Outcome of childhood epistaxis with treatment of allergic rhinitis: a randomized controlled study

Nasal Disorders

Nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, and epistaxis are common presenting concerns in primary care clinics. Nasal disorders affect the quality of life for many children and families. Rarely, these complaints may represent a life-threatening condition among infant obligate nasal breathers or cases of unusual pathology. The most common causes of rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction vary by age and include physiologic, infectious, allergic, foreign body, irritant, and traumatic causes. Less commonly, children may have congenital malformations, sinonasal masses, or autoimmune disease. The most common causes of epistaxis are inflammatory, environmental, and traumatic causes and medication misuse, but rarely, children may have predisposing anatomic, hematologic, or vascular abnormalities or even sinonasal tumors. In this article, we provide a thorough review of the common nasal disorders treated every day in primary care clinics and mention briefly some of the rare but serious cases that may be overlooked without considering a full differential diagnosis.

Clinical Presentation and Treatment Patterns of Pediatric Epistaxis: A Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Epistaxis, commonly known as nose bleeding, is a prevalent condition in pediatric patients, often managed either at home or in clinical settings. This study aimed to explore the differences in the management of pediatric epistaxis between home and clinical settings, focusing on gender distribution, clinical presentations, and treatment methods.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted, analyzing pediatric epistaxis cases managed both at home and in clinical settings. Data on gender distribution, clinical presentation, and treatment methods were collected and analyzed. Home remedies, first aid management, and clinical interventions like the use of nasal sprays and septoplasty were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study found significant differences in gender distribution between home (46.2% males) and clinical settings (61% males). Recurrent nasal bleeding was more common in home settings (75%), whereas more complex cases were predominant in clinical settings. Nasal sprays containing decongestants were widely used in clinical settings (62.1%), contrasting with a preference for first aid measures at home. Surgical interventions like septoplasty were occasionally employed in clinical scenarios.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights distinct approaches to managing pediatric epistaxis in home versus clinical settings. It underscores the importance of tailored treatment strategies, considering the severity and frequency of epistaxis episodes. These findings suggest a need for comprehensive guidelines to assist caregivers and healthcare professionals in effective decision-making for pediatric epistaxis management. The study also emphasizes the necessity for ongoing research and education in this area.

Environmental impact on pediatric epistaxis and the utility of diagnostic studies: A single-institutional review

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric epistaxis is a multifactorial disease entity. The objective of this study is to determine the socioeconomic and air-quality contributions to pediatric epistaxis. The study also evaluates the utility of diagnostic lab work as a predictor of bleeding rates and need for operative intervention.

METHODS

A case series of pediatric patients treated in an outpatient Otolaryngology clinic at a tertiary care children's hospital in 2021 for epistaxis was performed. Patients with nasal bone trauma (n = 8), consult while inpatient (n = 7), and those with nasal masses (n = 2) were excluded; 181 patients met inclusion criteria. Demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, and air quality (tropospheric ozone, particulate matter) data were recorded. Associations with persistent bleeding and operative interventions were evaluated using logistic regression, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and Spearman rank correlation.

RESULTS

Of the 181 patients, 75 (41.4%) were female. Forty-six of 181 (25.4%) had associated allergic symptoms. Twenty-six patients had allergy testing; 14/26 (53.8%) of these had positive results. Re-bleeding was more common in those with allergic symptoms (OR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.22-4.78, p = 0.01). Patients with re-bleeding lived in counties with more days with ozone over the US standard (median 5 days, range 0-32 days) compared with those with no re-bleeding (median 3 days, range 0-32 days, p = 0.007). There was also an association between the number of visits for re-bleed and percent below poverty level (ρ = 0.259, p = 0.03) as well as the number of days with particulate matter levels over the US standard (ρ = 0.343, p = 0.01). Coagulopathy was present in 9/54 (16.7%) patients, with the majority being Von Willebrand disease (5/54, 9.3%). Easy bruising was not significantly associated with positive lab results.

CONCLUSIONS

Environmental pollution, living in a zip code with more residents below the poverty level, and allergic rhinitis were positively associated with recurrent epistaxis. Understanding the geographic background of presenting patients may help direct workup and treatment options.

Allergic rhinitis facts from an Irish pediatric population

Objective

Assessing the main allergens in the pediatric population from the largest urban area in the country.

Methods

Clinical letters of patients referred with possible allergic rhinitis (AR) were retrospectively reviewed over the past 5 years.

Results

Five hundred and fifty-five patients were included. Males suffer twice as often with AR than females and have high titers of allergens. House dust mites (44.7%) and grass pollen (29%) were the main allergens in our area, with 48% of patients sensitized to both allergens. Half of the patients had the diagnosis of AR confirmed with positive allergen-specific tests. For the other half, the diagnosis was based on a clinical assessment performed by a pediatric otolaryngologist.

Conclusions

Half of suspected AR children have environmental allergen sensitivity confirmed by testing, and a large number had a clinical diagnosis of AR after an otolaryngology consultation. Our findings can help clinicians to initiate AR treatment considering the most problematic allergens in the area.