Overall survival of super-elderly (85 years or older) advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with active epidermal growth factor receptor mutations receiving first-line gefitinib therapy: a single-institute retrospective study

Comparing Gefitinib and Traditional Chemotherapy for Better Survival in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Current non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment consists of various combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation, depending on the tumor stage. Individuals with stage II-IIIa NSCLC undergo surgery, followed by combination chemotherapy containing cisplatin, such as vinorelbine + cisplatin. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as gefitinib, act by inhibiting any signaling pathway containing the EGFR mutation and inhibiting the growth of NSCLC. TKI is a treatment option in advanced NSCLC, resulting in more prolonged progression-free survival (PFS). This manuscript aims to evaluate the influence of utilizing gefitinib - either alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic drug regimens upon NSCLC patient profile survival parameters. A systematic literature review was conducted across multiple scientific literature repositories. The review was performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020. There were six randomized clinical trials (RCT) and five retrospective studies. The overall consensus based on the end outcome of each published journal on the effectiveness of gefitinib as a treatment option for NSCLC indicated that there was a notable difference in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) datasets. Gefitinib use correlated with increased timeframes for multiple patient survival parameters within articles shortlisted in this investigation. However, more comprehensive investigations are required to validate such correlations. Gefitinib did demonstrate the potential to provide beneficial effects and counteract NSCLC within such patients.

Evaluation of factors affecting epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced hepatotoxicity in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a two-center retrospective study

Background

Gefitinib and erlotinib, are epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and are currently recommended for non-small cell lung cancer stage IV in the elderly and in patients with decreased performance status in the Japanese Lung Cancer Society Guideline, but they occasionally caused severe hepatotoxicity requiring postponement or modification of treatment. However, little is known about the risk factors for hepatotoxicity in patients receiving gefitinib and erlotinib. In this study, we investigated the factors influencing hepatotoxicity in Japanese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib monotherapy.

Methods

Japanese patients with NSCLC who started gefitinib or erlotinib monotherapy from January 2005 to December 2017 at Kanazawa University Hospital or Kanazawa Medical University Hospital were included in this study. Factors affecting hepatotoxicity were retrospectively investigated by multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 102 patients who received gefitinib and 95 patients who received erlotinib were included in the analysis. In the gefitinib group, a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 was associated with an increased risk of hepatotoxicity (OR = 4.571, 95% CI = 1.486–14.056, P = 0.008). In the erlotinib group, concomitant use of acid-suppressing medications (AS), namely proton pump inhibitors or histamine-2 receptor antagonists, was associated with a reduced risk of hepatotoxicity (OR = 0.341, 95% CI = 0.129–0.900, P = 0.030).

Conclusions

BMI ≥ 25 in patients treated with gefitinib increased the risk of hepatotoxicity. In contrast, AS combination with erlotinib reduced the risk of hepatotoxicity. Thus, because different factors influence the risk of hepatotoxicity, monitoring for adverse events should take into account patient background factors and concomitant medications.

The Value of Radiotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Oncogene Driver-Mutation

Due to the widespread use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which have largely supplanted cytotoxic chemotherapy as the first-line therapeutic choice for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have oncogene driver mutations, advanced NSCLC patients with oncogene driver mutations had much long median survival. However, TKIs’ long-term efficacy is harmed by resistance to them. TKIs proved to have a limited potential to permeate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as well. Only a small percentage of plasma levels could be found in CSF at usual doses. Therefore, TKIs monotherapy may have a limited efficacy in individuals with brain metastases. Radiation has been demonstrated to reduce TKIs resistance and disrupt the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Previous trials have shown that local irradiation for bone metastases might improve symptoms, in addition, continuous administration of TKIs combined with radiotherapy was linked with beneficial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for oligometastasis or bone metastasis NSCLC with oncogene driver mutations. The above implied that radiotherapy combined with targeted therapy may have a synergistic impact in patients with advanced oncogene driver-mutated NSCLC. The objective of this article is to discuss the value of radiotherapy in the treatment of those specific individuals.

Further discussion on the association between desmoglein 2 and tumor size of non-small cell lung cancer

We have read the article by Cai et al. and find there is a discrepancy between their data and conclusion. Their statement, "Specifically, DSG2 expression was associated with tumor size", is not supported by their own clinicopathological data and analysis. After reviewing some similar articles, we also found no available evidence showed a statistically significant association between them. Therefore, we would like to suggest Cai et al. to rectify the results they published.