1
|
Huang L, Cheng W, He C, Li X, Huang L, Zhang J, Song L, Zhou Y, Wang C, Gan X, Qiu J. Is fluorometric sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer necessary? Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1434311. [PMID: 39114827 PMCID: PMC11304349 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1434311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective In this study, we collected perioperative and postoperative follow-up data from patients with endometrial cancer (EC) at different stages to evaluate the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in endometrial cancer surgery. Methods A total of 186 endometrial cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy from January 2018 to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into four groups. Group A comprised patients diagnosed with stage IA grade 1 and 2 endometrioid EC who underwent SLNB. Group B comprised patients with stage IA grade 1 and 2 endometrioid EC who did not undergo SLNB. Group C comprised patients with higher-grade endometrioid EC, wherein systematic lymph node dissection was performed based on SLNB results. Group D comprised patients with higher-grade endometrioid EC who did not undergo SLNB and instead underwent direct systematic lymph node dissection. Clinical, pathological data, and follow-up information for all patients were collected. Results In Group A and B, SLNB was performed on 36 out of 67 patients with IA stage 1 and 2 endometrial cancer, yielding a SLN positivity rate of 5.6%. There were no significant differences observed between the two groups regarding perioperative outcomes and postoperative follow-up. Conversely, among 119 patients with higher-grade endometrial cancer, 52 underwent SLNB, with 20 patients exhibiting SLN positivity, resulting in a SLN positivity rate of 38.4%. However, the decision to undergo SLNB did not yield significant differences in perioperative outcomes and postoperative follow-up among these patients. Conclusion For stage IA grade 1 and 2 endometrioid EC, the incidence of lymph node positivity is low, omitting SLNB in this subpopulation is a feasible option. In other stages of endometrioid EC, there is no significant difference in perioperative and postoperative follow-up data between patients undergoing routine systematic lymphadenectomy and those undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy based on SLNB results. Therefore, if SLNB is not available, the standard procedure of PLND remains an option to obtain information about lymph node status, despite the surgical complications associated with this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liqiong Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Chenghui He
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lu Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiajia Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Liwen Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yifan Zhou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chenchen Wang
- Shanghai United Family Pudong Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoqin Gan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jin Qiu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liyanage A, Cardoza S, Kasabia D, Moore H. Accuracy of MRI in predicting deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer and the influence of leiomyoma, adenomyosis and the microcystic elongated and fragmented tumour pattern. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 68:235-242. [PMID: 38377045 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The most common form of endometrial cancer is Type 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Depth of myometrial invasion is the most important prognostic factor correlating with overall patient survival. The objective was to investigate how accurate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is in predicting the depth of myometrial invasion in preoperative assessment, and the influence of leiomyoma and/or adenomyosis, or microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern of invasion on MRI diagnostic performance. METHOD Retrospective audit of 235 endometrial cancer patients from the regional Gynaecology Oncology multidisciplinary meeting at Auckland City Hospital, between January 2020 and January 2021. Radiologist assigned stage was compared to histopathology. Presence of leiomyoma, adenomyosis and MELF pattern evaluated followed by analysis under a Biostatistician's supervision. RESULTS Overall MRI diagnostic accuracy for depth of myometrial invasion was 86%. For deep myometrial invasion, MRI had a sensitivity of 72% and specificity 91%. Out of the misreported 32/235 cases, 16 demonstrated fibroids and/or adenomyosis leading to a sensitivity of 57% and specificity 93% for deep invasion, compared with 94% and 74% respectively in the population without, demonstrating statistical significance. Thirty seven cases with MELF pattern of invasion showed a sensitivity of 81% and specificity 80% for deep invasion, compared with 63% and 92% respectively in the group without, demonstrating no statistical significance. CONCLUSION MRI assessment of the depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer has high accuracy. In the presence of background uterine fibroids/adenomyosis, pre-operative MRI accuracy of evaluating deep invasion shows a statistically significant reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuja Liyanage
