Association between respiratory rate oxygenation index and need for positive pressure ventilation in children on high flow nasal cannula for bronchiolitis

Application of the TIDieR checklist to improve the HFNC use in bronchiolitis management

The use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) in children with bronchiolitis is globally increased in the last decade, despite the lack of evidence-based and universal guidelines to standardize their application in the clinical practice. In this systematic review, we aimed to analyse the completeness of previous studies on HFNC interventions in children with bronchiolitis using an adapted Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on children younger than 2 years old with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis were included. We analysed manuscripts published between January 2010 and October 2023. An adapted TIDieR checklist based on 14 items about HFNC interventions was used to assess the completeness of the studies. A total sample of 67,324 patients was analysed in the 78 included manuscripts (21 RCTs and 57 cohort studies). Completeness of TIDieR checklist items ranged from 1% to 100%. The most reported items were related to the study rationale and the selection strategy (inclusion/exclusion criteria), identifying high quality of patients' selection in the included manuscripts. However, most of the studies did not provide separate indications for children with comorbidities. Only 23% of studies reported a complete definition and rates of treatment failure suggesting that this item needs more clarification in future studies. A minority of articles (40%) described the HFNC weaning procedures. Interestingly, most of the interventions took place in ICUs (61%), showing how, in the last decade, this location was the most cited for the use of HFNC in children with bronchiolitis.

CONCLUSIONS

 Our results suggest complete reporting of our TIDieR checklist in future studies may improve the quality of the research on HFNC use in children with bronchiolitis. Our findings encourage researchers to clarify the personalization of treatment administration and to better define the criteria for treatment failure. The adoption of universal definitions in this field is needed to increase the results' comparability and create standardized protocols. Researchers may use the proposed TIDieR checklist to develop, conduct and report clinical research into HFNC and bronchiolitis as this may help to create a consensus for establishing an evidence-based protocol for HFNC.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a common device used in children with bronchiolitis in the presence of respiratory distress, after the failure of standard oxygen therapy. However, no evidence-based and standardized protocol for the use of this device is globally available.

WHAT IS NEW

• By using an adapted Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist to review previous studies on HFNC in bronchiolitis, we found a global heterogeneity in the description of interventions with some items of the checklist poorly reported. Thus, we suggest using our TIDieR checklist for developing, conducting and reporting clinical research into HFNC and bronchiolitis as this may help to create a consensus for establishing an evidence-based protocol for HFNC.

"Comparative analysis of predictors of failure for high-flow nasal cannula in bronchiolitis"

OBJECTIVE

To assess a comparative analysis of the ROX index, Wood-Downes-Ferrés score (WDF), p-ROXI, and the SpO2/FiO2 ratio as predictors of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) failure in children hospitalized for bronchiolitis.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the clinical trial "Comparison between HFNC and NIV in children with acute respiratory failure caused by bronchiolitis" conducted at a tertiary Brazilian hospital (Emergency Department and PICU). The inclusion criteria were children under 2 years of age admitted for bronchiolitis who developed mild to moderate respiratory distress and were eligible for HFNC therapy. Performance was determined by ROC and AUC metrics to define the best sensitivity and specificity for each variable. Children were evaluated at 0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 96 h after HFNC therapy initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were recruited for this analysis. The median age was 3 months. Ninety-one percent of the patients had an identified viral agent, with RSV being the most common (65%). Twenty-three percent (29/126) of patients experienced failed HFNC therapy and required mechanical ventilation. The best cutoff points at 12 hours were 4.5 for WDF (AUC = 0.83, 0.74-0.92), 8.8 for ROX (AUC = 0.7, 0.54-0.84), 1.45 for p-ROXI (AUC = 0.56, 0.38-0-74), and 269 for SpO2/FiO2 (AUC = 0.64, 0.48-0.74). The scores and indices were also correlated with the PICU and hospital LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

The ROX index and WDF were the most accurate scores for assessing HFNC failure considering 12-hour cutoff points.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

U1111-1262-1740; RBR-104z966s. Date of registration: 03/01/2023.

Helmet Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Acute Bronchiolitis Respiratory Failure in a Pediatric Ward: Is It a Replicable Experience?

(1) Background: Helmet Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (H-CPAP) has primarily been used in intensive care settings to treat moderate-to-severe bronchiolitis in infants. We aim to report on the feasibility of H-CPAP for selected infants with bronchiolitis in a pediatric ward. (2) Methods: A retrospective, observational, consecutive case series was studied of 26 patients who received H-CPAP on the pediatric ward from October 2022 to February 2023, including a description of patient outcomes and costs. (3) Results: Of 130 infants with bronchiolitis admitted to Bambino Gesù Hospital in Rome, 34 were hospitalized for moderate to severe bronchiolitis, and 26 began H-CPAP on the ward. Among the 26 pediatric patients who received H-CPAP on the ward, 4 out of 26 (15%) required transfer to the PICU within the first hours of care due to clinical deterioration. No problems with the H-CPAP interface or side effects attributable to H-CPAP were reported. Pharmacological sedation with a single dose of dexmedetomidine was required for 15/26 patients (57%) following failure of non-pharmacological anxiety reduction strategies. After introducing H-CPAP in our pediatric ward, we achieved total cost savings of approximately EUR 147,120. (4) Conclusions: Treatment with H-CPAP for infants with bronchiolitis may be feasible in non-intensive care settings with trained staff, appropriate monitoring, and rapid access to pediatric intensive care.

