Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with gemcitabine plus capecitabine for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer

Hallmarks of perineural invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: new biological dimensions

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignant tumor with a high metastatic potential. Perineural invasion (PNI) occurs in the early stages of PDAC with a high incidence rate and is directly associated with a poor prognosis. It involves close interaction among PDAC cells, nerves and the tumor microenvironment. In this review, we detailed discuss PNI-related pain, six specific steps of PNI, and treatment of PDAC with PNI and emphasize the importance of novel technologies for further investigation.

Can STEreotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Improve the Prognosis of Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer? Long-Term Clinical Outcomes, Toxicity and Prognostic Factors on 142 Patients (STEP Study)

AIM

The gold standard of care for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the integrated treatment of surgery and chemotherapy (ChT), but about 50% of patients present with unresectable disease. Our study evaluated the efficacy in terms of local control, survival and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

METHODS

A retrospective study (STEP study) analyzed patients with LAPC treated with a dose of 45 Gy in 6 fractions. Local control (LC), distant progression free survival (DPFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were analyzed according to the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were evaluated. Seventy-six patients (53.5%) received induction ChT before SBRT. The median follow-up was 11 months. One-, 2- and 3-year LC rate was 81.9%, 69.1% and 58.5%. Median DPFS was 6.03 months; 1- and 2-year DPFS rate was 19.9% and 4.5%. Median OS was 11.6 months and 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 45.4%, 16.1%, and 9.8%. At univariate analysis, performed by the log-rank test, age < 70 years (p = 0.037), pre-SBRT ChT (p = 0.004) and post-SBRT ChT (p = 0.019) were associated with better OS. No patients experienced G3 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

SBRT represents an effective and safe therapeutic option in the multimodal treatment of patients with LAPC in terms of increased LC. When SBRT was sequentially integrated with ChT, the treatment proved to be promising in terms of OS as well.

Edaravone Exerts Protective Effects on Mice Intestinal Injury without Interfering with the Anti-Tumor Effects of Radiation

The appropriate dosage of edaravone-a radioprotective agent-and its effect on tumors are unknown. This study evaluated the effects of edaravone on intestinal injuries and tumors in mice induced by whole body X-ray irradiation. Small intestinal mucositis was induced in C3H/HeNSlc mice using a single X-ray dose (15 Gy). Edaravone (15, 30, and 100 mg/kg) was administered 30 min before irradiation to evaluate its protective effect. After 3.5 days, the jejunum was removed and the histological changes were evaluated. Next, C3H/HeNSlc mice with squamous cell carcinoma VII tumors were provided the same single X-ray dose and 100 mg/kg edaravone; further, the tumors were immediately induced after irradiation. The tumor cell viability was detected using an in vivo-in vitro colony formation assay. We found that the intestinal colony-forming ability after irradiation was significantly higher in the 100 mg/kg edaravone group than that in the control group. Moreover, the apoptotic cells in the villi immunohistochemically stained with cleaved caspase-3 were significantly lower in the 100 mg/kg edaravone group than in the control group. We found no radioprotective effects of intraperitoneally inoculated edaravone in both hind legs on squamous cell carcinoma VII tumors. These findings suggest that 100 mg/kg edaravone exerts protective effects on small intestinal injuries without interfering with the antitumor effects of radiation.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) of Pancreatic Cancer-A Critical Review and Practical Consideration

Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the developed world and is predicted to become the second by 2030. A cure may be achieved only with surgical resection of an early diagnosed disease. Surgery for more advanced disease is challenging and can be contraindicated for many reasons. Neoadjuvant therapy may improve the probability of achieving R0 resection. It consists of systemic treatment followed by radiation therapy applied concurrently or sequentially with cytostatics. A novel approach to irradiation, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), has the potential to improve treatment results. SBRT can deliver higher doses of radiation to the tumor in only a few treatment fractions. It has attracted significant interest for pancreatic cancer patients, as it is completed quickly, requires less time away from full-dose chemotherapy, and is well-tolerated than conventional radiotherapy. In this review, we aim to provide the reader with a basic overview of current evidence for SBRT indications in the treatment of pancreatic tumors. In the second part of the review, we focus on practical information with respect to SBRT treatment plan preparation the performance of such therapy. Finally, we discuss future directions related to the use of magnetic resonance linear accelerators.

Current status and future perspectives of clinical research in pancreatic cancer: Establishment of evidence by science

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive diseases in the world due to a lack of early detection, leading to an overall 5-year survival of only 10%. In recent years, clinical trials targeted pancreatic cancer in efforts to improve survival. These studies introduce new technologies, concepts, and evidence which have instilled new optimism for improving prognosis. This review summarizes the current status of the recent (5-year) clinical trials and describes contemporary research on pancreatic cancer, including surgical technology, diagnostic skills, traditional chemoradiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and precision medicine. Then, the future trend and direction of clinical trials on pancreatic cancer are discussed.

Current and Future Therapies for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Simple Summary

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The poor survival associated with this disease is due to delayed diagnosis, a lack of reliable biomarkers, and tumour resistance to treatment. Currently, surgery is the only curative treatment option, but few patients are eligible for this procedure. Developing resistance to current chemotherapies such as gemcitabine has led to a reduction in effective therapy options for patients and an urgent requirement for the development of novel therapeutic avenues. Potential success has been noted in therapeutic approaches such as synthetic lethality and immunotherapy. An array of clinical trials are currently recruiting, primarily in the area of monoclonal antibodies in combination with other therapies such as chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review article aims to highlight the potential these therapies have to improve patient prognosis and survival.