- Department of Radiology, Te Whatu Ora - Health New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Supriya Cardoza
- Te Whatu Ora Counties Manukau Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Darshna Kasabia
- Te Whatu Ora Counties Manukau Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Helen Moore
- Te Whatu Ora Auckland City Hospital, Auckland Radiology Group, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fumagalli D, De Vitis LA, Caruso G, Occhiali T, Palmieri E, Guillot BE, Pappalettera G, Langstraat CL, Glaser GE, Reynolds EA, Fruscio R, Landoni F, Mariani A, Grassi T. Low-Volume Metastases in Apparent Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Prevalence, Clinical Significance, and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1338. [PMID: 38611016 PMCID: PMC11011093 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most diagnosed gynecologic malignancy, and its incidence and mortality are increasing. The prognosis is highly dependent on the disease spread. Surgical staging includes retroperitoneal evaluation to detect potential lymph node metastases. In recent years, systematic lymphadenectomy has been replaced by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and ultrastaging, allowing for the detection of macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Micrometastases and ITCs have been grouped as low-volume metastases (LVM). The reported prevalence of LVM in studies enrolling more than one thousand patients with apparent early-stage EC ranges from 1.9% to 10.2%. Different rates of LVM are observed when patients are stratified according to disease characteristics and their risk of recurrence. Patients with EC at low risk for recurrence have low rates of LVM, while intermediate- and high-risk patients have a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with nodal metastases, including LVM. Macro- and micrometastases increase the risk of recurrence and cause upstaging, while the clinical significance of ITCs is still uncertain. A recent meta-analysis found that patients with LVM have a higher relative risk of recurrence [1.34 (95% CI: 1.07-1.67)], regardless of adjuvant treatment. In a retrospective study on patients with low-risk EC and no adjuvant treatment, those with ITCs had worse recurrence-free survival compared to node-negative patients (85.1%; CI 95% 73.8-98.2 versus 90.2%; CI 95% 84.9-95.8). However, a difference was no longer observed after the exclusion of cases with lymphovascular space invasion. There is no consensus on adjuvant treatment in ITC patients at otherwise low risk, and their recurrence rate is low. Multi-institutional, prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical significance of ITCs in low-risk patients. Further stratification of patients, considering histopathological and molecular features of the disease, may clarify the role of LVM and especially ITCs in specific contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diletta Fumagalli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.F.); (F.L.)
| | - Luigi A. De Vitis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Caruso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Occhiali
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Emilia Palmieri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, , Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00136 Roma, Italy
| | - Benedetto E. Guillot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Pappalettera
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Carrie L. Langstraat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Gretchen E. Glaser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Evelyn A. Reynolds
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.F.); (F.L.)
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.F.); (F.L.)
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Tommaso Grassi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.F.); (F.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marchocki Z, Cusimano MC, Vicus D, Pulman K, Rouzbahman M, Mirkovic J, Cesari M, Maganti M, Zia A, Ene G, Ferguson SE. Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section and patterns of nodal spread in high grade endometrial cancer: A secondary outcome of the SENTOR prospective cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 173:41-48. [PMID: 37075495 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The study aimed to define the accuracy of intraoperative frozen section (FS) for the detection of metastases in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and describe the pattern of lymph node (LN) spread and relation to molecular classifiers in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS We performed a secondary outcome of clinicopathologic data from the Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Lymphadenectomy for Intermediate- and High-Grade Endometrial Cancer Staging (SENTOR) prospective cohort study evaluating SLNB in patients with clinical stage I high-grade EC (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01886066). The primary outcome was the sensitivity of FS of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) specimen, compared to a standardized ultrastaging protocol. Secondary outcomes included the pattern and characteristics of LN spread. RESULTS There were 126 patients with high-grade EC with a median age of 66 years (range:44-86) and a median Body Mass Index (BMI) of 26.9 kg/m2 (range:17.6-49.3). FS was performed on surgical specimens from 212 hemipelves; SLNs were identified in 202 specimens (95.7%) and fatty tissue alone was identified in 10 specimens (4.7%). Of the 202 hemipelves in which SLNs were identified, 24 were positive for metastatic disease on final pathology. Initial FS correctly identified only 12, yielding a sensitivity of 50% (12/24, 95% CI 29.6-70.4) and a negative predictive value of 94% (178/190, 95% CI 89-96.5). A total of 24 patients (19%) had LN metastases: 16 (13%) had isolated pelvic metastases, 7 (6%) had both pelvic and para-aortic metastases and 1 (0.8%) had an isolated para-aortic metastasis. