Lymphovascular and perineural invasion are risk factors for inguinal lymph node metastases in men with T1G2 penile cancer

New histological risk grading system for prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer

Inguinal lymph node surgery is a standard treatment for penile cancer patients with intermediate or high risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) according to European Association of Urology (EAU) risk grading. We are proposing a more objective histological prognostic grading system for inguinal LNM in these patients. We assessed worst pattern of invasion, lymphocytic host response, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion in a population-based cohort of 306 penile cancer patients. Patients were classified into low, intermediate, and high risk for inguinal LNM. There was a significant association both between risk groups and pT stage (p < 0.001) and between risk groups and LNM. Univariate logistic regression showed 25.43 times higher odds of LNM for patients in the intermediate risk group compared with the low risk group (odds ratio (OR) 25.43; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.94-108.97) and a 177.13 times higher odds in the high risk group compared to the low risk group (OR 177.13; 95% CI: 40.09-782.51). When comparing our histological risk grading with the EAU grading, we found a higher sensitivity, of 51.28% (95% CI: 45.68-56.88) versus 37.09% (95% CI: 31.68-42.50), as well as a higher area under the curve (0.86; 95% CI: 0.81-0.89; versus 0.65; 95% CI: 0.58-0.71) with our grading system. While our grading classified 111 patients as low risk, only 31 were considered low risk for LNM according to the EAU risk classification. The new histological risk grading system shows a higher sensitivity and includes a higher number of patients in the low risk group in whom lymph node surgery could be avoided, reducing morbidity and costs.

The role of radiotherapy in the management of squamous cell cancer of the penis

PURPOSE

To review the evidence for radiotherapy in the management of primary penile cancer, either as brachytherapy or external beam radiation, and the role of external beam radiotherapy in node positive penile cancer.

METHODS

English language literature was reviewed for the past 3 decades. As penile cancer is uncommon in developed nations, high quality evidence to guide management is limited. Single institution reports often span decades during which time staging systems and treatments have evolved, reducing their relevance to current practice. Successful clinical trials require collaboration not only among disciplines but also among multiple institutions and nations.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy is a definitive organ-preserving option for T1-T2 penile cancers. Interstitial brachytherapy is associated with penile preservation in 85% of men at 5 years, maintained in 70% by 10 years. Results of external radiotherapy are not quite as promising but nonetheless 60% of men will have an intact penis at 5 years. Inguino-pelvic external radiotherapy has been reported to increase overall survival when delivered as adjuvant treatment for men with pN3 groin but pN0 pelvic nodes, and improve disease specific survival for those with involved pelvic nodes. InPACT (ECOG-ACRIN_8134) is investigating the role of inguino-pelvic chemo-radiotherapy for men with pN3 inguinal nodes but imaging negative pelvic nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy has a well-defined role to play in treatment of squamous cell cancers of other sites, such as vulva, anal canal, uterine cervix and head and neck malignancies. Emerging data support the incorporation of radiotherapy into treatment paradigms for penile cancer.

Organ-sparing treatment for T1 and T2 penile cancer: an updated literature review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Penile cancer (PeCa) is an orphan disease due to its rare incidence in high-income countries. Traditional surgical options for clinical T1-2 disease, including partial and total penectomy, can dramatically affect patient's quality of life and mental health status. In selected patients, organ-sparing surgery (OSS) has the potential to remove the primary tumor with comparable oncologic outcomes while maintaining penile length, sexual and urinary function. In this review, we aim to discuss the indications, advantages, and outcomes of various OSSs currently available for men diagnosed with PeCa seeking an organ-preserving option.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patient survival largely depends on spotting and treating lymph node metastasis at an early stage. The required surgical and radiotherapy skill sets cannot be expected to be available in all centers. Consequently, patients should be referred to high-volume centers to receive the best available treatments for PeCa.

SUMMARY

OSS should be used for small and localized PeCa (T1-T2) as an alternative to partial penectomy to preserve patient's quality of life while maintaining sexual and urinary function and penile aesthetics. Overall, there are different techniques that can be used with different response and recurrence rates. In case of tumor recurrence, partial penectomy or radical penectomy is feasible, without impacting overall survival.

