Prospective multi-centre study to validate chromogenic in situ hybridisation for the assessment of HER2 gene amplification in specimens from adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer patients

HER2 testing and its predictive utility in anti-HER2 breast cancer therapy

Breast cancer treatment is dependent on accurate pathologic diagnosis. HER2 testing is now universally recommended as part of evaluation of invasive breast cancer. HER2 testing is available via various slide and non-slide based assays, and interpretation of results continues to evolve. Herein we review these testing modalities and their incorporation into the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Once accurate HER2 status has been established the proper treatment based on recent clinical trials can be instituted.

Instant-quality fluorescence in-situ hybridization as a new tool for HER2 testing in breast cancer: a comparative study

AIMS

HER2 instant-quality fluorescence in-situ hybridization (IQFISH) is a new fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) assay developed with a non-toxic buffer that reduces the hybridization time to 1-2 h, enabling a turnaround time of 3 h 30 min from dewax to counting. The aim of this study was to compare assessment of HER2 status using IQFISH and assessment using standard FISH.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We selected 160 breast cancer samples according to their HER2 status as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a retrospective multicentre cohort (40 cases in each scoring category, i.e. 0/1+/2+/3+). Each participating site (n = 5) constructed its tissue microarray (TMA) of 32 archival cases and sent it to the central site (site 1). HER2 IHC, HER2 FISH and HER2 IQFISH were performed blindly at site 1. IQFISH provided excellent quality signals without any background staining, thus allowing excellent reading conditions even on TMA. Statistical analysis showed almost perfect agreement between IQFISH and FISH (99.3%, κ = 0.98). The only discordant case was an equivocal one with an HER2/CEP17 ratio near the ASCO/CAP cut-off.

CONCLUSIONS

The highly concordant data support IQFISH as a useful alternative to FISH, allowing reliable assessment of HER2 status. Use of this method could lead to reporting of HER status to the oncologist within a day.

Frequent genetic alterations in EGFR- and HER2-driven pathways in breast cancer brain metastases

Current standard systemic therapies for treating breast cancer patients with brain metastases are inefficient. Targeted therapies against human epidermal growth factor receptors are of clinical interest because of their alteration in a subset of breast cancers (BCs). We analyzed copy number, mutation status, and protein expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN), and PI3K catalytic subunit (PIK3CA) in 110 ductal carcinoma in situ, primary tumor, and metastatic BC samples. Alterations in EGFR, HER2, and PTEN, alone or in combination, were found in a significantly larger fraction of breast cancer brain metastases tumor tissue compared with samples from primary tumors with good prognosis, bone relapse, or other distant metastases (all P < 0.05). Primary tumor patients with a subsequent brain relapse showed almost equally high frequencies of especially EGFR and PTEN alteration as the breast cancer brain metastases patients. PIK3CA was not associated with an increased risk of brain metastases. Genetic alterations in both EGFR and PTEN were especially common in triple-negative breast cancer patients and rarely were seen among HER2-positive patients. In conclusion, we identified two independent high-risk primary BC subgroups for developing brain metastases, represented by genetic alterations in either HER2 or EGFR/PTEN-driven pathways. In contrast, none of these pathways was associated with an increased risk of bone metastasis. These findings highlight the importance of both pathways as possible targets in the treatment of brain metastases in breast cancer.

Chromogenic in situ hybridization compared with other approaches to evaluate HER2/neu status in breast carcinomas

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has been evaluated in breast cancer patients to identify those most likely to benefit from herceptin-targeted therapy. HER2 amplification, detected in 20-30% of invasive breast tumors, is associated with reduced survival and metastasis. The most frequently used technique for evaluating HER2 protein status as a routine procedure is immunohistochemistry (IHC). HER2 copy number alterations have also been evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in moderate immunoexpression (IHC 2+) cases. An alternative procedure to evaluate gene amplification is chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), which has some advantages over FISH, including the correlation between HER2 status and morphological features. Other methodologies have also been used, such as silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) and quantitative real-time RT-PCR, to determine the number of HER2 gene copies and expression, respectively. Here we will present a short and comprehensive review of the current advances concerning HER2 evaluation in human breast cancer.

Anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies are associated with the absence of distant metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The presence of thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOab) are reported to be associated with improved outcome among breast cancer patients. We evaluated the correlation between TPOab and diagnostic parameters among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Three hundred and fourteen newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer, diagnosed and treated in Bethesda Essen between January 2002 and June 2006, were included in this study; 258 (82.2%) without TPOab (≤100 IU/mL) and 56 (17.8%) with TPOab (>100 IU/mL). Blood analysis was performed to measure serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 15-3 (CA-15-3), free triiodothyronine (fT3), free thyroxine (fT4), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and TPOab by radioimmunoassay. Data regarding age, tumor size, grading, TNM classification, receptor status, lymph node, and distant metastases were collected and analyzed from patient reports. Statistics were performed using Pearson’s χ2-test and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were no incidences of distant metastasis among 56 patients with TPOab, whereas 17 (6.6%) of 258 cases without TPOab displayed distant metastases (p=0.04). Logistic regression showed an inverse association of TPOab with CA-15-3 and CEA levels (p<0.001, respectively). Both groups, with and without TPOab, revealed no significant differences with respect to age, tumor size, grading, TNM classification, fT3, fT4, and receptor status. TPOab positive patients had higher TSH levels (2.55±3.58), compared to TPOab negative cases (1.20±1.15) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TPOab occurrence is associated with significantly lower frequency of distant metastases in breast cancer. TPOab level inversely correlates with the conventional tumor markers CA-15-3 and CEA.