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. This is due to delayed diagnosis and resistance to traditional chemotherapy. Delayed diagnosis is often due to the broad range of non-specific symptoms that are associated with the disease. Resistance to current chemotherapies, such as gemcitabine, develops due to genetic mutations that are either intrinsic or acquired. This has resulted in poor patient prognosis and, therefore, justifies the requirement for new targeted therapies. A synthetic lethality approach, that targets specific loss-of-function mutations in cancer cells, has shown great potential in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Immunotherapies have also yielded promising results in the development of new treatment options, with several currently undergoing clinical trials. The utilisation of monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell transfer, and vaccines have shown success in several neoplasms such as breast cancer and B-cell malignancies and, therefore, could hold the same potential in PDAC treatment. These therapeutic strategies could have the potential to be at the forefront of pancreatic cancer therapy in the future. This review focuses on currently approved therapies for PDAC, the challenges associated with them, and future directions of therapy including synthetically lethal approaches, immunotherapy, and current clinical trials.

Multimodal Treatment with GEMOX Plus Helical Tomotherapy in Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 2 Studies

In locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is a widely used treatment option. We performed a pooled analysis, including an exploratory analysis for prognostic and predictive factors, of two phase 2 trials including 73 patients with LAPC, treated with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) and hypofractionated tomotherapy. With a median follow-up of 36 months (range 1–65), median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8–13.2) and 14.3 (95% CI 12.0–18.1) months, respectively. The overall resectability rate was 23.3% (95% CI 13.6–33.0), and the R0 resection rate was 13.7% (95% CI 5.8–21.6). In the multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status (PS) 0 and low levels of CA 19–9 were associated with improved OS and PFS. Concerning OS, log(CA19–9) resulted in a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.20 (95% CI 1.02–1.42), p = 0.027. For ECOG PS 0, HR was 1.00; for PS 1, HR was 2.69 (95% CI 1.46–4.96); for PS 2, HR was 4.18 (95% CI 0.90–19.46); p = 0.003. Low CA19–9 levels were also predictive for resection, with an odds ratio of 0.71 (95% CI 0.52–0.97), p = 0.034. In conclusion, GEMOX and hypofractionated radiotherapy is a treatment option in LAPC. Further studies are needed to identify differences in tumor biology, which may help to predict resectability and prognosis.

Survival outcome after stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

•

For LAPC, median OS was 14.1 months; pooled 1/2/3-year OS rates were 57%, 19% and 10%.

•

The median PFS was 10 months; pooled 1/2/3-year PFS rates were 36%, 12% and 4%.

•

Pooled rates of acute GI, acute hematologic and late GI toxicities were 2%, 4% and 8%.

•

For BRPC, median OS was 17.5 months; pooled 1/2-year OS rates were 75% and 29%.

•

The median PFS was 12.2 months; pooled 1/2-year PFS rates were 48% and 18%.

Background

Some studies reported stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has demonstrated superior therapeutic results than conventional radiotherapy. Nevertheless, this statement is controversial and the trial attempting to prove this is underway. We conducted this systemic review and meta-analysis aiming to combine the latest and most complete information about the survival outcomes and toxicities following SBRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC).

Methods

Items involving SBRT and pancreatic cancer were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and Web of Science. Median overall survival (OS), 1/2/3-year OS, median progression-free survival (PFS), 1/2/3-year PFS and incidence of grade 3–5 toxicities were the endpoints of interest in this meta-analysis. These endpoint proportions were pooled and analyzed using R.

Results

For the LAPC series, the median OS was 14.1 months; pooled 1/2/3-year OS rates were 57%, 19% and 10%, respectively; the median PFS was 10 months; pooled 1/2/3-year PFS rates were 36%, 12% and 4%; pooled incidence rates of acute gastrointestinal (GI), acute hematologic and late GI toxicity (grade≥3) were 2%, 4% and 8%. For the BRPC series, the median OS was 17.5 months; pooled 1/2-year OS rates were 75% and 29%; the median PFS was 12.2 months; pooled 1/2-year PFS rates were 48% and 18%; the incidence rates of toxicity (grade ≥ 3) were all 0%.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis based on published results of OS, PFS and incidence rates of toxicity demonstrated that SBRT does not show desirable therapeutic result than the standard therapies for LAPC and BRPC.

Identification of Circulating Biomarkers and Construction of a Prognostic Signature for Survival Prediction in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After Irreversible Electroporation

Background

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), but the predictive factors, based on cytokines and immunocytes of survival, are still lacking. This study aimed to establish a risk model based on cytokines and immunocytes for LAPC patients undergoing IRE treatment.

Patients and Methods

Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 31 LAPC patients and 8 healthy control subjects before IRE. The phenotypes of lymphocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry, and the cytokines were evaluated with Luminex microarray assay. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox regression were applied to assess the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a concordance index (C-index) were used to compare the abilities to predict survival rates.

Results

The relationship between multiple cytokines and clinical factors was evaluated and their prognostic value was compared. The five best predictors for OS and PFS, including CA19-9, CD3⁺CD4⁺ T cells, CD3⁺CD8⁺ T cells, IL-17A, and TNF-α were selected and incorporated into a new immune panel. A risk model based on this immune panel was established and exhibited significantly higher values of C-indexes and AUC for OS and PFS prediction as compared with tumor marker score and TNM stage system.

Conclusion

We presented a risk model based on a microarray assay of cytokines and lymphocytes for LAPC patients after receiving IRE treatment for the first time. The established risk model showed relatively good performance in survival prediction and was able to facilitate tailed patient management in clinical practice.