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative FS of SLNs in high-grade EC patients has poor sensitivity. Since isolated para-aortic metastases are rare, para-aortic lymphadenectomy may be omitted in patients in which SLNs were successfully mapped to the pelvis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zibi Marchocki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Maria C Cusimano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine Pulman
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marjan Rouzbahman
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jelena Mirkovic
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Cesari
- Laboratory Medicine and Genetics Program, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manjula Maganti
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aysha Zia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gabrielle Ene
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah E Ferguson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhai L, Zhang X, Cui M, Wang J. Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:701758. [PMID: 34268126 PMCID: PMC8276058 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.701758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is known as a common gynecological malignancy. The incidence rate is on the increase annually. Lymph node status plays a crucial role in evaluating the prognosis and selecting adjuvant therapy. Currently, the patients with high-risk (not comply with any of the following: (1) well-differentiated or moderately differentiated, pathological grade G1 or G2; (2) myometrial invasion< 1/2; (3) tumor diameter < 2 cm are commonly recommended for a systematic lymphadenectomy (LAD). However, conventional LAD shows high complication incidence and uncertain survival benefits. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) refers to the first lymph node that is passed by the lymphatic metastasis of the primary malignant tumor through the regional lymphatic drainage pathway and can indicate the involvement of lymph nodes across the drainage area. Mounting evidence has demonstrated a high detection rate (DR), sensitivity, and negative predictive value (NPV) in patients with early-stage lower risk EC using sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) with pathologic ultra-staging. Meanwhile, SLNM did not compromise the patient’s progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with low operative complications. However, the application of SLNM in early-stage high-risk EC patients remains controversial. As revealed by the recent studies, SLNM may also be feasible, effective, and safe in high-risk patients. This review aims at making a systematic description of the progress made in the application of SLNM in the treatment of EC and the relevant controversies, including the application of SLNM in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lirong Zhai
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiwen Zhang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Manhua Cui
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jianliu Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lazaridis A, Kogeorgos S, Balinakos P, Pavlakis K, Gavresea T, Pistofidis G. The Advantage of Pinpoint Camera System With Indocyanine Green for Sentinel Lymph Node Micrometastasis Detection in Low Risk Endometrial Cancer. In Vivo 2021; 35:1033-1039. [PMID: 33622899 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM This report outlines our experience in the management of 10 cases of low-risk endometrial cancer with Indocyanine Green for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping using the Pinpoint 30-degree 4K S1 SPY real-time camera system (Stryker). This system offers simultaneous, real-time, high-definition white light and fluorescence imaging through a single laparoscope, without the need to change camera filters. PATIENTS AND METHODS In our retrospective case series we included all endometrioid endometrial cancers of grade G1 and pre-operative radiological staging FIGO 1A reported on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that were treated laparoscopically from October 2019 to April 2020. RESULTS Bilateral sentinel lymph node excision was achieved in 9 out of 10 cases. In one patient, one sentinel lymph node featuring a micrometastasis of <2 mm was identified. CONCLUSION A specialist minimal access team can safely and reliably reproduce this technique for sentinel lymph node excision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Lazaridis
- Department of Gynecologic Endoscopy, Lefkos Stavros Hospital, Athens, Greece; .,Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, U.K
| | - Stylianos Kogeorgos
- Department of Gynecologic Endoscopy, Lefkos Stavros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | - George Pistofidis
- Department of Gynecologic Endoscopy, Lefkos Stavros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|