Melatonin is useful alternative for sedation in children undergoing auditory brainstem responses testing

Melatonin for non-operating room sedation in paediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

The literature on melatonin as a sedative agent in children is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of studies assessing the efficacy and safety of melatonin for non-operating room sedation in children.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health were searched until 9 April 2020 for studies using melatonin and reporting one of the prespecified outcomes of this review. Two authors independently assessed the eligibility, risk of bias and extracted the data. Studies with a similar study design, comparator and procedure were pooled using the fixed-effect model.

RESULTS

25 studies (clinical trials=3, observational studies=9, descriptive studies=13) were included. Melatonin was used for electroencephalogram (EEG) (n=12), brainstem evoked response audiometry (n=8) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n=5). No significant differences were noted on meta-analysis of EEG studies comparing melatonin with sleep deprivation (SD) (relative risk (RR) 1.06 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.12)), melatonin with chloral hydrate (RR 0.97 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.05)) and melatonin alone with melatonin and SD combined (RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.10)) for successful procedure completion. However, significantly higher sedation failure was noted in melatonin alone compared with melatonin and SD combined (RR 1.55 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.33)) for EEG. Additionally, meta-analysis showed lower sleep latency for melatonin compared with SD (mean difference -10.21 (95% CI -11.53 to -8.89) for EEG. No major adverse events were reported with melatonin.

CONCLUSION

Although several studies were identified, and no serious safety concerns were noted, the evidence was not of high quality to establish melatonin's efficacy for non-operating room sedation in children.

The use of melatonin for auditory brainstem response audiometry in children with comorbidities

PURPOSE

In this study, the efficacy and feasibility of melatonin in young children with and without comorbidities, undergoing auditory brainstem response audiometry (ABR) was evaluated. The aim of this study was primarily to evaluate the use of melatonin for ABR investigations in children with comorbidities. Second, the efficacy of melatonin was evaluated based on several factors like sleep-onset latency, sleep duration, frequency of awakenings as well as adverse events.

METHODS

Click-induced ABR tests were performed at the outpatient clinic between January, 2018 and August, 2020. Investigations were considered successful when binaural testing was completed. A dose of melatonin depending on age, 5 mg for children younger than 6 years and 10 mg if older than 6 years, was administered after placement of electrodes.

RESULTS

131 children were included in this study. 87% of all ABR investigations were performed successfully. Comorbidities such as neurodevelopmental disorders or developmental delays were present in 70% of all children. There was no significant difference in age (p = 0.36) or gender (p = 0.97) between the success and failed group. In addition, comorbidities were equally distributed between both groups. Mean sleep duration was 38 (SD 21) min and sleep-onset latency was 28 (SD 20) min No adverse events were documented.

CONCLUSION

Melatonin is effective for ABR examinations in infants and children with and without comorbidities. Furthermore, it allows for sequential testing in those at risk for progressive hearing loss. Clear instructions to caregivers and expertise of audiologists are a prerequisite for optimal outcomes.

The Fluctuations of Melatonin and Copeptin Levels in Blood Serum During Surgical Stress Regarding the Pediatric Population

INTRODUCTION

Copeptin is known to be associated with heart damage, while melatonin is a regulatory hormone related to circadian rhythm and represents the levels of inflammation in the body.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

The aim of the study was to measure in different surgeries the levels of copeptin and melatonin at different times before and after surgery in 56 patients aged from 5 days to 13.6 years. We measured copeptin in 50-microL serum and plasma samples from patients before surgery, immediately after surgery, and 24 hours after surgery. The measured levels are aligned with the published GC / MS data, and the sensitivity of the analysis is such that serum and plasma levels can only be measured by rapid extraction. The measurement was made before surgery, immediately after surgery, and 24 hours after surgery.

RESULTS

The multifactorial statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the 24-hour postoperative copeptin values in group 1 (mild-moderate gravity surgery) and group 2 (severe surgery) of the severity of the surgery. Post-hoc tests with Tukey correction for age groups in multiple comparisons of the multifactorial analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (p <0.05) between 24-hour postoperative melatonin values in age groups 3 (3-6 years) and 5 (6-12 years old). The age group 3 showed significantly (p <0.05) lower 24 hours postoperative melatonin values compared to the age group 5 (6-12 years). Again, these 3-6-year-olds were more likely to have inflammation due to the severity of the surgery and the presence of inflammation after the surgery.