Helmet Ventilation in a Child with COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background

In pediatric patients with severe COVID-19, if the respiratory support provided using high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) becomes insufficient, no definitive evidence exists to support the escalation to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or mechanical ventilation (MV). Case Presentation. A 9-year-old boy being treated with face mask-delivered biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation developed fever, tachypnea, and frequent desaturation. The COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction test and urine antigen test for Streptococcus pneumoniae were both positive, and sputum culture yielded Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The do-not-resuscitate order precluded the use of endotracheal intubation. After 2 h of HFNC support, the respiratory rate oxygenation (ROX) index declined from 7.86 to 3.71, indicating impending HFNC failure. A helmet was used to deliver NIV, and SpO2 was maintained at >90%. Dyspnea and desaturation gradually improved, and the patient was switched to HFNC 6 days later and discharged 10 days later.

Conclusion

In some cases, acute respiratory distress syndrome severity cannot be measured using the oxygenation index or oxygenation saturation index, and the SpO2/FiO2 ratio and ROX index may serve as useful alternatives. Although NIV delivered through a facemask or HFNC is more popular than helmet-delivered NIV, in certain circumstances, it can help escalate respiratory support while providing adequate protection to healthcare professionals.

Oral enteral nutrition in the emergency department for children with bronchiolitis hospitalized on high flow nasal cannula

OBJECTIVES

We assessed whether initiation of oral enteral nutrition in the emergency department (ED) for patients with bronchiolitis hospitalized on humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) was associated with a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) without an increase in return ED visits or hospital readmissions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included children ≤24 months of age with bronchiolitis hospitalized to the general pediatric floor on HHFNC in two time periods: October 1, 2018 - April 30, 2019, and following implementation of a revised institutional bronchiolitis pathway that encouraged enteral nutrition initiation in the ED, October 1, 2021 - April 30, 2022. The primary outcome of interest was hospital LOS where the exposure was enteral feeding in the ED.

RESULTS

We included 391 'fed', 114 'not fed' and 304 'unknown' patients. HHFNC treatment time (25 h for 'fed' vs. 43 h for 'not fed' vs. 35 h for'unknown', p = 0.0001) and hospital LOS (39 h for 'fed' vs. 56 h for 'not fed' vs. 48 h for 'unknown', p = 0.0001) was shorter in the 'fed' group. There were no significant differences in return ED visits or hospital readmissions. Using our median LOS (45.1 h, inter-quartile range 30.2, 64.4 h) while controlling for age, sex, initial HHFNC flow rate, the respiratory oxygenation (ROX) index, viral etiology, and time period, an adjusted logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients fed in the ED were 1.8 times more likely to have a hospital LOS of <45 h (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.11-3.18, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation of oral enteral nutrition in the ED for patients with bronchiolitis on HHFNC is associated with a shorter hospital LOS without an increase in return ED visits or hospital readmissions. Future prospective studies are needed to develop feeding recommendations for children with bronchiolitis receiving HHFNC support.

Respiratory Rate Oxygenation (ROX) index as predictor of high flow nasal cannula in pediatric patients in pediatric intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is often used in pediatric populations with respiratory distress. In adults, the respiratory-rate oxygenation (ROX) index is used as a predictor of HFNC therapy; however, children have age-associated differences in respiratory rate, thus may not be applicable to children. This study aims to find the reliability of ROX index and modified P-ROX index as predictors of HFNC therapy failure in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Subjects in this analytical cross-sectional study were taken from January 2023 until November 2023 in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. Inclusion criteria are children aged 1 month to 18 years with respiratory distress and got HFNC therapy. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to find mP-ROX index cutoff value as a predictor of HFNC failure. The area under curve (AUC) score of mP-ROX index was assessed at different time point.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients, with 70% of the population with pneumonia, were included in this study. There are significant differences in the ROX index between the successful and failed HFNC group therapy (p < 0.05). This study suggests that mP-ROX index is not useful as predictor of HFNC therapy in pediatrics. While ROX index < 5.52 at 60 min and < 5.68 at 90 min after HFNC initiation have a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 71%, sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 76%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

mP-ROX index is not useful as a predictor of HFNC therapy in pediatrics. Meanwhile, ROX index at 60 min and 90 min after initiation of HFNC is useful as a predictor of HFNC failure.

Can the ROX index predict high-flow nasal cannula failure in children under 2 with lower respiratory tract infection?

