Test-retest reliability of static and dynamic motor fatigability protocols using grip and pinch strength in typically developing children

Children With Cerebral Palsy Show Higher Static-But Not Higher Dynamic-Motor Fatigability in Grip and Pinch Tasks Than Children With Typical Development Do

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in static and dynamic motor fatigability during grip and pinch tasks between children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (USCP) and children with typical development (TD) and between preferred and nonpreferred hands.

METHODS

Fifty-three children with USCP and 53 age-matched children with TD (mean = 11 years 1 month; SD = 3 years 8 months) participated in 30-second maximum exertion sustained and repeated grip and pinch tasks. For sustained tasks, the Static Fatigue Index and the ratio of mean force between the first and last thirds of the curve were calculated. For repeated tasks, the ratio of mean force and the ratio of numbers of peaks between the first and last thirds of the curve were calculated.

RESULTS

Higher Static Fatigue Index scores for grip and pinch were found with USCP in both hands and between hands in both groups. Dynamic motor fatigability showed inconsistent results, with higher levels of fatigability in children with TD than in children with USCP for grip in the ratio of mean force between the first and last thirds of the curve in nonpreferred hands and in the ratio of number of peaks between the first and last thirds of the curve in preferred hands.

CONCLUSION

Higher motor fatigability in children with USCP than in children with TD was found for static but not dynamic grip and pinch. Underlying mechanisms may play different roles in static and dynamic motor fatigability.

IMPACT

These results highlight that static motor fatigability in grip and pinch tasks should be part of a comprehensive upper limb assessment and that this could be the target of individualized interventions.

The effectiveness and safety of blood flow restriction training for the post-operation treatment of distal radius fracture

INTRODUCTION

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is a common injury in the upper extremities. Blood flow restriction (BFR) has been proven to be effective in improving function in low-load training, which is suitable for post-op rehabilitation. We explored the effectiveness and safety of BFR therapy in DRF patients who underwent surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients were randomly assigned to either the BFR or the regular training (RT; no BFR therapy) groups. All patients completed the same 4-week postoperative rehabilitation program, including anti-inflammatory treatments, strengthening and range of motion (ROM) training. In the BFR group, the pressure was 120 mmHg in strengthening training course. Pain, circumferences of wrists and forearms, ROM, muscle strength, and D-dimer levels were evaluated at weeks 0, 2, and 4. Radius union scoring system (RUSS) was measured at weeks 4 and 12. Finally, wrist functionality (Cooney modification) was evaluated at week 12.

RESULTS

The BFR group had significantly decreased pain levels compared with the RT group (p < 0.01, effect size= 2.33, -2.44 at weeks 2 and 4). Swelling was effectively relieved in both groups. The wrist swelling was less in the BFR group (p < 0.01, effect size = -2.17 at week 4). The isometric strength of wrist extension (p < 0.01, effect size = 1.5, 3.02 at weeks 2 and 4), flexion (p < 0.01, effect size = 1.33, 2.53 at weeks 2 and 4), and functionality significantly increased in the BFR group (p < 0.01, effect size = 2.80 at week 12). No risk of VT in the BFR group was found. BFR did not threaten bone healing.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with DRF who underwent corrective surgery, BFR therapy effectively relieved pain and swelling, increased muscle strength and wrist function, and had no additional risks for bone healing and VT.

Validity of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters in Healthy Young Adults Using a Motion-Sensor-Based Gait Analysis System (ORPHE ANALYTICS) during Walking and Running

Motion sensors are widely used for gait analysis. The validity of commercial gait analysis systems is of great interest because calculating position/angle-level gait parameters potentially produces an error in the integration process of the motion sensor data; moreover, the validity of ORPHE ANALYTICS, a motion-sensor-based gait analysis system, has not yet been examined. We examined the validity of the gait parameters calculated using ORPHE ANALYTICS relative to those calculated using conventional optical motion capture. Nine young adults performed gait tasks on a treadmill at speeds of 2−12 km/h. The three-dimensional position data and acceleration and angular velocity data of the feet were collected. The gait parameters were calculated from motion sensor data using ORPHE ANALYTICS, and optical motion capture data. Intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC(2,1)] were calculated for relative validities. Eight items, namely, stride duration, stride length, stride frequency, stride speed, vertical height, stance phase duration, swing phase duration, and sagittal angleIC exhibited excellent relative validities [ICC(2,1) > 0.9]. In contrast, sagittal angleTO and frontal angleIC demonstrated good [ICC(2,1) = 0.892−0.833] and moderate relative validity [ICC(2,1) = 0.566−0.627], respectively. ORPHE ANALYTICS was found to exhibit excellent relative validities for most gait parameters. These results suggest its feasibility for gait analysis outside the laboratory setting.

Test-Retest Reliability of a Static and Dynamic Motor Fatigability Protocol Using Grip and Pinch Strength in Children With Cerebral Palsy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the test-retest reliability, measurement error, and interpretability of new motor fatigability outcomes of grip and pinch strength for children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP).

METHODS

Motor fatigability during grip and pinch strength was measured twice (within 48 hours) in both hands of 50 children (mean age = 11 years 2 months; 14, 31, and 5 children with Manual Ability Classification System levels I, II, and III, respectively) using a 30-second static and dynamic maximum exertion protocol. For static motor fatigability, the Static Fatigue Index (SFI) and mean force (Fmean) in the first (Fmean1) and last (Fmean3) 10 seconds were calculated. For dynamic motor fatigability, Fmean1, Fmean3, and the number of peaks in the first and last 10 seconds were calculated.

RESULTS

For static motor fatigability, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were moderate to high for Fmean1 and Fmean3 (0.56-0.88), and the SFI showed low to moderate reliability (ICC = 0.32-0.72). For dynamic motor fatigability, the ICCs were moderate to high for all outcomes (0.54-0.91). The standard error of measurement agreement and the smallest detectable difference agreement were large in all outcomes, except for the SFI in static motor fatigability. Details per age group are provided. In general, younger children (6-11 years old) showed lower reliability than older children (12-18 years old).

CONCLUSION

Most outcome measures for static and dynamic motor fatigability of grip and pinch strength show moderate to high reliability in children with UCP, indicating that these tests can be used reliably to investigate the presence of motor fatigability in UCP, especially in older children. Standard error of measurement agreement and smallest detectable difference agreement indicated that these outcome measures should be interpreted with caution when evaluating change.

IMPACT

Most of the proposed outcome measures for static and dynamic motor fatigability of grip and pinch are reliable in children with UCP and can be used for discriminative purposes.