Accuracy of dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy for inguinal lymph node staging in cN0 penile cancer

BACKGROUND

Penile cancer is characterized by an early lymphatic dissemination. In intermediate and high-risk primary tumors without palpable inguinal lymph nodes, there is a 6-30% risk of micro-metastatic disease. Invasive lymph node staging in these patients is performed using dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy (DSNB). In this study, the role of DSNB in cN0 penile cancer was studied, evaluating features of sentinel lymph node (SN) visualization and outcome parameters. Patients with penile cancer without inguinal lymph node metastases who were referred for DSNB at our center between January 2015 and May 2021 and had a follow-up period of at least 18 months, were retrospectively included. After injection of 85 ± 20 MBq [^99mTc]Tc-nanocolloid peritumorally, dynamic, static planar and SPECT/CT imaging was performed. Primary endpoints were sensitivity of the diagnostic procedure, disease-free survival and DSNB-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints were SN detection rate, number of SNs and the number of counts of the most active SN.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven penile DSNB procedures in 75 patients (67 ± 11 years) were included. The detection rate of DSNB was 91% and 96% per procedure and groin, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were 79%, 100%, 97% and 100%, respectively. More SNs were seen on SPECT/CT than on static planar imaging (1.33 vs. 1.17, p = 0.001). The mean counts per SN on static planar imaging was lower compared to SPECT/CT (1343 vs. 5008; p < 0.0001). There was a positive correlation between the total counts of the SN on the static planar image and the SPECT/CT (r = 0.79, p < 0.0001). Only one out of seventy-five patients (1%) experienced DSNB-related adverse events. After 18 months, 58 patients remained disease free (77%), 13 developed local recurrence (17%), and 4 developed lymphatic or distant metastases (5%).

CONCLUSION

DNSB is a safe diagnostic procedure with a good detection rate and in particular high negative predictive value. It can therefore prevent overtreatment of patients with negative inguinal groins on clinical examination and DSNB examination. Finally, DSNB enables an early detection of occult metastases which would not be visualized with standardized imaging modalities.

Variations in Penile Cancer Management: Results From the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors Survey

INTRODUCTION

There is paucity of evidence and consensus on various aspects of management of penile cancer (PeCa), which is intuitive considering the rarity of this disease. We present here the details of an online survey conducted by the Global Society of Rare Genito-urinary Tumors (GSRGT) with the aim of capturing the variations in PeCa care across different regions of the world.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online questionnaire was developed by experts within the GSRGT and then circulated via email in English and Spanish versions to clinicians dealing with PeCa. Respondents were allowed 8 weeks to reply.

RESULTS

We received 102 responses; the majority of them were from South America (37.2%) followed by North America and Asia (17.6% each). Only 11.7% of the respondents treated more than 25 patients with PeCa annually. Total penectomy is performed by 21.5% of the respondents in >50% of their patients. Less than a fifth of the experts (19.6%) responded that >50% of their patients are clinically node-negative (cN0) at presentation. For intermediate-risk cN0 patients (T1 G2 cancer), about a third of the experts chose surveillance. For invasive inguinal staging, the options of Dynamic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (DSNB), Modified Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection (MILD), Superficial Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection (SILD), and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) were chosen by 28.4%, 26.4%, 31.3%, and 13.7% of the respondents respectively. Considerable variation was seen in the worldwide use of these techniques. For clinically node-positive patients, respondents were in favor of giving adjuvant chemotherapy instead of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, except for cN3 patients.

CONCLUSION

The results of this questionnaire objectified the variations in global practices in the management of PeCa. This serves as the baseline information which can help prioritize research areas for multinational collaborative efforts, a key mission of the GSRGT.

European Association of Urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Collaborative Guideline on Penile Cancer: 2023 Update

CONTEXT

Penile cancer is a rare disease but has a significant impact on quality of life. Its incidence is increasing, so it is important to include new and relevant evidence in clinical practice guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a collaborative guideline that offers worldwide physician and patient guidance for the management of penile cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Comprehensive literature searches were performed for each section topic. In addition, three systematic reviews were conducted. Levels of evidence were assessed, and a strength rating for each recommendation was assigned according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Penile cancer is a rare disease but its global incidence is increasing. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main risk factor for penile cancer and pathology should include an assessment of HPV status. The main aim of primary tumour treatment is complete tumour eradication, which has to be balanced against optimal organ preservation without compromising oncological control. Early detection and treatment of lymph node (LN) metastasis is the main determinant of survival. Surgical LN staging with sentinel node biopsy is recommended for patients with a high-risk (≥pT1b) tumour with cN0 status. While (inguinal) LN dissection remains the standard for node-positive disease, multimodal treatment is needed in patients with advanced disease. Owing to a lack of controlled trials and large series, the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation are low in comparison to those for more common diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

This collaborative penile cancer guideline provides updated information on the diagnosis and treatment of penile cancer for use in clinical practice. Organ-preserving surgery should be offered for treatment of the primary tumour when feasible. Adequate and timely LN management remains a challenge, especially in advanced disease stages. Referral to centres of expertise is recommended.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Penile cancer is a rare disease that significantly impacts quality of life. While the disease can be cured in most cases without lymph node involvement, management of advanced disease remains challenging. Many unmet needs and unanswered questions remain, underlining the importance of research collaborations and centralisation of penile cancer services.