Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and the impact of PD-L1 and smoking in driver-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immunotherapy

The real-world treatment characteristic and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: Data from a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unresolved issues. Here, we assessed the treatment characteristics and efficacy of ICIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using real-world data and evaluated the predictive value of factors, including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, for the clinical outcome of ICIs in NSCLC.

METHODS

Analyzed data was collected from hospitalized patients in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2017 and March 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for analyzing real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), while Cox regression models was employed to access the correlation between the efficacy of immunotherapy and sociodemographic characteristics, disease information, and characteristics of ICI treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 545 patients were included in the retrospective study and characteristics of immunotherapy varied significantly among PD-L1 expression groups. The median rwPFS for the entire population was 9.76 months. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with high PD-L1 expression, early TNM stage, first-line immunotherapy, EGFR wild-type and those who have not received radiotherapy and targeted therapy previously were more likely to have better rwPFS. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analyses identified PD-L1 expression, EGFR mutation status and previous radiotherapy as the most influential predictors of the response to ICI treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents the real-world experience of Chinese NSCLC patients undergoing ICI treatment, offering guidance for clinical decision-making based on various patient conditions, preferences, and indications for ICIs, through the evaluation of immunotherapy efficacy and predictors in NSCLC patients.

The safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 inhibitor-based combinational therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with oncogenic alterations

Background

The anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy has been extensively used in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in which the tumors are negative for oncogenic alterations. However, whether PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy could be applicable in patients harboring oncogenic mutations is largely unknown.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 inhibitor-based combinational therapy in a NSCLC cohort of 84 patients who harbored oncogenic alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), k-Ras, RET, HER2 and BRAF. The patients were followed up till disease progression or death. The adverse effects associated with the treatment were carefully evaluated and timely interrupted.

Results

There were 50 patients harboring EGFR mutations, 17 patients with k-Ras mutation, 2 patients with ALK rearrangement, 6 patients with RET rearrangement, 6 patients with HER2 exon20 insertion and 3 patients with BRAF V600E mutation. About 58.8% of the k-Ras mutant patients responded to the combinational treatment. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the k-Ras cohort was 14 months, with the 12-month median overall survival (mOS) ratio and the 24-month OS ratio of 86.7% and 75.8%, respectively. Patients with EGFR exon21 L858R mutation or RET rearrangement tended to have a more favorable response, while patients harboring ALK rearrangement, HER2 exon20 insertion and BRAF V600E mutation did not respond well to anti-PD-1 inhibitor-based combinational therapy. The incidence of treatment-related toxicity was 52.3% and the most common immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were PD-1 inhibitors-related hypothyroidism and pneumonitis. The PD-L1 status and lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) could be used as biomarkers dictating therapeutic outcomes of the combinational therapy.

Conclusions

The anti-PD-1 inhibitor-based combinational therapy elicited exciting anti-tumor efficacy and prolonged patient survival with manageable adverse effects in NSCLC patients harboring oncogenic alterations. The PD-L1 status and LIPI could be used as a biomarker predicting response to anti-PD-1 inhibitor-based combinational treatment in these patients.

Effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatment may predict treatment response in further lines in stage III/IV patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to evaluate if therapeutic success in the first-line of anticancer treatments in patients with NSCLC may predict treatment success in the following lines.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of patients with NSCLC stage III/IV from the TULUNG registry separately for chemotherapy, TKIs, ALK inhibitors, and immunotherapy in the first line during the years 2011-2019. "Succesful treatment " was defined as PFS ≥ 6 months, a "good responder " was a patient with ˃50% of "successful treatment " lines. Treatment responses were analyzed separately for each drug group. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact test, Pearson Chi-Squared test, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS

The first-line TKI therapy was successful in 66.2%, while good responders accounted for 50.7% of the cohort and their rates were similar for all types of TKIs. First-line platinum-based chemotherapy was successful in 43.1% and 48.6% for combinations with pemetrexed and bevacizumab, respectively. Good responders accounted for 29.5% and 25.9%, respectively. In the group of ALK inhibitors, we observed treatment success in 52.3% of cases, while alectinib showed the highest effectiveness (up to 70%). Good responders constituted 50% of the group. In the first-line immunotherapy group, survival benefit was observed in 52.3%, and good responders constituted 52.3% of the cohort.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that the treatment success in first-line therapies in patients with NSCLC may predict survival benefits in the subsequent lines, particularly in EGFR- or ALK-positive disease and immunotherapy-treated patients.

