HER2/neu-based vaccination with li-Key hybrid, GM-CSF immunoadjuvant and trastuzumab as a potent triple-negative breast cancer treatment

2-Aminoethyl Dihydrogen Phosphate (2-AEH2P) Associated with Cell Metabolism-Modulating Drugs Presents a Synergistic and Pro-Apoptotic Effect in an In Vitro Model of the Ascitic Ehrlich Tumor

The progression and maintenance of cancer characteristics are associated with cellular components linked to the tumor and non-cellular components with pro-tumoral properties. Pharmacological association with antagonists of the cellular components of the tumor, such as anti- and pro-apoptotic drugs, represents a novel adjuvant strategy. In this study, the antiproliferative, pro-apoptotic, and pharmacological effects of the combination of monophosphoester 2-AEH2P with Simvastatin, Coenzyme Q10, the chemotherapeutic drug paclitaxel, and colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were evaluated. Tests were conducted to determine cytotoxic activity using the MTT method, cell cycle phases, and fragmented DNA by flow cytometry, mitochondrial membrane potential, expression of cell markers Bcl2, TNF-α/DR-4, Cytochrome c, caspase 3, and P53, and analysis of drug combination profiles using Synergy Finder 2.0 Software. The results showed a synergistic effect among the combinations, compared to individual treatments with the monophosphoester and other drugs. In addition, there was modulation of marker expression, indicating a pro-apoptotic and immunomodulatory effect of 2-AEH2P. Pharmacological analysis revealed that tumor cells treated with GM-CSF + 2-AEH2P exhibited a synergistic effect, while groups of tumor cells treated with paclitaxel, Coenzyme Q10, and Simvastatin showed additive effects. Furthermore, treatment with the paclitaxel + 2-AEH2P combination (12 h) resulted in a significant reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential. Pharmacological combinations for normal cells did not exhibit deleterious effects compared to mammary carcinomatosis tumor (EAT) cells.

Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Breast Cancer: Cross-Sectional Study in China

BACKGROUND

The widespread use of vaccines against the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has become one of the most effective means to establish a population immune barrier. Patients with cancer are vulnerable to COVID-19 infection, adverse events, and high mortality, and should be the focus of epidemic prevention and treatment. However, real-world data on the safety of vaccines for patients with breast cancer are still scarce.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the safety of COVID-19 vaccines between patients vaccinated before or after being diagnosed with breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with breast cancer who sought medical advice from October 2021 to December 2021 were screened. Those who received COVID-19 vaccines were enrolled in this study to analyze the safety of the vaccines. The primary outcome was patient-reported adverse events (AEs). All events after vaccine injection were retrospectively documented from the patients.

RESULTS

A total of 15,455 patients with breast cancer from 41 hospitals in 20 provinces in China were screened, and 5766 patients who received COVID-19 vaccines were enrolled. Of those enrolled, 45.1% (n=2599) of patients received vaccines before breast cancer diagnosis, 41.3% (n=2379) were vaccinated after diagnosis, and 13.6% (n=784) did not known the accurate date of vaccination or cancer diagnosis. Among the patients vaccinated after diagnosis, 85.4% (n=2032) were vaccinated 1 year after cancer diagnosis and 95.4% (n=2270) were vaccinated during early-stage cancer. Of all 5766 vaccinated patients, 93.9% (n=5415) received an inactivated vaccine, 3.7% (n=213) received a recombinant subunit vaccine, and 2.4% (n=138) received other vaccines, including adenovirus and mRNA vaccines. In the first injection of vaccines, 24.4% (n=10, 95% CI 11.2-37.5) of patients who received an adenovirus vaccine reported AEs, compared to only 12.5% (n=677, 95% CI 11.6-13.4) of those who received an inactivated vaccine. Patients with metastatic breast cancer reported the highest incidence of AEs (n=18, 16.5%, 95% CI 9.5-23.5). Following the second injection, patients who received an inactivated vaccine (n=464, 8.7%, 95% CI 8.0-9.5) and those who received a recombinant vaccine (n=25, 8.7%, 95% CI 5.5-12.0) reported the same incidence of AEs. No significant differences in patient-reported AEs were found between the healthy population and patients with breast cancer (16.4% vs 16.9%, respectively); the most common AEs were local pain (11.1% vs 9.1%, respectively), fatigue (5.5% vs 6.3%, respectively), and muscle soreness (2.3% vs 3.6%, respectively). The type of vaccine and time window of vaccination had little impact on patient-reported AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients vaccinated before breast cancer diagnosis, there were no significant differences in patient-reported AEs in the patients vaccinated after diagnosis. Thus, it is safe for patients with breast cancer, especially for those in the early stage, to receive COVID-19 vaccines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200055509; https://tinyurl.com/33zzj882.