line therapies of systemic corticosteroids and inhaled beta-agonists often receive additional treatments. Because there are no national guidelines on the use of asthma therapies in the PICU, we sought to evaluate institutional variability in the use of adjunctive asthma treatments and associations with length of stay (LOS) and PICU use.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Administrative data from the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) database.

PATIENTS

All inpatients 2-18 years old were admitted to a PHIS hospital between 2013 and 2021 with a diagnostic code for asthma.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

This study included 213,506 inpatient encounters for asthma, of which 29,026 patient encounters included care in a PICU from 39 institutions. Among these PICU encounters, large variability was seen across institutions in both the number of adjunctive asthma therapies used per encounter (min: 0.6, median: 1.7, max: 2.5, p < 0.01) and types of adjunctive asthma therapies (aminophylline, ipratropium, magnesium, epinephrine, and terbutaline) used. The center-level median hospital LOS ranged from 1 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1, 3) to 4 (3, 6) days. Among all the 213,506 inpatient encounters for asthma, the range of asthma admissions that resulted in PICU admission varied between centers from 5.2% to 47.3%. The average number of adjunctive therapies used per institution was not significantly associated with hospital LOS ( p = 0.81) nor the percentage of encounters with PICU admission ( p = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of adjunctive therapies for status asthmaticus varies widely among large children's hospitals and was not associated with hospital LOS or the percentage of encounters with PICU admission. Wide variance presents an opportunity for standardizing care with evidence-based guidelines to optimize outcomes and decrease adverse treatment effects and hospital costs.

International perspective on research priorities and outcome measures of importance in the care of children with acute exacerbations of asthma: a qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbations of asthma are common in children, however, treatment decisions for severe exacerbations are challenging due to a lack of robust evidence. In order to create more robust research, a core set of outcome measures needs to be developed. In developing these outcomes, it is important to understand the views of clinicians who care for these children in particular, views that relate to outcome measures and research priorities.

METHODS

To determine the views of clinicians, a total of 26 semistructured interviews based on the theoretical domains framework were conducted. These included experienced clinicians from emergency, intensive care and inpatient paediatrics across 17 countries. The interviews were recorded, and later transcribed. All data analyses were conducted in Nvivo by using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The length of stay in hospital and patient-focused parameters, such as timing to return to school and normal activity, were the most frequently highlighted outcome measures, with clinicians identifying the need to achieve a consensus on key core outcome measure sets. Most research questions focused on understanding the best treatment options, including the role of novel therapies and respiratory support.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides an insight into what research questions and outcome measures clinicians view as important. In addition, information on how clinicians define asthma severity and measure treatment success will assist with methodological design in future trials. The current findings will be used in parallel with a further Paediatric Emergency Research Network study focusing on the child and family perspectives and will contribute to develop a core outcome set for future research.

Safety and Effectiveness of Prolonged Magnesium Sulfate (MgSO4) Infusion for Asthma Exacerbation in Children

The objective of this study was to assess the safety and describe treatment details of prolonged magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) infusion for children with asthma exacerbation. A retrospective cross-sectional study included children under 13 years of age who were admitted with asthma exacerbation and received at least 24 hours of MgSO4 infusion. One hundred children were included. No patient developed serious adverse events. The mean infusion duration was 74.2 hours. Eighty-nine percent recovered with no other bronchodilator infusions, and 94% did not require respiratory support escalation. Prolonged MgSO4 infusion is safe at a maximum dose of 30 mg/kg/h and may be beneficial for children with asthma exacerbation.

Efficacy of a loading dose of IV salbutamol in children with severe acute asthma admitted to a PICU: a randomized controlled trial

The optimal dose regimen for intravenous (IV) treatment in children with severe acute asthma (SAA) is still a matter of debate. We assessed the efficacy of adding a salbutamol loading dose to continuous infusion with salbutamol in children admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with SAA. This multicentre, placebo-controlled randomized trial in the PICUs of four tertiary care children's hospitals included children (2-18 years) with SAA admitted between 2017 and 2019. Children were randomized to receive either a loading dose IV salbutamol (15 mcg/kg, max. 750 mcg) or normal saline while on continuous salbutamol infusion. The primary outcome was the asthma score (Qureshi) 1 h after the intervention. Analysis of covariance models was used to evaluate sensitivity to change in asthma scores. Serum concentrations of salbutamol were obtained. Fifty-eight children were included (29 in the intervention group). Median baseline asthma score was 12 (IQR 10-13) in the intervention group and 11 (9-12) in the control group (p = 0.032). The asthma score 1 h after the intervention did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.508, β-coefficient = 0.283). The median increase in salbutamol plasma levels 10 min after the intervention was 13 μg/L (IQR 5-24) in the intervention group and 4 μg/L (IQR 0-7) in the control group (p = 0.001). Side effects were comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSION

We found no clinical benefit of adding a loading dose IV salbutamol to continuous infusion of salbutamol, in children admitted to the PICU with SAA. Clinically significant side effects from the loading dose were not encountered.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Pediatric asthma guidelines struggle with an evidence-based approach for the treatment of SAA beyond the initial steps of oxygen suppletion, repetitive administration of inhaled β2-agonists, and systemic steroids. • During an SAA episode, effective delivery of inhaled drugs is unpredictable due to severe airway obstruction.