Perioperative Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

The standard of care in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following surgical resection has been adjuvant chemotherapy for the last two decades, despite modest improvements in survival and high rates of disease recurrence. Numerous clinical trials have reported practice-changing findings demonstrating a benefit in disease-free survival (DFS) or event-free survival (EFS) with perioperative immunotherapy. This has led to several recent regulatory approvals supporting the use of adjuvant immunotherapy or neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy in NSCLC, and such therapies are now an integral component of care for early-stage disease. However, in select cases, such as in the presence of certain tumor oncogenes associated with immunotherapy resistance, the use of checkpoint inhibitors in the perioperative setting should generally be avoided. This speaks to the importance of integrating routine tissue-based molecular profiling, that evaluates for tumor oncogene mutations and PD-L1 expression, into our practice when caring for patients with early-stage NSCLC. While an overall survival (OS) advantage has yet to be firmly established from many of the recent studies evaluating perioperative immunotherapy, it is expected that an OS benefit and higher rates of cure will become evident as these data mature, especially among patients with greater levels of tumor PD-L1 expression.

Phase II Randomized Trial of Carboplatin, Pemetrexed, and Bevacizumab With and Without Atezolizumab in Stage IV Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Harbor a Sensitizing EGFR Mutation or Have Never Smoked

INTRODUCTION

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have never smoked or have tumors with mutations in EGFR generally derive minimal benefit from single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. Prior data indicate that adding PD-L1 inhibition to anti-VEGF and cytotoxic chemotherapy may be a promising approach to overcoming immunotherapy resistance in these patients, however prospective validation is needed. This trial in progress (NCT03786692) is evaluating patients with stage IV NSCLC who have never smoked or who have tumors with sensitizing EGFR alterations to determine if a 4-drug combination of atezolizumab, carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab can improve outcomes compared to carboplatin, pemetrexed and bevacizumab without atezolizumab.

METHODS

This is a randomized, phase II, multicenter study evaluating carboplatin, pemetrexed, bevacizumab with and without atezolizumab in 117 patients with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC. Randomization is 2 to 1 favoring the atezolizumab containing arm. Eligible patients include: 1) those with tumors with sensitizing EGFR alterations in exons 19 or 21 or 2) patients who have never smoked and have wild-type tumors (ie, no EGFR, ALK or ROS1 alterations). Patients are defined as having never smoked if they have smoked less than 100 cigarettes in a lifetime. Patients with EGFR-mutated tumors must have disease progression or intolerance to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), response rate, duration of response, and time to response.

CONCLUSION

This phase II trial is accruing patients at U.S. sites through the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). The trial opened in August 2019 and accrual is expected to be completed in the Fall of 2024.

Evaluation of the Molecular Landscape in PD-L1 Positive Metastatic NSCLC: Data from Campania, Italy

Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have increased and improved the treatment options for patients with non-oncogene-addicted advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role of ICIs in oncogene-addicted advanced stage NSCLC patients is still debated. In this study, in an attempt to fill in the informational gap on the effect of ICIs on other driver mutations, we set out to provide a molecular landscape of clinically relevant oncogenic drivers in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive NSCLC patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on 167 advanced stage NSCLC PD-L1 positive patients (≥1%) who were referred to our clinic for molecular evaluation of five driver oncogenes, namely, EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, ALK and ROS1. Results: Interestingly, n = 93 (55.7%) patients showed at least one genomic alteration within the tested genes. Furthermore, analyzing a subset of patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50% and concomitant gene alterations (n = 8), we found that n = 3 (37.5%) of these patients feature clinical benefit with ICIs administration, despite the presence of a concomitant KRAS gene alteration. Conclusions: In this study, we provide a molecular landscape of clinically relevant biomarkers in NSCLC PD-L1 positive patients, along with data evidencing the clinical benefit of ICIs in patient NSCLC PD-L1 positive alterations.