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the ROX index's accuracy in predicting the success or failure of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy in children under 2 years with acute respiratory failure (ARF) from lower respiratory tract infections.

METHODS

From January 2018 to 2021 we conducted this multicenter retrospective cohort study, which included patients aged 2-24 months. We aimed to assess HFNC therapy outcomes as either success or failure. The analysis covered patient demographics, diagnoses, vital signs, and ROX index values at intervals from 0 to 48 h after initiating HFNC. We used bivariate analysis, repeated measures ANOVA, multivariate logistic regression, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The study involved 529 patients from six centers, with 198 females (37%) and a median age of 9 months (IQR: 3-15 months). HFNC therapy failed in 38% of cases. We observed significant variability in failure rates across different centers and physicians (p < .001). The ROX index was significantly associated with HFNC outcomes at all time points, showing an increasing trend in success cases over time (p < .001), but not in HFNC failure cases. Its predictive ability is limited, with AUC-ROC values ranging from 0.56 at the start to 0.67 at 48 h.

CONCLUSION

While the ROX index is associated with HFNC outcomes in children under 2 years, its predictive ability is modest, impacted by significant variability among patients, physicians, and centers. These findings emphasize the need for more reliable predictive tools for HFNC therapy in this patient population.

ROX (Respiratory rate-OXygenation) index to predict early response to high-flow nasal cannula therapy in infants with viral bronchiolitis

INTRODUCTION

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is commonly used as first step respiratory support in infants with moderate-to-severe acute viral bronchiolitis (AVB). This device, however, fails to effectively manage respiratory distress in about a third of patients, and data are limited on determinants of patient response. The respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index is a relevant tool to predict the risk for HFNC failure in adult patients with lower respiratory tract infections. The primary objective of this study was to assess the relationship between ROX indexes collected before and 1 h after HFNC initiation, and HFNC failure occurring in the following 48 h in infants with AVB.

METHOD

This is an ancillary study to the multicenter randomized controlled trial TRAMONTANE 2, that included 286 infants of less than 6 months with moderate-to-severe AVB. Collection of physiological variables at baseline (H0), and 1 h after HFNC (H1), included heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2 ), respiratory distress score (modified Wood's Clinical Asthma Score [mWCAS]), and pain and discomfort scale (EDIN). ROX and ROX-HR were calculated asSpO 2 FiO 2 RR $\frac{\left(\frac{{\mathrm{SpO}}_{2}}{{\mathrm{FiO}}_{2}}\right)}{\mathrm{RR}}$ and100 × ROX HR $100\times \frac{\mathrm{ROX}}{\mathrm{HR}}$ , respectively. Predefined HFNC failure criteria included increase in respiratory distress score or RR, increase in discomfort, and severe apnea episodes. The accuracies of ROX, ROX-HR indexes and clinical variable to predict HFNC failure were assessed using receiver operating curve analysis. We analyzed predictive factors of HFNC failure using multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULT

HFNC failure occurred in 111 of 286 (39%) infants, and for 56 (50% of the failure) of them within the first 6 h. The area under the curve of ROX indexes at H0 and H1 were, respectively, 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.63, p = 0.14), 0.56 (95% CI 0.49-0.64, p = 0.09). ROX-HR performances were better but remained poorly discriminant. HFNC failure was associated with higher mWCAS score at H1 (p < 0.01) and lower decrease in EDIN scale during the first hour of HFNC delivery (p = 0.02). In the multivariate analyses, age and mWCAS score were were found to be independent factors associated with HFNC failure at H0. At H1, weight and mWCAS were associated factors.

CONCLUSION

In this study, neither ROX index, nor physiological variables usually collected in infants with AVB had early discriminatory capacity to predict HFNC failure.

ROX index as a predictor of failure of high-flow nasal cannula in infants with bronchiolitis

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a relatively recent therapy that has been used to treat respiratory failure. Until now, the criterion for failure requiring escalation to other forms of ventilatory support has remained unclear. This study evaluated how the ROX index predicts the success or failure of HFNC in infants with bronchiolitis. A prospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted in 2 pediatric ICUs. The data were collected at 7 moments. Patients were categorized into failure and success groups according to HFNC. A total of 102 infants were included, 18(17.6%) of whom failed HFNC therapy. For the ROX index, significant differences were observed between the failure 5.8(95%CI 4.7-7.1) and success 7.7(95%CI 7.2-8.2) groups (p = 0.005) at the 12 h evaluation. According to the analysis of the performance of the ROX index, the AUC at 12 h was 0.716(95%CI 0.591-0.842; p = 0.016). The best cutoff range for the ROX index at 12 h was 6.50-7.18, with a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 66% at the cutoff of 6.50, and a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 54% at the cutoff of 7.18. We concluded that the ROX index could be effective at predicting the failure of HFNC therapy in infants with bronchiolitis beginning at 12 h after installation.