DISCUSSION

In summary, copeptin is a reliable biomarker for assessing a patient's health both preoperatively and postoperatively. Copeptin and melatonin are two independent agents and are not related to each other, and more studies will be needed with more patients of the same age and with the same underlying disease to assess their diagnostic value. Finally, melatonin could be considered an indicator of inflammation on its own and based on pre-and post-surgery values to determine a patient's health status and take appropriate actions.

Drug Use in Pediatric Patients Admitted to Rehabilitation For Severe Acquired Brain Injury: Analysis of the Associations With Rehabilitation Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Patients with severe acquired brain injuries require drug therapies in intensive care for life support and injury treatment. Patients who then access rehabilitation usually maintain their drug treatments long term, with a potential influence on the rehabilitation course. Whereas drug effects have been reported for specific drugs and clinical issues in adults, comprehensive data on pediatric patients with traumatic and non-traumatic injuries are scant.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to describe the therapeutic classes and groups of drugs prescribed to pediatric inpatients recovering from severe acquired brain injury when they enter rehabilitation; to assess whether clinical variables may determine the use of drug classes; and to assess whether the use of drug classes may be associated with differences in rehabilitation outcomes.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective chart review, following a previous study on the clinical-epidemiological characteristics of our patients. We collected information on drug therapies present at admittance to rehabilitation and analyzed their distribution according to therapeutic classes and groups. We verified the associations of drug groups with clinical variables (putatively antecedents to drug use) and with rehabilitation outcomes (putatively resultant of drug use and of clinical variables) in regression models. The clinical variables considered were injury etiology, Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at admittance to rehabilitation, sex, age at injury, plus two aggregate factors resulting from the previous work, 'neurological dysfunction' regarding the use of devices and 'injury severity' regarding the neurological status. The rehabilitation outcomes used were death after rehabilitation, persistence of a vegetative/minimally conscious state, coma duration, duration of the rehabilitation stay, rehabilitation efficiency (GOS at discharge minus GOS at admittance, divided by the length of rehabilitation stay).

RESULTS

We described the distribution of drug classes and groups among pediatric patients with severe acquired brain injuries. Regarding the associations between drug classes and clinical variables, we found greater use of cardiovascular agents with higher patient age, 'neurological dysfunction' score, and with an etiology of hypoxic brain injury. The use of antithrombotic agents was greater with higher patient age and 'neurological dysfunction' score. Glucocorticoid use was greater with higher GOS at admittance and with several etiologies: brain tumor, infective encephalitis, and autoimmune encephalitis. Regarding drug classes and rehabilitation outcomes, we found that the use of cardiovascular drugs was associated with increased occurrence of death after rehabilitation. The use of antispastic drugs was associated with a more frequent permanence in vegetative/minimally conscious states. The use of antispastic drugs and melatonin was associated with longer coma duration. The use of glucocorticoid drugs was associated with decreased rehabilitation efficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

We provided a description of drug use in pediatric rehabilitation after severe acquired brain injuries, which was lacking in the literature. Prospective studies should verify our associative observations regarding clinical variables, drugs use, and outcomes, to assess causality.

Melatonin for anaesthetic indications in paediatric patients: a systematic review

The favourable safety profile and ubiquitous nature of melatonin has led to an increase in its use in various clinical settings in adults and children. We performed a systematic review of published studies on the use of melatonin for anaesthetic indications in paediatric patients. To identify relevant articles, PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched. Study title and abstract screening, and full text review were performed by two reviewers. Twenty-seven eligible studies investigating melatonin use for anaesthetic indications were identified. Due to significant heterogeneity in study methodology, a quantitative synthesis of the published findings was not possible. The identified studies were therefore categorised by the indication for melatonin: analgesia, diagnostic sedation and as an anaesthetic adjunct. Melatonin use for anaesthetic-related indications is safe; may provide analgesia for inflammatory-associated pain in neonates and children before venepuncture; may decrease the need for, or replace, general anaesthesia for diagnostic procedures; and may serve as an anaesthesia adjunct before induction in paediatric patients.