Predictors for thromboembolism in patients with cholangiocarcinoma

Acute brachial artery occlusion following cisplatin-based chemotherapy: case report

Thromboembolism is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in cancer patients. While the link between cancer and venous thrombosis is well known, the recognition of arterial thrombosis as a serious complication of cancer and chemotherapeutic agents is a recent development. One of the chemotherapy agents frequently linked to acute vascular events is cisplatin. We discuss a rare case of cisplatin-related brachial arterial thrombosis in a 50-year-old man who was treated for cholangiocarcinoma with cisplatin and gemcitabine. Although rare, cisplatin-related arterial thrombosis demands careful monitoring, a high index of suspicion, and prompt management to prevent serious complications and mortality.

Novel Insights in Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Methods in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: From the Guidelines to Clinical Practice

Many cancer patients will experience venous thromboembolism (VTE) at some stage, with the highest rate in the initial period following diagnosis. Novel cancer therapies may further enhance the risk. VTE in a cancer setting is associated with poor prognostic, a decreased quality of life, and high healthcare costs. If thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized cancer patients and perioperative settings is widely accepted in clinical practice and supported by the guidelines, it is not the same situation in ambulatory cancer patient settings. The guidelines do not recommend primary thromboprophylaxis, except in high-risk cases. However, nowadays, risk stratification is still challenging, although many tools have been developed. The Khrorana score remains the most used method, but it has many limits. This narrative review aims to present the current relevant knowledge of VTE risk assessment in ambulatory cancer patients, starting from the guideline recommendations and continuing with the specific risk assessment methods and machine learning models approaches. Biomarkers, genetic, and clinical features were tested alone or in groups. Old and new models used in VTE risk assessment are exposed, underlining their clinical utility. Imaging and biomolecular approaches to VTE screening of outpatients with cancer are also presented, which could help clinical decisions.

Comparison of risk prediction scores for cancer-associated thrombosis in ambulatory cancer patients not receiving thromboprophylaxis: A prospective cohort study in a South-East Asian population

INTRODUCTION

To date, there is limited data regarding the incidence and risk prediction of cancer-associated thrombosis among South-East Asian patients who do not receive thromboprophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary medical center from June 2020 to December 2021 in Thailand. We enrolled cancer patients aged ≥ 18 years, with ECOG score ≤ 1, scheduled to receive the first cycle of chemotherapy. We measured incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), all-cause mortality and performance of risk prediction scores.

RESULTS

A total of 457 patients were included with a mean age of 58.18 ± 12.60 years. By the end of 6 months period, VTE had occurred in 30 patients (6.56 %, 95%CI 4.36-9.21). The median time to the first thrombosis was 1.94 months (IQR 0.26-3.19). Cancer associated thrombosis incidence was 14.58 % for Khorana score ≥ 3, 6.67 % for scores 1-2 and 2.13 % for score 0. C-statistics were 0.50 (95%CI 0.41-0.60) for Khorana score cut-off ≥ 2, 0.57 (95%CI 0.49-0.65) for Khorana score ≥ 3, 0.55 (95%CI 0.46-0.65) for PROTECHT score ≥ 3, and 0.57 (95%CI 0.49-0.65) for CONKO score ≥ 3. Classifying cholangiocarcinoma as very-high-risk increased the Khorana score cut-off ≥ 3's C-statistic to 0.62 (95%CI 0.53-0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of ambulatory South-East Asian cancer patients without thromboprophylaxis developed VTE. Further prospective studies investigating the benefit of thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients with active cancer are warranted.

Venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing distal cholangiocarcinoma surgery: Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

To investigate venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) surgery, we performed a single-center study to assess its prevalence, risk factors, prognosis.

METHOD

We studied a total of 177 patients undergoing dCCA surgery from January 2017 to April 2022. Demographic, clinical data, laboratory data (including lower extremity ultrasound findings), and outcome variables were obtained, and compared between VTE and non-VTE groups.

RESULTS

Of the 177 patients undergoing dCCA surgery (aged 65.2 ± 9.6 years; 108 (61.0%) male), 64 patients developed VTE after surgery. Logistic multivariate analysis showed that, age, operation procedure, TNM stage, ventilator duration and preoperative D-dimer were independent risk factors. Based on these factors, we constructed the nomogram to predict VTE after dCCA for the first time. The areas under the receiver operating curve (ROC) of the nomogram were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72-0.88) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.89) in the training and validation groups, respectively. Patients developed VTE had a worse prognosis by Kaplan-Meier curve analysis (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of VTE is high and is associated with adverse outcomes in patients undergoing dCCA surgery. We developed a nomogram assessing VTE risk, which may help clinicians to screen out people at high risk for VTE and to undertake rational preventive measures.

Exploration of hub genes, lipid metabolism, and the immune microenvironment in stomach carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is the 5th most common cause of cancer in the world and the 3rd largest cause of cancer-related death. It is usually associated with a variety of cancers, of which cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) combined with GC accounts for about 1.6%. This study sought to examine the hub genes and role of lipid metabolism in the development and diagnosis of GC and CCA.

Methods

To screen potential hub genes, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data sets, including the GC (STAD, dataset of GC) and CCA (CHOL, dataset of CCA) data sets, were used to conduct a differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis and an enrichment analysis of the DEGs. A weighted-gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was conducted to identify the significant gene module and then find the hub genes in the module. To verify the 4 hub genes, we conducted a differentiation analysis of the 4 genes in GC and CCA and found that there were differences. A survival analysis of the hub genes was performed and mutations were mapped. Additionally, tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and immune analyses were performed to evaluate how lipid metabolism affects the development of GC with CCA.

Results

The principal component analysis showed that both GC and CCA had distinct up-regulated and down-regulated genes, which are involved in a variety of metabolic processes. Upon WGCNA, the turquoise and blue modules were meaningful, and the hub genes were identified from these 2 modules. Four hub genes were identified: amyloid beta precursor protein binding family B member 1 (APBB1), Homo sapiens armadillo repeat containing X-linked 1 (ARMCX1), DAZ interacting zinc finger protein 1 (DZIP1), and methionine sulfoxide reductase B3 (MSRB3). In survival analysis, increased expression of the 4 hub genes was associated with inferior survival outcomes, with variations in all 4 genes. Additionally, we demonstrated that genes related to lipid metabolism had an effect on immune function.

Conclusions

APBB1, ARMCX1, DZIP1, and MSRB3 affect the development of GC and CCA and can be used as biomarkers. The expression of lipid metabolism genes is related to the TIME of patients with GC and CCA.