Immune checkpoint inhibitors' combination therapy as first-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

FAM107A as a tumor suppressor in esophageal squamous carcinoma inhibits growth and metastasis

BACKGROUND

Sequence similarity Family 107 member A (FAM107A) has been recognized as a tumor suppressor of various malignancies, which suppresses tumor proliferation and metastasis. Its specific role in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear.

METHODS

Public datasets including Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and Western blot were utilized for comparative analysis of FAM107A expression between ESCC and normal tissues. The link between FAM107A and clinicopathological features, as well as prognosis determined through χ2-test, log-rank analysis, and univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. The impact of FAM107A on ESCC cell malignant behavior was confirmed through in vitro assays, including cell counting using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), clonal formation, wound healing, and transwell assays. Western blot analysis was employed to assess the effects of FAM107A on tumor epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cell cycle-related proteins. Finally, xenograft tumors were developed to investigate the influence of FAM107A on ESCC growth in vivo.

RESULTS

FAM107A exhibited low expression in ESCC tissues. Reduced FAM107A expression was associated with a poorer prognosis and unfavorable clinicopathological characteristics, such as degree of differentiation, T-stage, and N-stage. Overexpression of FAM107A suppressed ESCC cell proliferation, invasion, migration, the EMT process, and cell cycle progression. Finally, FAM107A overexpression inhibited tumor development in vivo.

CONCLUSION

The decreased expression of FAM107A is indicative of a worse prognosis for ESCC patients. FAM107A exerts inhibitory impacts on malignant behavior and may hold promise as a therapeutic target for ESCC.

Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Camrelizumab combination therapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has considerable survival benefits. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab combination therapy versus chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment for patients with ESCC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

METHODS

A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to estimate total costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and incremental net health benefits (INHBs) over a 20-year time horizon. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy increased QALYs by 0.30 (0.43 LYs), with an incremental cost of $9,272. The ICERs for camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone was $31,062/QALY ($21,599/LY), and the INHB was 0.05 QALY at the cost-effective threshold of $37,653/QALY (3 times China's GDP per capita). One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the ICER was the most sensitive to utility values in the PFS state. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested that camrelizumab combination therapy had a probability of 74.04% cost-effectiveness at a threshold of $37,653/QALY. Scenario analyses confirmed that the findings were robust.

CONCLUSIONS

Camrelizumab combination therapy is likely to have a cost-effectiveness advantage over chemotherapy alone for previously untreated advanced or metastatic ESCC in China.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background. Chemoimmunotherapy has become the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of different chemoimmunotherapy combinations to determine the optimal treatment option. Methods. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and abstracts of recent relevant meetings were searched to identify phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of first-line programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/its receptor (PD-L1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy for ESCC up to July 2022. A network meta-analysis (NMA) following Bayesian approaches was conducted in R software. Result. Our study included six RCTs and 3,611 patients. According to the NMA, toripalimab plus chemotherapy ranked first to prolong overall survival (OS). Sintilimab plus chemotherapy and camrelizumab plus chemotherapy consistently yielded the greatest benefits regarding progression-free survival (PFS). The maximal complete response rate (CRR) and objective response rate (ORR) were achieved with nivolumab plus chemotherapy. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy attained the highest likelihood of achieving a disease control rate (DCR). The addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy was associated with improved survival and increased adverse events. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with PD-L1 tumor positive score (TPS) ≥10% showed a better OS than those with lower values when undergoing first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Anti-PD-1 inhibitor with platinum plus paclitaxel (TP) regimen showed a superior PFS benefit over anti-PD-1 inhibitor with platinum plus fluorouracil (FP) regimen. Conclusion. The NMA analysis suggested that sintilimab plus chemotherapy was the preferred regimen for treatment-naive advanced ESCC patients with the best balance between efficacy and safety. Anti-PD-1 inhibitors with the TP regimen were associated with more favorable PFS than those with the FP regimen.