WHAT IS NEW

• This study found no beneficial effect of an additional loading dose IV salbutamol in children admitted to the PICU. • This study found no clinically significant side effects from the loading dose.

[Paediatric Life Support]

The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Paediatric Life Support (PLS) guidelines are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). This section provides guidelines on the management of critically ill or injured infants, children and adolescents before, during and after respiratory/cardiac arrest.

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Paediatric Life Support

These European Resuscitation Council Paediatric Life Support (PLS) guidelines, are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the management of critically ill infants and children, before, during and after cardiac arrest.

Variability in care for children with severe acute asthma in Latin America

BACKGROUND

Care variability for children with severe acute asthma has been well documented in high-income countries, yet data from low- and middle-income regions are lacking. We sought to characterize the magnitude of practice variability in the care of Latin American children to identify opportunities for standardization of care.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study performed through a retrospective analysis of contemporaneously collected data of children with severe acute asthma admitted to a center contributing to the LARed Network registry between May 2017 and May 2019. Centers were grouped by geographic location: Atlantic (AT), South Pacific (SP), and North Central (NC).

RESULTS

Among 434 children, most received care in hospitals in the AT group (54% [235/434]), followed by the NC (23% [101/434]) and SP (23% [98/434]) groups. The majority of children in the AT (92% [215/235]) and SP (91% [89/98]) groups received nebulized salbutamol/albuterol, while metered-dose inhalers were preferred in the NC group (72% [73/101]). There was a wide variation in the use of antibiotics: AT (57% [135/235]), SP (48% [47/98]), and NC (14% [14/101]). The same was true for ipratropium bromide: AT (67% [157/235]), SP (90% [88/98]), and NC (17% [17/101]), and aminophylline: AT (57% [135/235]), NC (5% [5/101]), and SP (0% [0/98]). High-flow nasal cannula was the preferred respiratory support modality in the AT (60% [141/235]) and NC (40% [40/101]) groups, while bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) use was more common in the SP group (80% [78/98]).

CONCLUSION

We identified significant variability in care for severe acute asthma. Our findings will help to inform the design of future studies, quality improvement initiatives, and development of practice guidelines within Latin America.

Methylprednisolone, dexamethasone or hydrocortisone for acute severe pediatric asthma: does it matter?

OBJECTIVE

Various intravenous (IV) corticosteroids are available for acute severe asthma (ASA) treatment. The choice of IV corticosteroids varies broadly and depends on institution, country, or physician preferences. In this study, we compared the efficacy of IV methylprednisolone, hydrocortisone and dexamethasone in ASA treatment during pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission.

METHODS

The study was a prospective randomized clinical trial. We enrolled patients of 1-21 years after they were admitted to the PICU requiring continuous beta-2 agonist treatment. Patients were randomized into three groups: Group A: IV Methylprednisolone, Group B: IV Hydrocortisone and Group C: IV Dexamethasone. The primary outcomes measured were durations of beta-2 agonist continuous nebulization treatment. Secondary outcomes, included PICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), pediatric asthma severity score (PASS), need for mechanical ventilation and maximum dose of beta-2 agonist treatment.

RESULTS

61 patients were included in the analysis. 22 patients recruited in Group A, 20 in group B and 19 group C. Median durations of beta-2-agonist treatment were 23 h (QR 16-38) for methylprednisolone, 27 h (QR 16-40) for hydrocortisone, and 32 h (QR 16-48) for dexamethasone (p = 0.90). There was no difference in PICU LOS, hospital LOS, PASS score, B2 agonist maximum dose, or need for ventilation support.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IV methylprednisolone, hydrocortisone, and dexamethasone have equivalent efficacy when used at the appropriate doses. Studies with larger cohorts are needed to compare the effectiveness of IV corticosteroids in the management of ASA in the PICU setting.

Validation of the Hospital Asthma Severity Score (HASS) in children ages 2-18 years old

INTRODUCTION

The Hospital Asthma Severity Score (HASS) was developed to communicate inpatient asthma severity between providers. The purpose of this prospective study was to validate the HASS against the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) and spirometry for assessment of inpatient asthma exacerbation severity in patients 2-18 years old, at a single point-in-time.

METHODS

This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02782065). Children admitted to a tertiary care, free-standing children's hospital were assessed for asthma severity using the HASS, PRAM, and pulmonary function by spirometry. Inter-rater agreement of HASS and PRAM scores was assessed between two blinded clinician raters. Spirometry results were obtained by a certified pulmonary laboratory technician and correlated with HASS and PRAM scores.

RESULTS

The sample included 58 subjects. Allowing for a one-point difference in continuous HASS and PRAM scores, inter-rater agreement was 79% for the HASS and 60% for the PRAM. When the scores were categorized as mild, moderate, and severe, inter-rater agreement was 62% for the HASS and 93% for the PRAM (p < .0001). Additionally, intra-rater agreement between HASS and PRAM severity categories was 71% for Rater 1 and 64% for Rater 2. A weak correlation was noted between both the HASS and FEV₁ (r = -0.31; p = 0.11), and PRAM and FEV₁ (r = -0.30; p = 0.11) for the 29 subjects with acceptable spirometry results.

CONCLUSIONS

The HASS and PRAM have acceptable inter-rater and intra-rater agreement. These results support validation of the HASS for managing hospitalized patients during asthma exacerbations.