Association between the use of aspirin and risk of lung cancer: results from pooled cohorts and Mendelian randomization analyses

Absence of Hypercoagulation Status after Neoadjuvant Treatment is Associated with Favorable Prognosis in Patients Undergoing Subtotal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Abnormal activation of the coagulation system is associated with malignant tumor progression. Although neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the standard of care, the correlation between coagulation status and prognosis of patients undergoing preoperative treatment is insufficiently understood.

METHODS

Patients (n = 200) who underwent radical subtotal esophagectomy after preoperative treatment for ESCC between January 2012 and December 2021were included in the analysis. Plasma D-dimer and fibrinogen levels and their combined indices (non-hypercoagulation; D-dimer and fibrinogen levels within the upper normal limit, or hypercoagulation; D-dimer or fibrinogen levels above the upper normal limit) were determined before and after NAT and correlated to clinicopathological factors and prognosis.

RESULTS

The nonhypercoagulation group achieved superior overall survival (OS) than the hypercoagulation group (5-year OS rates = 89% vs. 55%; hazard ratio 3.62, P = 0.0008) when determined according to coagulation status after NAT. Multivariate analysis showed that hypercoagulation after NAT served as an independent factor for poor postoperative OS (hazard ratio 3.20; P = 0.0028). The nonhypercoagulation group achieved significantly better disease-free survival (76% vs. 54%; P = 0.0065) than the hypercoagulation group that experienced a significantly higher rate of hematogenous metastasis as an initial recurrence (P = 0.0337).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypercoagulation state after NAT served as a valid indicator correlating with postoperative outcomes of patients with ESCC who underwent NAT followed by radical subtotal esophagectomy.

Heritable Traits and Lung Cancer Risk: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is a complex polygenic disorder. Analysis with Mendelian randomization (MR) allows for genetically predicted risks to be estimated between exposures and outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed 345 heritable traits from the United Kingdom Biobank and estimated their associated effects on lung cancer outcomes using two sample MR. In addition to estimating effects with overall lung cancer, adenocarcinoma, small cell lung cancer, and squamous cell lung cancers, we performed conditional effect modeling with multivariate MR (MVMR) and the traits of alcohol use, smoking initiation, average pre-tax income, and educational attainment.

RESULTS

Univariate MR provided evidence for increased age at first sexual intercourse (OR, 0.55; P = 6.15 × 10-13), educational attainment (OR, 0.24; P = 1.07 × 10-19), average household income (OR, 0.58; P = 7.85 × 10-05), and alcohol usually taken with meals (OR, 0.19; P = 1.06 × 10-06) associating with decreased odds of overall lung cancer development. In contrast, a lack of additional educational attainment (OR, 8.00; P = 3.48 × 10-12), body mass index (OR, 1.28; P = 9.00 × 10-08), pack years smoking as a proportion of life span (OR, 9.93; P = 7.96 × 10-12), and weekly beer intake (OR, 3.48; P = 4.08 × 10-07) were associated with an increased risk of overall lung cancer development.

CONCLUSIONS

Many heritable traits associated with an increased or inverse risk of lung cancer development. Effects vary based on histologic subtype and conditional third trait exposures.

IMPACT

We identified several heritable traits and presented their genetically predictable impact on lung cancer development, providing valuable insights for consideration.

Aspirin Use and Risk of Alzheimer's Disease: A 2-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have shown inconsistent findings of the relationships between aspirin use and the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD).

OBJECTIVE

Since residual confounding and reverse causality were challenging issues inherent in observational studies, we conducted a 2-sample Mendelian randomization analysis (MR) to investigate whether aspirin use was causally associated with the risk of AD.

METHODS

We conducted 2-sample MR analyses utilizing summary genetic association statistics to estimate the potential causal relationship between aspirin use and AD. Single-nucleotide variants associated with aspirin use in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of UK Biobank were considered as genetic proxies for aspirin use. The GWAS summary-level data of AD were derived from a meta-analysis of GWAS data from the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project (IGAP) stage I.

RESULTS

Univariable MR analysis based on these two large GWAS data sources showed that genetically proxied aspirin use was associated with a decreased risk of AD (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.87; 95%CI: 0.77-0.99). In multivariate MR analyses, the causal estimates remained significant after adjusting for chronic pain, inflammation, heart failure (OR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.78-0.98), or stroke (OR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.77-0.99), but was attenuated when adjusting for coronary heart disease, blood pressure, and blood lipids.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this MR analysis suggest a genetic protective effect of aspirin use on AD, possibly influenced by coronary heart disease, blood pressure, and lipid levels.

Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on risk of cancer

BACKGROUND

We aimed to map and describe the current state of Mendelian randomization (MR) literature on cancer risk and to identify associations supported by robust evidence.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Scopus up to 06/10/2020 for MR studies investigating the association of any genetically predicted risk factor with cancer risk. We categorized the reported associations based on a priori designed levels of evidence supporting a causal association into four categories, namely robust, probable, suggestive, and insufficient, based on the significance and concordance of the main MR analysis results and at least one of the MR-Egger, weighed median, MRPRESSO, and multivariable MR analyses. Associations not presenting any of the aforementioned sensitivity analyses were not graded.

RESULTS

We included 190 publications reporting on 4667 MR analyses. Most analyses (3200; 68.6%) were not accompanied by any of the assessed sensitivity analyses. Of the 1467 evaluable analyses, 87 (5.9%) were supported by robust, 275 (18.7%) by probable, and 89 (6.1%) by suggestive evidence. The most prominent robust associations were observed for anthropometric indices with risk of breast, kidney, and endometrial cancers; circulating telomere length with risk of kidney, lung, osteosarcoma, skin, thyroid, and hematological cancers; sex steroid hormones and risk of breast and endometrial cancer; and lipids with risk of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the large amount of research on genetically predicted risk factors for cancer risk, limited associations are supported by robust evidence for causality. Most associations did not present a MR sensitivity analysis and were thus non-evaluable. Future research should focus on more thorough assessment of sensitivity MR analyses and on more transparent reporting.

Aspirin use for cancer prevention: A systematic review of public, patient and healthcare provider attitudes and adherence behaviours

We undertook a systematic review to synthesise the data on attitudes and behaviour towards the use of aspirin for cancer prevention, and healthcare providers' attitudes towards implementing aspirin in practice. Searches were carried out across 12 databases (e.g. MEDLINE, EMBASE). We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to evaluate study quality, and conducted a narrative synthesis of the data. The review was pre-registered (PROSPERO: CRD42018093453). Thirty-eight studies were identified. Uptake and adherence data were all from trials. Trials recruited healthy participants, those at higher risk of cancer, and those with cancer. Four studies reported moderate to high (40.9-77.7%) uptake to an aspirin trial among people who were eligible. Most trials (18/22) reported high day-to-day adherence (≥80%). Three trials observed no association between gender and adherence. One trial found no association between adherence and colorectal cancer risk. Three studies reported moderate to high (43.6-76.0%) hypothetical willingness to use aspirin. Two studies found that a high proportion of healthcare providers (72.0-76.0%) perceived aspirin to be a suitable cancer prevention option. No qualitative studies were identified. The likelihood that eligible users of aspirin would participate in a trial evaluating the use of aspirin for preventive therapy was moderate to high. Among participants in a trial, day-to-day adherence was high. Further research is needed to identify uptake and adherence rates in routine care, the factors affecting aspirin use, and the barriers to implementing aspirin into clinical care.